Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.
Nicodemus Visiting Jesus
Nicodemus Visiting Jesus, Henry Ossawa Tanner, 1899. Public domain.

Johnchapter 21

25 verses · John, by tradition · AD 85 to 95 · The Gospels

Jesus asked a third time, “Simon son of John, do you love Me?” Peter was deeply hurt that Jesus had asked him a third time, “Do you love Me?” “Lord, You know all things,” he replied. “You know I love You.” Jesus said to him, “Feed My sheep.

Introduction

John, by tradition, The Gospels, John Overview.

The disciple Jesus loved wrote this chapter as the last word of his Gospel, after a close at the end of chapter 20 that could have stood alone. He writes for believers who know what it is to fail their Lord and who wonder whether He still wants them. The scene is set in the ordinary world of a fishing crew on the lake in Galilee. Listen for the places where earlier scenes of this Gospel return, down to the kind of fire on the beach. Listen also for the questions, and for who asks them. Read it as the Gospel's answer to what a follower does next.

Context

Who
Readers who knew what it was to have failed badly
What
The third appearance of the risen Jesus to His gathered disciples, with a great catch of fish, a breakfast on the shore, and Peter's restoration and new charge.
Where
The shore of the Sea of Galilee, which this Gospel calls the Sea of Tiberias, among the fishing towns where several of the disciples had first been called.
When
The weeks between the resurrection and the ascension, in AD 30 or 33, on a morning after a night of fishing.
Why
To show that the risen Lord restores a disciple who denied Him and sends him back to work, and to set the witness of the Gospel's writer on record.

Historical context

Night fishing was the normal working pattern on that lake, not a sign of desperation. Crews worked in the dark with dragnets and cast nets because the fish came up in cooler water and could not see the net, and they sold the catch at first light. Coming in empty after a full night was a bad night, and every fisherman had had them.

Show the rest of the historical context, 3 more paragraphs

The count of a hundred and fifty-three large fish is the kind of number that gets recorded because someone actually counted, a catch was tallied on the beach before it was divided among the partners and taxed. Readers have proposed symbolic meanings for centuries without agreement; the simplest explanation is that it is the number they counted.

The charcoal fire on the shore is the second one in the book. The only other charcoal fire John mentions is the one in the high priest's courtyard where Peter warmed his hands and denied him three times. The threefold question that follows on this beach is set beside a fire of the same kind, and Peter is asked three times.

The prediction about Peter's death uses a recognised description. When you are old you will stretch out your hands, and another will dress you and carry you where you do not want to go, stretching out the hands was a known way of speaking of crucifixion, and John adds that this was said to show by what kind of death he would glorify God. Early tradition holds that Peter was crucified in Rome.

Significance

The restoration is done in public and in the same currency as the failure. Three denials by a fire, three questions by a fire, and each answer answered with a job: feed my lambs, tend my sheep, feed my sheep. Peter is not merely forgiven; he is put back to work.

Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph

The last exchange corrects a rumour that had evidently been circulating, that the beloved disciple would not die before Jesus returned. John quotes the actual words and points out what they did and did not say, then closes with a writer's confession: there are many other things that Jesus did, and the world itself could not contain the books.

The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.

Breakfast on the Shore and a Net of 153 Fish

John 21:1-2

by the Sea of Tiberias: The Lord shows Himself again by the Sea of Tiberias, which is the Gospel's own name for the lake of Galilee. Seven are together, Peter, Thomas, Nathanael from Cana, the two sons of Zebedee, and two more left unnamed. The risen Lord had sent them to Galilee at Matthew 28:10.

John 21:1

“The sea of Tiberias - Called also the Sea of Galilee, being situated in Galilee. See the notes at Mat 4:18. In this place Jesus had promised to meet them, Mar 14:28; Mar 16:7; Mat 26:32; Mat 28:10. This interview of Jesus is but just mentioned by Matthew Mat 28:16, and is omitted by both Mark and Luke. This is the reason why John relates so particularly what occurred there.”

1 more voice on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.

John 21:1

“After these things Jesus manifested himself again. The Evangelist still labors to prove the resurrection of Christ, and relates, that he appeared to seven disciples, among whom he mentions Thomas, not out of respect to him, so much as because his testimony ought to be the more readily believed in proportion to the obstinacy of his unbelief.”

John Calvin · Commentaries (1554)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

were together: The seven wait in Galilee for the Spirit their Lord had promised. Albert Barnes reads them as choosing useful work over idleness in the interval, since fishing was also their only means of support. Their old trade fed them.

John 21:2

“There were together - Probably residing in the same place. While they were waiting for the promise of the Holy Spirit, they still found it proper to be usefully employed. Their Master had been taken away by death, and the promised Spirit had not descended on them. In the interval - before the promised Spirit was poured upon them - they chose not to be idle, and therefore returned to their former employment. It is to be remarked, also, that they had no other means of support.”

Peter returns to the boat and the other six go out with him. They fish all night and take nothing, the same empty night that stood before his call at Luke 5:5. The boat is where the Lord first called him.

John 21:3

“Peter saith unto them, I go a fishing--(See on Lu 5:11). that night . . . caught nothing--as at the first miraculous draught (see on Lu 5:5); no doubt so ordered that the miracle might strike them the more by contrast. The same principle is seen in operation throughout much of Christ's ministry, and is indeed a great law of God's spiritual procedure with His people.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

2 more voices on this verse

John 21:3

“It can be asked why Peter, who was a fisherman before his conversion, returned to fishing after his conversion; and since the Truth says: "No one putting his hand to the plow and looking back is fit for the kingdom of God," why did he return to what he had left behind? But if the virtue of discernment is examined, it is quickly seen that indeed the occupation which existed without sin before conversion was not a fault to take up again even after conversion.”

Gregory the Dialogist · written before 604 · Forty Gospel Homilies, Homily 24patristic

John 21:3

“Meanwhile, they do what they were accustomed to do, and what belonged to men in private life. It is true that Paul, in the midst of his employment as a preacher, gained the support of his life by his own hands, but it was for a different reason; for his time was so arranged, that the labors of his hands did not withdraw him from teaching.”

John Calvin · Commentaries (1554)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

John 21:4-6

Jesus stood on the shore: Jesus stands on the shore at first light, and the men in the boat do not know Him. He calls them children and tells them to put the net out on the right side. The catch is too heavy to haul in.

John 21:4

“But when the morning was now come,.... The day began to dawn, and light to appear, very early in the morning; for Christ visits his right early, and is a present help to them in their time of trouble. Jesus stood on the shore: on firm ground, whilst his disciples were beating about in the waves, and toiling to no purpose.”

3 more voices on this verse

John 21:4

“Jesus stood--(Compare Joh 20:19, 26). but the disciples knew not it was Jesus--Perhaps there had been some considerable interval since the last manifestation, and having agreed to betake themselves to their secular employment, they would be unprepared to expect Him.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

John 21:4

“Knew not that it was Jesus - Probably because it was either not light enough, or he was at too great a distance, or he had assumed another form, as in Mar 16:12; otherwise his person was so remarkable that all his disciples readily knew him when he was at hand: see Joh 21:12.”

John 21:4

“Christ's time of making himself known to his people is when they are most at a loss. When they think they have lost themselves, he will let them know that they have not lost him. Weeping may endure for a night; but joy comes, if Christ comes, in the morning.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse →

Jesus calls from the shore with a word of affection, which Albert Barnes sets beside the same address in 1 John 2:18. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown note that the word alone would not have told them who He was. His question, they add, makes them say their empty night aloud.

John 21:5

“Children - A term of affection and friendship, 1Jn 2:18. Any meat - This word (Greek) means anything eaten with bread. It was used by the Greeks especially to denote fish (Schleusner).”

2 more voices on this verse

John 21:5

“He asks as a tender father concerning his children whether they be provided with that which is fit for them, that if they be not, he may take care for their supply. Note, The Lord is for the body, 1 Cor. vi. Christ takes cognizance of the temporal wants of his people, and has promised them not only grace sufficient, but food convenient.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

John 21:5

“Children--This term would not necessarily identify Him, being not unusual from any superior; but when they did recognize Him, they would feel it sweetly like Himself. have ye any meat?--provisions, supplies, meaning fish. No--This was in His wonted style, making them tell their case, and so the better prepare them for what was coming.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

The command was plain. Matthew Henry reads the catch as the power of Christ meeting His men at the point where their own skill had failed. Adam Clarke takes the great number of fish as a sign of the many who would be won through the apostles' preaching.

John 21:6

“And ye shall find - The Ethiopic, three copies of the Itala, and St. Cyril, add, They said therefore unto him, we have labored all the night and caught nothing, nevertheless at thy command we will let down the net. This is borrowed from Luk 5:5. For the multitude of fishes - This was intended as an emblem of the immense number of souls which should be converted to God by their ministry; according to the promise of Christ, Mat 4:19.”

1 more voice on this verse

John 21:6

“Our Lord Jesus Christ once more gladdens His disciples with the enjoyment of the sight of Himself, Whom they so greatly longed to see, and vouchsafes unto them a third visit, in addition to the other two, in order that He might confirm their minds, and render them unchangeably steadfast in faith towards Him.”

Cyril of Alexandria · written before 444 · Commentary on the Gospel of John, Book 12patristic

The whole record on this verse →

The disciple Jesus loved knows Him first, by the size of the catch. Peter pulls his outer garment on, goes over the side, and swims for shore ahead of the boat. The boat comes in behind him.

John 21:7

“Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved - John, Joh 13:23. It is the Lord - He was convinced, perhaps, by the apparent miracle, and by looking more attentively on the person of one who had been the means of such unexpected and remarkable success. His fisher’s coat - His upper or outer garment or tunic, in distinction from the inner garment or tunic which was worn next the skin. In the case of Peter it may have been made of coarse materials such as fishermen commonly wore, or such as Peter usually wore when he was engaged in this employment.”

3 more voices on this verse

John 21:7

“After his resurrection, Jesus was standing on the shore; his disciples were in the ship. When the others did not know him, the disciple whom Jesus loved said to Peter, "It is the Lord." For virginity is the first to recognize a virgin body. Jesus was the same as he was before, yet he was not seen alike by all as the same. And immediately it is added, "And no one dared ask him, 'Who are you?' for they knew that he was the Lord." No one dared because they knew that he was God.”

Jerome · written before 420 · Against John of Jerusalem 35patristic

John 21:7

“Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved,.... Which was John the Evangelist and Apostle, the writer of this Gospel: saith unto Peter, it is the Lord; which two disciples were very intimate with each other, and communicated their thoughts freely to one another. John knew that it was the Lord, either by some special revelation, or from the multitude of fishes which were taken, and which showed a divine hand and power to be concerned. So faithful ministers of the Gospel know when Christ is with them, by his power attending their ministrations to the conversion of souls.”

John 21:7

“He whom Jesus loved was the first that said, It is the Lord; for those whom Christ loves he will in a special manner manifest himself to: his secret is with his favourites. John had adhered more closely to his Master in his sufferings than any of them: and therefore he has a clearer eye and a more discerning judgment than any of them, in recompence for his constancy.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse →

John 21:8-9

came ashore in the boat: The others row in the last hundred yards, dragging the net. On the beach a charcoal fire is already burning with fish on it and bread beside it. The Greek word anthrakia stands once before in this Gospel, at the fire Peter warmed himself by in the courtyard, John 18:18.

John 21:8

“Dragging the net - It is probable that this was that species of fishing in which the net was stretched from the shore out into the sea; the persons who were in the boat, and who shot the net, fetched a compass, and bringing in a hawser, which was attached to the other end of the net, those who were on shore helped them to drag it in.”

a charcoal fire: The meal is ready before they land. John Gill points out that the fish on the coals could not have come from their own net, which was still full in the water. Albert Barnes notes that the text names no miracle, so the meal stands simply as His provision.

John 21:9

“As soon then as they were come to land,.... As soon as they were come out of the ship, and safe on shore, not only Peter, but all the rest of the disciples: they saw a fire of coals there: on the shore, to their great surprise: and fish laid there; which could not be any that they had taken, for, as yet, the net was not drawn up, and the fish took out: and bread; not upon the coals baking, but hard by, being ready prepared to eat with the fish, when sufficiently broiled.”

2 more voices on this verse

John 21:9

“They saw a fire ... - We have no knowledge whence this was produced - whether it was, as Grotius supposes, by a miracle, or whether it was a place occupied by other fishermen, where they also might cook the fish which they had caught. As no miracle is mentioned, however, there is no reason for supposing that any existed in the case.”

John 21:9

“Our Lord ate to prove the resurrection, not to give his palate the pleasure of tasting of honey. He asked for a fish broiled on the coals that he might confirm the doubting apostles who did not dare approach him because they thought they saw not a body but a spirit.”

Jerome · written before 420 · Against John of Jerusalem 34patristic

The whole record on this verse →

John 21:10-11

Jesus asks for part of their catch to go with what is already on the fire. Peter hauls the net up the beach, 153 large fish, and the net holds, where the nets of Luke 5:6 began to break. The church has read the number many ways.

John 21:10

“To show that it was no vision, He bade them take of the fish they had caught. Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now caught. Another miracle follows; viz. that the net was not broken: Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so many, yet was not the net broken.”

Theophylact of Ohrid · written before 1107 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

2 more voices on this verse

John 21:10

“Jesus saith unto them,.... The disciples: bring of the fish which ye have now caught: for they might have caught some before, though so few and small, as scarcely to be reckoned any; nor were they bid to bring all they had taken, only some of them, to add to these Christ had prepared for them on land; they being both indeed of a miraculous production, and the effects of his divine power.”

John 21:10

“It is said of the slothful man that he roasteth not that which he took in hunting; he cannot find in his heart to dress what he has been at the pains to take, Prov. xii. But Christ would hereby teach us to use what we have. [2.] He would have them taste the gifts of his miraculous bounty, that they might be witnesses both of his power and of his goodness.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse →

full of large fish: Peter drags the net ashore by himself. Albert Barnes reads the exact count as the mark of an unusual haul after a night of nothing. To him it convinced the seven that the same Lord who had worked wonders before them was with them again.

John 21:11

“An hundred and fifty and three - The number is mentioned because it seems to have been a very unusual draught, and it was particularly gratifying and striking to them after they had spent the whole night and had caught nothing. This convinced them that it was no other than the same Saviour who had so often worked wonders before them that was now with them.”

1 more voice on this verse

John 21:11

“But it is not through the agency of a Christian ministry that all true disciples are gathered. Jesus Himself, by unseen methods, gathers some, who afterwards are recognized by the constituted fishers of men, and mingle with the fruit of their labors.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

John 21:12-14

Jesus keeps the fire, cooks the fish, and hands out the bread, the same giving that fed the five thousand at John 6:11. Every man there knows Him. John counts it the third time the risen Lord stood among His disciples.

John 21:12

“THE Lord Jesus is thoughtful of bodily wants. In His earlier days He fed multitudes of people, on two grand occasions, with bread and fish. And now that He has died and risen from the dead and is in the body of His Glory, He still thinks of the hungering bodies of men and calls to the fishermen, "Children, have you any meat?" Finding that they have nothing, He makes a breakfast for them. "Come and break your fast" falls very condescendingly from His lips and it proves to us how He cares for the temporal needs of the poor.”

1 more voice on this verse

John 21:12

“Come and dine - Δευτε αριϚησατε. Though this is the literal translation of the word, yet it must be observed that it was not dinner time, being as yet early in the morning, Joh 21:4; but Kypke has largely shown that the original word is used by Homer, Xenophon, and Plutarch, to signify breakfast, or any early meal, as well as what we term dinner. It might perhaps appear singular, otherwise it would be as agreeable to the use of the Greek word, to have translated it, come and breakfast.”

The whole record on this verse →

took the bread and gave it to them: Jesus serves the meal Himself. John Gill reads Him taking the bread as the host and head of the family, giving thanks as was His custom. Albert Barnes sees the whole meal as set to convince them that He had truly risen from the dead.

John 21:13

“Jesus then cometh and taketh bread,.... After they had taken the fish out of the net, and all was prepared for the meal, and the disciples were set down to eat, Christ came and took his place as the master of the feast, and head of the family; and taking up the bread, as was his usual method, he asked a blessing over it, and gave thanks for it. Beza's ancient copy, and one of Stephens's read, "and having given thanks he gave", &c. which is agreeably to his usual practice at meals.”

2 more voices on this verse

John 21:13

“This does not differ from this reading either, for he ate fish and bread. For he who could be roasted like a fish from his humanity, refreshes us with bread from his divinity, who says: "I am the living bread who came down from heaven." Therefore he ate roasted fish and bread, so that by his own food he might show us that he both endured suffering from our humanity, and provided our refreshment from his divinity. If we consider this carefully, we see how it is also fitting for us to imitate.”

Gregory the Dialogist · written before 604 · Forty Gospel Homilies, Homily 24patristic

John 21:13

“Jesus then cometh, and taketh bread ... - It is not said that Jesus himself ate with them, but he gave them food. The design of this interview seems to have been to convince them that he had truly risen from the dead. Hence, he performed a miracle before they suspected that it was he, that there might be no room to say that they had ascribed to him the power of the miracle through friendship and collusion with him.”

The whole record on this verse →

the third time: John counts only the group meetings. Adam Clarke lists the first two at John 20:19 and 20:26, and with the other Gospels he counts this as the seventh appearance. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown draw the same line between the gathered disciples and single witnesses.

John 21:14

“This is the third time that Jesus showed himself--was manifested. to his disciples--His assembled disciples; for if we reckon His appearances to individual disciples, they were more.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

Lovest Thou Me? Feed My Sheep

Jesus uses the old name, Simon son of John, and asks whether Peter loves Him more than these. These stands open, the boats and the trade, or the other disciples he once claimed to love above at Matthew 26:33. Feed My lambs is the first of three charges.

John 21:15

“So when they had dined,.... The Persic version adds, Jesus turned his face to Simon Peter; he did not interrupt them whilst they were eating; but when they had comfortably refreshed themselves, he looked at Peter, and singled him out from the rest, and directed his discourse to him; and saith unto Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas; not John, as the Vulgate Latin, and Nonnus, and some copies read; for this answers not to the Hebrew word Jochanan, but Jonah, the same name with the prophet.”

4 more voices on this verse

John 21:15

“It is Peter, chosen by the Lord himself to feed his flock, who merits three times to hear the words "Feed my little lambs; feed my lambs; feed my sheep." And so, by feeding well the flock of Christ with the food of faith, he effaced the sin of his former fall. For this reason he is admonished three times to feed the flock. He is asked three times whether he loves the Lord in order that he may confess him three times whom he had denied three times before his crucifixion.”

Ambrose of Milan · written before 397 · Exposition of the Christian Faith 5, PROLOGUE 2patristic

John 21:15

“READ the whole chapter and observe the change of scene. First, they are on the lake fishing, casting their nets at Christ's command, and dragging to land a multitude of great fishes. They have all come on shore and when they have breakfasted, their faces are not turned to the sea, but to the pastures on the hillside. These are clothed with flocks and the Master says no more about fishermen and fish, but speaks of shepherds and sheep. Herein lies a parable—the servants of the Lord Jesus are first, fishermen, and then shepherds.”

John 21:15

“We have it also demonstrated here that love and liking are one and the same thing; for the Lord also in the last question said not Diligis me? but, Amas me? Let us, then, love not ourselves, but Him; and in feeding His sheep, let us be seeking the things which are His, not the things which are our own. For in some inexplicable way, I know not what, every one that loveth himself, and not God, loveth not himself; and whoever loveth God, and not himself, he it is that loveth himself.”

Augustine of Hippo · written before 430 · Tractates on John 123patristic

John 21:15

“Simon, son of Jonah - The appellation Christ had given him, when be made that glorious confession, Matt. xvi, 16, the remembrance of which might make him more deeply sensible of his late denial of him whom he had so confessed.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

The whole record on this verse →

Jesus asked a second time: The second question drops the comparison and asks only whether Peter loves Him. The charge rises from the lambs to the sheep, which is the whole work of tending a flock. The Greek word behind it is poimaino.

John 21:16

If the faith of the apostle Peter is shaken by his Lord's passion, it is so that with bitter weeping he may hear the soothing words "Feed my sheep."

Jerome · written before 420 · LETTER 38.1patristic

2 more voices on this verse

John 21:16

“Feed my sheep - The word here rendered “feed,” as has been remarked, is different from the word in the previous verse. It has the sense of governing, caring for, guiding, protecting - the kind of faithful vigilance which a shepherd uses to guide his flock, and to make provision against their wants and dangers. It may be implied here that the care needed for the young in the church is to instruct them, and for those in advanced years both to instruct and govern them.”

John 21:16

“He saith to him . . . the second time . . . lovest thou me, &c.--In this repetition of the question, though the wound was meant to be reopened, the words "more than these" are not repeated; for Christ is a tender as well as skilful Physician, and Peter's silence on that point was confession enough of his sin and folly.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

Jesus asked a third time: The third question lands on the three denials by the fire. Peter is hurt and appeals past his own word to the Lord who knows all things. Some read the change from agapao to phileo as two different loves, and others as John varying his words by habit.

John 21:17

“Herein, also, is a type given to the Churches, that they ought thrice to ask for a confession of Christ from those who have chosen to love Him by coming to Him in Holy Baptism. And, by dwelling on this passage, instructors in religion may arrive at the knowledge that they cannot please the Chief Shepherd, that is Christ, unless they take thought for the health of the sheep of His fold, and their continuance in well-being.”

Cyril of Alexandria · written before 444 · Commentary on the Gospel of John, Book 12patristic

2 more voices on this verse

John 21:17

“PETER was somewhat pressed. He felt that he was pushed into a corner and compelled to look into his own heart and divulge its innermost secret. To be asked once, in the presence of his Brothers, whether he loved his Lord more than they did, had a tendency to humiliate him, for he had boastfully declared that, though all men should be offended because of Christ, he would not. But to be asked, next, whether he really loved Christ at all, sank him to the ground with holy shame.”

John 21:17

“It was fitting that he should; it was meant that he should. But this accomplished, the painful dialogue concludes with a delightful "Feed My sheep"; as if He should say, "Now, Simon, the last speck of the cloud which overhung thee since that night of nights is dispelled: Henceforth thou art to Me and to My work as if no such scene had ever happened." 18, 19.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

John 21:18-19

when you were young: The saying sets a young man who dressed himself against an old man whose hands are stretched out and bound. John reads it as the death by which Peter glorifies God, and the church from the second century has held that he was crucified. Peter is called again to follow.

John 21:18

“Thou shalt stretch forth thy hands - Wetstein observes that it was a custom at Rome to put the necks of those who were to be crucified into a yoke, and to stretch out their hands and fasten them to the end of it; and having thus led them through the city they were carried out to be crucified. See his note on this place.”

2 more voices on this verse

John 21:18

“When thou art old - He lived about thirty-six years after this: another shall gird thee - They were tied to the cross till the nails were driven in; and shall carry thee - With the cross: whither thou wouldest not - According to nature; to the place where the cross was set up.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

John 21:18

“Simon Peter the son of John, from the village of Bethsaida in the province of Galilee, brother of Andrew the apostle, and himself chief of the apostles, after having been bishop of the church of Antioch and having preached to the Dispersion — the believers in circumcision, in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia — pushed on to Rome in the second year of Claudius to overthrow Simon Magus, and held the sacerdotal chair there for twenty-five years until the last, that is the fourteenth, year of Nero.”

Jerome · written before 420 · De Viris Illustribus (On Illustrious Men), Section 1patristic

The whole record on this verse →

the kind of death: John explains the saying of verse 18 as a word about the death Peter would die. John Wesley draws the lesson that the saints glorify God chiefly by suffering, and Albert Barnes records that Peter was crucified at Rome. The call to follow comes again.

John 21:19

“By what death he should glorify God - It is not only by acting, but chiefly by suffering, that the saints glorify God. Follow me - Showing hereby likewise what death he should die.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

1 more voice on this verse

John 21:19

“By what death ... - In these words two things are implied: 1. That Peter would die a violent death; and, 2. That his death would be such as to honor God. The ancients say that Peter was crucified at Rome, about 34 years after this, with his head downward. Clemens says that he was led to the crucifixion with his wife, and sustained her in her sufferings by exhorting her to remember the example of her Lord.”

The whole record on this verse →

What Is That to Thee? Follow Thou Me

John 21:20-23

Peter turned and saw the disciple: Peter, just told how he will die, turns and asks what will become of the disciple behind them. Jesus answers with a condition about His own coming, and turns Peter back to follow. John prints the condition again to settle a rumor.

John 21:20

Then Peter turning about,.... After he was risen, and was following Christ: seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following also; by whom is designed John the Evangelist, and writer of this Gospel; who hearing Christ bid Peter follow him, rose up likewise, and went after him, in token of his willingness to serve him, and suffer for him too: which also leaned on his breast at supper; at the "paschal supper", as the Persic version here reads it: "and said, Lord, which is he that betrayeth thee?"

1 more voice on this verse

John 21:20

“Our Lord loved all His disciples—"having loved His own which were in the world, He loved them unto the end." He said to all the Apostles, "I call you not servants; for the servant knows not what his Lord does: but I have called you Friends; for all things that I have heard of My Father I have made known unto you." And yet within that circle of love there was an innermost place in which the beloved John was favored to dwell.”

The whole record on this verse →

The question is very short in the Greek. John Gill renders it Lord, and this one what. Albert Barnes takes it to ask what death John would die, with grief at Peter's own sentence mixed in.

John 21:21

Peter seeing him, saith to Jesus,.... Peter took a great deal of notice of John, and very likely understood, that he meant by his rising up and following Christ, to signify his readiness for service and suffering in the cause of Christ: and therefore says, Lord, and what shall this man do? The phrase in the original is very short and concise, "Lord, and this what?"

2 more voices on this verse

John 21:21

“What shall this man do? - This question probably means, “What death shall he die?” But it is impossible to ascertain certainly why Peter asked this question. John was a favorite disciple, and perhaps Peter suspected that he would have a happier lot, and not be put to death in this manner. Peter was grieved at the question of Jesus; he was probably deeply affected with the account of his own approaching sufferings; and, with perhaps a mixture of grief and envy, he asked what would be his lot.”

John 21:21

“But this is very doubtful, and it seems more natural to consider our Lord as intending to give no positive indication of John's fate at all, but to signify that this was a matter which belonged to the Master of both, who would disclose or conceal it as He thought proper, and that Peter's part was to mind his own affairs.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

what is that to you?: Peter's road is his own. Jesus answers with a condition resting on His own will, and John Wesley reads the coming here as the fall of Jerusalem, which John outlived. Adam Clarke sets out the older readings, one of them that John would never die.

John 21:22

“If I will that he tarry till I come - There are several opinions concerning this: the following are the principal. 1. Some have concluded from these words that John should never die. Many eminent men, ancients and moderns, have been and are of this opinion. 2. Others thought that our Lord intimated that John should live till Christ came to judge and destroy Jerusalem.”

1 more voice on this verse

John 21:22

“If I will that he tarry - Without dying, till I come - To judgment. Certainly he did tarry, till Christ came to destroy Jerusalem. And who can tell, when or how he died?”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

The whole record on this verse →

the rumor spread among the brothers: The saying passed among the believers as a promise that John would not die. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown trace the mistake to the expectation that the second coming was near. John corrects it with the exact words.

John 21:23

“Then went this saying abroad among the brethren, that that disciple should not die--into which they the more easily fell from the prevalent expectation that Christ's second coming was then near at hand. yet Jesus said not unto him, He shall not die--The Evangelist is jealous for His Master's honor, which his death might be thought to compromise if such a misunderstanding should not be corrected.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

3 more voices on this verse

John 21:23

“The brethren -- that is, the Christians. Our Lord himself taught them that appellation, chap. xx, 17. Yet Jesus did not say to him, that he should not die - Not expressly.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

John 21:23

“There is, then, nothing for us to fear in death, nothing for us to mourn, whether life, which was received from nature be rendered up to it again, or whether it is sacrificed to some duty that claims it, and this will be either an act of religion or the exercise of some virtue. And no one ever wished to remain as at present. This has been supposed to have been promised to John, but it is not the truth. We hold fast to the words and deduce the meaning from them.”

Ambrose of Milan · written before 397 · On the Death of Satyrus 2.49patristic

John 21:23

“Then went this saying ... - This mistake arose very naturally: 1. From the words of Jesus, which might be easily misunderstood to mean that he should not die; and, 2. It was probably confirmed when it was seen that John survived all the other apostles, had escaped all the dangers of persecution, and was leading a peaceful life at Ephesus. This mistake John deemed it proper to correct before he died, and has thus left on record what Jesus said and what he meant.”

The whole record on this verse →

John 21:24-25

the disciple who testifies: is the one who wrote it. A second voice adds that his testimony is true, a church attesting its own apostle. The last line overstates on purpose, the world too small for the books.

John 21:24

“This is the disciple which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things--thus identifying the author of this book with all that it says of this disciple. we know that his testimony is true--(Compare Joh 19:35).”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

3 more voices on this verse

John 21:24

“This is the disciple who testifieth - Being still alive after he had wrote. And we know that his testimony is true - The Church added these words to St. John's, Gospel, as Tertius did those to St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans, Rom. xvi, 22.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

John 21:24

“I think no wise man will doubt that the Lord would not have loved John if he had not been specially remarkable for virtue, and apt and perfectly equipped for every good work. For God can never be found to be inclined by any irrational leanings to those unworthy of His love, for such affections are more worthy of men.”

Cyril of Alexandria · written before 444 · Commentary on the Gospel of John, Book 12patristic

John 21:24

“This is the disciple - It is, I think, very likely that these two verses were added by some of the believers at that time, as a testimony to the truth of the preceding narration; and I allow, with Bishop Pearce and others, that it is possible that John may mean himself when he says We know, etc., yet, I think that it is very unlikely.”

The whole record on this verse →

ConnectionsJohn 1:35

many more things: The Gospel closes by owning how much it leaves out. Albert Barnes calls the last clause a hyperbole, the way writers often speak. Cyril of Alexandria reads it as a word to the reader, that what is written was picked out of thousands of deeds and is enough.

John 21:25

“And there are also many other things which Jesus did,.... Which refer not to his doctrines and discourses, his sermons and prayers, and the conversation he had with his disciples, and others, on different accounts; but to the signs, and wonders, and miraculous operations, which were done by him, that are neither recorded in this, nor in any of the evangelists: the which, if they should be written everyone; with all the particular circumstances relating to them: I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written.”

2 more voices on this verse

John 21:25

“Many other things - Many miracles, Joh 20:30. Many discourses delivered, etc. I suppose ... - This is evidently the figure of speech called a hyperbole. It is a mode of speech where the words express more or less than is literally true. It is common among all writers; and as the sacred writers, in recording a revelation to men, used human language, it was proper that they should express themselves as men ordinarily do if they wished to be understood.”

John 21:25

“Very great, then, says the Apostle, will the number of the miracles that God hath wrought, and altogether without number will the list of His deeds be seen to be, and out of many thousands have these that are recorded been taken, as not being inadequate to profit to the uttermost those who read them. And let no one who is of a teachable spirit and loveth instruction, S. John implies, blame him that wrote this book because he has not recorded the rest.”

Cyril of Alexandria · written before 444 · Commentary on the Gospel of John, Book 12patristic

The whole record on this verse →

Textual evidence — John 21

Verdict: Authentic

John 21 is present in every Greek manuscript, every ancient version, every lectionary, no textual tradition lacks it. Contrast with Mark 16: the Markan pericope has a legitimate textual challenge; John 21 does not. What earlier critics have called the 'appendix' is better read as an epilogue that the Evangelist wrote, sealed with 21:24, and released with the rest of the Gospel.

Manuscript census

John 21 is attested without exception. The oldest Johannine papyri that preserve the relevant folio carry the chapter; every major uncial carries it; every ancient version carries it; the Byzantine tradition is unanimous.

  • present
    𝔓66 (Papyrus 66, Bodmer II)(c. 200)

    Preserves most of John; what survives of chap. 21 is present.

  • present
    𝔓75 (Bodmer XIV–XV)(early 3rd century)
  • present
    Codex Sinaiticus (א)(4th century)
  • present
    Codex Vaticanus (B)(4th century)
  • present
    Codex Alexandrinus (A)(5th century)
  • present
    Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (C)(5th century)
  • present
    Codex Bezae (D)(5th century)
  • present
    Codex Washingtonianus (W)(4th/5th century)
  • present
    Old Latin tradition(2nd century onward)
  • present
    Peshitta (Syriac)(4th/5th century)
  • present
    Byzantine majority(9th–15th century)

Heptatic analysis

Number of Greek words in chap. 21≈ 518 (74 × 7)
Sevens across the verse structure of chap. 21several; see Panin's apparatus
153 fish (21:11)The verse itself

Panin's Johannine readings identified multiple heptadic patterns in chap. 21, including word counts and distinct vocabulary. The 153-fish notice, a verbatim counted report, not a symbolic gloss, is preserved by name because it is load-bearing for the chapter's historical register.

Source: Panin, Numeric Greek New Testament (1934, PD)

Patristic witnesses

  1. Augustine of Hippoc. 416
    Tractates on the Gospel of John— 122

    Reads 21:11's 153 as '10 law + 7 Spirit = 17, and 1+2+…+17 = 153', the triangular-number meditation that many later writers inherit.

  2. Jeromec. 390
    Commentary on Ezekiel, book 14 (on Ezek 47:9–10)

    Appeals to the fish species catalogued by the Greek naturalist Oppian, 153 species, as a homiletic reading of the catch.

  3. Cyril of Alexandriac. 430
    Commentary on John

    Handles chap. 21 as integral to John's testimony and devotes extended exposition to the restoration of Peter.

Theological integration

  • Three denials, three affirmations

    Peter denied Jesus three times (John 18:17, 25, 27). On the shore, Jesus asks three times: 'Lovest thou me?' (21:15, 16, 17). The pattern is not incidental, the text reverses the fall of Peter one question at a time. Westcott notes that the first two questions use ἀγαπᾷς (a higher love) and Peter answers with φιλῶ (affection); on the third Jesus himself shifts to φιλεῖς, meeting Peter where he is.

  • The beloved disciple's seal

    21:24, 'This is the disciple which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things: and we know that his testimony is true.' The seal is written in the first person plural; the natural reading is that the Johannine community ratified the Evangelist's authorship before the book was released. The chapter is not an afterthought; it is the Evangelist's colophon.

  • The 153 fish as historical realism

    Ancient narratives of miraculous catches tend to be vague. John's count is specific, 153, with a further note that the net was not broken (contrast Luke 5:6). Augustine's triangular-number meditation (1+2+…+17 = 153) and Jerome's Oppian-species note are homiletic readings layered on top of a historical report; they do not replace the report.

  • Feed my sheep

    The threefold 'feed / feed / feed' (Gr. βόσκε / ποίμαινε / βόσκε) hands Peter the shepherd's staff that Jesus had carried. John 10:11 and 10:14 had declared Jesus the Good Shepherd; 21:15–17 installs Peter as undershepherd. The chapter is the missing ordination sermon that Acts 1 assumes.

Sources

  • B. F. Westcott, The Gospel According to St. John (Speaker's Commentary / Cambridge) (1880)
  • Frédéric Godet, Commentary on the Gospel of John (tr. Crombie) (1886)
  • E. W. Bullinger, Number in Scripture: Its Supernatural Design and Spiritual Significance (1895)
  • Augustine of Hippo, Homilies on the Gospel of John (tr. Rettig, Post-Nicene Fathers) (c. 416 / tr. 1888)
  • Ivan Panin, The New Testament in the Original Greek (1934), Heptatic apparatus.

Keep studying

Sources for this chapter

The summary

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.

The form and classifications

Charles Spurgeon, The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 1684, "Feed My Lambs" (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition), on John 21:15; John Calvin, Commentary on the Gospel according to John, on John 21:1 and the site's John exposition, notes on 21:1 to 2, 21:12 to 14 and 21:24 to 25, citing J. C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels, John, and John Calvin, Commentary on the Gospel according to John.

The exposition

Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments; Augustine, Tractates on the Gospel of John; Brooke Foss Westcott, The Gospel according to St. John; Cyril of Alexandria, Commentary on the Gospel of John, Book 12; Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History; Frederic Godet, Commentary on the Gospel of John; J. C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels, John; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Calvin, Commentary on the Gospel according to John; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.