1 Samuelchapter 26
25 verses · BSB1 Samuel book hub →
Key verse
Saul said to him, “May you be blessed, David my son. You will accomplish great things and will surely prevail.” So David went on his way, and Saul returned home.
It stands in scene C of the chapter, verses 21 to 25.
The chapter
Chapter summary
The Ziphites betray David again, and this time he walks into Saul's camp at night with Abishai while a deep sleep from Jehovah is fallen upon them all, and stands over the king with the spear stuck in the ground at his head. Abishai asks for one stroke; David refuses on the same ground as at En-gedi, who can put forth his hand against Jehovah's anointed, and be guiltless? Jehovah will smite him, or his day shall come to die, or he shall go down into battle. They take the spear and the cruse of water to the far hill, and David shames Abner for failing to keep his lord. Saul's answer is his epitaph: I have played the fool, and have erred exceedingly.
Context
History · Samuel, Nathan, Gad · 1 Samuel overview
Where the chapter sits
1 Samuel 26 falls in David's rise in Saul's shadow (chapters 16–31). David anointed in secret; Goliath; Jonathan's covenant; Saul's pursuit; the cave of Adullam; Nabal and Abigail; the Philistine sanctuary; Saul's death at Gilboa.
Before it: Saul's reign: promise and rejection, chapters 9–15.
The whole shape of 1 Samuel→The world behind this chapter
1 Samuel 26The history
The two sparings are deliberately different. The first was an accident of geography, Saul walked into the cave David was already hiding in. This one is a raid David plans, carried out at night, into the middle of an armed camp of three thousand men. He chooses to go, and takes Abishai with him.
The rest of the history, and what it meant to them
Ancient camps were laid out with the commander at the center, his troops circled around him, and his spear thrust upright in the ground at his head, the standing spear marked where the leader slept the way a standard marks a headquarters. Taking that spear and the water jar from beside his head is proof of exactly how close a man got, and it is a public humiliation of Abner, the commander of the guard.
The deep sleep that fell on them is stated as the LORD's doing, which is the text's way of saying this was not merely good soldiering.
Abishai's offer, let me pin him to the earth with one stroke, I will not strike him twice, is the practical voice, and David's refusal adds a new argument to the one from the cave: the LORD will strike him, or his day will come to die, or he will go down into battle and perish. David lists the ways God can end a reign and declines to be any of them. That is the sentence the whole book has been arguing toward.
His complaint shouted across the valley names a real fear of exile in that world. If men have driven him out from the LORD's heritage, saying go serve other gods, then leaving the land means leaving the place where God is worshiped. The next chapter shows him doing exactly that.
What it meant to them
Saul's last words to David in the whole book are a blessing: blessed be you, my son David, you will do many things and will succeed in them. He goes back to his place and David goes his way, and they never see each other again.
For first hearers the point was in the repetition. Once could be a moment of restraint. Twice, planned and deliberate, was a settled principle, and it is the principle that made David's dynasty legitimate. He never lifted a hand against the throne he inherited.
Sources cited
- Yigael Yadin, The Art of Warfare in Biblical Lands in the Light of Archaeological Study
- Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Books of Samuel
A. The spear and cruse taken from beside Saul's head
1. (vv. 1-2)
a.the hill of Hachilah: The Ziphites bring Saul the same report in nearly the same words they used at 23:19, naming the same hill of Hachilah where they had already betrayed David once. Saul again musters three thousand chosen men, the same number he led into the wilderness of Engedi in the previous chapter. The repetition marks David's exile as a settled pattern: no hiding place stays hidden long, and no relenting of Saul's outlasts the next report.
1 Samuel 26:1, 1 voiceWhat preachers and commentators have said about these verses, in their own words.
1 Samuel 26:1
“The incident related in this chapter of the meeting between Saul and David bears a strong general resemblance to that recorded in 1 Sam. 24, and is of a nature unlikely to have occurred more than once. Existing discrepancies are explained by the supposition that one narrative relates fully some incidents on which the other is silent. On the whole the most probable conclusion is that the two narratives relate to one and the same event.”
1 Samuel 26:2, 1 voice
1 Samuel 26:2
“Three thousand chosen men - Though they knew that David was but six hundred strong, yet Saul thought it was not safe to pursue such an able general with a less force than that mentioned in the text; and, that he might the better depend on them, they were all elect or picked men out of the whole of his army.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
2. (vv. 3-5)
a.David sends spies rather than act on a report alone, then goes himself to see the ground before he decides anything. He finds Saul asleep inside the ring of wagons that formed the camp's night defense, Abner the captain lying at his side, and the whole army pitched around them. The picture sets up the chapter's question: two men lie within reach of each other, and only one of them will ask what he may lawfully do about it.
1 Samuel 26:5, 2 voices
1 Samuel 26:5
“David arose - As David and his men knew the country, they had many advantages over Saul and his men; and no doubt could often watch them without being discovered. Saul lay in the trench - The word במעגל bammaegal, which we translate in the trench, and in the margin in the midst of his carriages, is rendered by some in a ring of carriages, and by others in the circle, i.e., which was formed by his troops. Luther himself translates it wagenburg, a fortress formed of wagons or carriages.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Samuel 26:5
“Saul lay in the trench, and the people pitched round about him--Among the nomad people of the East, the encampments are usually made in a circular form. The circumference is lined by the baggage and the men, while the chief's station is in the center, whether he occupy a tent or not.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
3. (vv. 6-8)
a.David asks who will go down with him into the camp, and Abishai, his sister's son and Joab's brother, answers at once. Once inside, Abishai reads the sleeping king and the spear at his head as a verdict already handed down, God hath delivered thine enemy into thine hand, and offers to end it in one stroke and never need a second. His words echo the exact language David's own men used in the cave at Engedi in chapter 24, and David's answer will echo his own from that same chapter.
1 Samuel 26:6, 1 voice
1 Samuel 26:6
“Ahimelech the Hittite - Only mentioned here. Uriah was also a Hittite. Abishai - He was son of Zeruiah, David’s sister, but probably about the same age as David. He because very famous as a warrior 2Sa 23:18, but was implicated with his brother Joab in the murder of Abner in retaliation for the death of their brother Asahel 2Sa 3:30.”
1 Samuel 26:7, 2 voices
1 Samuel 26:7
“If Saul had been asked the reason for his hostility, he would have been compelled to admit that it was the favors received from David's hand. Moreover, even though Saul had been found asleep by David during the very time that the latter was being pursued, and although Saul lay, an easy victim, before his enemy, his life was again spared by that just man, for he refrained from doing him violence.”
Basil of Caesarea· written before 379· CONCERNING ENVYpatristic
1 Samuel 26:7
“So David and Abishai came to the people by night,.... Josephus (l) wrongly says, that he took with him both Abishai and Ahimelech; he chose to have but one, for the greater secrecy.”
1 Samuel 26:8, 2 voices
1 Samuel 26:8-12
“Besides, he was the sovereign; Though God had rejected him from the kingdom, it was in every way the best and most dutiful course, instead of precipitating his fall by imbruing their hands in his blood and thereby contracting the guilt of a great crime, to wait the awards of that retributive providence which sooner or later would take him off by some sudden and mortal blow.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 Samuel 26:8
“The last advantage he had of this kind was indeed but accidental, when Saul happened to be in the cave with him at the same time. But in this there was something extraordinary; the deep sleep that had fallen on Saul and all his guards was manifestly from the Lord, so that it was a special providence which gave him this opportunity; he ought not therefore to let it slip.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
4. (vv. 9-11)
a.David's refusal turns on one clause, repeated at 26:9, 26:11, and again at 26:16: who can stretch forth his hand against the Lord's anointed and be guiltless. The same restraint held him back in the cave at Engedi in chapter 24, and it will hold him back again over the Amalekite's claim at 2 Sam 1:14 and over Shimei at 2 Sam 19:21. David leaves Saul's death to three named outcomes, the Lord's own stroke, a natural day to die, or a fall in battle, and takes only the spear and the cruse instead of a life he has no right to.
1 Samuel 26:9, 2 voices
1 Samuel 26:9
“But this is marvelous not only for the fact that he grants life to the one who is doing everything against his life, but because David, although he had been anointed to the office of king and knew that he would not otherwise partake of that position unless Saul were out of the way, judged it better to suffer ill patiently in his private low estate than to enter upon the kingship by satisfying his anger against the one who had caused him grief.”
Gregory of Nyssa· written before 395· ON THE INSCRIPTIONS OF THE PSALMS 2.16.266patristic
1 Samuel 26:9
“And he gave two reasons for it:-- 1. It would be a sinful affront to God's ordinance. Saul was the Lord's anointed, king of Israel by the special appointment and nomination of the God of Israel, the power that was, and to resist him was to resist the ordinance of God, Rom. xiii.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Samuel 26:10, 1 voice
1 Samuel 26:10
“The Lord shall smite him - He shall die by a stroke of the Divine judgment; or his day shall come to die - he shall die a natural death; which in the course of things must be before mine, and thus I shall get rid of mine enemy; or he shall descend into the battle, and perish - he shall fall by the enemies of his country. These are the three ordinary ways by which man accomplishes, as a hireling, his day.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Samuel 26:11, 2 voices
1 Samuel 26:11
“The Lord forbid that I should stretch forth mine hand against the Lord's anointed,.... Or suffer any about him to do it; he speaks of it with the utmost detestation and abhorrence: but, I pray thee, take thou now the spear that is at his bolster; not to smite him with, as he desired, but to carry off, and was no other than his sceptre; See Gill on 1Sa 20:33, and the cruse of water; which stood in the same place, as appears by 1Sa 26:”
1 Samuel 26:11
“This common custom of Arab sheiks was also the practice of the Hebrew chiefs. at his bolster--literally, "at his head"; perhaps, Saul as a sovereign had the distinguished luxury of a bolster carried for him. A "cruse of water" is usually, in warm climates, kept near a person's couch, as a drink in the night time is found very refreshing.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
5. (v. 12)
a.The narrator names the cause outright: a deep sleep from the Lord had fallen on the whole camp, not the ordinary heaviness after a long watch. Whom God means to disable he can bind with a spirit of slumber, and here he binds an army so completely that a man can lift the king's own spear from beside him and no one wakes. The providence that keeps David from sin at verse 9 is the same providence that supplies him the proof he will use at verse 16.
1 Samuel 26:12, 2 voices
1 Samuel 26:12
“David took the spear and the cruse - The spear, we have already seen, was the emblem of power and regal dignity. But it is usual, in Arab camps, for every man to have his lance stuck in the ground beside him, that he may be ready for action in a moment. The cruse of water resembled, in some measure, the canteens of our soldiers.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Samuel 26:12
“It was a deep sleep from the Lord, who has the command of the powers of nature, and makes them to serve his purposes as he pleases. Whom God will disable, or destroy, he binds up with a spirit of slumber, Rom. xi. How helpless do Saul and all his forces lie, all, in effect, disarmed and chained! and yet nothing is done to them; they are only rocked asleep.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
B. David calls across the hill to Abner
1. (vv. 13-16)
a.From a hill with a wide ravine between them, close enough for a voice to carry in that clear air but far enough to be safe, David wakes the camp with one question, Answerest thou not, Abner? He shames the captain of the guard by name, calling him and his men worthy to die for the one watch they failed, then holds up the proof, the king's own spear and the cruse that stood at his head. The distance David keeps even now, after showing he could have closed it forever, answers Abishai's counsel from a few verses earlier: mercy resting on God does not need to stand near enough to be struck back.
1 Samuel 26:13, 1 voice
1 Samuel 26:13-20
“Then David . . . stood on the top of an hill afar off . . . and cried to the people--(See on Jud 9:7). The extraordinary purity and elasticity of the air in Palestine enable words to be distinctly heard that are addressed by a speaker from the top of one hill to people on that of another, from which it is separated by a deep intervening ravine.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 Samuel 26:15, 1 voice
1 Samuel 26:15
“This incidental testimony to Abner’s great eminence as a warrior is fully borne out by David’s dirge at Abner’s death 2Sa 3:31-34, 2Sa 3:38, as well as by his whole history. At the same time David’s bantering tone in regard to Abner, coupled with what he says in 1Sa 26:19, makes it proable that David attributed Saul’s persecution of him in some degree to Abner. Abner would be likely to dread a rival in the young conqueror of Judah (compare 2Sa 2:8).”
2. (vv. 17-18)
a.Saul calls him my son before David has said a word in his own defense, the same address he used at the cave's mouth in chapter 24 and will use again at verse 21, words that cost him nothing to speak and nothing to keep. David answers with two questions of his own, what have I done, and what evil is in mine hand, the same appeal to a clean record Saul had already conceded at 24:17, Thou art more righteous than I. A king who has already granted the verdict once is being asked to hold to it a second time.
1 Samuel 26:17, 1 voice
1 Samuel 26:17
“In the same manner he had expressed his relentings, ch. xxiv. He had given his wife to another and yet calls him son, thirsted after his blood and yet is glad to hear his voice. Those are bad indeed that have never any convictions of good, nor ever sincerely utter good expressions.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Samuel 26:18, 1 voice
1 Samuel 26:18
“He had lately had Saul's own testimony concerning him ( ch. xxiv. 17 ): Thou art more righteous than I. It was very unreasonable and wicked for Saul to pursue him as a criminal, when he could not charge him with any crime.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
3. (v. 19)
a.David names two possible causes for the whole pursuit and settles neither: either the Lord himself has stirred Saul against him, a trial to be met with an offering, or human hands are behind it, men who deserve a curse for driving him from the land of the Lord's own inheritance into a country where other gods are served. Barnes reads the first clause against the evil spirit sent on Saul back at 16:14, one persecution with two possible sources named in a single breath. David does not choose between them; he leaves the judgment to God rather than pass it himself, and this driven-out complaint is the sharpest word he speaks against his own exile in either sparing chapter.
1 Samuel 26:19, 2 voices
1 Samuel 26:19
“If the Lord have stirred thee up - The meaning is clear from the preceding history. “An evil spirit from God troubling him” was the beginning of the persecution. And this evil spirit was sent in punishment of Saul’s sin 1Sa 16:1, 1Sa 16:14. If the continued persecution was merely the consequence of this evil spirit continuing to vex Saul, David advises Saul to seek God’s pardon, and, as a consequence, the removal of the evil spirit, by offering a sacrifice.”
1 Samuel 26:19
“Saul himself could not say that justice put him on thus to persecute David, or that he was obliged to do it for the public safety. David was not willing to say (though it was very true) that Saul's own envy and malice put him on to do it; and therefore he concludes it must be attributed either to the righteous judgment of God or to the unrighteous designs of evil men.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
4. (v. 20)
a.David's closing image is self-deprecation aimed to disarm: the king of Israel, with three thousand chosen men, come out after a single flea, hunted the way men hunt a partridge in the mountains, put up again and again until it tires enough to be clubbed. Every figure in the speech shrinks David and enlarges the disproportion of Saul's whole campaign, from a flea to a bird that only flies rather than fights. The plea that his blood not fall before the face of the Lord ties the whole appeal back to the inheritance he says he has been driven out of a verse earlier.
1 Samuel 26:20, 2 voices
1 Samuel 26:20
“As when one doth hunt a partridge - It is worthy of remark that the Arabs, observing that partridges, being put up several times, soon become so weary as not to be able to fly; they in this manner hunt them upon the mountains, till at last they can knock them down with their clubs. It was in this manner that Saul hunted David, coming hastily upon him, and putting him up from time to time, in hopes that he should at length, by frequent repetitions of it, be able to destroy him. See Harmer.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Samuel 26:20
“He compares himself to a partridge, a very innocent harmless bird, which, when attempts are made upon its life, flies if it can, but makes no resistance. And would Saul bring the flower of his army into the field only to hunt one poor partridge? What a disparagement was this to his honour!”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
C. I have played the fool: Saul's last words to David
1. (vv. 21-22)
a.Saul's confession here goes further than the one he gave at the cave in chapter 24, naming himself a fool and owning that he has erred exceedingly, but Henry notes it is not the first such word from him and asks what a confession is worth without a change in the life behind it. David does not answer with trust; he keeps his distance still, telling one of Saul's own young men to come and fetch the spear rather than approach the king himself. The spear handed back is also a message: David could have kept the very weapon that names a king's rule, and chooses instead to return it whole.
1 Samuel 26:21, 2 voices
1 Samuel 26:21
“I have sinned - Perhaps the word חטאתי chatathi, “I have sinned,” should be read, I have erred, or, have been mistaken. I have taken thee to be a very different man from what I find thee to be. Taken literally it was strictly true. He often purposed the spilling of David’s blood; and thus, again and again, sinned against his life.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Samuel 26:21-25
“Saul gets information of David's movements and acts offensively. The Ziphites came to him and told him where David now was, in the same place where he was when they formerly betrayed him, ch. xxiii. Perhaps (though it is not mentioned) Saul had given them intimation, under-hand, that he continued his design against David, and would be glad of their assistance.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
2. (vv. 23-24)
a.David's closing appeal moves from the human court he has argued before Abner and Saul to the divine one, the Lord render to every man his righteousness and his faithfulness, the same court he trusts to settle what Saul's own promises have already failed to settle once. Verse 24 turns the appeal personal, asking that his own life be held as precious in the eyes of the Lord as Saul's life was just now held in his hand and spared. The prayer closes the chapter's whole argument in one line: the anointed does not defend himself by force because he has already appealed to a higher bench.
1 Samuel 26:23, 1 voice
1 Samuel 26:23
“He appeals to God as judge of the controversy: The Lord render to every man his righteousness. David, by faith, is sure that he will do it because he infallibly knows the true characters of all persons and actions and is inflexibly just to render to every man according to his work, and, by prayer, he desires he would do it.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
3. (v. 25)
a.Saul's last blessing to David in either book foretells great things and continued prevailing, and neither man rests his weight on the words; each returns to his own place rather than to one road together. Barnes reads this chapter as a second telling of the encounter in the cave at Engedi, one event carried by more than one source; Keil and Delitzsch and most of the bench read the differences, a night camp instead of a cave, a spear and cruse instead of a severed skirt, Abishai present instead of David alone, as evidence of two separate sparings rather than one confused into two. Either way this is the last time Saul and David meet as living men; David hears of him next from an Amalekite messenger, over a body already dead.
1 Samuel 26:25, 3 voices
1 Samuel 26:25
“Thou shalt both do great things, and also shalt still prevail. - The Hebrew is גם עשה תעשה וגם יכל תוכל gam asoh thaaseh, vegam yachol tuchal; “Also in doing thou shalt do, and being able thou shalt be able; which the Targum translates, also in reigning thou shalt reign, and in prospering thou shalt prosper; which in all probability is the meaning. There is a vast deal of dignity in this speech of David, arising from a consciousness of his own innocence.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Samuel 26:25
“So David went on his way--Notwithstanding this sudden relenting of Saul, David placed no confidence in his professions or promises, but wisely kept at a distance and awaited the course of Providence.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 Samuel 26:25
“He foretels his victories, and his elevation at last: Thou shalt do great things. Note, Those who make conscience of doing that which is truly good may come, by the divine assistance, to do that which is truly great. He adds, " Thou shalt also still prevail, more and more," he means against himself, but is loth to speak that out.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
The text of this chapter
This page carries no textual note on 1 Samuel 26. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →
This page draws on 11 works. Open for the list.
This page draws on Adam Clarke; Albert Barnes; Basil of Caesarea, CONCERNING ENVY; Bede, Commentary on Samuel; Gregory of Nyssa, ON THE INSCRIPTIONS OF THE PSALMS 2.16.266; Jamieson Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871); John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Books of Samuel and Matthew Henry.
Keep studying
On this page
Studies1
