The counter-decree grants defense against a standing order to exterminate, and licenses no massacre. The king's grant is quoted here in full measure: the Jews were permitted 'to gather themselves together, and to stand for their life, to destroy, to slay, and to cause to perish, all the power of the people and province that would assault them' (8:11). The verbs match Haman's decree word for word (3:13), because the second letter answers the first in the same legal language, and the operative clause is the last one, restricting the action to those who would assault them. Four details bear on the reading. Haman's decree included the spoil (3:13), and three times the narrator reports the Jews took none (9:10, 9:15, 9:16), which cuts plunder out as a motive and answers Saul's failure at 1 Samuel 15:9. The fighting fell on the one day the enemies' own decree had appointed. The seventy-five thousand of 9:16 are counted across an empire of a hundred and twenty-seven provinces on the day set for the extermination of every Jew in it. The hanging of Haman's ten sons (9:13-14) came after their deaths, a public display ending a house that had held the empire's second seat.
Defensive war under a decree that could not be revoked
held by the text's own limiting clause at 8:11, and conservative commentators including Jobes (NIVAC, 1999) and Yamauchi (Persia and the Bible, 1990)
A revenge narrative the book takes satisfaction in
held by critical readers including Paton (ICC, 1908), who found the book's nationalism troubling and said so plainly
Esther, argued in full→