Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Exodus 2:12

in Exodus 2

After looking this way and that and seeing no one, he struck down the Egyptian and hid his body in the sand.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV

ASV

And he looked this way and that way, and when he saw that there was no man, he smote the Egyptian, and hid him in the sand.

KJV

And he looked this way and that way, and when he saw that there was no man, he slew the Egyptian, and hid him in the sand.

This verse in Exodus 2

Commentary

11 notes on this verse

A commentator

Ambrose of Milan

On Cain and Abel 2.4.14 · Written before 397.

Moses indeed killed the Egyptian and became a fugitive from the land of Egypt, in order to avoid the tyrant of that land. But he would not have killed that Egyptian man before he had first killed the Egyptian man of spiritual wickedness within himself, and had renounced the luxury of regal honors, considering the reproach of Christ a greater inheritance than the treasures of Egypt.

This site's exposition

in those days, when Moses was grown

on Exodus 2:11-12

Moses goes out to his brethren and looks on their burdens, and his first recorded act as a grown man is to defend someone who cannot defend himself. Acts 7:23 puts his age at forty and Acts 7:25 says he supposed his brethren would have understood that God would deliver them by his hand. He looks this way and that way before he strikes, and readers have long divided over the act, with Stephen at Acts 7:24 reporting it as the avenging of a man oppressed and Matthew Henry faulting the manner of it.

This site's exposition

After looking this way and that

Moses looked around, saw no one, killed the Egyptian and hid the body in the sand. His care to be unseen shows he knew the act would be judged, and verse 14 shows it had been seen after all. Interpreters divide over it. John Wesley holds that Moses acted by special warrant from heaven, while Albert Barnes holds the killing unjustified and says it delayed Israel's deliverance for many years.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers3 voices

A commentator

Clement of Alexandria

The Stromata Book 1 · Written before 215.

proposed

Eupolemus in his work On the Kings of Judea says that Moses was the first sage and the first person to transmit to the Jews the science of writing, which passed from the Jews to the Phoenicians and from the Phoenicians to the Greeks. When he reached the age of manhood he developed his practical wisdom, being zealous for his national, ancestral educational traditions, to the point of striking down and killing an Egyptian who was unjustly attacking a Hebrew. The mystics say that he eliminated the Egyptian simply by speaking, as later in Acts Peter is said to have killed by his words those who had kept for themselves part of the price of the land and had told lies.

A commentator

Basil of Caesarea

EXEGETIC HOMILIES 1.1 · Written before 379.

proposed

He who hated the pomp of royalty returned to the lowly state of his own race. He preferred to suffer affliction with the people of God rather than to have the fleeting enjoyment of sin. He who, possessing naturally a love for justice, on one occasion even before the government of the people was entrusted to him was seen inflicting on the wicked punishment to the extent of death because of his natural hatred of villainy. He was banished by those to whom he had been a benefactor. He gladly left the uproar of the Egyptians and went to Ethiopia and, spending there all his time apart from others, devoted himself for forty entire years to the contemplation of creation.

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

QUESTIONS ON EXODUS 2 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

Concerning Moses' deed, when he killed the Egyptian to defend his brethren, we have treated the point adequately in the book that we wrote against Faustus on the lives of the patriarchs. The question was whether his role in that deed was praiseworthy, insofar as he admitted his sin, just as the richness of the earth, even before useful seeds are planted, is often praised for a growth of plants, even if they are useless. Or perhaps the deed itself should be justified. But to do so does not seem right, for up to that point Moses had no legitimate authority—neither authority that he received from God nor authority ordained by human society. But still, as Stephen says in the Acts of the Apostles, Moses thought that his brethren understood that God would bring them salvation through him, so that by this testimony it appeared that Moses could dare to do this because he was already called by God to act. (But Scripture is silent on this point).

The Puritans and the Awakening2 voices

A commentator

John Wesley

1703–1791

Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)

He slew the Egyptian - Probably it was one of the Egyptian task-masters, whom he found abusing his Hebrew slave. By special warrant from heaven (which makes not a precedent in ordinary cases) Moses slew the Egyptian, and rescued his oppressed brother.
And he looked this way, and that way,....
3 more voices on this verse

The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

His taking care to execute this justice privately, when no man saw, was a piece of needful prudence and caution, it being but an assay; and perhaps his faith was as yet weak, and what he did was with some hesitation. Those who come to be of great faith, yet began with a little, and at first spoke tremblingly.

The Nineteenth Century2 voices

The slaying of the Egyptian is not to be justified, or attributed to a divine inspiration, but it is to be judged with reference to the provocation, the impetuosity of Moses’ natural character, perhaps also to the habits developed by his training at the court of Pharaoh. The act involved a complete severance from the Egyptians, but, far from expediting, it delayed for many years the deliverance of the Israelites. Forty years of a very different training prepared Moses for the execution of that appointed work.

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

But we must not judge of his action in such a country and age by the standard of law and the notions of right which prevail in our Christian land; and, besides, not only is it not spoken of as a crime in Scripture or as distressing the perpetrator with remorse, but according to existing customs among nomadic tribes, he was bound to avenge the blood of a brother.

How the passage was read

What the Jewish commentators add

On the verses either side of this one

This is to be understood that he grew to manhood. It has already been said, And the child grew, 80 Verse. which means that it was no longer necessary to wean him, and then the mother.
Ramban: Spain, 1194–1270 · Ramban on Exodus 2:11:1, via Sefaria, Commentary on the Torah by Ramban (Nachmanides). Translated and annotated by Charles B. Chavel. New York, Shilo Pub. House, 1971-1976
1 more on this passage, in their own words ▾
Nitzim (striving) is a nifal adjective. 135 That is, a nifal participle. I.E. refers to nifal participles as adjectives.
Ibn Ezra: Spain, 1089–1167 · Ibn Ezra on Exodus 2:13:1, via Sefaria, Ibn Ezra's commentary on the Pentateuch, tran. and annot. by H. Norman Strickman and Arthur M. Silver. Menorah Pub., 1988-2004

This section is reception history: how the passage was read and kept in the Jewish tradition. Where a reading parts from an essential of the Christian faith, the section says so at that point.

Texts and citation data: Sefaria; each excerpt follows its version’s licence. 4 further sources are cited on this chapter that carry no English text this site may quote or only restate the verse.

The words behind it

12 Hebrew words

Every Hebrew word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

  • וַיִּ֤פֶןand he turned

    vaiyifenH6437135 times

  • כֹּה֙thus

    kohH3541577 times

  • וָכֹ֔הand thus

    vakhohH3541577 times

  • וַיַּ֖רְאand he saw

    vaiyar'H72001300 times

  • כִּ֣יthat

    kiH35884482 times

  • אֵ֣יןthere not

    ʾeinH369789 times

  • אִ֑ישׁ[was] a person

    ʾishH3761663 times

  • וַיַּךְ֙and he struck down

    vaiyakhH5221499 times

  • אֶת־<obj.>

    ʾet-H85310935 times

  • הַמִּצְרִ֔יthe Egyptian

    hamitzriH471370 times

  • וַֽיִּטְמְנֵ֖הוּand he hid him

    vaiyitmenehuH2934

  • בַּחֽוֹל׃in the sand

    bacholH2344

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

Where this verse is studied

About Exodus

The Finding of Moses — Gustave Doré, Doré's English Bible (1866), public domain
The Finding of Moses — Gustave Doré, Doré's English Bible (1866), public domain
This page draws on 11 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Ambrose of Milan, On Cain and Abel 2.4.14; Augustine of Hippo, QUESTIONS ON EXODUS 2; Basil of Caesarea, EXEGETIC HOMILIES 1.1; Clement of Alexandria, The Stromata Book 1; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Calvin, Commentary on the Four Last Books of Moses Arranged in the Form of a Harmony; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament (1748-1763); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.