Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.

Matthewchapter 1

25 verses · Matthew, by tradition · AD 50 to 65 · The Gospels

Key verse

The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

It stands in The Line of the King: Abraham to Christ, verses 1 to 17.

The chapter

Chapter summary

Genealogy of Jesus the Christ, son of David and son of Abraham, arranged in three groups of fourteen from Abraham to David to the exile to Christ. The angelic announcement to Joseph, the virgin conception, and the name 'Jesus'. He shall save his people from their sins. Matthew grounds the opening of his Gospel in fulfillment (Isa 7:14, cited 1:22–23).

Context

Gospel · Matthew · Matthew overview

The world behind this chapter

Matthew 1
When
The last years of Herod the Great · c. 6-4 BC
Where
The village of Nazareth in Galilee, in a household preparing for a wedding
Who first heard it
Jewish readers who cared, above all, about a man's line of descent

The history

Jewish families kept their descent on record. Land rights, priestly service, and any claim to royal blood all ran through documented ancestry, and family lists were preserved and recited. Opening a book with a genealogy was not dull bookkeeping to a Jewish reader; it was the legal case being filed.

The rest of the history, and what it meant to them

Betrothal in that world was not engagement as we know it. It was a binding contract, usually made about a year before the couple lived together, with a bride-price paid and witnesses present. The pair were already called husband and wife, and the only way out was a formal certificate of divorce. Unfaithfulness during that year was treated as adultery.

That is why Joseph's plan matters. He could have brought the matter to a public hearing and shamed Mary, or he could hand her the certificate quietly before two witnesses. He chose the quiet route, the merciful option a righteous man had available.

The four women named in the list would have raised eyebrows: Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and the wife of Uriah. Three were foreigners or married into scandal, and all four entered Israel's royal line by irregular paths.

What it meant to them

For a Jewish reader the first question about any claimant was simple: show me the papers. Matthew answers before he tells a single story, this man descends from Abraham, through David, through the kings, through the exile.

And the exile is the hinge. The list breaks at Babylon, where the throne stopped. Matthew's readers lived in the long aftermath of that break, under Rome. He is saying the line did not die there; it ran underground and surfaced in a carpenter's household in Nazareth.

Sources cited

Every work MannaFest builds on →

Where the chapter sits

Matthew 1 falls in Prologue: genealogy, birth, preparation (chapters 1–4).

Genealogy and birth. Fourteen generations × three; son of David, son of Abraham.

After it: Sermon on the Mount, chapters 5–7.

The whole shape of Matthew

The structure of this chapter

The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.

A. The Line of the King: Abraham to Christ

1. (vv. 1-2)

Matthew 1:1

The book of the generation - This is the proper title of the chapter. It is the same as to say, “the account of the ancestry or family, or the genealogical table of Jesus Christ.” The phrase is common in Jewish writings. Compare Gen 5:1. “This is the book of the generations of Adam,” i. e., the genealogical table of the family or descendants of Adam. See also Gen 6:9. The Jews, moreover, as we do, kept such tables of their own families. and it is probable that this was copied from the record of the family of Joseph.

1 more voice on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.

Matthew 1:1

Its use, then, in the opening words of this Gospel (and in Mt 1:17, 18) is in the style of the late period when our Evangelist wrote, rather than of the events he was going to record. the son of David, the son of Abraham--As Abraham was the first from whose family it was predicted that Messiah should spring (Ge 22:18), so David was the last.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

Matthew 1:2

Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren--Only the fourth son of Jacob is here named, as it was from his loins that Messiah was to spring (Ge 49:10).

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 1:2

Abraham begat Isaac - In this genealogy, those persons only, among the ancestors of Christ, which formed the direct line, as specified: hence no mention is made of Ishmael, the son of Abraham, nor of Esau, the son of Isaac; and of all the twelve patriarchs, or sons of Jacob, Judah alone is mentioned.

The whole record on this verse

The book of the generation of Jesus Christ: Matthew opens with Genesis 5:1's own formula, the book of the generation, turning Adam's toledot heading into a new book, a new beginning headed by a new Man. Two titles frame the whole Gospel before the list of names even starts, son of David for the king thread and son of Abraham for the promise to bless all nations in Genesis 22:18. Both lines of descent run their fourteen generations down to this one name, and the sources read the double title as deliberate, the whole genealogy answering both promises at once.

2. (vv. 3-5)

Matthew 1:3

And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar,.... The genealogical account of Christ goes on from Judah in the line of Phares, with whom Zara is mentioned; not because they were twins, for so were Jacob and Esau, and yet the latter is taken no notice of; but it may be because of what happened at their birth, see Gen 38:28. But the line of the Messiah was in Phares, and very rightly is he put in the genealogy of Christ, the Jews themselves being witnesses; who expressly say, that "the Messiah comes from him."

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 1:3

Phares and Zara - The remarkable history of these twins may be seen, Genesis 38: Some of the ancients were of opinion, that the evangelist refers to the mystery of the youngest being preferred to the eldest, as prefiguring the exaltation of the Christian Church over the synagogue. Concerning the women whose names are recorded in this genealogy, see the note at the end of the chapter, (Mat 1:25 (note)).

The whole record on this verse

Matthew 1:4

And Aram begat Aminadab,.... Which, with what follows in this verse, exactly agrees with the genealogical account in Rth 4:19.

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 1:4

Or following another interpretation, according to the abundance of grace, and the width of love. He isn Aram the chosen, according to that, Behold my Servant whom I have chosen. (Is. 42:1.) He is Aminadab, that is 'willingo,' in that He says, I will freely sacrifice to Thee. (Is. 54:6.) Also He is Naassonp, i. e. 'augury,' as He knows the past, the present, and the future; or, 'like a serpent,' according to that, Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness. (John 3:14.) He isq Salmon, i. e. 'that feeleth,'as He said, I feel that power is gone forth out of me. (Luke 8:46.)

Rabanus Maurus· written before 856· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

Matthew 1:4

But as we believe that the names of these Fathers were given for some special reason under the providence of God, it follows, but Naasson begat Salmon. This Salmon after his father's death entered the promised land with Joshua as prince of the tribe of Judah. He took a wife of the name of Rahab. This Rahab is said to have been that Rahab the harlot of Jericho who entertained the spies of the children of Israel, and hid them safely. For Salmon being noble among the children of Israel, inasmuch as he was of the tribe of Judah, and son of the prince thereof, beheld Rahab so ennobled through her great faith, that she was worthy whom he should take to wife. Salmon is interpreted 'receive a vesselk,' perhaps as if invited in God's providence by his very name to receive Rahab a vessel of election.

Pseudo-Chrysostom· written before 500· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

Matthew 1:5

And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab,.... That Salmon begat Boaz, is affirmed in Rth 4:21 but it is not there said, nor any where else in the Old Testament, as here, that he begat him of Rahab, that is, of Rahab the harlot. This the Evangelist had from tradition, or from the Jewish records.

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 1:5

It will be observed that Rachab is here represented as the great-grandmother of David (see Ru 4:20-22; 1Ch 2:11-15) --a thing not beyond possibility indeed, but extremely improbable, there being about four centuries between them. There can hardly be a doubt that one or two intermediate links are omitted.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

begat Phares and Zara of Thamar: Three of the four women Matthew names outside Mary appear in these verses, and none is a patriarch's wife by expectation. Tamar the Canaanite posed as a harlot to secure her right within Judah's own family in Genesis 38, Rahab was the Canaanite harlot of Jericho who hid the spies in Joshua 2, and Ruth was the Moabitess who came under Boaz's wing after Naomi's loss. The bench reads the four women together as an early signal that the King's own line runs through Gentile blood and open scandal, so that grace rather than pedigree carries the promise forward.

3. (v. 6)

Matthew 1:6

And Jesse begat David the king,....

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 1:6

The Evangelist has now finished the first fourteen generations, and is come to the second, which consists of royal personages, and therefore beginning with David, who was the first king in the tribe of Judah, he calls him David the king. Besides, he does not name Bathsheba, that, by naming Urias, he may recal to memory that great wickedness which she was guilty of towards him.

Glossa Ordinaria· written before 1274· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

Matthew 1:6

Let us enquire why Matthew does not mention Bathsheba by name as he does the other women. Because the others, though deserving of much blame, were yet commendable for many virtues. But Bathsheba was not only consenting in the adultery, but in the murder of her husband, hence her name is not introduced in the Lord's genealogy.

Remigius of Rheims· written before 533· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

The whole record on this verse

her that had been the wife of Urias: The fourth woman is named by omission rather than by name, her that had been the wife of Urias, forcing the reader to remember Uriah the Hittite and the sin his name recalls from 2 Samuel 11 and 12. The bench reads the wording as deliberate, the evangelist declining to smooth David's worst chapter out of the King's own genealogy. Grace that reaches a king's adultery and a soldier's murder is the same grace that will reach Gentile magi and a Canaanite woman's daughter later in this book.

4. (vv. 7-11)

Matthew 1:7

And Solomon begat Roboam,.... Called Rehoboam, 1Ki 11:43 of Naamah an Ammonitess, 1Ki 14:21. And Roboam begat Abia, sometimes called Abijam, as in 1Ki 14:31, sometimes Abijah, 2Ch 12:16 and sometimes, as here, Abia, 1Ch 3:10. Him Rehoboam begat of Maachah, the daughter of Abishalom, 1Ki 15:2 called Michaiah, the daughter of Uriel, 2Ch 13:2. Maachah and Michaiah being the same name; or else she went by two names, as her father did.

Matthew 1:8

Joram begat Ozias - This is the Uzziah, king of Judah, who was struck with the leprosy for his presumption in entering the temple to offer incense before the Lord. See 2Ch 26:16, etc. Ozias was not the immediate son of Joram: there were three kings between them, Ahaziah, Joash, and Amaziah, which swell the fourteen generations to seventeen: but it is observed that omissions of this kind are not uncommon in the Jewish genealogies. In Ezr 7:3, Azariah is called the son of Meraioth, although it is evident, from 1Ch 6:7-9, that there were six descendants between them.

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 1:8

In the fourth book of Kings we read, that Ochozias was the son of Joram. On his death, Josabeth, sister of Ochozias and daughter of Joram, took Joash, her brother's son, and preserved him from the slaughter of the royal seed by Athalias. To Joash succeeded his son Amasias; after him his son Azarias, who is called Ozias; after him his son Joatham. Thus you see according to historical truth there were three intervening kings, who are omitted by the Evangelist. Joram, moreover, begot not Ozias, but Ochozias, and the rest as we have related.

Jerome· written before 420· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

Matthew 1:8

Jehoram begat Uzziah - Jehoahaz, Joash, and Amaziah coming between. So that he begat him mediately, as Christ is mediately the son of David and of Abraham. So the progeny of Hezekiah, after many generations, are called the sons that should issue from him, which he should beget, Isaiah xxxix, 7.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

The whole record on this verse

Matthew 1:9

And Ozias begat Joatham,.... Called Jotham, 2Ki 15:7 him Ozias begat of Jerushah, the daughter of Zadok, 2Ki 15:33. And Joatham begat Achaz, or Ahaz, 2Ki 15:38 to him the sign was given, and the famous prophecy of the Messiah, Isa 7:14. And Achaz begat Ezekias, or Hezekiah, 2Ki 16:20 him Ahaz begat of Abi, the daughter of Zachariah, 2Ki 18:2. He was a very religious king, and had that singular favour from God to have fifteen years added to his days, Isa 38:5.

Matthew 1:10

And Ezekias begat Manasses,.... Or Manasseh, 2Ki 20:21. Him Hezekiah begat of Hephzibah, 2Ki 21:1. He was very remarkable both for his sins, and for his humiliation on account of them. And Manasses begat Amon, of Meshullemeth, the daughter of Haruz of Jotbah, 2Ki 21:19. He was a very wicked prince. And Amon begat Josias, or Josiah of Jedidah, the daughter of Adaiah of Boscath, 2Ki 22:1. He was a very pious king, and was prophesied of by name some hundreds of years before he was born, 1Ki 13:2.

Matthew 1:11

Josias begat Jechonias, etc. - There are three considerable difficulties in this verse. 1. Josias was not the father of Jechonias; he was only the grandfather of that prince: 1Ch 3:14-16. 2. Jechonias had no brethren; at least, none are on record. 3. Josias died 20 years before the Babylonish captivity took place, and therefore Jechonias and his brethren could not have been begotten about the time they were carried away to Babylon. To this may be added a fourth difficulty, viz. there are only thirteen in this 2nd class of generations; or forty-one, instead of forty-two, in the whole.

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 1:11

And Josias begat Jechonias,.... This Jechonias is the same with Jehoiakim, the son of Josias, called so by Pharaohnecho, when he made him king, whose name before was Eliakim, 2Ki 23:34 begat of Zebudah, the daughter of Pedaiah of Rumah, 2Ki 23:36. and his brethren. These were Johanan, Zedekiah, and Shallum.

Matthew 1:11

And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren--Jeconiah was Josiah's grandson, being the son of Jehoiakim, Josiah's second son (1Ch 3:15); but Jehoiakim might well be sunk in such a catalogue, being a mere puppet in the hands of the king of Egypt (2Ch 36:4).

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

Solomon begat Roboam: From Solomon the line runs through Judah's kings to the exile, and verse 8 quietly telescopes it, since between Joram and Ozias Matthew drops three names that 2 Kings records, Ahaziah, Joash and Amaziah, likely to hold the count at fourteen and possibly to pass over the house that Ahab's daughter Athaliah had corrupted. Jechonias, also called Jehoiachin, closes the second fourteen at the deportation itself, the royal line now a captive in Babylon. The bench reads the compression as ordinary ancient genealogical practice, since begat regularly means was ancestor of in a Hebrew king list, not as an error in the record.

5. (vv. 12-16)

Matthew 1:12

And after they were brought to Babylon,.... Not Jechonias, but the father of Jechonias, and the Jews. Jechonias begat Salathiel. Not Jechonias mentioned in the former verse, but his son, called Jehoiachin, 2Ki 24:6 and Coniah, Jer 22:24 both which are rendered Jechonias by the Septuagint in 2Ch 36:8 and he is so called, 1Ch 3:16. Abulpharagius (c) calls him Junachir, and says he is the same who in Matthew is called Juchonia; and he asserts him to be the father of Daniel the Prophet.

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 1:12

Jechonias begat Salathiel - After Jechonias was brought to Babylon, he was put in prison by Nebuchadnezzar, where he continued till the death of this prince, and the accession of Evilmerodach, who brought him out of prison, in which he had been detained thirty-seven years, and restored him to such favor that his throne (seat) was exalted above all the kings which were with him in Babylon: Jer 52:31, Jer 52:32. But though he thus became a royal favorite, he was never restored to his kingdom.

The whole record on this verse

Matthew 1:13

And Zorobabel begat Abiud,.... The children of Zorobabel are said in 1Ch 3:19, to be Meshullam, and Hananiah, and Shelomith their sister, but no mention is made of Abiud: he seems to be the same with Meshullam the eldest son, who might have two names; nor is this unlikely, since it was usual, especially about the time of the Babylonish captivity, for men to have more names than one, as may be observed in Daniel and others, Dan 1:7 where they went by one, and in Judea by another. And Abiud begat Eliakim, &c.

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 1:13

And Zorobabel begat Abiud, &c.--None of these names are found in the Old Testament; but they were doubtless taken from the public or family registers, which the Jews carefully kept, and their accuracy was never challenged.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

Matthew 1:14

He is also Sadoch, that is, 'the just,' or, 'the justified,' according to that, He was delivered, the just for the unjust. (1 Pet. 3:18.) He is also Achim, that is, 'my brother is He,' according to that, Whoso doeth the will of My Father, he is My brother. (Matt. 12:50.) He is also Eliud, that is, 'He is my God,' according to that, My Lord, and my God. (John 20:28.)

Remigius of Rheims· written before 533· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

Matthew 1:15

He is also Eleazar, i. e. 'God is my helper,' as in the seventeenth Psalm, My God, my helper. He is also Mathan, that is, 'giving,' or, 'given,' for, He gave gifts for men; (Eph. 4:8.) and, God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son. (John 3:16.)

Glossa Ordinaria· written before 1274· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 1:15

He is also Jacob, 'that supplanteth,' for not only hath He supplanted the Devil, but hath given His power to His faithful people; as, Behold I have given you power to tread upon serpents. (Luke 10:19.)

Remigius of Rheims· written before 533· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

Matthew 1:16

And Jacob begat Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus--From this it is clear that the genealogy here given is not that of Mary, but of Joseph; nor has this ever been questioned.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 1:16

Jesus, who is called Christ - The name Jesus respects chiefly the promise of blessing made to Abraham: the name Christ, the promise of the Messiah's kingdom, which was made to David. It may be further observed, that the word Christ in Greek, and Messiah in Hebrews, signify anointed, and imply the prophetic, priestly, and royal characters, which were to meet in the Messiah.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

Matthew 1:16

Jesus, who is called Christ - As the word Χριστος Christ, signifies the anointed or anointer, from χριω, to anoint, it answers exactly to the Hebrew משיח mashiach, which we pronounce Messiah or Messias; this word comes from the root משח mashac, signifying the same thing. As the same person is intended by both the Hebrew and Greek appellation, it should be regularly translated The Messiah, or The Christ; whichever is preferred, the demonstrative article should never be omitted. Priests, prophets, and kings, among the Jews, were anointed in order to the legitimate exercise of their respective offices.

The whole record on this verse

Jechonias begat Salathiel: The third fourteen runs from the captivity to Christ through names largely unknown outside this list, governors and priests of a line stripped of the throne yet still faithfully recorded. Verse 16 breaks the chapter's rhythm on purpose, since every other line reads begat, but of Joseph it reads of whom was born Jesus, refusing to say Joseph begat him. The bench reads the shift as Matthew's own guard for the virgin birth he states outright at verse 18, the legal line establishing Jesus' throne right through Joseph without claiming his flesh.

6. (v. 17)

Matthew 1:17

So all the generations ... - This division of the names in the genealogical tables was doubtless adopted for the purpose of aiding the memory. It was common among the Jews; and other similar instances are preserved. The Jews were destitute of books besides the Old Testament, and they had but few copies of that among them, and those chiefly in their synagogues. They would therefore naturally devise plans to keep up the remembrance of the principal facts in their history.

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 1:17

There are four women, and but four, named in this genealogy; two of them were originally strangers to the commonwealth of Israel, Rachab a Canaanitess, and a harlot besides, and Ruth the Moabitess; for in Jesus Christ there is neither Greek, nor Jew; those that are strangers and foreigners are welcome, in Christ, to the citizenship of the saints.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Matthew 1:17

It will be observed that the last of the three divisions of fourteen appears to contain only thirteen distinct names, including Jesus as the last. LANGE thinks that this was meant as a tacit hint that Mary was to be supplied, as the thirteenth link of the last chain, as it is impossible to conceive that the Evangelist could have made any mistake in the matter.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations: Matthew states his own arithmetic, three sets of fourteen, though the third set holds only thirteen names by a plain count unless Jechonias is counted twice, once closing the second set and once opening the third, a solution much of the bench accepts. A widely held tradition ties the number itself to gematria, since the Hebrew letters of David's name, dalet vav dalet, sum to fourteen, making the genealogy spell his name in numbers three times over; the bench names this as a longstanding reading rather than a claim the text itself makes. Either way the shape is deliberate, a genealogy built to be remembered and arriving at one name.

B. Joseph Told to Take Mary as His Wife

1. (vv. 18-19)

Matthew 1:18

For the one and the same Spirit of God, who proclaimed by the prophets what and of what sort the advent of the Lord should be, did by these elders give a just interpretation of what had been truly prophesied; and He did Himself, by the apostles, announce that the fulness of the times of the adoption had arrived, that the kingdom of heaven had drawn nigh, and that He was dwelling within those that believe on Him who was born Emmanuel of the Virgin.

Matthew 1:19

Her husband - The word in the original does not imply that they were married. It means here the man to whom she was espoused. A just man - Justice consists in rendering to every man his own. Yet this is evidently not the character intended to be given here of Joseph. The meaning is that he was kind, tender, merciful; that he was so attached to Mary that he was not willing that she should be exposed to public shame.

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 1:19

But how is Joseph thus called just, when he is ready to hide his wife's sin? For the Law enacts, that not only the doers of evil, but they who are privy to any evil done, shall be held to be guilty. Or this may be considered a testimony to Mary, that Joseph, confident in her purity, and wondering at what had happened, covered in silence that mystery which he could not explain.

Jerome· written before 420· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

The whole record on this verse

his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph: Betrothal in first century Judea was legally binding, broken only by divorce, so Mary's pregnancy before the marriage was consummated placed Joseph exactly where Deuteronomy 22 already addressed the case. Matthew states the true cause to the reader before Joseph learns it, of the Holy Ghost, so the coming crisis is read with the answer already known. Called a just man, Joseph resolves to end the betrothal privily rather than expose her to public shame or legal danger, the law's own mercy carried out by a righteous man who still believed himself wronged.

2. (v. 20)

Matthew 1:20

That which is conceived (or formed) in her - So I think γεννηθεν should be translated in this place: as it appears that the human nature of Jesus Christ was a real creation in the womb of the virgin, by the power of the Holy Spirit. The angel of the Lord mentioned here was probably the angel Gabriel, who, six months before, bad been sent to Zacharias and Elisabeth, to announce the birth of Christ’s forerunner, John the Baptist. See Luk 1:36.

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 1:20

In this word appeared is conveyed the power of Him that did appear, allowing Himself to be seen where and how He pleases. (in Luc. ii. 5.) Be not troubled that he calls her his wife; for she is not herein robbed of her virginity, but her wedlock is witnessed to, and the celebration of her marriage is declared.

Ambrose of Milan· written before 397· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

The whole record on this verse

the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream: The angel's address, Joseph, thou son of David, is the first beat of the royal title in this book, spoken not to Jesus but to the man whose legal line will carry the throne right to him. This dream is the first of five that guard the child through chapters 1 and 2, revelation moving each time danger presses closest. Fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife answers Joseph's fear directly, and the reason given confirms what Matthew already told the reader two verses earlier.

3. (v. 21)

Matthew 1:21

And she shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Jesus. For though she was with child, it could not be known any otherwise than by prediction or divine revelation, that she should have a son, whose name should be called Jesus; a name of the same signification with Joshua and Hosea, and may be interpreted a "Saviour", Act 13:23 for the word ישוע Jesus, comes from ישע which signifies "to save." And to this agrees the reason of the name given by the Angel, for he shall save his people from their sins.

3 more voices on this verse

Matthew 1:21

Jesus is a Hebrew word, meaning Saviour. He points to the etymology of the name, saying, For He shall save His people from their sins.

Jerome· written before 420· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

Matthew 1:21

His name Jesus - The name Jesus is the same as Saviour. It is derived from the verb signifying to save, In Hebrew it is the same as Joshua. In two places in the New Testament it is used where it means Joshua, the leader of the Jews into Canaan, and in our translation the name Joshua should have been retained, Act 7:45; Heb 4:8. It was a very common name among the Jews. He shall save - This expresses the same as the name, and on this account the name was given to him.

Matthew 1:21

Jesus - That is, a Saviour. It is the same name with Joshua (who was a type of him) which properly signifies, The Lord, Salvation. And all the Israel of God.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

The whole record on this verse

thou shalt call his name JESUS: JESUS transliterates the Hebrew Yeshua, itself a shortened form of Joshua, the LORD saves, so the name is already a sentence before the angel finishes it, for he shall save his people from their sins. The salvation named is moral rather than political, from sin rather than from Rome, which the bench reads against the deliverer many in Israel expected of a son of David. His people in Matthew's own Jewish setting reads first as Israel, though the same book will widen the promise to all nations by its final chapter.

4. (vv. 22-23)

Matthew 1:22

Now all this was done,.... These are not the words of the Angel, but of the Evangelist; observing that Mary's being with child of the Holy Ghost, and her conception in such an extraordinary manner, whilst a pure virgin, before she and Joseph came together, who though espoused to him, was untouched by him, were all brought about in this way, and with such circumstances, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the Prophet; that is, the Prophet Isaiah, and so some copies read.

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 1:22

Now all this was done - The prophecy here quoted is recorded in Isa 7:14. See the notes at that passage. The prophecy was delivered about 740 years before Christ, in the reign of Ahaz, king of Judah. The land of Judea was threatened with an invasion by the united armies of Syria and Israel, under the command of Rezin and Pekah. Ahaz was alarmed, and seems to have contemplated calling in aid from Assyria to defend him.

The whole record on this verse

Matthew 1:22

Matthew 1:23

It is observable, the words in Isaiah are, Thou (namely, his mother) shalt call; but here, They - that is, all his people, shall call - shall acknowledge him to be Emmanuel, God with us. Which being interpreted -- this is a clear proof that St. Matthew wrote his Gospel in Greek, and not in Hebrew.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 1:23

THOSE words, "being interpreted," salute my ear with much sweetness. Why should the word, "Emmanuel," in the Hebrew, be interpreted at all? Was it not to show that it has reference to us Gentiles and, therefore, it must be interpreted into one of the chief languages of the then existing Gentile world, namely, the Greek? This, "being interpreted," at Christ's birth and the three languages employed in the inscription upon the Cross at His death, show that He is not the Savior of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles.

Matthew 1:23

Behold, a virgin shall be with child,.... These words are rightly applied to the virgin Mary and her son Jesus, for of no other can they be understood; not of Ahaz's wife and his son Hezekiah, who was already born, and must be eleven or twelve years of age when these words were spoken; nor of any other son of Ahaz by her or any other person since no other was Lord of Judea; nor of the wife of Isaiah, and any son of his, who never had any that was king of Judah.

The whole record on this verse

Matthew 1:23

that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet: This is the first of Matthew's twelve fulfillment quotations, and it draws on Isaiah 7:14, spoken originally to King Ahaz as a sign within his own lifetime. The Hebrew almah names a young woman of marriageable age rather than certainly a virgin, while the Greek parthenos that Matthew follows does specify virgin; the bench holds a near fulfillment in Isaiah's own day and this final fulfillment in Christ together rather than trading one for the other. Emmanuel, God with us, is named once here and answered once more at the Gospel's very last words, I am with you alway, framing the whole book between the two.

5. (vv. 24-25)

Matthew 1:24

Being raised from sleep - Having fully awoke. Did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him - That is, he took Mary to wife. Probably this was done immediately, since he was now convinced of her innocence, and, by delay, he would not leave any ground of suspicion that he had not confidence in her.

Matthew 1:25

Knew her not - The doctrine of the virginity of Mary before the birth of Jesus is a doctrine of the Scriptures, and is very important to be believed. But the Bible does not affirm that she had no children afterward. Indeed, all the accounts in the New Testament lead us to suppose that she did have them. See the notes at Mat 13:55-56. The language here evidently implies that she lived as the wife of Joseph after the birth of Jesus.

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 1:25

And knew her not,.... Or "but he knew her not", και answering to the Hebrew ו that is, had carnal knowledge of her, or copulation with her, though his wife. The words are an euphemism, or a modest way of expressing the conjugal act, and is a very ancient one, see Gen 4:1 and what has been used in nations and languages.

The whole record on this verse

took unto him his wife: Joseph obeys at once, taking Mary as his wife and naming the child himself, a legal act that grafts Jesus into David's line through adoption rather than blood. Knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son has divided readers for centuries: most Protestant commentators take till and firstborn as ordinary language implying a normal marriage afterward, noting the brothers named at 13:55, while Catholic and Orthodox readers hold Mary's perpetual virginity and read both words as leaving that later question open rather than settled. The chapter that opened with a list of names closes on an act of naming, Joseph calling him JESUS exactly as he was told.

This page carries no textual note on Matthew 1. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →

Keep studying

Sources for this chapter

The summary

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.

The exposition

Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Gospels; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.