Romans 14:20
in Romans 14Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All food is clean, but it is wrong for a man to let his eating be a stumbling block.
BSB
The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾
ASV
Overthrow not for meat’s sake the work of God. All things indeed are clean; howbeit it is evil for that man who eateth with offence.
KJV
For meat destroy not the work of God. All things indeed are pure; but it is evil for that man who eateth with offence.
⋯
This verse in Romans 14
Commentary
18 notes on this verseFor meat destroy not the work of God - Do not hinder the progress of the Gospel either in your own souls or in those of others, by contending about lawful or unlawful meats. And do not destroy the soul of thy Christian brother, Rom 14:15, by offending him so as to induce him to apostatize. All things indeed are pure - This is a repetition of the sentiment delivered, Rom 14:14, in different words.
This site's exposition
what leads to peace and to mutual edification
on Romans 14:19-21
The work of God named in verse 20 is the brother himself, whom food is a poor reason to tear down. Paul calls all food clean and still gives up meat and wine where they would trip a brother.
This site's exposition
Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food
Theophylact names the work of God as a brother's salvation, and Ambrosiaster as the man himself, made once by creation and again by regeneration. Wesley reads it as what God builds in the soul by faith and in the church by concord. Oecumenius places that work at the cross.
The record, by era
The Church Fathers5 voices
"It is good, then, neither to eat flesh nor to drink wine," as both he and the Pythagoreans acknowledge. For this is rather characteristic of a beast; and the fumes arising from them being dense, darken the soul. If one partakes of them, he does not sin. Only let him partake temperately, not dependent on them, nor gaping after fine fare. For a voice will whisper to him, saying, "Destroy not the work of God for the sake of food."
For it is the mark of a silly mind to be amazed and stupefied at what is presented at vulgar banquets, after the rich fare which is in the Word; and much sillier to make one's eyes the slaves of the delicacies, so that one's greed is, so to speak, carried round by the servants.
God did his work on the cross, but now you are destroying it.
Man is the work of God by creation, and again by his renewal in regeneration, and food is God's work as well. But man was not made for food; food was made for man, which is very different!
A commentator
Origen of AlexandriaCOMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS · Written before 253.
proposed
All things indeed are clean, but it is evil for the man who eats through offense. What he said, All things indeed are clean, but it is evil for the man who eats through offense, is like what he said above, that nothing is common of itself, except that to him who reckons something to be common, to that man it is common. Therefore according to their own nature and the principle of creation, by which all things that exist were made by God, all things are clean; and there is nothing unclean, or what is called common.
10 more voices on this verse
The Church Fathers2 voices
But further: when writing to the Romans, the apostle now gives you a home-thrust, detractors as you are of this observance: "Do not for the sake of food," he says, "undo the work of God.
Giving this name to the salvation of a brother, and adding greatly to the fears, and showing that he is doing the opposite of that he desires. For thou, he says, art so far from building up as thou intendest, that thou dost even destroy, and that a building too not of man but of God, and not for any great end either, but for a trivial thing. For it was "for meat," he says. Then lest so many indulgences should confirm the weaker brother in his misconception, he again becomes doctrinal, as follows, "All things indeed are pure, but it is evil for that man who eateth with offence." Who does it, that is, with a bad conscience. And so if you should force him, and he should eat, there would be nothing gained. For it is not the eating that maketh unclean, but the intention with which a man eats. If then thou dost not set that aright, thou hast done all to no purpose, and hast made things worse: for thinking a thing unclean is not so bad as tasting it when one thinks it unclean. Here then you are committing two errors, one by increasing his prejudice through your quarrelsomeness, and another by getting him to taste of what is unclean. And so, as long as you do not persuade him, do not force him.
The Medieval Church2 voices
He calls the salvation of a brother the work of God. Therefore, do not destroy that which was acquired for him by God, and moreover for the sake of food, that is, by an unwillingness to abstain from pork, in order to gain benefit for …
Then when he says, destroy not the work of God for food, he presents the fourth argument, which is taken from our reverence for God's works, to which we owe this reverence in the sense that what God does we should not destroy for some …
The Puritans and the Awakening4 voices
The work of God - Which he builds in the soul by faith, and in the church by concord. It is evil to that man who eateth with offense - So as to offend another thereby.
You should work together with God, do not countermine his work. First, The work of grace and peace is the work of God; it is wrought by him, it is wrought for him; it is a good work of his beginning, Phil. i. Observe, The same for whom Christ died (
quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — unbalanced-parens
For meat destroy not the work of God,....
When we are ready to reproach and reflect upon the name and memory of those that are dead and gone, and to pass a censure upon them (which some the rather do, because such judgments of the dead are more likely to pass uncontrolled and uncontradicted), we must consider that Christ is Lord of the dead, as well as of the living.
The Nineteenth Century2 voices
A commentator
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown1802–1910
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)
All things indeed are pure--"clean"; the ritual distinctions being at an end. but it is evil to that man--there is criminality in the man who eateth with offence--that is, so as to stumble a weak brother.
A commentator
Albert Barnes1798–1870
Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869)
proposed
For meat - By your obstinate, pertinacious attachment to your own opinions about the distinctions of meat and drinks, do not pursue such a course as to lead a brother into sin, and ruin his soul. Here is a new argument presented why Christians should pursue a course of charity - that the opposite would tend to the ruin of the brother’s soul. Destroy not - The word here is what properly is applied to pulling down an edifice; and the apostle continues the figure which he used in the previous verse. Do not pull down or destroy the “temple” which God is rearing. The work of God - The work of God is what God does, and here especially refers to his work in rearing “his church.” The “Christian” is regarded specially as the work of God, as God renews his heart and makes him what he is. Hence, he is called God’s “building” 1Co 3:9, and his “workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works” Eph 2:10, and is denominated “a new creature;” 2Co 5:17. The meaning is, “Do not so conduct yourself, in regard to the distinction of meats into clean and unclean, as to cause your brother to sin, and to impair or ruin the work of religion which God is carrying on in his soul.” The expression does not refer to “man” as being the work of God, but to the “piety” of the Christian; to what God, by his Spirit, is producing in the heart of the believer. All things are indeed pure - Compare Rom 14:14. This is a concession to those whom he was exhorting to peace. All things under the Christian dispensation are lawful to be eaten. The distinctions of the Levitical law are not binding on Christians. But it is evil - Though pure in itself, yet it may become an occasion of sin, if another is grieved by it. […]
The words behind it
19 Greek wordsEvery Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.
| Greek | Sound | Meaning | Word study | In the Bible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| μὴ | me | Not | G3361 → | 1066 times |
| ἕνεκεν | heneken | for the sake of | G1752 → | |
| βρώματος | bromatos | food | G1033 → | 17 times |
| κατάλυε | katalue | do destroy | G2647 → | |
| τὸ | to | the | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| ἔργον | ergon | work | G2041 → | 168 times |
| τοῦ | tou | <the> | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| θεοῦ. | theou | of God. | G2316 → | 1312 times |
| πάντα | panta | All things | G3956 → | 1235 times |
| μὲν | men | indeed [are] | G3303 → | 176 times |
| καθαρὰ | kathara | clean | G2513 → | |
| ἀλλὰ | alla | but | G235 → | 635 times |
| κακὸν | kakon | [it is] evil | G2556 → | 50 times |
| τῷ | to | to the | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| ἀνθρώπῳ | anthropo | man | G444 → | 549 times |
| τῷ | to | <the> | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| διὰ | dia | through | G1223 → | 664 times |
| προσκόμματος | proskommatos | a stumbling block | G4348 → | 6 times |
| ἐσθίοντι· | esthionti | eating; | G2068 → | 65 times |
μὴNot
meG3361 →1066 times
ἕνεκενfor the sake of
henekenG1752 →
βρώματοςfood
bromatosG1033 →17 times
κατάλυεdo destroy
katalueG2647 →
τὸthe
toG3588 →19766 times
ἔργονwork
ergonG2041 →168 times
τοῦ<the>
touG3588 →19766 times
θεοῦ.of God.
theouG2316 →1312 times
πάνταAll things
pantaG3956 →1235 times
μὲνindeed [are]
menG3303 →176 times
καθαρὰclean
katharaG2513 →
ἀλλὰbut
allaG235 →635 times
κακὸν[it is] evil
kakonG2556 →50 times
τῷto the
toG3588 →19766 times
ἀνθρώπῳman
anthropoG444 →549 times
τῷ<the>
toG3588 →19766 times
διὰthrough
diaG1223 →664 times
προσκόμματοςa stumbling block
proskommatosG4348 →6 times
ἐσθίοντι·eating;
esthiontiG2068 →65 times
A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.
The walk
8 stopsEach card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.
Through
Titus 1:15To the pure, all things are pure; but to the defiled and unbelieving, nothing is pure. Indeed, both their minds and their consciences are defiled.
it leads to
- Romans 14:14
I am convinced and fully persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself. But if anyone regards something as unclean, then for him it is unclean.
Reached by 2 separate paths from here.
- Romans 14:14
Through
Matthew 18:6But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned…
it leads to
- Mark 9:42
But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be thrown…
- Luke 17:1–2
Jesus said to His disciples, “It is inevitable that stumbling blocks will come, but woe to the one through whom they come!
- Matthew 18:10
See that you do not look down on any of these little ones. For I tell you that their angels in heaven always see the face of My Father in heaven.
- 2 Thessalonians 1:6–9
After all, it is only right for God to repay with affliction those who afflict you,
- Matthew 18:14
In the same way, your Father in heaven is not willing that any of these little ones should perish.
- Mark 9:42
Through
Acts 10:15The voice spoke to him a second time: “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.”
it leads to
- 1 Corinthians 10:25
Eat anything sold in the meat market without raising questions of conscience,
- Matthew 15:11
A man is not defiled by what enters his mouth, but by what comes out of it.”
- 1 Corinthians 10:25
Where this verse is studied
About Romans

This page draws on 14 works. Open the list of works
This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Ambrosiaster, COMMENTARY ON PAUL'S EPISTLES; Clement of Alexandria, The Instructor Book 2; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Chrysostom, Homily on Romans 26; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Oecumenius, PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH; Origen of Alexandria, COMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS; Tertullian, On Fasting; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Romans and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Romans.
