Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Daniel 6:8

in Daniel 6

Therefore, O king, establish the decree and sign the document so that it cannot be changed—in accordance with the law of the Medes and Persians, which cannot be repealed.”

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV

ASV

Now, O king, establish the interdict, and sign the writing, that it be not changed, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not.

KJV

Now, O king, establish the decree, and sign the writing, that it be not changed, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not.

This verse in Daniel 6

Commentary

8 notes on this verse

A commentator

Jerome

St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER SIX · Written before 420.

Verse 8. "Now therefore, O king, confirm the measure and write the decree so that it may not be altered, according to the custom established by the Medes and Persians." It is perfectly evident, as we have remarked above, that there was only one kingdom of the Medes and Persians both, under the rule of Darius and Cyrus.

This site's exposition

King Darius, live for ever

on Daniel 6:6-9

The conspirators bring the king a decree engineered to look like flattery, thirty days of petitions to Darius alone, and press him to sign it according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not, a formula the bench sets directly beside the same unalterable law governing Esther's court. Barnes reads the appeal to the king's vanity, live for ever, as calculated to keep Darius from asking why such a decree is needed at all, and the trap closes the moment his signature is on the writing, since even a king who wished to reverse it now cannot. The chapter's real subject surfaces here before Daniel appears in the plot at all: a government whose law cannot bend also cannot pardon.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers2 voices

A commentator

Ephrem the Syrian

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 6:1-15 · Written before 373.

proposed

Darius, as he loved quietness and inactivity and found work and business unpleasing, left the care of the empire to his prefects, and for this reason the Scripture adds, he set over the kingdom satraps, that is, 120 governors. And over them he placed three …

A commentator

Hippolytus of Rome

Commentary on Daniel 3.20.3-5 · Written before 235.

proposed

Then, having made one decision, they came to the king and said, "Darius, O king, live forever! Your captains and satraps and chiefs and governors have deliberated to set up a royal statute over your kingdom and to confirm an edict, that whoever asks a petition from any God and man for thirty days except from you, O king, shall be cast into the den of the lions. And so now O king, set up the edict and set out a writing because the decree of the Persians and Medes shall not be changed." [Daniel 6:6-8] Then Darius, not perceiving the machination of theirs, purposed a decision, he commended a decree to be written and it to be put forth publicly. For also later Haman wishing to kill Mordecai and his race went to king Artaxerxes and deliberated the same, that by royal decree on the fourteenth of the twelfth month on that one day, all the Jews shall be killed. [Esther 3]

The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice

Now, O king, establish the decree, and sign the writing,....

The Nineteenth Century2 voices

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

According to the law of the Medes and Persians - I do not think that this is to be understood so as to imply that whatever laws or ordinances the Medes or Persians once enacted, they never changed them. This would argue extreme folly in legislators in any country. Nothing more appears to be meant than that the decree should be enacted, written, and registered, according to the legal forms among the Medes and Persians; and this one to be made absolute for thirty days.

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

proposed

decree--or, "interdict." that it be not changed-- (Es 1:19; This immutability of the king's commands was peculiar to the Medes and Persians: it was due to their regarding him infallible as the representative of Ormuzd; it was not so among the Babylonians.

quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — starts-lowercase+unbalanced-parens

1 more voice on this verse

The Nineteenth Century1 voice

Now, O king, establish the decree - Ordain, enact, confirm it. And sign the writing - An act necessary to make it the law of the realm. That it be not changed - That, having the sign-manual of the sovereign, it might be so confirmed that it could not be changed. With that sign it became so established, it seems, that even the sovereign himself could not change it. According to the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not - Margin, Passeth. Which does not pass away; which is not abrogated. A similar fact in regard to a law of the Medes and Persians is mentioned in Esther viii., in which the king was unable to recall an order which had been given for the massacre of the Jews, and in which he attempted only to counteract it as far as possible by putting the Jews on their guard, and allowing them to defend themselves. Diodorus Siculus (lib. iv.) refers to this custom where he says that Darius, the last king of Persia, would have pardoned Charidemus after he was condemned to death, but could not reverse what the law had passed against him. - Lowth. “When the king of Persia,” says Montesquieu (Spirit of Laws, as quoted by Rosenmuller, Morgenland, in loc.), “has condemned any one to death, no one dares speak to him to make intercession for him. Were he even drunk when the crime was committed, or were he insane, the command must nevertheless be executed, for the law cannot be countermanded, and the laws cannot contradict themselves. This sentiment prevails throughout Persia.” It may seem singular that such a custom prevailed, and that the king, who was the fountain of law, and whose will was law, could not change a statute at his pleasure. But this custom grew out of the opinions which prevailed in the East in regard to the monarch. […]

The words behind it

15 Hebrew words

Every Hebrew word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

  • כְּעַ֣ןnow

    keanH370513 times

  • מַלְכָּ֔אking O

    malka'H4430180 times

  • תְּקִ֥יםyou will establish

    tekimH696635 times

  • אֱסָרָ֖אprohibition the

    ʾesara'H6337 times

  • וְתִרְשֻׁ֣םso you may sign

    vetirshumH75607 times

  • כְּתָבָ֑אwriting the

    ketava'H379212 times

  • דִּ֣יwhich

    diH1768345 times

  • לָ֧אnot

    la'H380982 times

  • לְהַשְׁנָיָ֛הto change

    lehashnayahH813321 times

  • כְּדָת־according to [the] law of

    kedot-H188214 times

  • מָדַ֥י[the] Medes

    madaiH40765 times

  • וּפָרַ֖סand [the] Persians

    ufarasH65406 times

  • דִּי־which

    di-H1768345 times

  • לָ֥אnot

    la'H380982 times

  • תֶעְדֵּֽא׃it will pass away

    te'de'H57099 times

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Isaiah 10:1

    Woe to those who enact unjust statutes and issue oppressive decrees,

    it leads to

    • Psalms 94:20–21

      Can a corrupt throne be Your ally— one devising mischief by decree?

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • Luke 11:52

      Woe to you experts in the law! For you have taken away the key to knowledge. You yourselves have not entered, and you have hindered those who were entering.”

    • Micah 3:1–4

      Then I said: “Hear now, O leaders of Jacob, you rulers of the house of Israel. Should you not know justice?

    • Matthew 23:23

      Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You pay tithes of mint, dill, and cumin. But you have disregarded the weightier matters of the law: justice, mercy, and faithfulness. You should have practiced…

  • Through

    Esther 1:19

    So if it pleases the king, let him issue a royal decree, and let it be recorded in the laws of Persia and Media so that it cannot be repealed, that Vashti shall never…

    it leads to

    • Esther 8:8

      Now you may write in the king’s name as you please regarding the Jews, and seal it with the royal signet ring. For a decree that is written in the name of the king…

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • 1 Samuel 15:28

      So Samuel said to him, “The LORD has torn the kingdom of Israel from you today and has given it to your neighbor who is better than you.

  • Through

    Daniel 6:15

    Then the men approached the king together and said to him, “Remember, O king, that by the law of the Medes and Persians no decree or ordinance established by the king can be changed.”

    it leads to

    • Daniel 6:12

      So they approached the king and asked about his royal decree: “Did you not sign a decree that for thirty days any man who petitions any god or man except you, O king, will…

  • Through

    Daniel 6:12

    So they approached the king and asked about his royal decree: “Did you not sign a decree that for thirty days any man who petitions any god or man except you, O king, will…

    it leads to

    • Daniel 3:8–12

      At this time some astrologers came forward and maliciously accused the Jews,

Where this verse is studied

About Daniel

Daniel in the Lions' Den — Gustave Doré, Doré's English Bible (1866), public domain
Daniel in the Lions' Den — Gustave Doré, Doré's English Bible (1866), public domain
This page draws on 9 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes on the Book of Daniel; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Carl Friedrich Keil, Biblical Commentary on the Book of Daniel; Ephrem the Syrian, COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 6:1-15; Hippolytus of Rome, Commentary on Daniel 3.20.3-5; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jerome, St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER SIX and John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament (1748-1763).