Genesischapter 34
31 verses · Moses, by tradition · 15th to 13th century BC · The Law
Demand a high dowry and an expensive gift, and I will give you whatever you ask. Only give me the girl as my wife!”
Introduction
Moses, by tradition, The Law, Genesis Overview.
This is one of the hardest chapters in Genesis, and it was written for a nation about to live among the peoples of Canaan. Jacob's family is camped outside a walled town, and a wrong done to his daughter draws the whole household into violence. The chapter records what each party says and does, and it passes few verdicts in its own voice. Listen for who speaks and who stays silent, and for how the sign of the covenant is used. Hold the account beside Jacob's last words to his sons, where his own judgment on it is given. It asks to be read slowly.
Context
- Who
- Israel in the wilderness, being taught about marriage with the land's people and about vengeance
- What
- A narrative of the violation of Dinah at Shechem, the marriage proposal that follows, and the revenge Simeon and Levi take on the town.
- Where
- Shechem, a walled Canaanite town in the pass between Mount Ebal and Mount Gerizim, with Jacob camped on his field outside it.
- When
- The traditional dating places it in the 1900s BC, while Jacob was camped at Shechem, and Genesis gives no year.
- Why
- To warn Israel against merging with the peoples of the land and against using God's covenant as a tool of revenge.
Historical context
The chapter belongs to Dinah, Leah's daughter, and to the two full brothers who act for her, and she does not speak in it.
Show the rest of the historical context, 5 more paragraphs
The place is Shechem, a walled town in the pass between Ebal and Gerizim, with Jacob camped on ground he had bought outside it.
The occasion is an outrage followed by a marriage proposal, and the talks are held at the city gate, where a town's public business was done.
A first hearer heard the proposal for what it was. Hamor offers intermarriage, land to settle in, free movement and property, which for a small clan of newcomers meant absorption into the city and the end of a separate people.
He also knew the law behind the bride price. A man who violated an unbetrothed girl was expected under the region's law to pay and to marry her, so Shechem's open offer of any price he names looks generous to him, and verse 7 calls what he did an outrage in Israel, the Hebrew nebalah, standing here for the first time in Scripture.
The last thing he understood was the timing. A whole town of grown men circumcised at once would be helpless for days, and Simeon and Levi strike on the third day. Jacob's objection afterwards is practical, that the Canaanites and Perizzites outnumber him and his household will be destroyed, because he is a small clan living on tolerance in a country of walled towns.
Significance
Israel heard the first case of what happens when the covenant family begins trading marriages with the people of the land, and the result is a daughter violated, a town killed and the sign of the covenant used as the cover.
Show the rest of the significance, 2 more paragraphs
The revenge is recorded and never approved. Jacob still holds it against Simeon and Levi on his deathbed at Genesis 49:5 to 7 and scatters them in Israel for it.
The last word of the chapter is the brothers' question about their sister, and Genesis records no answer to it from their father.
This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.
How it is read
This is the thinnest chapter of the half for quotable classical commentary and one of the fullest for citation. Rashi comments at fourteen places and Malbim at three and Ibn Ezra at three, and the corpus holds no English of any of those twenty under a licence permitting quotation, so the whole of that commentary stands here as citation: Rashi on Genesis 34:1:1, 34:2:1, 34:3:1, 34:7:1, 34:8:1, 34:12:1, 34:13:1, 34:14:1, 34:15:1, 34:16:1, 34:21:1, 34:22:1, 34:23:1 and 34:25:1, Malbim on Genesis 34:4:1, 34:11:1 and 34:24:1, Ibn Ezra on Genesis 34:5:1, 34:17:1 and 34:19:1. Four short comments carry English. Sforno reads Hamor's coming out to Jacob as fear rather than courtesy, "when he noticed that Yaakov's reaction had been silence he began to worry about reprisals" (Sforno on Genesis 34:6:1, translated by Eliyahu Munk, HaChut Hameshulash, CC-BY). Radak glosses the proposal of intermarriage as the ordinary word for with us, and the offer of the land as an offer to trade in it (Radak on Genesis 34:9:1 and 34:10:1, Munk translation, CC-BY). His note on the twentieth verse is the one that shows the reader a piece of the ancient world: the gate of the city "is where they would hold an assembly of the elders of the town together with the other influential citizens as was the custom pertaining to all matters of common concern", and he points to Deuteronomy for the same practice (Radak on Genesis 34:20:1).
What the rabbis say
The corpus records forty rabbinic locators on this chapter, thirty-seven of them Midrash and three Talmud, every one a locator without text. The rabbis take up the chapter from its first word: Bereshit Rabbah 18:2 and Avot DeRabbi Natan, Recension B 3:8 at Dinah's going out, then 80:6, 80:7, 80:8 and 80:11 through the negotiation and its end, with 19:12 and 97:6 drawn in from elsewhere in the midrash. Midrash Lekach Tov is the densest single work here, cited thirteen times, at Genesis 34:4:1, 34:5:1, 34:8:1, 34:9:1, 34:11:1, 34:16:1, 34:17:1, 34:18:1, 34:20:1, 34:22:1, 34:23:1 and 34:31:1 and at Exodus 8:3:1. Bereshit Rabbati is cited at Parashat Vayishlach 18, 20, 21, 54 and 55 and at Parashat Lech Lecha 35, Midrash Sekhel Tov at Bereshit 34:24:1, 34:28:1 and 34:29:1, Midrash Aggadah at Genesis 34:5:1 and 34:8:1, and Kohelet Rabbah at 1:16:1. Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 47:5 and Sefer HaYashar, Book of Genesis, Vayishlach 6 are each cited once, and the three Talmud locators are Avot DeRabbi Natan, Recension B 3:8, Bava Batra 15b:7 and Avot DeRabbi Natan 37:4.
Sources: Sforno, Sforno on Genesis 34:6:1, translated by Eliyahu Munk, HaChut Hameshulash, CC-BY; Radak, Radak on Genesis 34:9:1, 34:10:1 and 34:20:1, translated by Eliyahu Munk, HaChut Hameshulash, CC-BY; Rashi, Rashi on Genesis 34:1:1, 34:2:1, 34:3:1, 34:7:1, 34:8:1, 34:12:1, 34:13:1, 34:14:1, 34:15:1, 34:16:1, 34:21:1, 34:22:1, 34:23:1 and 34:25:1, cited only, no English version in the corpus under a licence permitting quotation; Malbim, Malbim on Genesis 34:4:1, 34:11:1 and 34:24:1, cited only; Ibn Ezra, Ibn Ezra on Genesis 34:5:1, 34:17:1 and 34:19:1, cited only; Midrash, Bereshit Rabbah 18:2, 19:12, 80:6, 80:7, 80:8, 80:11 and 97:6; Midrash Lekach Tov, Genesis 34:4:1, 34:5:1, 34:8:1, 34:9:1, 34:11:1, 34:16:1, 34:17:1, 34:18:1, 34:20:1, 34:22:1, 34:23:1 and 34:31:1 and Exodus 8:3:1; Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Vayishlach 18, 20, 21, 54 and 55 and Parashat Lech Lecha 35; Midrash Sekhel Tov, Bereshit 34:24:1, 34:28:1 and 34:29:1; Midrash Aggadah, Genesis 34:5:1 and 34:8:1; Kohelet Rabbah 1:16:1; Aggadat Bereshit 79:4 and 83:1; Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 47:5; Sefer HaYashar (midrash), Book of Genesis, Vayishlach 6; Ein Yaakov, Nazir 4:2; Babylonian Talmud, Bava Batra 15b:7; Avot DeRabbi Natan, Avot DeRabbi Natan 37:4; Avot DeRabbi Natan, Recension B 3:8.
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
Dinah Defiled at Shechem
Genesis 34:1-2
went out to visit the daughters of the land: Verse 1 names Dinah as Leah's daughter, borne to Jacob. The two brothers who act for her in verse 25 are Leah's sons. Shechem is Hamor's son, and Hamor the Hivite is prince of the region. He saw her and took her, and he lay with her by force.
Genesis 34:1
“And Dinah - went out to see the daughters of the land - It is supposed that Jacob had been now about seven or eight years in the land, and that Dinah, who was about seven years of age when Jacob came to Canaan, was now about fourteen or fifteen. Why or on what occasion she went out we know not, but the reason given by Josephus is very probable, viz., that it was on one of their festivals.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
3 more voices on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.
Genesis 34:1
“Note, It is a very good thing for children to love home; it is parents' wisdom to make it easy to them, and children's duty then to be easy in it. Her pretence was to see the daughters of the land, to see how they dressed, and how they danced, and what was fashionable among them.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Genesis 34:1
“But let us examine everything in order. Dinah is ravished, because, having left her father's house, she wandered about more freely than was proper. She ought to have remained quietly at home, as both the Apostle teaches and nature itself dictates; for to girls the virtue is suitable, which the proverb applies to women, that they should be (oikouroi,) or keepers of the house.”
John Calvin · Commentaries (1554)reformed
Genesis 34:1
“According to JOSEPHUS, she had been attending a festival; but it is highly probable that she had been often and freely mixing in the society of the place and that she, being a simple, inexperienced, and vain young woman, had been flattered by the attentions of the ruler's son.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
he took her and lay with her by force: Shechem saw her and took her, the pair of verbs used of the sons of God at Genesis 6:2. By force renders the Hebrew anah, to humble or afflict, the verb used of Amnon at 2 Samuel 13:14. The Hivites return at Joshua 9:7 as the people of Gibeon.
Genesis 34:2
“Prince of the country - i.e., Hamor was prince; Shechem was the son of the prince or chief. Our version appears to represent Shechem as prince, but his father was the chief of the country. See Gen 34:6, Gen 34:8, etc.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Genesis 34:3-4
his soul was drawn to Dinah: What follows the force is affection, and the chapter sets the two side by side. Clarke reads spoke to her tenderly as speaking to her heart, an attempt to reconcile her to what was done, and he takes verses 2 and 3 as evidence she was held in Shechem's house. Shechem asks his father for her as a wife. Dinah never speaks in this chapter, and the text is silent on what she wanted.
Genesis 34:3
“Spake kindly unto the damsel - Literally, he spake to the heart of the damsel - endeavored to gain her affections, and to reconcile her to her disgrace. It appears sufficiently evident from this and the preceding verse that there had been no consent on the part of Dinah, that the whole was an act of violence, and that she was now detained by force in the house of Shechem. Here she was found when Simeon and Levi sacked the city, Gen 34:26.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Marriages were arranged between fathers, so Shechem sends Hamor to ask for her. Samson makes the same demand of his parents at Judges 14:2 over a Philistine woman. The word for girl here is yaldah, a young girl.
Genesis 34:4
“And Shechem spake unto his father Hamor,.... And told him the whole affair, at least what a strong affection he had for Dinah: saying, get me this damsel to wife; by which he meant not only that he would give his consent that he might marry her, but that he would get her parents' consent unto it, and settle the matter with them; by which it appears how early, and that even among Heathen nations, consent of parents on both sides was judged necessary to marriage.”
Genesis 34:5-7
he remained silent about it until they returned: Jacob heard it and remained silent until his sons returned from the field. Verse 7 calls what Shechem did an outrage in Israel, the Hebrew nebalah, a word for an act that breaks a people's own law. This is the first time the word stands in Scripture. Tamar puts it to Amnon in nearly the same words at 2 Samuel 13:12, over another violated sister.
Genesis 34:5
“Jacob held his peace--Jacob, as a father and a good man, must have been deeply distressed. In the case of a family by different wives, it is not the father, but the full brothers, on whom the protection of the daughters devolves--they are the guardians of a sister's welfare and the avengers of her wrongs.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Hamor came to speak with Jacob: Hamor comes out to Jacob as one father to another. The sons return from the field in verse 7, so the talks of verse 8 are held with them as well. At Judges 9:28 Gaal still calls Shechem to serve the men of Hamor.
Genesis 34:6
“Hamor--that is, "ass"; and it is a striking proof of the very different ideas which, in the East, are associated with that animal, which there appears sprightly, well proportioned, and of great activity.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
committed an outrage in Israel: In Israel names Jacob's household by the name given at Genesis 32:28, before any nation bore it. A thing that should not be done is Abimelech's charge against Abraham at Genesis 20:9. The household is already Israel.
Genesis 34:7
“He had wrought folly in Israel - The land, afterwards generally called Israel, was not as yet so named; and the sons of Jacob were neither called Israel, Israelites nor Jews, till long after this. How then can it be said that Shechem had wrought folly in Israel? The words are capable of a more literal translation: בישראל beyisrael, may be translated, against Israel. The angel had said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob - not only Jacob, but Israel.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Genesis 34:7
“Uncleanness is folly; for it sacrifices the favour of God, peace of conscience, and all the soul can pretend to that is sacred and honourable, to a base and brutish lust. This folly is most shameful in Israel, in a family of Israel, where God is known and worshipped, as he was in Jacob's tents, by the name of the God of Israel.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
A Marriage Bargained with Circumcision
Genesis 34:8-10
Hamor asks for the girl and then widens it to marriage between the two peoples, land to settle in, free movement and property. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown mark what the offer leaves out, that no regret is spoken and Dinah is not sent home. The talks open with a proposal and no apology.
Genesis 34:8
“They betray no jealousy of the powerful shepherds; on the contrary, they show every desire to establish friendly intercourse. But their conduct was unjustifiable in neither expressing regret nor restoring Dinah to her family; and this great error was the true cause of the negotiations ending in so unhappy a manner.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Intermarry with us: Deuteronomy 7:3 forbids this very exchange with the peoples of Canaan, daughters given and daughters taken. Isaac had sent Jacob away at Genesis 28:1 to keep him from a Canaanite wife. The Hebrew verb is chatan, to become a son-in-law.
Move about freely renders sachar, to travel as a trader, the root behind the Midianite traders who carry Joseph off at Genesis 37:28. Hamor offers as a favor the land God had already promised Jacob at Genesis 28:13. Israel acquires property with the same verb in Goshen at Genesis 47:27.
Genesis 34:11-12
Shechem speaks for himself and offers to pay whatever they name, a high dowry and an expensive gift. Money is his answer to what he has done. His own city will be answered in that currency at verse 28, when its flocks and herds and donkeys are carried off. The chapter records no word from Dinah while the terms are set.
Demand a high dowry and an expensive gift: The dowry is the Hebrew mohar, the bride-price paid to the bride's family, and the gift is mattan, a present besides. Exodus 22:16 to 17 later lays this payment on a man who seduces a virgin. Jacob paid his own in years of labor.
Genesis 34:12
“Ask me never so much dowry - See Clarke on Gen 29:20 (note), etc. See the law relative to this, Exo 22:16, Exo 22:17.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Genesis 34:13-14
Jacob’s sons answered him and his father Hamor deceitfully: Jacob's sons answered deceitfully, and the verse says so before the speech begins. The Hebrew is mirmah, the same word Isaac used of Jacob at Genesis 27:35, and the root Jacob threw at Laban at Genesis 29:25 for the switch of Leah for Rachel. The sons answer in their father's own vocabulary. Their ground is stated in verse 14, a disgrace in giving their sister to an uncircumcised man.
Genesis 34:13
“Answered - deceitfully - Which nothing could excuse; yet, to show that they had had much provocation, it is immediately subjoined וידברו vaidabberu, they spoke thus because he had defiled Dinah their sister; for so this parenthesis should be read.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Genesis 34:13
“Nothing is said of their teaching the people to worship the true God, but only of their insisting on their being circumcised; and it is evident that they did not seek to convert Shechem, but only made a show of religion--a cloak to cover their diabolical design.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
an uncircumcised man would be a disgrace: Disgrace is the Hebrew cherpah, reproach, the word Rachel used of her barrenness at Genesis 30:23. At Joshua 5:9 the LORD rolls away the reproach of Egypt on the day Israel is circumcised at Gilgal. Goliath is called uncircumcised in contempt at 1 Samuel 17:26.
Genesis 34:14
“That were a reproach unto us - Because the uncircumcised were not in the covenant of God; and to have given an heiress of the promise to one who had no kind of right to its spiritual blessings, from whom might spring children who would naturally walk in the way of their father would have been absurd, reproachful and wicked.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Genesis 34:15-17
The condition they set is that every male be circumcised, the sign of the covenant given to Abraham at Genesis 17:10. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown observe that nothing in the terms brings these men to the God of Jacob. One people is what verse 16 offers, and Hamor repeats it at the gate in verse 22. The daughters go both ways in the bargain.
Genesis 34:15
“Religion is never more injured, nor are God's sacraments more profaned, than when they are thus used for a cloak of maliciousness. Nay, if Jacob's sons had not had this bloody design, I do not see how they could justify their offering the sacred sign of circumcision, the seal of God's covenant, to these devoted Canaanites, who had no part nor lot in the matter.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
become one people: One people is am echad in Hebrew, the phrase the LORD spoke over the builders of Babel at Genesis 11:6. Esau had taken wives from the daughters of the land at Genesis 26:34, and they grieved his father Isaac. Jacob's sons offer the same road as bait.
The Hebrew has bittenu, daughter, where the Berean gives sister, so the brothers speak as heads of the family. Jacob, her father, says nothing through the whole exchange.
Genesis 34:17
“But if ye will not hearken to us to be circumcised,.... Will not agree to this condition, circumcision: then will we take our daughter; by force, as the Targum of Jonathan adds: and we will be gone: depart from this part of the country, and go elsewhere.”
Genesis 34:18-19
Their offer seemed good to Hamor: The terms seem good to both men, and Shechem does not hesitate to fulfill the request. Verse 19 calls him the most respected in his father's household, which stands beside what he did in verse 2. Genesis states both and leaves the strain standing.
Genesis 34:18
“And their words pleased Hamor, and Shechem Hamor's son. The condition proposed was acceptable to them both, and they agreed to comply with it; Hamor, because of the great love he had for his son; Shechem, because of the great love he had for Dinah.”
1 more voice on this verse
Genesis 34:18
“To this perhaps they were moved not only by the strong desire they had to bring about, this match, but by what they might have heard of the sacred and honourable intentions of this sign, in the family of Abraham, which it is probable they had some confused notions of, and of the promises confirmed by it; which made them the more desirous to incorporate with the family of Jacob.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
who was the most respected: Most respected renders nikbad, from kabed, to be heavy, the root of kavod, glory. A man of that weight carries the men at the gate in verse 24. Delighted is chaphets, a word for strong desire.
Genesis 34:20-23
went to the gate of their city: The gate is where a city's public business was done, and the speech made there never mentions Dinah. Hamor and Shechem sell the plan on profit, that the livestock and possessions and animals of these men will become the city's. Wesley reads it as a good return promised to neighbors. The word used of Jacob's household, at peace with us, stands on the root Jerome traced at Salem in Genesis 33:18.
Genesis 34:20
“Hamor and Shechem . . . came unto the gate of their city--That was the place where every public communication was made; and in the ready obsequious submission of the people to this measure we see an evidence either of the extraordinary affection for the governing family, or of the abject despotism of the East, where the will of a chief is an absolute command.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
it is large enough for them: Large enough renders a Hebrew idiom, wide on both hands, for a land with room for livestock and trade. The same words describe the land of Laish at Judges 18:10. Simeon's clans find such pasture at 1 Chronicles 4:40.
only on this condition will the men agree: The verb for agree is the rare Hebrew ut, to consent, found in verses 15, 22 and 23 and elsewhere only at 2 Kings 12:8. Hamor gives the brothers' condition to the city almost word for word. At the gate the covenant sign becomes a term of trade.
Genesis 34:22
“Only herein will the men consent unto us,.... The only term or condition insisted upon, to come into an alliance and affinity with us, and for to dwell with us, to be one people, to become one body politic, is the following one: if every male among us be circumcised, as they are circumcised; submitting to this rite, they agree to take up their residence with us, and be incorporated among us, and become one people.”
their livestock, their possessions, and all their animals: To Jacob at verse 10 Hamor promised that the family could acquire property in the land. To the city he promises that the same property will become theirs. Each hearer is told what he wants.
Genesis 34:23
“Shall not their cattle and their substance be ours? - They observed that Jacob's sons were industrious, thriving people, and promised themselves and their neighbours advantage by an alliance with them: it would improve ground and trade, and bring money into their country.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Genesis 34:24-25
every male of the city was circumcised: A whole city takes the covenant sign on the word of its chief, which Clarke reads as either strong attachment to the ruling house or the obedience an eastern prince could expect. Three days later, while the men were still in pain, Simeon and Levi took their swords and killed every male. At Genesis 49:5 to 7 Jacob curses their anger and says he will scatter them in Israel.
Genesis 34:24
“Every male was circumcised - These simple people must have had very great affection for their chief and his son, or have been under the influence of the most passive obedience, to have come so readily into this measure, and to have submitted to this rite. But the petty princes in Asiatic countries have ever been absolute and despotic, their subjects paying them the most prompt and blind obedience.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Simeon and Levi Take the Sword
went into the unsuspecting city: Unsuspecting renders the Hebrew betach, in security, and the city lay open to them in its trust. Judges 18:27 uses the same root of Laish, struck by the Danites while it lived secure. Two brothers strike a whole city.
Genesis 34:25
“On the third day, when they were sore - When the inflammation was at the height, and a fever ensued which rendered the person utterly helpless, and his state critical, Simeon and Levi, the half brothers of Dinah, took each man his sword, probably assisted by that portion of the servants which helped them to take care of the flock, came on the city boldly, בטח betach, securely - without being suspected, and being in no danger of meeting with resistance, and slew all the males.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Genesis 34:26-29
took Dinah out of Shechem’s house: Dinah has to be taken out of Shechem's house, which tells the reader where she had been since verse 2. Jacob's other sons then loot the city, and Gill marks the turn in it, that men who accepted circumcision to gain Jacob's livestock lost their own. The flocks and herds and donkeys go, and so does everything in the houses. The women and children are carried off.
Genesis 34:26
“And they slew Hamor and Shechem his son with the edge of the sword,.... Whom they had been just treating with in a seeming friendly manner: Shechem was the chief aggressor, and his crime was very heinous; but considering that he did all he could, after the fact was committed, to make recompence for the injury done, he deserved other treatment, at least mercy should have been shown him.”
came upon the slaughter and looted the city: The Hebrew gives defiled a plural subject, the townsmen, and the brothers lay the deed on the whole city. Defiled is tame, the word of ritual uncleanness in Leviticus. It stands in verses 5, 13 and 27.
Genesis 34:27
“The sons of Jacob - The rest of Jacob’s sons, the remaining brothers of Simeon and Levi, spoiled the city. Though the others could slay the defenceless males, it was not likely that they could have carried away all the booty, with the women, children, and cattle; it is therefore most natural to suppose that the rest of the sons of Jacob assisted at last in the business.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
They took their flocks and herds and donkeys: The word for donkeys is chamor, the name of the prince whose city is being stripped. The same animals are listed at Genesis 12:16, when Sarai is taken into Pharaoh's house. Here they are taken by the sword.
Genesis 34:28
“They took their sheep, their oxen, and their asses,.... The Shechemites hoped to have the cattle and substance of Jacob's family, and in a hypocritical manner submitted to circumcision, for the sake of worldly advantage; for that, and pleasing their prince, seem to be the only views they had in it; wherefore, in this there is a just retaliation of them in Providence: and that which was in the city, and that which was in the field; the cattle that were kept at home, and those that were brought up in the field, all became a prey.”
They carried off all their possessions: Children is taph, the little ones of a household. The women and children of Shechem now live inside Jacob's camp, with the goods of their houses. At Genesis 35:2 Jacob orders his household and all who were with him to get rid of their foreign gods.
Jacob speaks at last, and he names the danger to himself: they have made him a stench to the people of this land, and his household will be destroyed if the land unites against him. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown read the argument as the one likely to reach sons in this state. Henry takes it as a father seeing the ruin his children cannot.
Genesis 34:30
Those who are brothers according to faith to the injured one, if they are in the priestly order, like Levi, are among the subjects (Simon, in fact, is interpreted as "obedience"). They are extremely displeased if somebody who is their intimate friend according to faith is offended. However, they should not proceed to demand blood, nor should they expect extremely severe punishments for the corruptors, so as not to listen to Christ, who said to them, "You have made me hateful, so that I am now evil in the eyes of all the inhabitants of the land."
Cyril of Alexandria · written before 444 · GLAPHYRA ON GENESIS, 5.4-5patristic
3 more voices on this verse
Genesis 34:30
“Ye have troubled me - Brought my mind into great distress, and endangered my personal safety; to make me to stink - to render me odious to the surrounding tribes, so that there is every reason to suspect that when this deed is come abroad they will join in a confederacy against me, and extirpate my whole family. And had he not been under the peculiar protection of God, this in all human probability would have been the case; but he had prevailed with God, and he was also to prevail with men.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Genesis 34:30
“Jacob knew indeed that God had promised to preserve and perpetuate his house; but he might justly fear that these vile practices of his children would amount to a forfeiture, and cut off the entail. Note, When sin is in the house, there is reason to fear ruin at the door. The tender parents foresee those bad consequences of sin which the wicked children have no dread of.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Genesis 34:30
“We may wonder that, in speaking of it to his sons, he did not represent it as a heinous sin, an atrocious violation of the laws of God and man, but dwelt solely on the present consequences. It was probably because that was the only view likely to rouse the cold-blooded apathy, the hardened consciences of those ruffian sons.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Simeon and Levi have the last word of the chapter, and no answer from Jacob their father is recorded. Clarke notes that the word they use for prostitute stands here for the first time in Scripture. It comes next over Judah at Genesis 38:15, where he takes his own daughter-in-law for one. Their question about their sister is left standing.
Genesis 34:31
“Should he deal with our sister as with a harlot? - On this outrage alone they vindicated their flagitious conduct. The word harlot first occurs here: the original is not פילגש pilegesh, which we render concubine, (see its explanation Gen 22:24 (note)), but זונה zonah, which ordinarily signifies one who prostitutes herself to any person for hire. Our word harlot is said to have been derived from a very odd circumstance: Robert, duke of Normandy, seeing a fine-looking country girl dancing with her companions on the green, took her to his bed.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
How this psalm is built
The form: A narrative of outrage and reprisal, told through negotiations at which the injured party never speaks, as Jamieson, Fausset & Brown classes it.
The patterns in this chapter
| Device | What it does | Where to see it |
|---|---|---|
| Deceitfully, announced before the speech begins | Verse 13 says Jacob's sons answered deceitfully and then gives their words, so the reader hears the offer knowing what it is. The Hebrew is mirmah, the word Isaac used of Jacob at Genesis 27:35 and the root Jacob threw at Laban at Genesis 29:25. The family word for deception is used on the family's behalf here.Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on Genesis 34:13 and 14. | Genesis 34:13 |
| The covenant sign turned into a condition of trade | The brothers set circumcision as the terms, which is the sign given to Abraham at Genesis 17:10, and Hamor repeats the terms at the city gate as a business proposal. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown observe that nothing in the terms brings these men to the God of Jacob.Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, 1871, on Genesis 34:15 to 17. | Genesis 34:15, Genesis 34:22, Genesis 34:24 |
| Everything spoken about her, nothing spoken by her | Dinah is named in the first verse and taken out of Shechem's house in verse 26, and she says nothing in between. Her father is silent until verse 30 and then speaks about himself. Her brothers speak last and ask a question nobody answers.Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on Genesis 34:3 and 4. | Genesis 34:1, Genesis 34:26, Genesis 34:31 |
| The profit promised and the profit lost | Hamor and Shechem sell the plan at the gate by telling their city that the livestock and possessions of these men will become theirs. Four verses later the city's own flocks, herds and donkeys are carried off. John Gill marks the turn, that men who took the sign to gain Jacob's livestock lost their own.John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament, 1748 to 1763, on Genesis 34:26 to 29. | Genesis 34:23, Genesis 34:28, Genesis 34:29 |
The historical value
11 more paragraphs on the patterns
The chapter records the city gate as the place a town's public business was done, and gives a speech made there in full. It records a bride price and a gift as the ordinary terms of a marriage, and shows a ruling house able to persuade a whole city to accept a religious sign on its word. Adam Clarke reads that agreement as the attachment owed to the ruling house, or the obedience an eastern prince could expect.
Verse 7 carries the Hebrew word nebalah, an outrage in Israel, standing for the first time in Scripture. Tamar puts the same word to Amnon at 2 Samuel 13:12, over another violated sister.
Adam Clarke notes that the word the brothers use for a prostitute at verse 31 also stands here for the first time, and comes next over Judah at Genesis 38:15.
The debated concept
How to judge Simeon and Levi is the chapter's debate, and Genesis withholds its own verdict until Genesis 49. One position holds that the killing was a crime out of all proportion, since a whole city died for one man's act, and it points to Jacob's curse on their anger at Genesis 49:5 to 7 as Scripture's own ruling. A second holds that the brothers' closing question stands unanswered because it cannot be answered, and that Jacob's silence from verse 5 to verse 30 and his concern for his own standing when he does speak are the chapter's criticism of the father rather than of the sons. Matthew Henry reads verse 30 as a father seeing a ruin his children could not. The text gives both the deceit at verse 13 and the question at verse 31 without resolving them, and Genesis 49:7 curses the anger rather than the cause.
The second question is what Genesis means by Shechem's affection at verse 3. The force comes first and the tenderness after, Adam Clarke reads the phrase as speaking to her heart, and the chapter never says what Dinah wanted.
Where the chapter reaches
The reach of Genesis 34 runs inside the Old Testament. Jacob's word on Simeon and Levi at Genesis 49:5 to 7 disperses them in Israel, and Levi's portion afterwards is the priesthood rather than a territory.
The word for an outrage in Israel carries forward to 2 Samuel 13:12, where Tamar uses it of Amnon.
The divine connection
God is not named as acting anywhere in this chapter, and that silence is itself the chapter's most striking feature in a book where God speaks in almost every other one. The covenant sign appears in it, used as a weapon. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown mark that nothing in the terms brings the men of the city to the God of Jacob. At the Evidence Standard the claim is that Genesis reports the whole affair without approval from any side, and that the first word God speaks after it is the command at Genesis 35:1 to go up to Bethel and build the altar.
Keep studying
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The form and classifications
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on Genesis 34:13 and 14; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown and John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament, 1765, on Genesis 34:20 to 23.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jerome, Hebrew Questions on Genesis; John Calvin, Commentary on Genesis; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.
