Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.

2 Kingschapter 3

27 verses · BSB2 Kings book hub →

2 Kings 3:1-3

Jehoram is measured against both parents in one sentence: evil, but not like Ahab and Jezebel, since he puts away the image of Baal his father made. The reform stops short. He still cleaves to the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, the golden calves at Bethel and Dan, and the narrator uses the same refrain that opened at Jeroboam himself in 1 Ki 12:28 and will close the northern kingdom's story at 2 Ki 17:21-22. Every northern king in these books is weighed on that one scale, and a partial reform still fails it.

The wording quoted in this note is the King James Version.

2 Kings 3:1, 2 voicesWhat preachers and commentators have said about these verses, in their own words.

2 Kings 3:1

Now Jehoram the son of Ahab began to reign over Israel in Samaria the eighteenth year of Jehoshaphat king of Judah,.... So that the two years of the reign of his brother Ahaziah were not complete, only part of the seventeenth and part of the eighteenth of Jehoshaphat, since he began to reign in his seventeenth year, at the beginning of that, and died towards the close of the eighteenth, when Jehoram succeeded him, see 1Ki 22:51, and reigned twelve years.

2 Kings 3:1

In the eighteenth year of Jehoshaphat - This date agrees exactly with the statements that Jehoshaphat began to reign in the fourth year of Ahab 1Ki 22:41, and Ahaziah in the 17th year of Jehoshaphat 1Ki 22:51.

2 Kings 3:2, 1 voice

2 Kings 3:2

On the “evil” done by Ahab, see especially 1Ki 16:30-34. Jehoram, warned by the fate of his brother (2Ki 1:4 note), began his reign by a formal abolition of the Phoenician state religion introduced by Ahab - even if he connived at its continuance among the people 2Ki 10:26-27; and by a re-establishment of the old worship of the kingdom as arranged by Jeroboam.

2 Kings 3:3, 1 voice

2 Kings 3:3

He departed not therefrom, because that was the state engine by which the division between the two tribes was supported. Those do not truly, nor acceptably, repent or reform, who only part with the sins that they lose by, but continue their affection to the sins that they get by.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

B.Bring me a minstrel: make this valley full of trenchesvv. 9-19

So the king of Israel, the king of Judah, and the king of Edom set out, and after they had traveled a roundabout route for seven days, they had no water for their army or for their animals. “Alas,” said the king of Israel, “for the LORD has summoned these three kings to deliver them into the hand of Moab!” But Jehoshaphat asked, “Is there no prophet of the LORD here? Let us inquire of the LORD through him.” And one of the servants of the king of Israel answered, “Elisha son of Shaphat is here. He used to pour water on the hands of Elijah.” Jehoshaphat affirmed, “The word of the LORD is with him.” So the king of Israel and Jehoshaphat and the king of Edom went down to him. Elisha, however, said to the king of Israel, “What have we to do with each other? Go to the prophets of your father and of your mother!” “No,” replied the king of Israel, “for it is the LORD who has summoned these three kings to deliver them into the hand of Moab.” Then Elisha said, “As surely as the LORD of Hosts lives, before whom I stand, were it not for my regard for the presence of Jehoshaphat king of Judah, I would not look at you or acknowledge you. But now, bring me a harpist.” And while the harpist played, the hand of the LORD came upon Elisha and he said, “This is what the LORD says: ‘Dig this valley full of ditches.’ For the LORD says, ‘You will not see wind or rain, but the valley will be filled with water, and you will drink—you and your cattle and your animals.’ This is a simple matter in the sight of the LORD, and He will also deliver the Moabites into your hand. And you shall attack every fortified city and every city of importance. You shall cut down every good tree, stop up every spring, and ruin every good field with stones.”

C.Water red as blood, and a king's son on the wallvv. 20-27

The next morning, at the time of the morning sacrifice, water suddenly flowed from the direction of Edom and filled the land. Now all the Moabites had heard that the kings had come up to fight against them. So all who could bear arms, young and old, were summoned and stationed at the border. When they got up early in the morning, the sun was shining on the water, and it looked as red as blood to the Moabites across the way. “This is blood!” they exclaimed. “The kings have clashed swords and slaughtered one another. Now to the plunder, Moab!” But when the Moabites came to the camp of Israel, the Israelites rose up and attacked them, and they fled before them. So the Israelites invaded their land and struck down the Moabites. They destroyed the cities, and each man threw stones on every good field until it was covered. They stopped up every spring and cut down every good tree. Only Kir-haraseth was left with stones in place, but men with slings surrounded it and attacked it as well. When the king of Moab saw that the battle was too fierce for him, he took with him seven hundred swordsmen to break through to the king of Edom, but they could not prevail. So he took his firstborn son, who was to succeed him, and offered him as a burnt offering on the city wall. And there was great fury against the Israelites, so they withdrew and returned to their own land.

2 Kings 3:4-5

The tribute of lambs, rams and wool describes a pastoral kingdom paying in the coin it had, and Moab's rebellion follows Ahab's death the way vassal states test a new reign. The Moabite Stone, Mesha's own inscription found at Dibon in 1868, tells this same history from the other side: it names Omri by name as the king who afflicted Moab and boasts of Chemosh's deliverance in Mesha's own words. The traditional reading of the biblical account leads; the stele is independent evidence that the rebellion and its Israelite rulers were real events outside the text.

2 Kings 3:4, 2 voicesWhat preachers and commentators have said about these verses, in their own words.

2 Kings 3:4

Was a sheepmaster - The original is נקד naked, of which the Septuagint could make nothing, and therefore retained the Hebrew word νωκηδ: but the Chaldee has מרי גיתי marey githey, “a sheepmaster;” Aquila has ποιμνιοτροφος; and Symmachus, τρεφων βοσκηματα; all to the same sense. The original signifies one who marks or brands, probably from the marking of sheep. He fed many sheep, etc., and had them all marked in a particular way, in order to ascertain his property. A hundred thousand lambs - The Chaldee and Arabic have a hundred thousand fat oxen.

2 Kings 3:4

Taxes were then paid not so much in money as in the commodities of the country, which was an ease to the subject, whether it was an advantage to the prince or no. The revolt of Moab was a great loss to Israel, yet Ahaziah sat still in sloth and ease.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2 Kings 3:5, 1 voice

2 Kings 3:5

But it came to pass, when Ahab was dead, that the king of Moab rebelled against the king of Israel. Who then was Ahaziah; but either through the pusillanimity of his temper, or the sickness that attended him, or the shortness of his reign, he took no steps to the reduction of him, or to oblige him to pay his tribute, which he neglected to do, and is meant by his rebellion.

2 Kings 3:6-8

Jehoram's muster and his message to Jehoshaphat, wilt thou go with me against Moab to battle, repeat Ahab's own summons before Ramoth-gilead in 1 Ki 22:4 almost word for word, down to Jehoshaphat's identical answer, I am as thou art, my people as thy people, my horses as thy horses. Jehoshaphat's readiness to yoke Judah to a northern king's war is the same pattern the chronicler will later rebuke him for at 2 Chr 19:2, lovest thou them that hate the LORD. The route chosen, through the wilderness of Edom, adds a third king and a longer march to an alliance already made.

The wording quoted in this note is the King James Version.

2 Kings 3:6, 1 voice

2 Kings 3:6

King Jehoram . . . numbered Israel--made a levy from his own subjects, and at the same time sought an alliance with Jehoshaphat, which, as on the former occasion with Ahab, was readily promised (1Ki 22:4).

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

2 Kings 3:7, 2 voices

2 Kings 3:7

And he went and sent to Jehoshaphat the king of Judah, saying, the king of Moab hath rebelled against me,.... By refusing to pay him tribute: wilt thou go up with me against Moab to battle? and he said, I will go up; which he agreed to, partly to encourage in the reformation of religion which he had begun, and partly to chastise the Moabites for their invasion of his country, 2Ch 20:

2 Kings 3:7

The close alliance between the two kingdoms still subsisted. Jehoram therefore sends confidently to make the same request with respect to Moab that his father had made two years before with respect to Syria (marginal reference). Jehoshaphat consented at once, notwithstanding that his former compliance had drawn upon him the rebuke of a prophet 2Ch 19:2. Perhaps Jehoram’s removal of the Baal-worship 2Ki 3:2 weighed with him.

2 Kings 3:8, 2 voices

2 Kings 3:8

Through the wilderness of Edom - Because he expected the king of Edom to join them, as we find he did; for, being tributary to Judah, he was obliged to do it.

2 Kings 3:8-12

They were disappointed by finding the wady of this valley, the brook Zered (De 2:13-18) [ROBINSON], dry. But the pious mind of Jehoshaphat inquired for a prophet of the Lord; and, on being informed that Elisha was at hand, the three kings "went down to him"; that is, to his tent, which was either in the camp, or close by it.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

2 Kings 3:9-10

Seven days through the wilderness of Edom leave three armies and their cattle without water, and the crisis exposes the difference between the two kings before Elisha ever speaks. Jehoram's response is fatalism dressed as piety, alas, that the LORD hath called these three kings together to deliver them into the hand of Moab, blaming God for a route his own alliance chose. It is the same reflex Ahab showed toward Elijah at 1 Ki 18:17, trouble laid at the prophet's door rather than the king's.

The wording quoted in this note is the King James Version.

2 Kings 3:9, 2 voices

2 Kings 3:9

Seven days’ journey - The distance of the route probably followed is not much more than 100 miles. But the difficulties of the way are great; and the army might not be able to move along it at a faster rate than about 15 miles a day. No water - The kings had probably expected to find sufficient water for both men and baggage animals in the Wady-el-Ahsy, which divides Edom from Moab, and which has a stream that is now regarded as perennial.

2 Kings 3:9

King of Edom - That is, the vice-roy under Jehosaphat, 1 Kings xxii, 47, here called king: because that word is sometimes used for any prince or chief ruler. Seven days - Because they made a great army, which could move but slowly; and they fetched a greater compass than was usual, for some advantage which they expected by it.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

2 Kings 3:10, 1 voice

2 Kings 3:10

The Lord hath called these three kings together - That is, This is a Divine judgment; God has judicially blinded us, and permitted us to take this journey to our destruction.

2 Kings 3:11-12

Jehoshaphat's question repeats his own words to Ahab at 1 Ki 22:7 almost exactly, the one instinct that never fails him even in bad company. The servant who names Elisha does it by a small credential rather than a title, which poured water on the hands of Elijah, the posture of an apprentice rather than an office. That same humility is what the mantle at 1 Ki 19:19-21 was thrown over, and the servant's memory of it is the reason three kings now go down to find him.

The wording quoted in this note is the King James Version.

2 Kings 3:11, 3 voices

2 Kings 3:11

A prophet of the Lord - i. e. of Yahweh. It was necessary to inquire thus definitely, as there were still plenty of prophets who were only prophets of Baal 2Ki 3:13. Here is Elisha - Jehoram appears to have been ignorant of his presence with the host, and one of his “servants,” or officers, answered Jehoshaphat’s inquiry. Which poured water - An act signifying ministration or attendance (compare Joh 13:5 ff).

2 Kings 3:11

Poured water - Who was his servant; this being one office of a servant: and this office was the more necessary among the Israelites, because of the frequent washings which their law required. Probably it was by a special direction from God, that Elisha followed them, unasked, unobserved.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

2 Kings 3:11

Probably it was such a servant as Obadiah was to his father Ahab, one that feared the Lord; to such a one Elisha made himself known, not to the kings. The account he gives of him is that it was he that poured water on the hands of Elijah, that is, he was his servant, and particularly attended him when he washed his hands.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2 Kings 3:12, 1 voice

2 Kings 3:12

The word, &c. - He is a true prophet. Which Jehoshaphat might easily understand, because being a good man, many would be ready to inform him of. Went - To his tent; which was either in the camp, or not far from it: they did not send for him, but went to him, that by giving him this honour, they might engage him to give them his utmost assistance.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

2 Kings 3:13-14

Elisha sends Jehoram to the prophets of his father and mother before he will speak a word, refusing the king's own scale of religion. His oath, as the LORD of hosts liveth, before whom I stand, is Elijah's own sentence from 1 Ki 18:15 carried over syllable for syllable into his successor's mouth, the double portion of spirit made audible. Elisha says plainly that only Jehoshaphat's presence turns his face toward Jehoram at all.

The wording quoted in this note is the King James Version.

2 Kings 3:13, 2 voices

2 Kings 3:13

Jehoram’s humility in seeking 2Ki 3:12 instead of summoning Elisha, does not save him from rebuke. His reformation 2Ki 3:2 had been but a half reformation - a compromise with idolatry. Nay: for the Lord hath called ... - The force of this reply seems to be - “Nay, reproach me not, since I am in a sore strait - and not only I, but these two other kings also. The Lord - Yahweh - is about to deliver us into the hand of Moab. If thou canst not, or wilt not help, at least do not reproach.”

2 Kings 3:13

What have I, &c. - I desire to have no discourse with thee. Get thee - To the calves, which thou after thy father's example dost worship; and to the Baals which thy mother yet worshippeth by thy permission; let these idols whom thou worshippest in thy prosperity, now help thee in thy distress.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

2 Kings 3:14, 1 voice

2 Kings 3:14

He composed himself to receive instructions from God. His mind was somewhat ruffled and disturbed at the sight of Jehoram; though he was not put into a sinful heat or passion, nor had spoken unadvisedly, yet his zeal for the present indisposed him for prayer and the operations of the Spirit, which required a mind very calm and sedate.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2 Kings 3:15

Music settles Elisha's spirit, ruffled by Jehoram's presence, before the hand of the LORD comes upon him, the same pairing of instrument and prophetic inspiration Saul met among the company of prophets with psaltery and harp at 1 Sam 10:5-6. The prophetic schools evidently kept this as a regular practice rather than an isolated event. The word requires quiet first and utterance after, not the other way round.

2 Kings 3:15, 3 voices

2 Kings 3:15

But now bring me a minstrel,.... A piper, a man that knows how to play upon the harp, as the Targum; according to Procopius Gazaeus, this was one of the Levites he ordered to be fetched, who was used to the spiritual melody of David, and could play on musical instruments as he directed. This he did to allay his passion, and compose his spirits, ruffled at the sight of Jehoram, and to fit him to receive prophetic inspiration, which sometimes came upon the Lord's prophets when thus employed, see 1Sa 10:

2 Kings 3:15

Music seems to have been a regular accompaniment of prophecy in the “schools of the prophets” (marginal reference), and an occasional accompaniment of it elsewhere Exo 15:20.

2 Kings 3:15

The text is a somewhat singular one, but I hope it will suggest a profitable idea. ‘But now bring me a minstrel. And it came to pass, when the minstrel played, that the hand of the Lord came upon him.’’2 Kings 3:15. ELISHA needed that the Holy Spirit should come upon him to inspire him with prophetic utterances. ‘Holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.’ We need that the hand of the Lord should be laid upon us, for we can never open our mouths in wisdom except we are under the divine touch.

Charles Spurgeon· The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 1612: “The Minstrel” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition) (1881)Particular (Reformed) Baptist / Five-point Calvinist / 1689 LBCF / 19th-c. evangelical

2 Kings 3:16-18

The command asks for labor before the miracle, ditches dug in a dry valley with no cloud in sight, and the promise that follows refuses ordinary means on purpose: no wind, no rain, yet the valley filled with water. Water without a storm to send it is named a light thing beside the greater gift, the Moabites themselves delivered into their hand. The order runs the same course as the widow's jars in 2 Ki 4:1-7, obedience supplying the vessel that the LORD alone fills.

2 Kings 3:16, 2 voices

2 Kings 3:16

Make this valley full of ditches - The word נחל nachal may be translated brook, as it is by the Vulgate and Septuagint. There probably was a river here, but it was now dry; and the prophet desires that they would enlarge the channel, and cut out various canals from it, and reservoirs, where water might be collected for the refreshment of the army and of the cattle; and these were to be made so wide that the reflection of the sun’s rays from this water might be the means of confounding and destroying the Moabites.

2 Kings 3:16-17

God is not tied to second causes. Ordinarily it is by a plentiful rain that God confirms his inheritance ( Ps. lxviii. 9 ), but here it is done without rain, at least without rain in that place.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2 Kings 3:17, 2 voices

2 Kings 3:17

No rain was to fall where the Israelites and their enemies were encamped; there was not even to be that all but universal accompaniment of rain in the East, a sudden rise of wind (compare 1Ki 18:45; Psa 147:18; Mat 7:25). Cattle, and your beast - The former are the animals brought for food. The latter are the baggage animals.

2 Kings 3:17

Ye shall not see wind--It is common in the East to speak of seeing wind, from the clouds of straw, dust, or sand, that are often whirled into the air, after a long drought.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

2 Kings 3:18, 1 voice

2 Kings 3:18

And this is but a light thing in the sight of the Lord,.... To give them such a plenty of water in such an extraordinary manner: he would do for them what was greater, not only save them from falling into the hand of Moab, which they feared, but he wilt deliver the Moabites into your hands; which was more than was asked for, or expected.

2 Kings 3:19-20

The instruction to fell every good tree sits beside Deut 20:19-20, which forbids destroying an enemy's fruit trees in siege. The two are commonly read as different cases rather than a contradiction: Deuteronomy governs a war of conquest meant to end in settling the land, while this campaign against Moab has no plan to occupy it, only to break its power. The water arrives the next morning at the hour of the meat offering, with neither wind nor rain to account for it, timed to Israel's own act of worship rather than to weather.

2 Kings 3:19, 1 voice

2 Kings 3:19

Ye shall fell every good tree - This is not an infringement of the rule laid down in Deu 20:19-20. The Israelites were not forbidden to fell the fruit trees in an enemy’s country, as a part of the ravage of war, when they had no thoughts of occupying the country. The plan of thus injuring an enemy was probably in general use among the nations of these parts at the time. We see the destruction represented frequently on the Assyrian monuments and mentioned in the inscriptions of Egypt.

2 Kings 3:20, 2 voices

2 Kings 3:20

When the meat-offering was offered - This was the first of all offerings, and was generally made at sun-rising. There came water - This supply was altogether miraculous, for there was neither wind nor rain, nor any other natural means by which it could be supplied.

2 Kings 3:20

The meal-offering - That is, the morning sacrifice: which doubtless was attended with the solemn prayers of God's people. At this time Elisha joined his prayers with the prayers of God's people, especially those at Jerusalem.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

2 Kings 3:21-23

Moab gathers everyone able to bear arms, old and young, and stands at the border to meet the invasion. The next morning's sun turns the standing water red, and the Moabites read it as three armies that destroyed one another in the night rather than as sunrise on a flood, a misreading that draws them off their guard toward the spoil. The narrator gives no comment on the mistake beyond letting its consequence follow in the next verse.

2 Kings 3:22, 1 voice

2 Kings 3:22

Saw the water on the other side as red as blood - This might have been an optical deception; I have seen the like sight when there was no reason to suspect supernatural agency. The Moabites had never seen that valley full of water, and therefore did not suspect that their eyes deceived them, but took it for the blood of the confederate hosts, who they thought might have fallen into confusion in the darkness of night and destroyed each other, as the Midianites had formerly done, Jdg 7:22, and the Philistines lately, 1Sa 14:20.

2 Kings 3:23, 2 voices

2 Kings 3:23

The sun had risen with a ruddy light, as is frequently the case after a storm (compare Mat 16:3), nearly over the Israelite camp, and the pits, deep but with small mouths, gleaming redly through the haze which would lie along the newly moistened valley, seemed to the Moabites like pools of blood. The preceding year, they and their allies had mutually destroyed each other 2Ch 20:23. It seemed to them, from their knowledge of the jealousies between Judah, Israel, and Edom, not unlikely that a similar calamity had now befallen their foes.

2 Kings 3:23

Quod volumus facile credimus--What we wish we readily believe. Thus those that are to be destroyed are first deceived ( Rev. xx. 8 ), and none are so effectually deceived as those that deceive themselves.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2 Kings 3:24-25

Israel executes the instructions of verse 19 to the letter, cities beaten down, land marred with stones, wells stopped, good trees felled, until only Kir-haraseth's walls are left standing under siege by slingers. The narrator's one exception, only in Kir-haraseth left they the stones thereof, marks the campaign's edge rather than its failure; the royal city holds while the countryside around it does not. Kir-haraseth is identified with the fortress later called Kerak, east of the Dead Sea.

The wording quoted in this note is the King James Version.

2 Kings 3:24, 1 voice

2 Kings 3:24

When the Moabites came to plunder the camp, they convinced themselves that its ruins had been abandoned by their guards. Instead, Jehoshaphat and the kings with him suddenly rose up with drawn swords when they realized that their enemies were approaching and almost upon them. …

Ephrem the Syrian· written before 373· ON THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS 3:23patristic

2 Kings 3:25, 2 voices

2 Kings 3:25

Kir-Haraseth, also Kir-Hareseth, is identified almost certainly with the modern Kerak, a strong city on the highland immediately east of the southern part of the Dead Sea. It was the great fortress of Moab, though not the capital, which was Rabbath or Rabbah. It was an important strong-hold at the time of the Crusades, and is still a place of great strength.

2 Kings 3:25

Kir-haraseth - This was the royal city of the Moabites, into which the remnant of the Moabites were gathered, where also their king was with them. The stones - The walls and buildings of this city only were left; their whole country being destroyed.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

2 Kings 3:26-27

Mesha's sortie toward the king of Edom fails, and with the city about to fall he offers his own heir, the son who should have reigned in his stead, as a burnt offering on the wall where the besiegers can see it. What follows, there was great indignation against Israel, is a genuine crux and the readings differ on whose indignation it names. Wesley reads it as Israel's own horror and grief at having driven a father to this, ending the war in revulsion at what their siege had provoked; Barnes names the same possibility alongside another, that Judah and Edom were indignant at Israel specifically for causing the pollution of such a sacrifice; and the Hebrew word for wrath elsewhere names the LORD's own anger, at Num 1:53 and Josh 22:20, which Keil weighs as a live if unproven third reading. The text does not say which, and the campaign ends there, the kings withdrawing to their own land.

The wording quoted in this note is the King James Version.

2 Kings 3:26, 1 voice

2 Kings 3:26

Seven hundred men - These were no doubt the choice of all his troops, and being afraid of being hemmed up and perhaps taken by his enemies, whom he found on the eve of gaining possession of the city, he made a desperate sortie in order to regain the open country; and supposing that the quarter of the Edomites was weakest, or less carefully guarded, he endeavored to make his impression there; but they were so warmly received by the king of Edom that they failed in the attempt, and were driven back into the city.

2 Kings 3:27, 4 voices

2 Kings 3:27

Compare the marginal reference. Mesha, when his sally failed, took, as a last resource, his first born son, and offered him as a burnt-offering to appease the manifest anger of his god Chemosh, and obtain his aid against his enemies. This act was thoroughly in accordance with Moabitish notions. And there was great indignation against Israel - Either the Israelites were indignant with themselves, or the men of Judah and the Edomites were indignant at the Israelites for having caused the pollution of this sacrifice, and the siege was relinquished.

2 Kings 3:27

On the wall - That the besiegers might see it, and be moved by it. There was, &c. - Or, great trouble or repentance upon Israel, the Israelitish king and people (who was the first cause of the war, and had brought the rest into confederacy with him) were greatly grieved for this barbarous action, and resolved to prosecute the war no farther.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

2 Kings 3:27

He designed by this, (1.) To obtain the favour of Chemosh his god, which, being a devil, delighted in blood and murder, and the destruction of mankind. The dearer any thing was to them the more acceptable those idolaters thought it must needs be if offered in sacrifice to their gods, and therefore burnt their children in the fire to their honour.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2 Kings 3:27

This failing, he did that which was brutish and barbarous; he took his own son, his eldest son, that was to succeed him, than whom nothing could be more dear to himself and his people, and offered him for a burnt-offering upon the wall,

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Where the chapter sits

2 Kings 3 falls in Elijah's ascension; Elisha's ministry (chapters 1–13). Elijah taken up by whirlwind; double portion; widow's oil; the Shunammite's son raised; Naaman healed; siege of Samaria broken; Elisha dies and his bones raise a man.

After it: Northern kingdom's fall, chapters 14–17.

The whole shape of 2 Kings

Key words

The Hebrew words this chapter turns on, by how often it uses them. Each one opens its word study.

WordWhat it meansVerses
מֶלֶךְmelek24 times, as מֶ֣לֶךְ, מֶֽלֶךְ־, לְמֶֽלֶךְ־king of1, 4, 5, 6 and 10 more
אָמַרʼâmar15 times, as לֵאמֹ֗ר, וַיֹּ֣אמֶר, וַיֹּ֕אמֶרto say7, 8, 10, 11 and 6 more
יִשְׂרָאֵלYisrâʼêl14 times, as יִשְׂרָאֵל֙, יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל, יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃Israel1, 3, 4, 5 and 8 more
מוֹאָבMôwʼâb13 times, as מוֹאָ֖ב, מוֹאָב֙, מוֹאָֽב׃Moab4, 5, 7, 10 and 7 more
יְהֹוָהYᵉhôvâh11 times, as יְהוָ֔ה, יְהוָ֗ה, לַֽיהוָ֔הyahweh2, 10, 11, 12 and 6 more
מַיִםmayim9 times, as מַ֧יִם, מַ֖יִם, מָ֑יִםwater9, 11, 17, 19 and 3 more
Every word of this chapter, on the Original level →

Cross references

The 8 chapters this one speaks with, most first. Open a row for the verses it shares.

  • 1 Kings 226 verses
    • 2 Kings 3:7

      1 Kings 22:4So he asked Jehoshaphat, “Will you go with me to fight against Ramoth-gilead?” Jehoshaphat answered the king of Israel, “I am like you, my people are your people, and my horses are your horses.”
    • 2 Kings 3:13

      1 Kings 22:6So the king of Israel assembled the prophets, about four hundred men, and asked them, “Should I go to war against Ramoth-gilead, or should I refrain?” “Go up,” they replied, “and the Lord will deliver it into the hand of the king.”
    • 2 Kings 3:11

      1 Kings 22:7But Jehoshaphat asked, “Is there not still a prophet of the LORD here of whom we can inquire?”
    • 2 Kings 3:9

      1 Kings 22:27and tell them that this is what the king says: ‘Put this man in prison and feed him only bread and water until I return safely.’”
    • 2 Kings 3:9

      1 Kings 22:47And there was no king in Edom; a deputy served as king.
    • 2 Kings 3:1

      1 Kings 22:51In the seventeenth year of Jehoshaphat’s reign over Judah, Ahaziah son of Ahab became king of Israel, and he reigned in Samaria two years.
    • Read 1 Kings 22 →
  • 1 Samuel 153 verses
    • 2 Kings 3:19

      1 Samuel 15:3Now go and attack the Amalekites and devote to destruction all that belongs to them. Do not spare them, but put to death men and women, children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and donkeys.’”
    • 2 Kings 3:6

      1 Samuel 15:4So Saul summoned the troops and numbered them at Telaim—200,000 foot soldiers and 10,000 men of Judah.
    • 2 Kings 3:14

      1 Samuel 15:26“I will not return with you,” Samuel replied. “For you have rejected the word of the LORD, and He has rejected you as king over Israel.”
    • Read 1 Samuel 15 →
  • 2 Kings 12 verses
    • 2 Kings 3:5

      2 Kings 1:1After the death of Ahab, Moab rebelled against Israel.
    • 2 Kings 3:1

      2 Kings 1:17So Ahaziah died according to the word of the LORD that Elijah had spoken. And since he had no son, Jehoram succeeded him in the second year of the reign of Jehoram son of Jehoshaphat over Judah.
    • Read 2 Kings 1 →
  • 2 Kings 82 verses
    • 2 Kings 3:1

      2 Kings 8:16In the fifth year of the reign of Joram son of Ahab over Israel, Jehoram son of Jehoshaphat succeeded his father as king of Judah.
    • 2 Kings 3:5

      2 Kings 8:20In the days of Jehoram, Edom rebelled against the hand of Judah and appointed their own king.
    • Read 2 Kings 8 →
The rest of the chapters this one speaks with, 4 of them, for a reader following a thread past the four above

Cross-references from the Treasury of Scripture Knowledge and OpenBible.info.

The world behind itThe place, the time and the people around this chapter, for a reader who wants the setting.

The world behind this chapter

2 Kings 3
When
The reign of Joram of Israel and the Moabite revolt · c. 852, 851 BC
Where
The desert route around the southern end of the Dead Sea into Moab
Who first heard it
Israelites who had lost a rich tribute province and wanted it back

The history

Moab paid Israel in livestock, the text gives a hundred thousand lambs and the wool of a hundred thousand rams, which describes a highland sheep economy on the plateau east of the Dead Sea. When Ahab died, Mesha stopped paying.

We have Mesha's own version. A basalt stone found at Dhiban in 1868, carved in Moabite, records that Omri king of Israel oppressed Moab for many years and that Mesha threw off Israel and captured towns, and it names both the God of Israel and Moab's god Chemosh. The two accounts overlap and diverge, each is a national record written by the winning side of the part it wants remembered, and having both is unusual and valuable.

The campaign takes the long southern route around the Dead Sea through waterless country, and the army runs dry after seven days. The prophet asks for a musician before he speaks, which fits what is known of prophetic practice: music was used to prepare for receiving a word. The instruction to dig the valley full of trenches and the water arriving without wind or rain describes a real desert phenomenon, a storm falling on distant highlands sends a flash flood down a dry wadi hours later under a clear sky.

The Moabites see the water at dawn as red as blood, which is what low sunlight does on water in a valley of red sandstone. The scorched-earth tactics that follow, felling trees, stopping springs, ruining fields with stones, were ordinary siege practice, though Israel's own law forbade it against fruit trees. The chapter ends at the wall of Kir-hareseth with the king of Moab sacrificing his eldest son in full view. Child sacrifice in extreme crisis is attested for Moab and Phoenicia. The closing note that great wrath came upon Israel is genuinely disputed: it may mean the fury of a Moabite army with nothing left to lose, or divine displeasure at what the campaign had produced.

What it meant to them

The first hearers heard a prophet tell a king of Israel to his face that he would not look at him except for the presence of Jehoshaphat of Judah. The alliance is what saved the army, and the book does not approve of it.

And they heard God provide water for three kings, two of whom had no claim on him, in a valley where the enemy would misread it and walk into a trap.

Sources cited

  • The Mesha Stele (the Moabite Stone, c. 840 BC)
  • John H. Walton, Victor H. Matthews & Mark W. Chavalas, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament

Every work MannaFest builds on →

Featured studies

Pages of this site that take up something in this chapter. Each one opens on its own.

The text of this chapter

This page carries no textual note on 2 Kings 3. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →

This page draws on 10 works. Open for the list.

This page draws on Adam Clarke; Albert Barnes; Alfred Edersheim, Bible History: Old Testament; Charles Spurgeon, The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 1612: “The Minstrel” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition) (1881); Ephrem the Syrian, ON THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS 3:23; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871); John Gill; John Wesley; Keil, The Books of the Kings and Matthew Henry.