1 Kingschapter 16
34 verses · Jeremiah, by tradition · 6th century BC · History
And the people that were encamped heard say, Zimri hath conspired, and hath also slain the king: wherefore all Israel made Omri, the captain of the host, king over Israel that day in the camp.
Introduction
Jeremiah, by tradition, History, 1 Kings Overview.
The writer of Kings is not named, and Jewish tradition gives the book to Jeremiah. He passes through five kings of the north in a single chapter. His first hearers belonged to a royal line God had promised to keep, and they needed to see what a throne without that promise looked like. The chapter is regnal record told at speed, and the speed is part of its point. Listen for how little space the most powerful of these kings is given, and for the one line that grades the last king worse than all before him. The chapter prepares the ground for Elijah.
Context
- Who
- Israelites in a kingdom that had three kings inside a single year
- What
- The fall of Baasha's house, the seven-day reign of Zimri, the civil war that made Omri king, the building of Samaria and the accession of Ahab.
- Where
- Tirzah, the army camp at the Philistine town of Gibbethon, and the new capital on the hill of Samaria.
- When
- About 886 to 874 BC, with Ahab's reign beginning about 874 BC; the years are reckoned and approximate.
- Why
- To show a kingdom without a promised dynasty destroying its own kings, and to introduce Ahab as the worst of them.
Historical context
The chapter belongs to five kings, and the reason it moves so fast is constitutional. The northern throne carried no promised dynasty, so it belonged to whoever held the army.
Show the rest of the historical context, 6 more paragraphs
The sequence shows what that meant. Zimri, a chariot commander, murdered a drunk king and lasted seven days, the troops in the field acclaimed their general Omri instead, and Zimri burned the palace at Tirzah down over himself.
Omri is the most important king here and gets six verses. He bought a hill from a man named Shemer for two talents of silver and built Samaria on it.
A first hearer understood why a king bought land rather than seizing it. A capital purchased with the king's own money belonged to the crown rather than to a tribe, which is the logic David had used at Jerusalem.
The site was chosen for defence as much as for ownership. The hill stood alone with steep sides and commanded the road to the coast, and it held out against Assyria for three years when the end finally came.
Foreign records take Omri more seriously than the Bible's own space for him suggests. Assyrian scribes called the northern kingdom the house of Omri for well over a century after his death, and the Moabite Stone of King Mesha opens by naming him as the man who oppressed Moab.
Ahab's marriage is the hinge of the next six chapters. Jezebel's father Ethbaal ruled Sidon and, in the Tyrian records Josephus quotes, was a priest of Astarte who took the throne. She arrived as the daughter of a priestly house, and a temple of Baal went up in Samaria.
Significance
The first hearers were watching a kingdom devour itself. Three kings held the throne inside one year, and the book's only comment on each is that he walked in the way of Jeroboam.
Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph
Then comes the line that sets up everything after it. Ahab did more to provoke the LORD than all the kings of Israel before him, and the stage is cleared for Elijah.
This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.
How it is read
This chapter runs five reigns into one another, and Rashi's notes hold the sequence together. At the seventh verse he explains why the word against Baasha is repeated after his son has already come to the throne. He reads it as a continuation of the prophecy given earlier in the chapter. Metzudat David's note adds that the verse opens with a word meaning also, for that reason (Rashi on I Kings 16:7:1, The Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J, CC-BY). In the second note on the same verse he states the principle the whole chapter turns on. A man who destroys a guilty house is answerable for the blood he spilled if he repeats the sins he destroyed it for. Rashi writes: "Since he too, committed the same sins, consequently he should not have killed him, therefore he was punished for his murder." (Rashi on I Kings 16:7:2). He carries the same rule forward to the later house through the word of Hosea against the blood of Jezreel.
The palace killings are read as court history. The conspirator of the ninth verse was one of two officers set over the chariots (Rashi on I Kings 16:9:1). The sweep that followed took the dead king's kinsmen and his friends, with Metzudat David's alternative that the word stands in the singular and means his one confidant (Rashi on I Kings 16:11:1). On the five-year contest for the throne Rashi carries two accounts and keeps both. The first is from Seder Olam: when Asa took Omri's daughter in marriage for his son Jehoshaphat "they killed Tivni," once they saw where the weight had fallen. The second is from Radak, that "he died a natural death and thereby Omri ruled undisputedly." (Rashi on I Kings 16:22:1). He then dates the struggle exactly: "His conflict with Tivni lasted five years, from the twenty-seventh year of Asa[’s reign] until the thirty-first [year]." (Rashi on I Kings 16:23:1).
The last verses are read as the point where the northern sin changes in kind. Rashi glosses the worship of Baal as standing "In addition to Yerovom’s calves." A question follows from that. The Talmud at Sanhedrin holds that the later king's smaller sins were like the earlier king's great ones, so why is the older king's sin the one the account keeps naming? Rashi answers: "Because he opened the way to sin for the Bnei Yisroel." (Rashi on I Kings 16:31:1). The Asherah he explains in five words, "A tree that is worshiped.", with Radak's note that it stood beside the Baal rather than in place of it (Rashi on I Kings 16:33:1). The closing verse on the rebuilding of Jericho carries the longest note in the chapter. Rashi first reads the builder's title as a place name, on the pattern of three other men named for their towns in Samuel and Judges. He then reports a second reading that takes the word from the root for a curse, "since he accepted upon himself Yehoshua’s curses". He then gives the tradition that the man belonged to Benjamin and to Jehoshaphat's kingdom. The account attaches him to the northern king for a reason of its own: "because a curse is related to a corrupt person." (Rashi on I Kings 16:34:1). Metzudat David's alternative closes the note. The northern king saw the sentence fall on the builder and repented of it.
Radak, Metzudat David and Malbim comment across the chapter as well. The corpus carries their refs with the reason that Sefaria holds no English version of them, so they stand here cited and unquoted. The corpus holds Radak on I Kings 16:3:1, 16:9:1, 16:11:1, 16:15:1, 16:16:1, 16:18:1, 16:19:1, 16:21:1, 16:24:1, 16:26:1 and 16:32:1. It holds Metzudat David on I Kings 16:8:1, 16:10:1 and 16:29:1. It holds Malbim on I Kings 16:25:1.
What the rabbis say
The corpus carries thirty rabbinic locators for this chapter and the text of none, so each is cited and linked here rather than quoted. This is the smallest set in the eleven chapters of this lane, and it is weighted almost entirely toward the end of the chapter, where Ahab comes to the throne.
The early reigns carry one or two apiece. On the third verse the corpus carries Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Shabbat 5:8. On the seventh it carries Seder Olam Rabbah 20:2, and on the eighth, Pesikta Rabbati 6:1. On the fifteenth, the seven-day reign of Zimri, it carries Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Vayechi 15, Midrash Tehillim 90:1 and Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 950:4, and on the sixteenth, Seder Olam Rabbah 17:2. On the twentieth it carries Midrash Lekach Tov, Deuteronomy 32:19:1 and Midrash Tannaim on Deuteronomy 32:19:2. The buying of the hill of Samaria at the twenty-fourth carries Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sanhedrin 11:75, Sanhedrin 102b:8 and Tanna DeBei Eliyahu Rabbah 9:1. The death of Omri at the twenty-eighth carries Esther Rabbah, Petichta 6.
The Ahab verses carry the rest. On the twenty-ninth the corpus carries Tanna DeBei Eliyahu Zuta 8:1, and on the thirtieth, where the account says he did worse than all before him, Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Appendix to Vaetchanan 2:2. The thirty-first verse carries the Phoenician marriage and the house built for Baal. It carries five locators: Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sanhedrin 11:74, Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 10:2:4, Midrash Tanchuma, Vayechi 6:7, Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 17:5 and Sanhedrin 102b:6. On the thirty-third it carries Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sanhedrin 11:76 and Sanhedrin 102b:17.
The heaviest cluster in the chapter stands on its last verse, where Jericho is rebuilt and two sons die. Four of its eight are Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sanhedrin 11:137, Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 10:2:5, Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 10:8:3 and Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 10:8:4. The other four are Otzar Midrashim, Midrashim on Missing and Extra Letters 1:34, Sanhedrin 113a:8, Sifrei Devarim 95:7 and Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 888:3. Rashi's own note on that verse cites the same Talmudic discussion, so the commentary and the locators stand on one verse together, which happens nowhere else in this chapter. What each of them teaches is a saying of the rabbis, and is reported as theirs wherever this site quotes one. The quotations wait on a fetch that carries the text.
Sources: Rashi, Rashi on I Kings 16:7:1, 16:7:2, 16:9:1, 16:11:1, 16:22:1, 16:23:1, 16:31:1, 16:33:1 and 16:34:1, The Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J, CC-BY; Radak, Radak on I Kings 16:3:1, 16:9:1, 16:11:1, 16:15:1, 16:16:1, 16:18:1, 16:19:1, 16:21:1, 16:24:1, 16:26:1 and 16:32:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; Metzudat David, Metzudat David on I Kings 16:8:1, 16:10:1 and 16:29:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; Malbim, Malbim on I Kings 16:25:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; The Sefaria corpus, scripts/data/sources/sefaria/1-kings/16.json, the 30 Talmud and Midrash locators of this chapter.
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
Jehu son of Hanani against the house of Baasha
1 Kings 16:1-2
against Baasha, saying: Jehu's oracle against Baasha reuses, almost word for word, the charge Ahijah brought against Jeroboam at 14:7 through 14:9: exalted out of the dust, made prince, and now made my people to sin. Baasha took the throne by killing every one of Jeroboam's house at 15:29, and the same words that raised him now condemn him for repeating the very sin he was raised up to punish. Kings measures every northern king by his distance from Jeroboam's calves, and Baasha fails his own test.
1 Kings 16:1
“Hanani, the father of Jehu, was seer to Asa in the kingdom of Judah 2Ch 16:7-10. His son Jehu, who here discharges the same office in the kingdom of Israel, appears at a later date as an inhabitant of Jerusalem where he prophesied under Jehoshaphat, whom he rebuked on one occasion. He must have lived to a great age, for he outlived Jehoshaphat, and wrote his life (marginal references).”
The LORD still calls the northern kingdom My people Israel, even under Baasha and his sins. Matthew Henry reads the name as kept because Israel still bore circumcision and many good people still lived in the land. Hosea 1:9 gives Israel the name Lo-ammi later.
1 Kings 16:2
“I made thee prince over my people. God calls Israel his people still, though wretchedly corrupted, because they retained the covenant of circumcision, and there were many good people among them; it was not till long after that they were called Loammi, not a people, Hos. i.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
2 more voices on this verse
1 Kings 16:2
“Made thee prince over my people - That is, in the course of my providence, I suffered thee to become king; for it is impossible that God should make a rebel, a traitor, and a murderer, king over his people, or over any people. God is ever represented in Scripture as doing those things which, in the course of his providence, he permits to be done.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Kings 16:2
“And if Baasha had done this in obedience to God's command, and with a single design, to execute God's vengeance threatened against him, it had been no more a sin, than Jehu's act in killing his master king Jehoram, upon the same account, 2 Kings ix, 24.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
1 Kings 16:3-4
like the house of Jeroboam: The sentence itself, thy house like the house of Jeroboam, sends Baasha's own line back to the fate his hands carried out on Jeroboam's line at 15:29. The dogs and fowls formula against Baasha's house is this chain's second link, following Jeroboam's house at 14:11 and preceding Ahab and Jezebel's at 21:19 through 21:24, the same sentence falling on three dynasties before the book turns south. No burial was the ancient world's severest dishonor, and the text simply states the terms rather than describing the horror.
1 Kings 16:3
“Note, Those who resemble others in their sins may expect to resemble them in their plagues, especially those who seem zealous against such sins in others as they allow themselves in; the house of Jehu was reckoned with for the blood of the house of Ahab, Hos. i.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Baasha had carried out this same sentence on the family of Jeroboam, and now it returns on his own house. Matthew Henry sets beside it Hosea 1:4, where the house of Jehu is punished for the bloodshed of Jezreel. The one who executes a judgment stays under it.
1 Kings 16:4
“Him that dieth of Baasha in the city shall the dogs eat, and him that dieth of his in the fields shall the fowls of the air eat. They should not have burial, which is just the same that was threatened to and executed on Jeroboam's family, 1Ki 14:11.”
1 Kings 16:5-7
and his might, are they not written: The closing formula, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel, seals Baasha's reign here and marks a source the author used but did not preserve; the same line closes four reigns before this chapter ends. Verse 7 adds a second charge behind the first: Baasha is judged not only for keeping the calves but for killing Nadab's whole house with his own hand, even though that killing carried out the sentence spoken in chapter 14. The commentators read the addition as a warning to any agent of judgment, that the office does not excuse the manner or the heart it is carried out in.
1 Kings 16:5
“Now the rest of the acts of Baasha, and what he did, and his might, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? As those of Jeroboam and Nadab were, 1Ki 14:19.”
1 more voice on this verse
1 Kings 16:5
“The “might” of Baasha is sufficiently indicated by those successes which drove Asa to call Ben-hadad to his aid. 1Ki 15:17-21.”
was buried in Tirzah: Baasha dies a natural death and is buried in Tirzah, the royal city where Jeroboam's wife returned at 14:17. The sentence of verses 3 and 4 passes over him and falls on his son. Elah reigns two years by verse 8.
1 Kings 16:6
“So Baasha slept with his fathers,.... Or died, not a violent, but natural, death: and was buried in Tirzah; where was the royal palace of the kings of Israel: and Elah his son reigned in his stead; yet but a short time.”
Albert Barnes reads this verse as added by the writer after the close of the reign of Baasha. John Wesley held that the killing of the house of Jeroboam would have been no sin had Baasha acted only to carry out the word of the LORD. His motive made the deed evil.
1 Kings 16:7
“The natural position of this verse would be after 1Ki 16:4 and before 1Ki 16:5. But it may be regarded as added by the writer, somewhat irregularly, as an afterthought; its special force being to point out that the sentence on Baasha was intended to punish, not only his calf-worship, but emphatically his murder of Jeroboam and his family.”
Elah drunk in his steward's house; Zimri strikes
1 Kings 16:8-10
began Elah the son of Baasha to reign: Elah reigns two years and dies as his father's sentence lands, drunk in the house of his own steward while his army sits at the Philistine siege of Gibbethon. Zimri, captain of half his chariots, kills him in that same house, the same undefended weakness that let Baasha's line be exposed now visited on the son. Nadab, Elah and soon Zimri each fall inside a window of years or days, and a fourth reign in a row opening with an assassination shows a throne no house can hold.
1 Kings 16:8
“In the twenty sixth year of Asa king of Judah began Elah the son of Baasha to reign over Israel in Tirzah, two years. Not complete, for he died in the twenty seventh of Asa, 1Ki 16:10 he reigned just the time that Nadab the son of Jeroboam did, 1Ki 15:25.”
Albert Barnes notes that the steward over the household held high rank, and in the court of Solomon that officer bore the title of prince. Barnes reads the chariot command of Zimri in Tirzah as his opening, with the troops away at Gibbethon. Elah had stayed home from the war.
1 Kings 16:9
“The conspiracy of Zimri - Elah’s “servant” (i. e., “subject”) - was favored by his position, which probably gave him military authority in the city, by the absence of a great part of the people and of the officers who might have checked him, at Gibbethon 1Ki 16:15, and by the despicable character of Elah, who, instead of going up to the war, was continually reminding men of his low origin by conduct unworthy of royalty. Steward - The office was evidently one of considerable importance. In Solomon’s court it gave the rank of שׂר śar, prince.”
Verse 8 dates the accession of Elah to the twenty-sixth year of Asa, and he dies in the twenty-seventh. Elah's two years were partial years. The reign of Asa in Judah serves as the clock for every northern change in this chapter.
1 Kings 16:10
“And Zimri went in and smote him, and killed him,.... When in his drunken fit: and this was in the twenty seventh year of Asa; when Elah had not reigned two full years: and reigned in his stead; that is, Zimri; his reign was short indeed, but seven days, 1Ki 16:15.”
1 Kings 16:11-13
pisseth against a wall: Zimri's purge leaves not one that pisseth against a wall, a coarse idiom for every male of Baasha's line, and the narrator credits the massacre directly to the word of the LORD spoken by Jehu the son of Hanani. Verse 13 sums Baasha and Elah under one word, vanities, the Hebrew term for an idol that means emptiness or breath, the same charge that opened the oracle at verse 2. Zimri carries the sentence out in full, and the text gives him no credit for the deed; his own house is next.
1 Kings 16:11
“Neither of his kinsfolks, nor of his friends - Zimri’s measures were of much more than ordinary severity. Not only was the royal family extirpated, but the friends of the king, his councillors and favorite officers, were put to death. Omri, as having been in the confidence of the late monarch, would naturally fear for himself, and resolve to take the course which promised him at least a chance of safety.”
The same fulfilment formula closed the house of Jeroboam at 15:29, where Baasha himself did the killing. John Gill sets the two sentences side by side, the same fate threatened and carried out on both families. Now a servant of the king strikes Baasha's line.
1 Kings 16:12
“Thus did Zimri destroy all the house of Baasha, according to the word of the Lord, which he spoke against Baasha by Jehu the prophet. That not only his posterity, but all any way related to him, should be cut off; yea, it seems to have been carried further, even to all that were in any connection with him in point of friendship, see 1Ki 16:3.”
Albert Barnes identifies the worthless idols of this verse as the golden calves Jeroboam set up at Bethel and Dan in 12:28 and 12:29. Baasha and Elah are charged with keeping that worship alive. Father and son share one verdict.
1 Kings 16:13
“Their vanities - The “calves.” The Hebrews call an idol by terms signifying “emptiness,” “vapor,” or “nothingness.” (Compare marginal references.)”
1 Kings 16:14-15
acts of Elah, and all that he did: The chronicle formula closes Elah's short reign, and verse 15 opens Zimri's with the same clock already running, seven days in Tirzah while the army still besieges Gibbethon. Four kings have now died by the same violence they used to rise, and the text tells each fall without pausing to moralize over it. The repetition itself is the argument: a throne built on Jeroboam's sin cannot outlast the pattern it copies.
1 Kings 16:14
“Now the rest of the acts of Elah, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? See 1Ki 16:5.”
Seven days of Zimri, and fire in the king's house
Gibbethon was already under siege at 15:27, when Baasha killed Nadab there. John Wesley reads the second siege as a sign that the Philistines had retaken the town while Israel quarrelled. Both coups came while the army sat before Gibbethon.
1 Kings 16:15
“Gibbethon - Which had been besieged before, but, it seems, was then relieved, or afterwards recovered by the Philistines; taking the advantage of the disorders and contentions which were among their enemies.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
1 Kings 16:16-18
made Omri, the captain of the host, king: Word reaches the camp at Gibbethon and the army crowns its own general on the spot, the instinct armies would show centuries later crowning emperors in the field. Omri marches home and besieges Tirzah; when the city falls, Zimri burns the king's house over himself rather than face capture, a death the ancient historians compare to the last king of Assyria's own end by fire. Seven days after killing Elah, the killer is gone, and Israel has had three kings inside one year.
1 Kings 16:16
“And the people that were encamped heard say, Zimri hath conspired, and hath also slain the king,.... Tidings came to the army of what he had done, which was displeasing to them: wherefore all Israel made Omri, the captain of the host, king over Israel that day in the camp; that is, all Israel that were in the army proclaimed Omri, their general, king; just as the Roman army declared Vespasian, their general, emperor of Rome, and as several of the emperors were chosen.”
1 more voice on this verse
1 Kings 16:16
“They did not attempt to avenge the death of Nadab upon Baasha, perhaps because the house of Baasha had ruled with more gentleness than the house of Jeroboam; but Zimri shall feel the resentments of the provoked army. The siege of Gibbethon is quitted (Philistines are sure to gain when Israelites quarrel) and Zimri is prosecuted.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Albert Barnes notes that Omri and the army of Israel marched up from Gibbethon in the western foothills to the hill country where Tirzah stood. Joshua 19:44 lists Gibbethon among the towns of Dan. John Gill records the march as thirty-six miles.
1 Kings 16:17
“And Omri went up from Gibbethon, and all Israel with him,.... He, and the army under him, broke up the siege of that place, and marched to Tirzah; which, according, to Bunting (c) were thirty six miles distant from each other: and they besieged Tirzah; the royal city, in which Zimri was. (c) Travels, &c. p. 162.”
1 more voice on this verse
1 Kings 16:17
“Went up - The expression “went up” marks accurately the ascent of the army from the Shephelah, where Gibbethon was situated Jos 19:44, to the hill country of Israel, on the edge of which Tirzah stood 1Ki 14:17.”
Barnes names the citadel as the palace keep. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown read the fire as a last act to keep the palace and its treasures from Omri. Adam Clarke links this burning with the later move of the capital from Tirzah to Samaria in verse 24.
1 Kings 16:18
“The palace of the king’s house - The tower of the king’s house. A particular part of the palace - either the “harem,” or, more probably, the keep or citadel, a tower stronger and loftier than the rest of the palace. Zimri’s desperate act has been repeated more than once. That the last king of Assyria, the Sardanapalus of the Greeks, thus destroyed himself, is almost the only “fact” which we know concerning him.”
1 more voice on this verse
1 Kings 16:18
“Zimri soon saw that he was not in circumstances to hold out against all the forces of the kingdom; so, shutting himself up in the palace, he set it on fire, and, like Sardanapalus, chose to perish himself and reduce all to ruin, rather than that the palace and royal treasures should fall into the hands of his successful rival.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 Kings 16:19-20
to make Israel to sin: The verdict on Zimri names the same sin named on every king since Jeroboam, walking in his way and making Israel to sin, the refrain that falls seventeen times across both books and never changes even as the names do. Verse 20 closes his seven days with the same chronicle formula given every other king, his treason filed beside their acts and might as though the length of a reign made no difference to how the book records it. Kings measures every northern king against one man's sin, not against how long he sat on the throne.
1 Kings 16:19
“Zimri’s death illustrates the general moral which the writer of Kings draws from the whole history of the Israelite monarchs. that a curse was upon them on account of their persistence in Jeroboam’s sin, which, sooner or later, brought each royal house to a bloody end.”
1 more voice on this verse
1 Kings 16:19
“For his sins - This befell him for his sins. In walking, &c. - This he might do, either before his reign, in the whole course of his life, which is justly charged upon him, because of his impenitency: or during his short reign; in which, he had time enough to publish his intentions, about the worship of the calves; or to sacrifice to them, for his good success.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
The treason is the conspiracy of verse 9, and the royal records kept it with the acts of the other kings. Zimri's name outlived his seven days. At 2 Kings 9:31, Jezebel greets Jehu as a Zimri, murderer of your master.
1 Kings 16:20
“Now the rest of the acts of Zimri, and his treason that he wrought, are they not written in the book of the kings of Israel? What he did both before and after his usurpation, during the seven days he was king, and the manner of his conspiracy, and success in it.”
1 Kings 16:21-22
divided into two parts: Israel splits a second time, now inside its own splinter kingdom, half following Tibni the son of Ginath and half following Omri. Comparing the years given at verses 15, 23 and 29, the commentators reckon the two rivals held the field together for about four years before Omri prevailed, and the text says only that Tibni died, leaving the manner as silence rather than filling it with invention. A kingdom born from revolt against David's line now revolts against itself.
1 Kings 16:21
“Then were the people of Israel divided into two parts,.... About the succession in the kingdom: half the people followed Tibni the son of Ginath, to make him king: these were the friends of Zimri, or however such who did not like that the army should impose a king upon them; who this Tibni was is not said: and half followed Omri; the general of the army, perhaps the whole of that.”
Albert Barnes judges that Tibni was killed in battle or put to death by Omri, and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown hold that the Hebrew leaves the manner of death open. Omri had the army that proclaimed him king at Gibbethon in verse 16. His side held the troops.
1 Kings 16:22
“From a comparison of the dates given in 1Ki 16:15, 1Ki 16:23, 1Ki 16:29 it follows that the contest between the two pretenders lasted four years. Tibni’s death can scarcely be supposed to have been natural. Either he must have been slain in battle against Omri, or have fallen into his hands and been put to death. There has probably been some derangement of the text here. The passage may have run thus: “So Tibni died, and Omri reigned in the thirty-first year of Asa, king of Judah.”
1 more voice on this verse
1 Kings 16:22
“Tibni died--The Hebrew does not enable us to determine whether his death was violent or natural.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Omri buys a hill and builds Samaria
1 Kings 16:23-24
began Omri to reign over Israel: Omri buys the hill of Samaria from a man named Shemer for two talents of silver and builds there the city that stands as Israel's capital for the rest of its history, the city Assyria will finally take in 2 Ki 17. Assyrian royal inscriptions call the northern kingdom bit-Khumri, the house of Omri, on tablets naming later kings who were not his blood, evidence the field reads as a mark of how deep his dynasty's name reached even after his own line was cut off. The city keeps the former owner's name, though Eastern custom more often named a city for its builder instead.
1 Kings 16:23
“In the thirty and first year of Asa . . . began Omri to reign--The twelve years of his reign are computed from the beginning of his reign, which was in the twenty-seventh year of Asa's reign.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 more voice on this verse
1 Kings 16:23
“In the thirty and first year of Asa - There must be a mistake here in the number thirty-one; for, in 1Ki 16:10 and 1Ki 16:15, it is said that Zimri slew his master, and began to reign in the twenty-seventh year of Asa; and as Zimri reigned only seven days, and Omri immediately succeeded him, this could not be in the thirty-first, but in the twenty-seventh year of Asa, as related above. Rab. Sol.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The city is named after the seller, Shemer, and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown suggest the name was a term of the sale. Adam Clarke traces the royal seat from Shechem, where Jeroboam built at 12:25, to Tirzah and now to Samaria. Omri owned the hill by purchase.
1 Kings 16:24
“He bought the hill Samaria of Shemer - This should be read, “He bought the hill of Shomeron from Shomer, and called it Shomeron, (i.e., Little Shomer), after the name of Shomer, owner of the hill.” At first the kings of Israel dwelt at Shechem, and then at Tirzah; but this place having suffered much in the civil broils, and the place having been burnt down by Zimri, Omri purposed to found a new city, to which he might transfer the seat of government.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
1 Kings 16:24
“Shemer had probably made it a condition of the sale, that the name should be retained. But as city and palace were built there by Omri, it was in accordance with Eastern custom to call it after the founder. The Assyrians did so, and on a tablet dug out of the ruins of Nineveh, an inscription was found relating to Samaria, which is called Beth-khumri--the house of Omri [LAYARD].”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 Kings 16:25-27
did worse than all that were before him: Omri wrought evil and did worse than all that were before him, a sentence this chapter repeats and then raises twice more, once for Omri and once again for his son. Micah 6:16 later names the statutes of Omri as a byword, decrees the commentators read as an organized system enforcing the calf worship rather than merely permitting it. The chronicle formula closes his reign the same way it closed every king before him, might and acts filed in a book the author expects his reader to know and does not reproduce.
1 Kings 16:25
“But Omri wrought evil in the eyes of the Lord,.... Openly and publicly, as if it were in defiance of him: and did worse than all that were before him; taking no warning by the judgments inflicted on them, which aggravated his sins; and besides, he not only worshipped the calves, as the rest, and drew Israel by his example into the same, as they did, but he published edicts and decrees, obliging them to worship them, and forbidding them to go to Jerusalem, called "the statutes of Omri", Mic 6:16.”
1 more voice on this verse
1 Kings 16:25
“Omri outwent his idolatrous predecessors in his zeal, reducing the calf-worship to a regular formal system, which went down to posterity (compare the marginal reference).”
Omri founded a new dynasty and a new capital, and the worship of the calves of Jeroboam went on unchanged. The worthless idols of verse 13 stand in his record as well. A change of capital left the calves in place.
1 Kings 16:26
“For he walked in the way of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, in his sin wherewith he made Israel to sin,.... Worshipping the calves; to provoke the Lord God of Israel to anger with their vanities; these, and whatsoever idols else were worshipped by him, see 1Ki 16:13.”
Albert Barnes connects the might of Omri with a war against Syria of Damascus. At 20:34, Ben-hadad speaks of cities his father took from the father of Ahab and of Syrian markets in Samaria. Barnes reads the outcome as a loss for Omri.
1 Kings 16:27
“His might - Perhaps in the war between Israel and Syria of Damascus (1Ki 20:1, etc.), during the reign of Omri. Its issue was very disadvantageous to him 1Ki 20:34; 1Ki 22:2.”
1 Kings 16:28-29
Ahab his son reigned in his stead: Omri dies a natural death and is buried in the city he built, the first king of this dynasty to leave a throne to a son rather than to a killer. Ahab holds that throne twenty and two years, longer than any northern king before him, and the chapter has already spent nine verses establishing that Omri did worse than every predecessor. Ahab is about to be measured against that new floor rather than against Jeroboam alone.
1 Kings 16:28
“So Omri slept with his fathers,.... Died a natural death: and was buried in Samaria; the city he had built, and now the royal seat and metropolis of the kingdom: and Ahab his son reigned in his stead; of whom much is said in the following history.”
Ahab, Jezebel, and Jericho rebuilt at the price of sons
Albert Barnes compares the dates of 15:10 and 22:51 and counts the reign of Ahab at no more than twenty-one years. Ahab rules from Samaria, his father's new city. Ephrem the Syrian reads him as a king who judged the calves of Jeroboam too small a religion.
1 Kings 16:29
“Twenty and two years - Rather, from a comparison between 1Ki 15:10 and 1Ki 22:51, not more than 21 years. Perhaps his reign did not much exceed 20 years.”
1 Kings 16:30-31
above all that were before him: repeats Omri's own epitaph and raises it one degree further for the son, and the Hebrew of verse 31 asks was it a light thing, a question that answers itself by refusing an easy no. Marrying Jezebel, daughter of Ethbaal king of the Zidonians, ties Ahab's throne to Tyre's priesthood of Baal and Astarte by treaty as much as by love, and the verse names that marriage as the hinge everything after it turns on.
1 Kings 16:30
“And Ahab the son of Omri did evil in the sight of the Lord, above all that were before him. Adding other idols to the calves, and those more abominable than they; since the other kings pretended to worship God in them, but he worshipped other gods besides him, as the following verses show.”
Jamieson, Fausset and Brown report from ancient historians that Ethbaal was a priest of Astarte who killed the king of Tyre and took his throne. John Gill notes that Tyre and Sidon then had one king, so the king of the Sidonians ruled Tyre too. Baal means lord, Matthew Henry notes.
1 Kings 16:31
“And it came to pass, as if it had been a light thing for him to walk in the sin of Jeroboam the son of Nebat,.... To worship the golden calves he set up: that he took to wife Jezebel the daughter of Ethbaal king of the Zidonians; who is called Ithobalus and Itobalus king of the Tyrians, by Heathen historians (h); and, by Theophilus of Antioch (i), Juthobalus, priest of Astarte; for Tyre and Zidon were under one king.”
3 more voices on this verse
1 Kings 16:31
“This was done through the influence of Jezebel, Ahab's queen. She was "the daughter of Eth-baal, king of the Zidonians." He was priest of Ashtaroth or Astarte, who, having murdered Philetes, king of Tyre, ascended the throne of that kingdom, being the eighth king since Hiram.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 Kings 16:31
“A light thing - The Hebrew runs, was it a light thing,&c., that is, was this but a small sin, that therefore he needed to add more abominations? Where the question, as is usual among the Hebrew, implies a strong denial; and intimates, that this was no small sin, but a great crime; and might have satisfied his wicked mind, without any additions.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
1 Kings 16:31
“In honour of this mock deity, whom they called Baal--lord, and for the convenience of his worship, 1. Ahab built a temple in Samaria, the royal city, because the temple of God was in Jerusalem, the royal city of the other kingdom.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Kings 16:32-33
an altar for Baal in the house of Baal: Ahab builds Baal an altar and a house in Samaria itself, the capital his father bought, and adds a grove, Asherah, the goddess image the older writers name by different words but the same office. Verse 33's closing line outdoes verse 30's already: Ahab did more to provoke the LORD God of Israel to anger than all the kings of Israel that were before him, the chapter's third and steepest escalation in nine verses. Manufactured religion has moved from two calves at Bethel and Dan to a state temple for a foreign god inside one royal lifetime.
1 Kings 16:32
“And he reared up an altar for Baal in the house of Baal, which he had built in Samaria. That he might not go so far as Tyre or Zidon; and for his wife's convenience also he built a temple in Samaria for Baal, and erected an altar there to offer sacrifices upon it unto him; so open and daring was he in his idolatrous practices.”
Adam Clarke notes that the Syriac version renders Asherah as an idol and the Arabic as a tall tree. Deuteronomy 16:21 forbade any wooden Asherah pole next to the altar of the LORD. Ahab set one up in his capital.
1 Kings 16:33
“Ahab made a grove - אשרה Asherah, Astarte, or Venus; what the Syriac calls an idol, and the Arabic, a tall tree; probably meaning, by the last, an image of Priapus, the obscene keeper of groves, orchards, and gardens.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
laid the foundation thereof in Abiram his firstborn: Hiel of Bethel rebuilds Jericho and the price is his own sons, Abiram at the foundation and Segub the youngest at the gates, exactly the sentence Joshua spoke over that ground at Josh 6:26 nearly five centuries earlier. The chapter that opened by fulfilling a sentence on Baasha's house inside one generation closes by fulfilling one held in reserve for centuries, and the narrator names both the same way, according to the word of the Lord. Whether the deaths came through the ordinary loss any builder risked or through a direct stroke, the commentators differ, and the text itself names only that the word Joshua spoke came to pass.
1 Kings 16:34
“But the curse was fulfilled more than five hundred years after it was uttered; and from Jericho being inhabited after Joshua's time (Jud 3:13; 2Sa 10:5), it has been supposed that the act against which the curse was directed, was an attempt at the restoration of the walls--the very walls which had been miraculously cast down.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
2 more voices on this verse
1 Kings 16:34
“In his days - This is added, 1. as an instance of the certainty of divine predictions, this being fulfilled eight hundred years after it was threatened; and withal, as a warning to the Israelites, not to think themselves innocent or safe, because the judgment threatened against them by Ahijah, chap. xiv, 15, was not yet executed.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
1 Kings 16:34
“It comes in as an instance of the height of impiety to which men had arrived, especially at Bethel, where one of the calves was, for of that city this daring sinner was. Like Achan he meddled with the accursed thing, turned that to his own use which was devoted to God's honour.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
How this psalm is built
The form: Regnal notice at speed: five dynasties, four assassinations and one purchase, each closed by the chronicle formula whatever the length of the reign, as Barnes classes it.
The patterns in this chapter
| Device | What it does | Where to see it |
|---|---|---|
| The charge against Jeroboam, spoken again to Baasha | Jehu's oracle at verses 2 and 3 reuses the charge Ahijah brought at 14:7 to 14:9, exalted out of the dust, made prince, and now making the people sin. The site's published exposition of verses 1 and 2 marks the turn in it, that the man who took the throne by destroying Jeroboam's house is condemned in the words that condemned Jeroboam. Baasha fails the test he was raised up to enforce.Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, on 1 Kings 16:1. | 1 Kings 16:2, 1 Kings 16:3, 1 Kings 14:7 |
| The dogs and the birds, the second link of three | Verse 4 passes on Baasha's house the sentence spoken over Jeroboam's at 14:11, and the same sentence falls a third time on Ahab and Jezebel at 21:19 to 21:24. The site's published exposition of verses 3 and 4 records that no burial was the severest dishonour of the ancient world, and that the text states the terms without describing the horror. Three dynasties take the same words before the book turns south.John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament, 1748 to 1763, on 1 Kings 16:4. | 1 Kings 16:4, 1 Kings 14:11, 1 Kings 21:19 |
| The chronicle formula, given to a seven-day reign and a twelve-year reign alike | The closing notice falls at verses 5, 14, 20 and 27, and Zimri's seven days are filed with the same words as Omri's twelve years. The site's published exposition of verses 19 and 20 marks the point of it. Zimri's treason is filed beside the acts and might of every other king, as though the length of a reign made no difference to the record. The book measures a northern king by his distance from Jeroboam's calves rather than by his time on the throne.Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments, 1832 to 1869, on 1 Kings 16:19. | 1 Kings 16:5, 1 Kings 16:14, 1 Kings 16:20, 1 Kings 16:27 |
| Worse than all before him, raised three times in nine verses | Verse 25 says Omri did worse than all before him, and verse 30 says the same of Ahab. Verse 33 raises it again, saying Ahab provoked the LORD further than every king of Israel who came before. The site's published exposition of verses 32 and 33 calls it the chapter's third and steepest escalation, and marks how far the worship has travelled. Two calves at Bethel and Dan have become a state temple for a foreign god inside one royal lifetime.This site's published exposition of 1 Kings 16, the notes on verses 25 to 27 and 32 to 33, data/commentary/1-kings-16-exposition.json. | 1 Kings 16:25, 1 Kings 16:30, 1 Kings 16:33 |
| Was it a light thing, a question that answers itself | Verse 31 asks whether walking in the sin of Jeroboam was a light thing, and then names the marriage to Jezebel. John Wesley records that the Hebrew runs as a question, and that a question of that form among the Hebrews implies a strong denial, so it intimates a great crime rather than a small sin. Albert Barnes draws the other lesson from the same verse in four words, that idolatries are not exclusive.John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament, 1765, on 1 Kings 16:31. | 1 Kings 16:31 |
| A sentence closed in one generation and a sentence closed in five centuries | The chapter opens with Jehu's word against Baasha carried out on his house inside one generation, at verses 11 to 13. It closes at verse 34 with the curse Joshua spoke over Jericho at Joshua 6:26 falling on Hiel's two sons. The site's published exposition of verse 34 marks that the narrator names both fulfilments the same way, according to the word of the LORD. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown record that the curse was fulfilled more than five hundred years after it was uttered.Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, 1871, on 1 Kings 16:34. | 1 Kings 16:12, 1 Kings 16:34, Joshua 6:26 |
The historical value
14 more paragraphs on the patterns
This chapter carries more foreign attestation than any other in the book, because it introduces Omri. This site's published archaeology section for 1 Kings records the Mesha Stele, inscribed about 840 BC and found at Dhiban in 1868. On it Mesha king of Moab records that Omri king of Israel oppressed Moab for many years, and that Moab then threw the occupation off. The section notes the weight of that, since Omri is introduced here in a handful of verses and stands in a hostile foreign monument as the ruler who subjugated a neighbouring kingdom.
The Assyrian records go further and outlast his line. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown record that a tablet dug out of the ruins of Nineveh carries an inscription relating to Samaria, which it calls Beth-khumri, the house of Omri. They name Layard as the source. The site's published exposition of verses 23 and 24 records that the Assyrian royal inscriptions use the name on tablets naming later kings who were not his blood.
The same archaeology section carries the Kurkh Monolith of Shalmaneser III, inscribed about 853 BC, whose account of the battle of Qarqar lists Ahab of Israel among the coalition kings with a large chariot force. It is an enemy's record of the king this chapter installs, and it places him in the century the biblical chronology puts him in. The site's published historical layer for this chapter gives the reigns from Thiele as Elah 886 to 885, Zimri 885, Omri 885 to 874 and Ahab 874 to 853 BC.
The debated concept: the deaths of Hiel's sons
Verse 34 states that Hiel of Bethel rebuilt Jericho, and that it cost him Abiram his firstborn and Segub his youngest, in the terms Joshua had used. It explains nothing further. The site's published exposition of verse 34 records that the commentators differ and that the text itself names only that the word Joshua spoke came to pass.
The first position reads the deaths as a direct stroke of judgment on a man who touched ground devoted to God. Matthew Henry takes it that way and sets Hiel beside Achan, holding that he meddled with the accursed thing and turned to his own use what was devoted to God's honour. Henry adds that the notice stands as an instance of how far impiety had reached, especially at Bethel, since that is where this builder came from.
The second position reads them as the ordinary losses a builder of that age risked, with the curse fulfilled through them rather than apart from them. The site's published exposition of verse 34 names this reading beside the first and leaves the question open.
Jamieson, Fausset and Brown raise a third question about what was cursed. They record that the curse was fulfilled more than five hundred years after it was uttered. Since Jericho was inhabited after Joshua's time, it has been supposed that the act the curse was directed against was an attempt to restore the walls, the very walls that had been miraculously cast down. The page states no verdict among the three.
The debated concept: how long Tibni held the field
The text says Israel divided into two parts at verse 21 and that Tibni died at verse 22, and it gives no length for the division and no manner for the death.
The commentators reckon the interval from the chapter's own numbers. The site's published exposition of verses 21 and 22 records that comparing the years given at verses 15, 23 and 29 yields about four years in which the two rivals held the field together. It also records the restraint the text asks for, since the manner of Tibni's death is left as silence rather than filled with invention.
Where the chapter reaches
The statutes of Omri outlive him and reach the prophets. Micah 6:16 names the statutes of Omri and the practices of Ahab's house together as the ground of a sentence. The site's published exposition of verses 25 to 27 records that the commentators read those statutes as an organised system enforcing the calf worship rather than merely permitting it.
The city Omri bought carries the book's other long reach. Samaria stands as Israel's capital for the rest of its history until Assyria takes it in 2 Kings 17. The New Testament nowhere cites 1 Kings 16.
Keep studying
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The form and classifications
Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments, 1832 to 1869, on 1 Kings 16:19; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, on 1 Kings 16:1; This site's published exposition of 1 Kings 16, the note on verses 8 to 10, data/commentary/1-kings-16-exposition.json and This site's published guide to 1 Kings, src/components/book/guides/1-kings/Book1KingsGuide.tsx, the chapter table at chapter 16.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes; Bede, Thirty Questions on the Book of Kings; Ephrem the Syrian, ON THE FIRST BOOK OF KINGS 16:29; Jamieson Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil, The Books of the Kings and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.
