Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Matthew 9:14

in Matthew 9

At that time John’s disciples came to Jesus and asked, “Why is it that we and the Pharisees fast so often, but Your disciples do not fast?”

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV

ASV

Then come to him the disciples of John, saying, Why do we and the Pharisees fast oft, but thy disciples fast not?

KJV

Then came to him the disciples of John, saying, Why do we and the Pharisees fast oft, but thy disciples fast not?

This verse in Matthew 9

Commentary

18 notes on this verse

A commentator

Jerome

Commentary on Matthew · Written before 420.

(Verse 14) Then the disciples of John came to him, saying: Why do we and the Pharisees fast often, but your disciples do not fast? Proud question, and full of the arrogance of the Pharisees. Certainly, to say nothing else, the boasting of fasting should be reprehended. And the disciples of John could not be blameless, who were slandering him, whom they knew had been proclaimed by their master's words, and were joining themselves to the Pharisees, whom they knew had been condemned by John, saying: O generation of vipers, who has shown you to flee from the coming wrath?

This site's exposition

disciples of John

on Matthew 9:14-15

The disciples of John ask why his disciples and the Pharisees fast often while Jesus' disciples do not, and Jesus answers from a wedding, the children of the bridechamber cannot mourn while the bridegroom is with them. He identifies himself as the bridegroom, the first sounding of the bridegroom thread that runs to the marriage of the king's son in chapter 22 and the ten virgins in chapter 25, drawing on Hosea's marriage theology of Israel and her God. The days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken from them, and then shall they fast names his death plainly and reorders fasting as mourning for an absence rather than a work that earns favor.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers5 voices

A commentator

Peter Chrysologus

SERMONS 31.2 · Written before 450.

proposed

What did John's disciples have in common with the Pharisees if not a bond of ill will uniting those whom discipline had separated? In this case jealousy loses its bearings: Accustomed to separating people, it united them. The Jews were not disposed to esteem Moses …

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

(ubi sup.) Though Matthew mentions only the disciples of John as having made this enquiry, the words of Mark rather seem to imply that some other persons spoke of others, that is, the guests spoke concerning the disciples of John and the Pharisees—this is still more evident from Luke; why then does Matthew here say, Then came unto him the disciples of John, (Luck 5:33.) unless that they were there among other guests, all of whom with one consent put this objection to Him?

A commentator

Hilary of Poitiers

Commentary on Matthew 9.3 · Written before 367.

proposed

The Pharisees and John's disciples were fasting, and the apostles were not. But Jesus answered them in a spiritual way and indicated to John's disciples that he was a bridegroom. John taught that all hope in life lay in Christ. While he was still preaching, however, his disciples could not be received by the Lord. Up until the time of John, the law and the prophets prevailed, and unless the law came to an end, none of them would subscribe to faith in the gospel. The fact that he said there was no need for his disciples to fast as long as the bridegroom is with them illustrates the joy of his presence and the sacrament of the holy food, which no one need be without while he is present, that is, bearing Christ in the light of the mind. But once he is gone, Jesus says that they will fast, for all those who do not believe that Christ has risen will not have the food of life. By faith in the resurrection, the sacrament of the heavenly bread is received. Whoever is without Christ will be forsaken, fasting from the food of life.

A commentator

Tertullian

On Fasting · Written before 220.

proposed

At all events, in the Gospel they think that those days were definitely appointed for fasts in which "the Bridegroom was taken away; " and that these are now the only legitimate days for Christian fasts, the legal and prophetical antiquities having been abolished: for wherever it suits their wishes, they recognise what is the meaning of" the Law and the prophets until John.

A commentator

Jerome

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 420.

proposed

O boastful enquiry and ostentation of fasting much to be blamed, nor can John's disciples be excused for their taking part with the Pharisees who they knew had been condemned by John, and for bringing a false accusation against Him whom they knew their master had preached.
11 more voices on this verse

The Church Fathers1 voice

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 30 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

He then having stopped their mouths every way, as well from the Scriptures as from the natural consequence of things; and they having nothing to say, proved as they were obnoxious to the charges which they had brought against Him, and adversaries of the law and the Old Testament; they leave Him, and again transfer their accusation to the disciples. And Luke indeed affirms that the Pharisees said it, but this evangelist, that it was the disciples of John; but it is likely that both said it. That is, they being, as might be expected, in utter perplexity, take the other sort with them; as they did afterwards with the Herodians likewise. Since in truth John's disciples were always disposed to be jealous of Him, and reasoned against Him: being then only humbled, when first John abode in the prison. They came at least then, "and told Jesus;" but afterwards they returned to their former envy. Now what say they? "Why do we and the Pharisees fast oft, but thy disciples fast not?" This is the disease, which Christ long before was eradicating, in the words, "When thou fastest, anoint thy head, and wash thy face;" foreknowing the evils that spring therefrom. But yet He doth not rebuke even these, nor say, "O ye vainglorious and over-busy;" but He discourses to them with all gentleness.

The Medieval Church4 voices

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Matthew · Written before 1107.

proposed

"Then came to Him the disciples of John, saying, Why do we and the Pharisees fast often, but Thy disciples fast not?" John's disciples were envious of Christ's fame and so accused Him of not fasting. And perhaps they were wondering how He conquered the …

A commentator

Rabanus Maurus

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 856.

proposed

For John drank neither wine, nor strong drink, increasing his merit by abstinence, because he had no power over nature. But the Lord who has power to forgive sins, why should He shun sinners that eat, since He has power to make them more righteous than those that eat not? Yet doth Christ fast, that you should not avoid the command; but He eats with sinners that you may know His grace and power.

A commentator

Glossa Ordinaria

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 1274.

proposed

(ap. Anselm.) When He had replied to them respecting eating and converse with sinners, they next assault Him on the matter of food; Then came to him the disciples of John, saying, Why do we and the Pharisees fast often, but thy disciples fast not?

A commentator

Thomas Aquinas

Commentary on Matthew · Written before 1274.

proposed

Here arises a question about banqueting, followed by the answer. But then there is the textual question as to why it seems from Mark (2:18) and Luke (5:29) that the question was proposed by others; for it says in Mark (2:18): "Why do John's disciples …

The Puritans and the Awakening2 voices

Then came to him the disciples of John,.... Of John the Baptist, to whom they had addicted themselves, and by whom they abode: though their master was in prison, and the Messiah was known to be come, yet still they were attached to John, and particularly imitated him in the austerities of his life.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

Note, As it is wisdom's honour to be justified of all her children, so it is her children's happiness to be all justified of wisdom. What we do according to the precept and pattern of Christ, he will be sure to bear us out in, and we may with confidence leave it to him to clear up our integrity.

The Nineteenth Century4 voices

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

Thy disciples fast not? - Probably meaning that they did not fast so frequently as the others did, or for the same purposes, which is very likely, for the Pharisees had many superstitious fasts. They fasted in order to have lucky dreams, to obtain the interpretation of a dream, or to avert the evil import of a dream. They also fasted often, in order to obtain the things they wished for. The tract, Taanith is full of these fasts, and of the wonders performed thus by the Jewish doctors.
Let us mark, in this passage, the gracious name by which the Lord Jesus speaks of himself. He calls himself “the bridegroom” What the bridegroom is to the bride, the Lord Jesus is to the souls of all who believe in him. He loves them with a deep and everlasting love. He takes them into union with himself: they are “one with Christ and Christ in them.”

A commentator

J.C. Ryle

1816–1900

Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew (1856)

proposed

Let us mark, in this passage, the gracious name by which the Lord Jesus speaks of himself. He calls himself “the bridegroom” What the bridegroom is to the bride, the Lord Jesus is to the souls of all who believe in him. He loves them with a deep and everlasting love. He takes them into union with himself: they are “one with Christ and Christ in them.” He pays all their debts to God; he supplies all their daily needs; he sympathizes with them in all their troubles; he bears with all their infirmities, and does not reject them for a few weaknesses. He regards them as part of himself: those that persecute and injure them are persecuting him. The glory that he has received from his Father they will one day share with him, and where he is, there shall they be. Such are the privileges of all true Christians, they are the Lamb’s wife ( 19:7 ). Such is the portion to which faith admits us. By it God joins our poor sinful souls to one precious Husband; and those whom thus joins together shall never be put asunder. Blessed indeed are they that believe. Let us mark in the next place, what a wise principle the Lord Jesus lays down for the treatment of young disciples. There were some who found fault with our Lord’s followers because they did not fast as John the Baptist’s disciples did. Our Lord defends his disciples with an argument full of deep wisdom. He shows that there would want of fitness in their fasting so long as he, their Bridegroom, was with them. But he does not stop there. He goes on to show, by two parables, that young beginners in the school of Christianity must be dealt with gently. They must be taught as they are able to bear: they must not be expected to receive everything at once. To neglect this rule would be as unwise as to “put new wine into old bottles” piece of new cloth to an old garment.”
Then came the disciples of John ... - This narrative is found also in Mar 2:18-22; Luk 5:33-39. The reference here is to John the Baptist. It is probable that they had understood that John was the forerunner of the Messiah; and if such was the case, they could not account for the fact that there was such a difference between them and the disciples of Jesus. The Pharisees fasted often - regularly twice a week besides the great national days of fasting, Luk 18:12. See the notes at Mat 6:16-18. This was the established custom of the land, and John did not feel himself authorized to make so great a change as to dispense with it. They were desirous of knowing, therefore, why Jesus had done it. Besides, it is probable that this question was put to Jesus when John was in prison, and his disciples, involved in deep grief on account of it, observed days of fasting. Fasting was the natural expression of sorrow, and they wondered that the followers of Jesus did not join with them in lamenting the captivity of him who was the forerunner and baptizer of their Lord. Christ, in reply to them, used three illustrations, all of them going to establish the same thing - that “we should observe a fitness and propriety in things.” The first is taken from a marriage. The children of the bride-chamber - that is, the bridemen, or “men who had the special care of the bridal chamber, and who were therefore his special friends” - do not think of fasting while he is with them. With them it is a time of festivity and rejoicing, and mourning would not be appropriate. When he is removed or taken away, then their festivity will be ended, and “then” will be the proper time for sorrow. So, says he, John, your friend and teacher, is in captivity. With you it is a time of deep grief, and it is appropriate that you should fast. I am with my disciples. It is with them a time of joy. […]

How the passage was read

On Matthew 9:9-17

On Matthew 9:9-17

Why eating at Matthew's table shocked, and why the fasting question was sincere

The Pharisaic program was a table program. A chaver (“associate,” a member of the fellowship) undertook to eat only properly tithed, ritually pure food, and therefore would not accept the hospitality of an am ha'aretz (“people of the land,” the ordinary non-observant), whose food and vessels could not be trusted; the Mishnah sets out those membership terms (Demai 2:2). Tax collectors stood lower still: collaborators living by extortion, so far outside the community's trust that the Mishnah rules a house unclean if tax collectors have entered it (Taharot 7:6). Reclining at Matthew's table was therefore not loose etiquette; it was a deliberate crossing of a purity-and-loyalty boundary, and Jesus defends it from the prophets: “I desire mercy, and not sacrifice” (Hosea 6:6).

The fasting question that follows comes from devout practice, not hostility: John's own disciples fasted. The Torah commands one fast a year (the Day of Atonement); the pious added voluntary fasts, by Jesus' day typically Monday and Thursday, a rhythm the Talmud's fasting tractate discusses (Ta'anit 12a) and the Pharisee of Luke 18:12 names: “I fast twice in the week.” Jesus' answer runs on the tradition's own wedding law: a bridegroom is exempt from reciting the Shema on his wedding night, because joy overrides (Mishnah Berakhot 2:5). “Can the wedding guests mourn while the bridegroom is with them?” claims that exemption for His whole company, and quietly takes the Bridegroom's role, which in the Prophets belongs to God Himself (Hosea 2, Isaiah 62:5).

This section is reception history: how the passage was read and kept in the Jewish tradition. Where a reading parts from an essential of the Christian faith, the section says so at that point.

Sources: Mishnah Demai 2:2 (the associate's table discipline) · Mishnah Taharot 7:6 (tax collectors and the unclean house) · Mishnah Berakhot 2:5 (the bridegroom's exemption) · Ta'anit 12a (Babylonian Talmud, the voluntary fast days)

The words behind it

21 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

5 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Matthew 6:16

    When you fast, do not be somber like the hypocrites, for they disfigure their faces to show men they are fasting. Truly I tell you, they already have their full reward.

    it leads to

    • Isaiah 58:3–5

      “Why have we fasted, and You have not seen? Why have we humbled ourselves, and You have not noticed?” “Behold, on the day of your fast, you do as you please, and you oppress…

    • Matthew 9:14–15

      At that time John’s disciples came to Jesus and asked, “Why is it that we and the Pharisees fast so often, but Your disciples do not fast?”

    • Nehemiah 1:4

      When I heard these words, I sat down and wept. I mourned for days, fasting and praying before the God of heaven.

    • Daniel 9:3

      So I turned my attention to the Lord God to seek Him by prayer and petition, with fasting, sackcloth, and ashes.

    • Psalms 69:10

      I wept and fasted, but it brought me reproach.

Where this verse is studied

About Matthew

John the Baptist Baptizes Jesus, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.
John the Baptist Baptizes Jesus, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.
This page draws on 18 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Augustine of Hippo, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Glossa Ordinaria, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Hilary of Poitiers, Commentary on Matthew 9.3; J.C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jerome, Commentary on Matthew; Jerome, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew; John Chrysostom, Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 30; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Peter Chrysologus, SERMONS 31.2; Rabanus Maurus, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Tertullian, On Fasting; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Matthew and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Matthew.