Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.

Numberschapter 26

65 verses · Moses, by tradition · 15th to 13th century BC · The Law

Notwithstanding the land shall be divided by lot: according to the names of the tribes of their fathers they shall inherit.

Introduction

Moses, by tradition, The Law, Numbers Overview.

This chapter is the second census of Numbers, taken nearly forty years after the first. The count at Sinai numbered a generation that died in the wilderness, and this count numbers their children on the plains of Moab. The list had a practical purpose, since the land would be shared out by the size of each tribe and clan. Each family name here is a claim on a future home. Listen for the places where the list pauses to remember a family. Listen for the closing line about who is missing. The chapter measures what unbelief cost and what faithfulness kept.

Context

Who
The generation born in the wilderness, being counted for the first time
What
A census list of the twelve tribes by their clans, with the Levites counted apart and a rule for dividing the land.
Where
The plains of Moab by the Jordan across from Jericho.
When
The fortieth year after the exodus, after the plague of Peor and before the crossing of the Jordan, about 1406 BC by the count of 1 Kings 6:1, or near 1230 BC on a later dating of the exodus.
Why
To number the generation that would inherit Canaan and to set each tribe's share of the land by its size.

Historical context

The count is taken by Moses and Eleazar. The first census was taken by Moses and Aaron, and Aaron died at Mount Hor in 20:28, so his son wears the garments now.

Show the rest of the historical context, 6 more paragraphs

The year is the fortieth and the place is the last camp before the crossing. The count follows the plague of chapter 25, which had taken twenty four thousand men.

The occasion is the division of the land. Verses 52 to 56 say the land is to be divided as an inheritance according to the number of names, with the ground itself settled by lot.

A first hearer knew that counting people produced two things a government wanted, a tax roll and a muster roll. He knew the terms of this count were military, every man of twenty and upward who could serve in the army.

He knew the clan structures the counting ran through, because the same families are named in Genesis 46 and in Exodus 6. The roll is the backbone of later Israelite descent.

He also knew why a daughter in a muster roll was worth noticing. A count of fighting men had no place for one, and this list names Serah the daughter of Asher and the five daughters of Zelophehad anyway.

The totals themselves were the report. Six hundred and one thousand seven hundred and thirty, against the six hundred and three thousand five hundred and fifty of Numbers 1:46. Simeon was down by more than thirty seven thousand and Manasseh up by more than twenty thousand.

Significance

The chapter ends by saying that among these there was not one of those counted at Sinai except Caleb and Joshua. God had said the whole generation would fall in the wilderness, and this is the ledger showing it done.

Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph

And the total was nearly the same. Forty years of judgment had not shrunk Israel, and the people standing at the river were as many as the people who had refused to cross it.

This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.

How it is read

Rashi opens the second census with two readings of why it stands here. In the first a shepherd counts his flock after wolves have taken some of it. In the second Moses received the people by number when they left Egypt, and hands them back by number now that he is near death (Rashi on Numbers 26:1:1, citing Midrash Tanchuma, Pinchas 4). He notes that descent is reckoned by the father's tribe rather than the mother's (Rashi on Numbers 26:2:1, citing Bava Batra 109b).

The spelling of the family names carries a whole argument in Rashi. He records that the nations spoke against Israel, saying that the Egyptians who mastered the men had certainly mastered their wives. God therefore set two letters of his own name around each family name. The point was "to intimate: I bear testimony for them that they are the sons of their reputed fathers" (Rashi on Numbers 26:5:1, citing Shir HaShirim Rabbah 4:12). He reads Psalm 122:4 as saying the same thing, that the tribes bearing the divine name are a testimony for Israel. He then notices the exception. The family of Jimnah needed no added letters, because the name already carried them (Rashi on Numbers 26:5:1, citing Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 773).

The note on the sons of Korah is one of the best known lines in this chapter. Rashi holds that they were in the plot at first, and that repentance came into their hearts when the rebellion broke out. A high place was fenced off for them in Gehinnom, and they stayed there (Rashi on Numbers 26:11:1, citing Sanhedrin 110a). He reads the fate of Korah's company as a standing sign, so that no stranger would press a claim to the priesthood again (Rashi on Numbers 26:10:1).

Rashi also works out which families had died out, and he shows his own uncertainty while he does it. He counts seven extinct families from Simeon, Benjamin and Gad, and adds families from Levi (Rashi on Numbers 26:13:1, citing the Jerusalem Talmud at Sotah 1:10 and Yoma 1:1). He says plainly of the fourth Levite family that he does not know which one it was. He weighs the explanation of Rabbi Tanchuma, that they died in the plague after Balaam, and rejects it on the arithmetic. The fall in the tribe of Simeon between the two censuses is large enough to account for all twenty four thousand who died (Rashi on Numbers 26:13:1). He gives his sources for the harder notes as the work of Rabbi Moses the Preacher, and says he has had to omit from and add to his words (Rashi on Numbers 26:24:1 and 26:36:1). Serah the daughter of Asher is named here, in his reading, because she was still alive after all those years (Rashi on Numbers 26:46:1, citing Sotah 13a and Seder Olam 9).

The rules for dividing the land are read as law. Rashi holds that the land went only to those counted here. Sons of a man who died in the wilderness took his one portion between them (Rashi on Numbers 26:53:1, citing Bava Batra 117a). He sets out how the lot worked. Eleazar wore the Urim and Thummim and spoke by the Holy Spirit. The tablets of the tribes and of the districts were mixed in an urn. The lot itself then declared the match (Rashi on Numbers 26:54:1, citing Bava Batra 122a and Midrash Tanchuma, Pinchas 6). He adds that the portions were weighed by the quality of the soil rather than by area alone. He then states the rule of the fifty-fifth verse in its sharpest form. In every other inheritance the living inherit from the dead, and here the dead inherit from the living (Rashi on Numbers 26:55:1, citing Sifrei Bamidbar 132:1).

Ibn Ezra comments at two places here and Malbim at two more, and the corpus carries none of their text. The reason differs for each. Ibn Ezra stands cited at Numbers 26:12:1 and 26:57:1 because the licence Sefaria reports does not permit keeping the text. Malbim stands cited at Numbers 26:8:1 and 26:34:1 because Sefaria holds no English version of either.

A Christian reader should see where the readings part. Rashi reads the census as the register of the men who would receive the land, and he treats the numbers as plain numbers throughout. This site carries a theology entry titled "Two censuses, two generations" on Numbers 1:2-3 and 26:64-65, in src/components/book/dossier-content/numbers.ts, which makes the difference between the two lists the subject of the book. The same file carries the contested reading of the size of the census with its holders, and states no verdict. The commentators here are reported in their own terms.

What the rabbis say

The corpus carries forty locators on this chapter and the text of none, so each is cited and linked here rather than quoted. Thirty-seven of them are midrashic and three are Talmudic. Midrash Lekach Tov carries the heaviest run. It stands at Numbers 26:3:1, 26:14:1, 26:16:1, 26:22:1, 26:23:1, 26:25:1, 26:26:1, 26:37:1, 26:42:1, 26:44:1, 26:50:1 and 26:52:1. Bamidbar Rabbah stands at 2:11, 13:15, 14:5, 14:7, 18:20, 21:7, 21:8 and 21:11. Midrash Aggadah stands at Numbers 26:15:1, 26:20:1 and 26:38:1, and at Numbers 1:10:1.

The rest of the midrashic locators sit in eight works. Bereshit Rabbah stands at 6:9, 37:3 and 94:9. Bereshit Rabbati stands at Parashat Lech Lecha 21, Parashat Vayeshev 5 and Parashat Vayechi 2. Ein Yaakov in the Glick Edition stands at Sanhedrin 4:9 and 11:127. Devarim Rabbah stands at 11:9, Aggadat Bereshit at 22:3, and Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer at 48:18. The Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael stands at Tractate Shirah 9:8, and Sifrei Zuta at Midrashah shel Lod, Place of Compilation of Sifrei Zuta and Its Final Redactor 60. The Talmudic locators are only three. Bava Batra stands at 143b:6, with the Jerusalem Talmud at Bava Batra 8:2:1 and Yoma 1:1:8. What each of them teaches is a saying of the rabbis, and is reported as theirs wherever this site quotes one. The quotations wait on a fetch that carries the text, because the corpus holds these locators without it.

Sources: Rashi, Rashi on Numbers 26:1:1 to 26:56:1, the Pentateuch with Rashi's commentary translated by M. Rosenbaum and A. M. Silbermann, 1929 to 1934, public domain; Ibn Ezra, Ibn Ezra on Numbers 26:12:1 and 26:57:1, cited by ref because the licence the corpus reports does not permit keeping the text; Malbim, Malbim on Numbers 26:8:1 and 26:34:1, cited by ref because Sefaria holds no English version; The Sefaria corpus, scripts/data/sources/sefaria/numbers/26.json, the 37 Midrash and 3 Talmud locators of this chapter, fetched 2026-09-19; MannaFest, src/components/book/dossier-content/numbers.ts, for the theology entry on the two censuses and for the contested reading of the census size with its holders.

The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.

Counting the generation born in the wilderness

Numbers 26:1-4

Moses and Aaron took the first census at Sinai. Moses and Eleazar take this one "on the plains of Moab", because Aaron died at Mount Hor in 20:28 and his son now wears the garments. The terms repeat chapter 1, those "twenty years of age or older who can serve in the army of Israel", counted again after the plague of chapter 25 had taken 24,000 men.

Numbers 26:1

“After the plague - These words serve to show approximately the date at which the census was taken, and intimate the reason for the great decrease in numbers which was found to have taken place in certain tribes. Compare Deu 4:3 and Num 26:5 note in this chapter.”

Adam Clarke gives this second census three ends: to keep the families distinct, to order the tribes before they entered the land, and to fix the share each tribe would receive. Jamieson, Fausset & Brown put first the proof that Abraham's seed had multiplied in spite of the judgments. The land will follow these fathers' houses.

Numbers 26:2

“Take the sum of all the congregation - After thirty-eight years God commands a second census of the Israelites to be made, to preserve the distinction in families, and to regulate the tribes previously to their entry into the promised land, and to ascertain the proportion of land which should be allowed to each tribe. For though the whole was divided by lot, yet the portions were so disposed that a numerous tribe did not draw where the lots assigned small inheritances. See Num 26:53-56, and also see the note on Num 1:1.”

Matthew Henry notes that Eleazar is joined in the commission as Aaron had been at Sinai. The pairing honoured Eleazar before the elders and confirmed his succession. The place matters as well. Israel is counted at its last camp before the river, with Jericho across the water.

Matthew Henry notes that Moses numbered the people only when God commanded it, and sets this beside David, who counted without a command and paid dearly for it. John Calvin reads the verse as proof that the rule set at Sinai was followed again. The count waited on the word.

Numbers 26:5-11

Reuben's roll stops to tell how "the earth opened its mouth and swallowed" Dathan and Abiram, adding "They serve as a warning sign". Verse 11 adds what chapter 16 never gave: "the line of Korah did not die out". That house sings afterward: 1 Chronicles 6:22 and 6:33 run Samuel and Heman out of it and eleven psalms carry the sons of Korah in their titles.

Numbers 26:5

“Reuben, the eldest son of Israel,.... the number of his tribe is taken first on that account; there were four families that descended from him, the Hanochite, Palluite, Hesronite, and Carmite, and the number of men from twenty years old and upwards, fit for war, were 43,730; so that, since the last numbering, this tribe was decreased 2770; which may in part be accounted for by the families of Dathan and Abiram being cut off for their rebellion, who were this tribe, and whose affair is briefly related in the following verses, and it may be to point out this…”

1 more voice on this verse

Numbers 26:5

“Following The tribes are mentioned in the same order as in the earlier census Num. 1, except that Manasseh here precedes Ephraim; probably as being now the larger tribe.”

Hezron and Carmi complete the four clans of Reuben. Matthew Henry explains that a family in these rolls means all the descendants of one son of a patriarch, who kept that son's name in his honour. John Wesley adds that each tribe's land was shared among its families according to the number of persons in each.

Reuben stands at 43,730 against 46,500 at Sinai, a loss of 2,770. John Wesley and Jamieson, Fausset & Brown both lay part of it to Korah's conspiracy and to other outbreaks in the tribe. The firstborn's tribe arrives smaller. Its clans, in their reading, were principal households divided into many smaller families.

Numbers 26:7

“These are the families of the Reubenites--the principal households, which were subdivided into numerous smaller families. Reuben had suffered great diminution by Korah's conspiracy and other outbreaks [Nu 16:1].”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

John Gill notes that Pallu had one son only, Eliab, the father of Dathan and Abiram. Here the roll leaves the clan heads and follows one line down two generations. It has a reason. The next verse names the two rebels that line produced.

Numbers 26:8

“And the sons of Pallu,.... Or son, the plural for the singular, Pallu having but one son, whose name was Eliab, the father of Dathan and Abiram; Num 26:9.”

Matthew Henry takes chosen by the congregation to mean that these men were well known, able and fit for business, and might have risen in time under God and Moses. Their ambition set them against both. Henry adds that the story returns here so that later readers proud of their pedigree would remember the evildoers in it.

Numbers 26:9

“Though the story had been largely related but a few chapters before, yet here it comes in again, as fit to be had in remembrance and thought of by posterity, whenever they looked into their pedigree and pleased themselves with the antiquity of their families and the glory of their ancestors, that they might call themselves a seed of evil doers.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Readers have divided over whether Korah went down with Dathan and Abiram or died in the fire with the 250. John Wesley and Jamieson, Fausset & Brown both mention the rendering the things of Korah, meaning his tent and goods. The point is still argued. Wesley reads the warning sign as a monument against rebellion and against seizing the priest's office.

Numbers 26:10

“Together with Korah - The Samaritan text does not intimate that Korah was swallowed up, but that he was burnt, as appears in fact to have been the case. And the earth swallowed them up, what time that company died; and the fire devoured Korah with the two hundred and fifty men, who became a sign.”

1 more voice on this verse

Numbers 26:10

“With Korah - According to this translation Korah was not consumed by fire with his two hundred and fifty men, but swallowed up by the earth. But others rather think he was devoured by the fire, and render these words, and the things of Korah, or belonging to Korah, namely, his tent and goods, and family, children excepted, as here follows.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The whole record on this verse →

Two accounts are given of why the sons of Korah lived. Jamieson, Fausset & Brown say either they took no part in the crime or they turned from it in time. John Wesley says they disowned their father's act and left his tent and company. Both readings clear the sons.

Numbers 26:11

“The children of Korah died not - Compare Num 26:58. Samuel the prophet was of this family, and Heman, “the king’s seer” 1Ch 6:22, 1Ch 6:33; 1Ch 25:5. Several of the Psalms appear from the titles to have been composed for the sons of Korah: compare titles of Psa 42:1-11; 44; 45, etc.”

Numbers 26:12-18

Simeon comes out of the wilderness at 22,200, down from 59,300 at Sinai, a loss of more than 37,000 men and the largest fall of any tribe. Chapter 25:14 had just named Zimri, the man slain at Peor, as "the leader of a Simeonite family". Gad falls too, by about five thousand, and the chapter reports both numbers and says nothing about either.

Numbers 26:12

“Thus God's justice and holiness, as well as His truth and faithfulness, were strikingly displayed: His justice and holiness in the sweeping judgments that reduced the ranks of some tribes; and His truth and faithfulness in the extraordinary increase of others so that the posterity of Israel continued a numerous people.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

Zerah and Shaul close a roll of five Simeonite clans. Matthew Henry and John Wesley note that a sixth, the house of Ohad named at Exodus 6:15, had died out in the wilderness. Its name has no place here. The land shared out in verses 52 to 56 went only to clans that still stood.

At 22,200 Simeon holds little more than a third of its 59,300 at Sinai, as John Wesley puts it. Wesley and Matthew Henry report the conjecture that most of the 24,000 slain at Peor were Simeonites. Its later history stayed small. Moses leaves Simeon out of his blessing in Deuteronomy 33, and Joshua 19:9 gives it a portion inside Judah's lot.

Numbers 26:14

“For Zimri, a ring-leader in that iniquity, was a prince of that tribe. Simeon is not mentioned in Moses's blessing, Deut. xxxiii, 1-29. And the lot of that tribe in Canaan was inconsiderable, only a canton out of Judah's lot, Josh. xix, 9.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

John Gill explains that Gad follows Simeon because both camped under the standard of Reuben. He also notes that several names differ from the list in Genesis 46:16, where Zephon appears as Ziphion. Such variants recur in these rolls. John Wesley suggests that names were sometimes added or changed on occasions Scripture does not record.

Numbers 26:15

“The children of Gad, after their families tribe was numbered next to Simeon,.... because it lay encamped with that under the standard of Reuben. There is a little variation in the names of two or three of his sons, from those by which they are called Gen 46:16, instead of Ziphion, here Zephon; and for Haggai, here Haggi; and what is much wider, for Ezbon, here Ozni.”

Ozni stands where Genesis 46:16 has Ezbon, a variant noted by John Gill. Gill calls it much wider than the other changes in the roll of Gad. The clan kept its place whatever its spelling. Its name would still mark out its share of the ground Gad received.

Arod and Areli bring Gad to seven clans, one of the largest numbers in Matthew Henry's count of families. Only Manasseh, with eight, has more. The number of clans did not settle a tribe's strength. The seven clans of Gad come to fewer men than the single clan of Dan.

Gad counts 40,500, down 5,150 from 45,650 at Sinai, a fall John Wesley puts at above five thousand. Matthew Henry notes that all three tribes under the standard of Judah grew. The camp of Reuben shows the reverse. Reuben, Simeon and Gad, who camped together, all come back smaller.

Numbers 26:19-22

The sons of Judah were Er and Onan: Er and Onan are written into Judah's roll and struck out in one verse, since "they died in the land of Canaan" and left no family. Genesis 38 tells how, and the son born afterward is Perez, whose family stands here and whom Ruth 4:18-22 runs down to David and Matthew 1:3 to Christ. Judah is the largest tribe in both censuses, 76,500 here against 74,600 at Sinai.

Three sons of Judah head clans here, Shelah, Perez and Zerah. Matthew Henry counts five families in Judah, since two sons of Perez head clans of their own in the next verse. Perez's line branches further. Each of the five would hold its own share when Judah's ground was divided.

Hezron and Hamul are grandsons of Judah through Perez, yet each heads a clan beside Judah's sons. The roll does this in several tribes. Machir and Gilead in Manasseh, Ard and Naaman in Benjamin, and Heber and Malchiel in Asher are further cases. Matthew Henry's count of families in each tribe includes all of them.

Judah has grown by 1,900 since Sinai. John Wesley points out that Reuben, Simeon and Gad, the three tribes before it in the roll, had all fallen. Matthew Henry sees meaning in the growth of Judah's whole camp, since Judah was the ancestor of Christ and his church would be built up and multiplied.

Numbers 26:23-28

Issachar and Zebulun both grow, Issachar by nine thousand nine hundred and Zebulun by three thousand one hundred. The tribes are taken in the order chapter 1 used, with one change, that Manasseh is named before Ephraim. Jacob crossed his hands to set Ephraim first at Genesis 48:14, and the numbers in the verses that follow run the other way.

Numbers 26:23

“Of the sons of Issachar, after their families,.... This tribe was numbered next to Judah, because it was under his standard. Two of his sons are a little differently named than they are Gen 46:13 instead of Phuvah one is called Pua, and instead of Job another is called here Jashub; this tribe consisted of four families, and the number of warlike men in it was 64,300; their increase since the last numbering of them is 9900.”

Jashub stands where the list of Genesis 46:13 has Job, one of two Issacharite names John Gill finds changed between the rolls. Gill counts four families in the tribe. Those four carry the gain of 9,900 men Issachar made since Sinai into the land.

Issachar reaches 64,300 against 54,400 at Sinai. John Gill notes that it is numbered next to Judah because it camped under the standard of Judah. Only Manasseh, Asher and Benjamin grew by more. Issachar now ranks third among the tribes in size.

Zebulun has three clans, the fewest of any tribe after Dan in Matthew Henry's count. John Gill places it after Issachar because it too camped under the standard of Judah. Its muster is large all the same.

Numbers 26:26

“Of he sons of Zebulun, after their families,.... This is numbered next to Issachar, because it was encamped under the standard of Judah; it consisted of three families, whose numbers were 60,500, so that this tribe was increased 3100.”

Zebulun counts 60,500, a rise of 3,100 on its 57,400 at Sinai, as John Gill records. Its total completes the camp of Judah. The three tribes under that standard now number 201,300 men, up from 186,400 in Numbers 1.

John Gill explains the order by numbers, since Manasseh had now grown the larger of the two. Matthew Henry goes further and suggests that Ephraim had grown proud of Jacob's blessing and looked down on Manasseh. In his reading God raised the weaker brother. The two sons of Joseph still count as two tribes.

Numbers 26:28

“Jacob had crossed hands upon their heads, and had preferred Ephraim before Manasseh, which perhaps the Ephraimites had prided themselves too much in, and had trampled upon their brethren the Manassites; but, when the Lord saw that Manasseh was despised, he thus multiplied him exceedingly, for it is his glory to help the weakest, and raise up those that are cast down.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Numbers 26:29-34

Manasseh is counted through Machir and Gilead, whose six sons give the tribe's six families. The list reaches Hepher and Zelophehad, then records five names a muster of men who "can serve in the army" had no need of, "Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah", and writes them in anyway. In chapter 27 they ask a share of the inheritance this census is taken to divide.

The roll of Manasseh runs three generations deep, from Machir to Gilead to the sons of Gilead. Iezer and Helek are the first of those sons to head clans. Matthew Henry counts eight families in Manasseh, the most of any tribe. The smallest tribe at Sinai now has the most clans.

Asriel and Shechem continue the clans of Gilead. John Wesley explains that the share falling to a tribe by lot was then given to its families in proportion to their numbers. A clan name in this roll was therefore a title to land.

Hepher closes the six clans of Gilead that John Gill lists under Manasseh. The roll then pauses at his line. Gill traces the whole tribe to one son, Machir, and one grandson, Gilead. From that narrow stem came eight clans and 52,700 men.

Zelophehad's house enters the roll with no man to be counted in it. Jamieson, Fausset & Brown explain that shares were fixed by the number of persons twenty years old at this census. On that rule alone his line would draw nothing. Recording the daughters by name keeps his house in view when the land is shared.

Manasseh has grown from 32,200 to 52,700, a gain of 20,500 and the largest of any tribe. John Wesley ties the rise to the words of Jacob over Joseph at Genesis 49:22. Matthew Henry notes the reversal. The smallest tribe at Sinai is now among the largest.

Numbers 26:34

“Fifty two thousand and seven hundred - Whereas they were but thirty two thousand and two hundred, in chap. i, 35. So they are now increased above twenty thousand, according to that prophecy, Gen. xlix, 22.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

Numbers 26:35-41

Ephraim loses eight thousand men and comes in at 32,500, twenty thousand below Manasseh. Benjamin had ten sons at Genesis 46:21 and five of them head families here, and the chapter gives no reason for the other five. Benjamin has grown by ten thousand men since Sinai even so.

Numbers 26:35

“These are the sons of Ephrain, after their families,.... Which were but three, the Shuthalhite, the Bachrite, and the Tahanite, only from the former sprung another family, called the Eranite; the number of the whole was 32,500; there was a decrease in this tribe of 8000.”

Eran is a grandson of Ephraim through Shuthelah, and his line forms a fourth clan beside the three sons. John Gill notes that it sprang from the first of them. Ephraim has four clans in Matthew Henry's count. Only Zebulun and Dan have fewer.

Ephraim counts 32,500, eight thousand below its 40,500 at Sinai. Matthew Henry notes that the tribe Jacob set first is now one of the least. The house of Joseph as a whole still grew. Manasseh and Ephraim together come to 85,200 against 72,700 in Numbers 1.

John Wesley counts five of the ten sons of Benjamin in this roll and supposes the rest died out with their families. Bela, Ashbel and Ahiram open the list. A lost line had no clan and no share when the land was divided by families.

Numbers 26:38

“The sons of Benjamin - Who were ten, Gen. xlvi, 21, whereof only five are here mentioned, the rest probably, together with their families, being extinct.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

Shupham and Hupham complete the sons of Benjamin who head clans. John Gill notes that Benjamin is counted next to Ephraim because it camped under the standard of Ephraim. That camp grew most of the four. Its three tribes now number 130,800, against 108,100 at Sinai.

Ard and Naaman appear here as sons of Bela, each heading a clan. Matthew Henry reckons seven of the ten names of Genesis 46:21 as preserved in this roll, which counts these two among the sons of Benjamin. John Wesley counts five sons only. The two readings place these men differently in the family.

Benjamin counts 45,600, up 10,200 from 35,400 at Sinai. Only Manasseh and Asher grew more. Matthew Henry still calls it none of the most numerous tribes, and he draws a lesson from the ten sons Benjamin once had. Providence, he says, does not tie itself to probabilities in building up families.

Numbers 26:42-47

Dan has one son, one family, and 64,400 men, second in size only to Judah. Ten sons of Benjamin produced fewer fighting men than the one son of Dan. Asher grows by nearly twelve thousand, and his roll closes on a woman, his daughter Serah, whom Genesis 46:17 also names.

Numbers 26:42

“These are the sons of Dan, after their families,.... Though he had but one son, the plural being put for the singular; or by sons are meant his posterity; his son's name was Shuham, and by transposition Hushim, in Gen 46:23 from him was the family of the Shulamite; and yet, though but one, consisted of 64,400 men; there was an increase of 1700 in this tribe.”

The single clan of Dan counts 64,400, a rise of 1,700 on its 62,700 at Sinai. Of the seven tribes that grew, Dan grew least. Matthew Henry says of it that its beginning was small and its latter end greatly increased. John Wesley draws the lesson that the growth of families depends on God's blessing alone.

Numbers 26:43

“Threescore and four thousand and four hundred - All from one son and family, whereas of Benjamin who had ten sons, and five families, there were only forty five thousand and six hundred, to shew that the increase of families depends singly upon God's blessing and good pleasure.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

Imnah, Ishvi and Beriah head the first three clans of Asher. Matthew Henry counts five Asherite families in all. The two sons of Beriah in the next verse supply the other two. The older English text Henry expounds spells the first two names Jimna and Jesui.

Heber and Malchiel are grandsons of Asher through Beriah, and both head clans. The line of Beriah thus supplies three of the five Asherite families in Matthew Henry's count. One son's house branched into three clans. The rise of 11,900 men Asher made since Sinai came through clans like these.

Serah is named between the clans of Asher and their total, and she heads no clan of her own. Matthew Henry's count of five Asherite families leaves her outside it. The roll records her anyway. Her place in it goes unexplained in the chapter.

Asher rises to 53,400 from 41,500, a gain Matthew Henry gives as 11,900. Only Manasseh grew more. John Gill places Asher with Dan and Naphtali under the standard of Dan, and that camp as a whole now stands at 163,200 against 157,600 at Sinai.

Numbers 26:48-51

Naphtali closes the tribes eight thousand men down, and the whole comes to 601,730 against 603,550 at Sinai in 1:46. After forty years, a plague, a rebellion swallowed by the ground and a generation buried, the fighting strength of Israel is smaller by 1,820 men. Every man in this total is a different man from the men in that one.

Numbers 26:48

“Of the sons of Naphtali, after their families,.... This tribe, which is the last of them, was numbered next to Asher, because it was with that under the standard of Dan; it had four families in it, the Jahzeelite, Gunite, Jezerite, and Shillemite, and its number was 45,400, being less by 8000 than it was when first numbered.”

Jezer and Shillem close the four clans of Naphtali, as John Gill lists them. Naphtali is the last tribe in the roll. Gill explains its place by the camp, since it stood with Asher under the standard of Dan. The roll of tribes keeps the order of the camps.

Naphtali stands at 45,400, eight thousand below its 53,400 at Sinai. Matthew Henry sets it among five tribes that fell, whose losses together outweigh the gains of the other seven. Ephraim lost the same eight thousand. The five losses come to 61,020 men, the seven gains to 59,200.

John Calvin says anyone would have expected a people who had lost a whole generation, and 24,000 in one plague, to be smaller by a fourth. The total barely moved. Calvin calls this a remarkable miracle and ties it to the promise to Abraham in Genesis 22:17. John Wesley sees God's justice, mercy and truth in the one number.

Numbers 26:51

“These were the numbered - Very nigh as many as there were before, chap. i, 46. So wisely and marvelously did God at the same time manifest his justice in cutting off so vast a number; his mercy in giving such a speedy and numerous supply; and his truth in both.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

Land divided by number and by lot

Numbers 26:52-56

Here the chapter says what the counting was for. The land is divided according to the number of names, more to the many and less to the few, and it is also divided by lot. Two rules govern one act, the size of a tribe fixing how much ground it holds and the lot fixing which ground. Joshua 14 to 19 is where this is carried out, and Proverbs 16:33 gives the ground the lot stands on.

Numbers 26:52

“And the Lord spake unto Moses,.... After the sum of the people of Israel had been taken: saying; as follows.”

according to the number of names: Matthew Henry likens the census to a court roll that enters these men as heirs of Canaan. John Wesley says the land was cut into nine and a half parts, weighing the quality of the ground as well as its size. Number of names, in his reading, means number of persons.

Numbers 26:53

“The land shall be divided - The land was divided into nine parts and an half, respect being had in such division to the goodness as well as to the largeness of the several portions, and the lot gave each tribe their part.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown note that the figure used was this census itself. Later growth and the losses of the war of conquest were left out of the reckoning. Matthew Henry observes that Moses received the rule and never applied it. He would hold no land himself, and the task passed to Joshua.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown think the lot fixed where a tribe would settle, north or south, east or west. The size of its ground then followed the rule of verse 54. John Wesley adds that lots were cast for the tribes only. Sharing within a tribe was left to the wisdom of the rulers.

Numbers 26:55

“The land shall be divided by lot - The word גורל goral, translated lot, is supposed by some to signify the stone or pebble formerly used for the purpose of what we term casting lots.”

2 more voices on this verse

Numbers 26:55

“And thus Christ, our Joshua, when he was urged to appoint one of his disciples to his right hand, another to his left in his kingdom, acknowledged the sovereignty of his Father in the disposal: It is not mine to give. Joshua must not dispose of inheritances in Canaan according to his own mind. But it shall be given to those for whom it is prepared of my Father.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Numbers 26:55

“The manner in which the lot was taken has not been recorded. But it is evident that the lot was cast for determining the section of the country in which each tribe should be located--not the quantity of their possessions.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

Albert Barnes gives two reasons for the lot, to shut out jealousy between the tribes and to let each regard its territory as fixed by God. Matthew Henry carries the thought to Christ. He compares the answer Christ gave when disciples asked for places at his right and left, which left the gift with the Father.

Numbers 26:56

“According to the lot ... - This method was adopted not only in order to preclude jealousies and disputes, but also that the several tribes might regard the territories as determined for them by God Himself: compare Pro 16:33.”

Levi counted apart from the rest

Numbers 26:57-62

Levi is counted apart, as in chapter 3, by another rule, "every male a month old or more", "because no inheritance was given to them among the Israelites". The roll stops at Amram's house to name Jochebed, and at Aaron's to record that Nadab and Abihu died when they "offered unauthorized fire", which Leviticus 10:1-2 tells. Levi comes to 23,000, a thousand more than at Sinai.

The Levites are listed here by five family names, among them the Korahites, whose line verse 11 said did not die out. Jamieson, Fausset & Brown point to Exodus 6:16-19 for the fuller tree. The roll then narrows to one house. Kohath's son Amram is the father of Moses and Aaron.

In the Hebrew behind born to Levi in Egypt, Albert Barnes finds a verb in the feminine with no stated subject. He judges the text probably imperfect at this point. The verse still sets Aaron, Moses and Miriam inside the Levite roll by birth. Their mother is named beside them.

Aaron's four sons are named, though two of them were dead long before this count. Matthew Henry notes that Eleazar and Ithamar were already past twenty at Sinai and still entered Canaan. Levi was counted apart and fell outside the sentence on the other tribes. Eleazar now shares this census with Moses.

Matthew Henry pairs this notice with the notice of Korah in verses 9 to 11, since both were kept as examples for later readers. Their deaths left the priesthood to Eleazar and Ithamar. The census that names the priestly heirs also names the sin that removed two brothers.

Albert Barnes takes 23,000 as a round number. Matthew Henry notes that Levi grew by only a thousand in forty years and stayed one of the smallest tribes. That is so even with infants a month old counted in its total.

Numbers 26:62

“The total number of male Levites, 23,000, shows an increase of 1,000 on the number at Sinai Num 3:39. It is doubtless to be taken as a round number; and, as before, includes the male children from a month old and upward, as well as the male adults.”

Only Caleb and Joshua are left

Numbers 26:63-65

The book has been moving toward this verse since Kadesh: of the men counted in the Wilderness of Sinai "there was not one" left, and the sentence of 14:29-30 is reported as carried out. The exceptions are "Caleb son of Jephunneh and Joshua son of Nun", the two who brought back the other report. Deuteronomy 2:14-15 says the last of that generation was gone before Israel crossed the brook Zered.

Numbers 26:63

“These are they that were numbered by Moses and Eleazar the priest,.... That is, these were the Levites, their families, and the number of males in them, which was taken by Moses and Eleazar, who might be only concerned in numbering the Levites, of which tribe they were: and who also numbered the children of Israel; all the tribes of them, with the assistance of their princes: in the plains of Moab, by Jordan, near Jericho; as they were commanded by the Lord.”

1 more voice on this verse

Numbers 26:63

“34 These are the families of Manasseh, and those that were numbered of them, fifty and two thousand and seven hundred. 35 These are the sons of Ephraim after their families: of Shuthelah, the family of the Shuthalhites: of Becher, the family of the Bachrites: of Tahan, the family of the Tahanites. 36 And these are the sons of Shuthelah: of Eran, the family of the Eranites.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Matthew Henry supposes the officers in each tribe compared the new rolls with the old to find any man left from Sinai. Jamieson, Fausset & Brown say the statement must not be taken as absolute. Levi was numbered apart. Many Levites over sixty were in all probability still alive, with Eleazar and Ithamar among them.

Numbers 26:64

“It appears from Deu 2:14-15 that the generation numbered at the former census had perished before the host crossed the brook Zered.”

1 more voice on this verse

Numbers 26:64

“The goodness of God to this people, notwithstanding their provocations. Though that murmuring race was cut off, yet God raised up another generation, which was as numerous as they, that, though they perished, yet the name of Israel might not be cut off, lest the inheritance of the promise should be lost for want of heirs.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse →

Matthew Henry notes that many of the condemned lived on almost to the fortieth year, yet none reached this muster. The sentence waited and then was carried out. Henry also observes that the new host were men in their prime, between twenty and sixty. They had spent the wandering years learning God's law under Moses and Aaron.

Numbers 26:65

“For the Lord had said of them, they shall surely die in the wilderness,.... This was threatened them, Num 14:32 and now it was fulfilled: and there was not left a man of them, save Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun; the only two of the spies that brought a good report of the land of Canaan; all the rest of them, and those that murmured on the ill report of theirs, were now dead.”

1 more voice on this verse

Numbers 26:65

“Not left a man - Only of the Levites, who being not guilty of that sin did not partake of their judgment.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

How this psalm is built

The form: Census list, taken by clan and family for war and for the division of the land, as Barnes classes it.

The patterns in this chapter

The devices this chapter is built on, what each one does, and one verse where it stands.
DeviceWhat it doesWhere to see it
The tribes counted in orderThe tribes are taken in the order chapter 1 used, with one change, that Manasseh is named before Ephraim. Jacob crossed his hands to set Ephraim first at Genesis 48:14, and the numbers in these verses run the other way.Numbers 26:5, Numbers 26:28, Numbers 26:35
The roll that stops to tell a storyThe list halts four times to say what became of a name. Dathan and Abiram became a sign, the sons of Korah did not die, Er and Onan died in Canaan, and Nadab and Abihu died offering unauthorised fire. Each is a sentence inside a column of numbers.Numbers 26:10, Numbers 26:11, Numbers 26:19, Numbers 26:61
Able to go to war, said twice across forty yearsThe terms of this census are word for word what chapter 1 used, from twenty years old and upward, all who can serve in Israel's army. The same clause opens both counts, so the two totals can be set side by side.Numbers 26:2, Numbers 26:4
The five daughters written into a muster rollA daughter has no standing in a count of men able to go to war. The list reaches Hepher and then Zelophehad, and records Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah and Tirzah anyway. Chapter 27 is where they come and ask for a share of what this census is being taken to divide.Numbers 26:33

The chapter is the book's ledger. The whole comes to six hundred and one thousand seven hundred and thirty, against six hundred and three thousand five hundred and fifty at Sinai in 1:46. Forty years, a plague, a rebellion swallowed by the ground and a generation buried, and the fighting strength of Israel is smaller by one thousand eight hundred and twenty men. Every man in this total is a different man from the men in that one.

11 more paragraphs on the patterns

The interruptions carry the book's memory. Dathan and Abiram are entered in their place in the family tree with a note that the earth opened its mouth and they became a sign. Then verse 11 adds that the sons of Korah did not die. That house sings afterward, since 1 Chronicles 6:22 and 6:33 run Samuel and Heman out of it and eleven psalms carry the sons of Korah in their titles.

Two women are named in a count of fighting men. Asher's roll closes on Serah his daughter, whom the list of Genesis 46:17 also names, and Manasseh's roll carries the five daughters of Zelophehad. They are the only women this census names.

The two rules for dividing the land run together. The size of a tribe fixes how much ground it holds and the lot fixes which ground. Joshua 14 to 19 is where this is carried out, and Proverbs 16:33 gives the ground the lot stands on.

The New Testament's use

Judah's roll runs through Perez, since Er and Onan died in Canaan and left no family. Ruth 4:18 to 22 runs Perez down to David and Matthew 1:3 runs him down to Christ, so the line the New Testament opens with passes through this chapter's list.

The verdict of verses 63 to 65 is what Hebrews 3:17 to 19 and 1 Corinthians 10:5 look back at when they say the bodies of that generation fell in the wilderness.

The debated point

The size of the count is the contested point the dossier for this book carries with its holders. A literal count of the fighting men is held by the plain sense of the Hebrew text and by most historic Jewish and Christian interpreters. The reading of eleph as a clan or a troop rather than strictly a thousand is proposed by J. W. Wenham in Large Numbers in the Old Testament, Tyndale Bulletin 18, 1967, and by George Mendenhall. The dossier states no verdict, and this row states none.

The smaller point is the order of the tribes. Manasseh is named before Ephraim here, where Genesis 48:14 has Jacob crossing his hands to set Ephraim first, and the numbers in this chapter run the other way. The chapter reports both and explains neither.

Where to go deeper

A feature page on the census is owed, and this row carries the full presentation until it stands. The generation counted here is set out at the wilderness generation and the country they were counted in at the wilderness. The rebellion of verses 9 to 11 is set out at Korah's rebellion, and the two spies who survive the sentence at Caleb and the twelve spies.

Keep studying

Sources for this chapter

The summary

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.

The form and classifications

Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments, 1832 to 1869, on Numbers 26:1; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch, on Numbers 26:5 and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, on Numbers 26:63.

The exposition

Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch and Matthew Henry.