Joshuachapter 15
63 verses · Joshua, by tradition · 15th or 13th century BC · History
And unto Caleb the son of Jephunneh he gave a part among the children of Judah, according to the commandment of the Lord to Joshua, even the city of Arba the father of Anak, which city is Hebron.
Introduction
Joshua, by tradition, History, Joshua Overview.
This chapter gives Judah its portion first and at the greatest length. Judah was the tribe of the royal line, and its first hearers knew many of these towns as places where they lived and worked. In that world a boundary list and a list of towns served as a title deed. The book is credited to Joshua by tradition, and this record kept Judah's claim. The chapter sets one family's courage and a daughter's request inside the survey. Listen for the districts as the land falls from the hills to the lowland and the desert. Listen also for the last line about Jerusalem, which leaves a question open.
Context
- Who
- The largest tribe, receiving the largest and most varied territory
- What
- The borders of Judah, Caleb's taking of Hebron and Debir, Achsah's request for springs, and Judah's towns listed district by district.
- Where
- The south of Canaan, from the Dead Sea to the Mediterranean and from the wilderness of Zin to the Valley of Hinnom below Jerusalem.
- When
- During the division of the land, about 1400 BC on the traditional dating, while many scholars read the town lists as reflecting the later districts of the kingdom of Judah.
- Why
- To record Judah's inheritance as its title to the land, and to show one family taking its share by faith while Jerusalem stayed unconquered.
Historical context
The book carries no superscription naming its writer, and it reports Joshua writing at least part of it at 24:26. The Babylonian Talmud at Bava Batra 14b to 15a assigns the whole book to him, while Martin Noth read it as the second volume of an exilic Deuteronomistic History.
Show the rest of the historical context, 3 more paragraphs
The dossier names verse 63 of this chapter in that question, since the note that the Jebusites still hold Jerusalem reads as written before David took the city. The boundary description is a surveyor's document, running point to point along wadis, ascents, springs and named rocks, the way land was described in that world before maps existed. Anyone walking the line could check it against the ground.
Judah's territory falls into four different bands of country, and a first hearer heard the farming of each in the names. The Negev in the south is dry grazing country, and the lowland foothills are rolling grain land and the frontier with the Philistine plain. The hill country is terraced ridge farming, olives and vines, and the eastern wilderness drops to the Dead Sea in bare folded chalk hills.
Water rights were the value of a field in that country, which is why Acsah asks for springs to go with the land in the Negev and is given the upper and the lower springs. The town lists are grouped by district, with more than a hundred names and their villages, of which many can still be located and some cannot.
Significance
For first hearers this was their address. A tribe that had been a wandering clan for four hundred years now had named villages, named springs and a described border.
Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph
The Jerusalem note also told them the work was unfinished. The stronghold that later became the capital was still in other hands, sitting in the middle of the inheritance.
This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.
How it is read
This is the chapter the classical commentary works hardest on, and the corpus carries twenty kept notes of Rashi for it, more than for any other chapter of 13 to 24. He begins by teaching the reader how to read a boundary line at all. Three Hebrew verbs in the third verse, and it went out, and it encircled, and it encompassed, "are used only in the place where the boundary line bulges outward, or is indented inward, and does not follow a straight line" (Rashi on Joshua 15:3:1, the Metsudah Publications translation of 1997, CC-BY). Once that rule is given, the whole list can be read as a drawn shape rather than a string of names, and Rashi uses it again at the fourth, fifth, tenth and eleventh verses to fix which side of a line a place falls on.
Two of his notes turn a boundary point into a matter of the Temple. At the eighth verse the line climbs toward Jerusalem, and Rashi brings what the rabbis said in the chapter of the slaughter of holy things: they considered building at Ein Etam, which stands higher than Jerusalem, and drew back a little because the verse of Moses over Benjamin says the LORD dwells between his shoulders, "Let us descend a little, because the shoulders are below the head" (Rashi on Joshua 15:8:1). At the sixth verse he records a dispute over a name rather than settling it, and the Metsudah translation prints both sides, Radak taking the city as Even with a ruler named Bohan son of Reuben, and Metzudos Tzion taking the whole name Even Bohan as the city's own (Rashi on Joshua 15:6:1). This is the one place in these twelve chapters where the corpus itself shows Jewish readings parting over the same words.
The middle of the chapter carries the taking of Debir and the marriage of Achsah, and here the commentary is at its most aggadic. Rashi reads the old name of Debir, Kiriath Sepher, the city of the book, through the Talmud in Temurah: "These are the laws that were forgotten during the days of mourning for Moshe, which Osniel, son of Kenaz, rediscovered through his brilliant dialectic scholarship" (Rashi on Joshua 15:15:1). On this reading Caleb's challenge is put not to soldiers but to the scholars sitting in Debir, and the man who wins the daughter is the man who recovers the lost halakhot. Of Achsah leaning down from her donkey Rashi says plainly, "She bent herself to fall at his feet" (Rashi on Joshua 15:18:1), and he glosses her request for a blessing as a request for sustenance, a portion of land she and her husband could live from (Rashi on Joshua 15:19:1). Othniel he makes Caleb's brother by their mother (Rashi on Joshua 15:17:1).
Rashi also handles the two places where the chapter's own totals fail to match its lists, and he handles them as an editor would. At the thirty-second verse the text says twenty nine cities and the names run to thirty eight, and he accounts for the nine by the cities Simeon later took out of Judah's portion, naming them one by one (Rashi on Joshua 15:32:1). At the thirty-sixth the text says fourteen and the names run to fifteen, and he answers that two of the names are one place, Tappuah and its spring (Rashi on Joshua 15:36:1). On the twenty-first verse he brings the Sages' explanation that Joshua counted only the towns on the borders, which is why the roll of Judah's cities reads as it does (Rashi on Joshua 15:21:1). At the thirteenth and fourteenth he sets the chronology straight, that Caleb drove out the giants after Joshua had died and the account stands here only because it belongs with the division of the land (Rashi on Joshua 15:14:1).
Radak and Metzudat David are in the corpus for this chapter at four places, carried with the reason that Sefaria holds no English version of them, so they stand cited and unquoted: Radak on Joshua 15:12:1 and 15:35:1, and Metzudat David on Joshua 15:20:1 and 15:25:1.
What the rabbis say
The corpus carries forty rabbinic locators for this chapter and the text of none, so each is cited and linked here rather than quoted. The place where the Temple was almost built draws the Talmud directly: on the tenth verse the corpus carries Zevachim 54b:5, which is the passage Rashi names in his own note, and on the eighth, Jerusalem Talmud Megillah 1:12:4 and Midrash Lekach Tov, Deuteronomy 33:12:1. The Valley of Achor at the seventh verse carries Jerusalem Talmud Rosh Hashanah 2:1:7 and Keritot 6a:16, and the fourth verse carries Jerusalem Talmud Sheviit 6:1:12 and 6:1:14.
The Caleb and Achsah passage carries the heaviest aggadic weight. On the thirteenth verse the corpus carries Bereshit Rabbah 58:4 and, across the whole run from the thirteenth to the nineteenth, Sefer HaYashar (midrash), Book of Deuteronomy. On the fifteenth, the city of the book, it carries Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Chayei Sarah 2 and Sifrei Devarim 37:10; on the sixteenth, Midrash Lekach Tov, Genesis 24:13:1 and Vayikra Rabbah 37:4; on the seventeenth, Bereshit Rabbah 58:2 and Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sotah 1:37; on the eighteenth, Temurah 16a:10, the tractate Rashi's own note draws on; and on the nineteenth, Sifrei Devarim 77:2 with Introductions to Tanaitic Literature, Introductions to Tractates of the Mishnah, Eruvin 306.
The city roll that fills the rest of the chapter carries its own locators, town by town. The corpus holds Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Gittin 1:3 and Ein Yaakov, Gittin 1:4 on the twenty-second verse; Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sotah 1:23 on the twenty-third; Ein Yaakov, Sotah 9:18 and Sotah 48b:17 on the twenty-fourth; Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 1:2:16 on the twenty-ninth; Gittin 7a:12 on the thirty-first; Bamidbar Rabbah 10:5 on the thirty-third; Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sotah 1:28 and Ein Yaakov, Sotah 1:34 on the thirty-fourth; Jerusalem Talmud Eruvin 5:5:1 and 5:5:3 on the thirty-seventh; Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Appendix to Devarim 3:1 on the forty-fifth; Shemot Rabbah 23:10 and Shir HaShirim Rabbah 1:5:3 on the forty-seventh; Midrash Lekach Tov, Deuteronomy 11:10:1 and Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 743:4 on the forty-ninth; Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Vayigash 12 on the fifty-first; Bamidbar Rabbah 4:20 on the sixtieth; and Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Vayigash 22 on the last verse, where the Jebusites stay in Jerusalem. Two further locators stand on the ninth and tenth to eleventh verses, Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Vayechi 29 and Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 910:2. What each of them teaches is a saying of the rabbis, and is reported as theirs wherever this site quotes one. The quotations wait on a fetch that carries the text.
Sources: Rashi, Rashi on Joshua 15:1:1 to 15:36:1, The Book of Joshua, Metsudah Publications, 1997, CC-BY; Radak, Radak on Joshua 15:12:1 and 15:35:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; his reading of Even Bohan is reported inside Rashi on Joshua 15:6:1; Metzudat David, Metzudat David on Joshua 15:20:1 and 15:25:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; Metzudos Tzion, the reading of Even Bohan reported inside Rashi on Joshua 15:6:1, The Book of Joshua, Metsudah Publications, 1997; The Sefaria corpus, scripts/data/sources/sefaria/joshua/15.json, the 40 Talmud and Midrash locators of this chapter.
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
Judah's borders, Salt Sea to Great Sea
Joshua 15:1-12
Judah is given first and given most, before the tabernacle tribe and before Joseph, which matches the scepter of Genesis 49:10 rather than birth order. The lot is literal, as Numbers 26:55 and Joshua 14:2 both say, so nobody could steer these borders. The frame runs from the Salt Sea at verse 2 to the Great Sea at verse 12, drawing the whole before naming anything inside.
Joshua 15:1
“This then was the lot of the tribe of the children of Judah--In what manner the lot was drawn on this occasion the sacred historian does not say; but it is probable that the method adopted was similar to that described in Jos 18:10.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
The south line starts where Numbers 34:3 said the border of the whole land would start, at the end of the Salt Sea. Gill notes that the Hebrew calls the bay a tongue, which the Targum and Kimchi read as a point of rock running out into the water. The corner is fixed first.
Joshua 15:2
“And their south border was from the shore of the salt sea,.... Sometimes called the dead sea, the sea of Sodom, and the lake Asphaltites, which, as Jarchi observes, was southeast of the land of Israel: from the bay that looketh southward; or the "tongue", as the Hebrew, which the Targum and Kimchi interpret of a rock or promontory, the point that ran out into the sea, looking to the southeast.”
1 more voice on this verse
Joshua 15:2
“From the bay that looketh southward - These were the southern limits of the tribe of Judah, which commenced at the extremity of the lake Asphaltites or Dead Sea, and terminated at Sihor or the river of Egypt, and Mediterranean Sea; though some think it extended to the Nile.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Akrabbim means scorpions, and Clarke and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown take the pass to be named for the creatures found there. Kadesh-barnea on the same line is the camp from which the spies were sent at Numbers 32:8, and Miriam died there at Numbers 20:1. The border runs past the place of the old failure.
Joshua 15:3
“Maaleh-acrabbim - The ascent of the Mount of Scorpions, probably so called from the multitude of those animals found in that place. Kadesh-barnea - This place was called Enmishpat, Gen 14:7. It was on the edge of the wilderness of Paran, and about twenty-four miles from Hebron. Here Miriam, the sister of Moses and Aaron, died; and here Moses and Aaron rebelled against the Lord; hence the place was called Meribah-Kadesh, or the contention of Kadesh. Karkaa - Supposed to be the Coracea of Ptolemy, in Arabia Petraea. - Calmet.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
2 more voices on this verse
Joshua 15:3
“That the lot did not at this time so unchangeably determine each tribe, that their portion could neither be increased or diminished; as is manifest, because after Judah's lot was fixed, Simeon's lot was taken out of it, chap. xix, 9, though after the land was more distinctly known and surveyed, it is likely the bounds were more certain and fixed.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Joshua 15:3
“Maaleh-akrabbim--Hebrew, "the ascent of scorpions"; a pass in the "bald mountain" (see on Jos 11:17), probably much infested by these venomous reptiles.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Verse 4 follows Numbers 34:5 almost word for word, turning at Azmon and joining the Brook of Egypt before it reaches the Sea. Clarke weighs whether the brook is a branch of the Nile and concludes that the question cannot be decided either way. Azmon, he says, was the last town held toward Egypt.
Joshua 15:4
“Toward Azmon - This was the last city they possessed toward Egypt. The river of Egypt - The most eastern branch of the river Nile. See on Jos 13:3 (note). But there is much reason to doubt whether any branch of the Nile be meant, and whether the promised land extended to that river. On this subject it is impossible to decide either way.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The whole eastern side is water, the length of the Salt Sea from its southern bay to the point where the Jordan enters it. Gill gives its length from Josephus as five hundred and eighty furlongs. Genesis 14:3 calls the same water the Valley of Siddim.
Joshua 15:5
“And the east border was the salt sea, even unto the end of Jordan,.... To the place where Jordan fell into it; so that this border was the whole length of the salt sea, which Josephus says (y) was five hundred eighty furlongs; and, according to Pliny (z), an hundred miles: and their border in the north quarter was from the bay of the sea, at the uttermost part of Jordan; this northern border began where the eastern ended, at the bay or creek of the sea, where Jordan fell into it. (y) De Bello Jud. l. 4. c.”
The Stone of Bohan marks the same point on Benjamin's southern line at 18:17, since the two tribes share this border. A Reubenite held no land west of the Jordan, so Wesley and Barnes take the stone to recall some deed of his in the wars, and Barnes calls its site wholly uncertain. Beth-hoglah later falls to Benjamin at 18:22.
Joshua 15:6
“Beth-hogla - A place between Jericho and the Dead Sea, belonging to the tribe of Benjamin, Jos 18:21, though here serving as a frontier to the tribe of Judah. Stone of Bohan - This must have been some remarkable place, probably like the stone of Jacob, which afterwards became Bethel; but where it was situated is uncertain.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
valley of Achor: The line climbs out of the Valley of Achor, named at 7:26 for the heap of stones raised over Achan. The Ascent of Adummim, Barnes notes, lies on the road from Jerusalem to Jericho, the road of the parable at Luke 10:30. En-rogel appears again at 2 Samuel 17:17 and 1 Kings 1:9.
Joshua 15:7
“The going up to Adummim - Rather, “the ascent or pass of Adummim” (compare Jos 15:3, margin), on the road from Jerusalem to Jericho. Its name signifies “red” and is explained by Jerome as given because of the frequent bloodshed there by robbers. This road is the scene of the parable of the Good Samaritan. Possibly the name may be due to some aboriginal tribe of “red men,” who held their ground in these fastnesses after the invaders had driven them from the face of the country elsewhere.”
valley of Hinnom: The line runs below the southern slope of the Jebusite city, and Benjamin's border at 18:16 follows the same valley from the other side, so the city stands north of it. Wesley suggests that Judah is still tied to Jerusalem because part of it was allotted to Judah, or because Benjamin needed Judah's strength to hold it. Barnes derives the name Gehenna from this valley.
Joshua 15:8
“And the border went up by the valley of the son of Hinnom,.... Which belonged to a man of that name formerly; and was near Jerusalem, placed by Jerom (l) to the east of it; but Reland (m) rather thinks it is to the south.”
1 more voice on this verse
Joshua 15:8
“Jerusalem - It may seem hence, that Jerusalem properly, or at least principally, belonged to Benjamin; and yet it is ascribed to Judah also; either because a part of the city was allotted to Judah; or because the Benjamites desired the help and conjunction of this powerful tribe of Judah, for the getting and keeping of this most important place.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Baalah is the older name of Kiriath-jearim, and Clarke notes the town's later fame as the place where the ark stayed twenty years, which 1 Samuel 7:2 records. Barnes places the Waters of Nephtoah at a spring about two and a half miles northwest of Jerusalem. The line is turning west toward the lowland.
Joshua 15:9
“Nephtoab is probably the modern “Ain Lifta”, two miles and a half northwestward of Jerusalem: and Mount Ephron is conjecturally connected with the city Ephrain 2Ch 13:19 or Ophrah Jos 18:23.”
went down to Beth–shemesh: Beth-shemesh means house of the sun, and Clarke takes the name as a sign of sun worship among the Canaanites. The ark came back to it first at 1 Samuel 6:12, and men of the town were struck for looking inside it at 6:19. Barnes takes this Mount Seir to be a local wooded ridge.
Joshua 15:10
“Beth-shemesh - The house or temple of the sun. It is evident that the sun was an object of adoration among the Canaanites; and hence fountains, hills, etc., were dedicated to him. Beth-shemesh is remarkable for the slaughter of its inhabitants, in consequence of their prying curiously, if not impiously, into the ark of the Lord, when sent back by the Philistines. See 1Sa 6:19.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The northern line ends at the Sea by way of Ekron and Jabneel, two towns of the Philistine plain. Barnes identifies Jabneel with the Jabneh whose walls Uzziah tore down at 2 Chronicles 26:6, and with the Jamnia of Josephus. The line is drawn through ground the Philistines held.
Joshua 15:11
“Jabneel - The modern “Yebna”, about three miles from the coast and twelve miles south of Joppa. It is called Jabneh in 2Ch 26:6, where Uzziah is recorded to have taken it from the Philistines and destroyed its fortifications. The town is repeatedly mentioned with its haven in the wars of the Maccabees (1 Macc. 4:15; 2 Macc. 12:8), and by Josephus under the name of Jamnia.”
Numbers 34:6 gave the Great Sea as the western border of the whole land, and Judah's portion takes that same coast. With verse 12 the four sides are complete. Matthew Henry observes that even this strong tribe received fixed bounds and was left no room to widen its holding at will.
Joshua 15:12
“Though it was a powerful warlike tribe, and had a great interest in the other tribes, yet they must not therefore be left to their own choice, to enlarge their possessions at pleasure, but must live so as that their neighbours might live by them. Those that are placed high yet must not think to be placed alone in the midst of the earth.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Caleb takes Hebron; Achsah asks for springs
Joshua 15:13-15
Caleb receives Hebron by the LORD's command rather than by lot, discharging the promise of Numbers 14:24 that he claimed at Joshua 14:12. The three he drives out, Sheshai, Ahiman and Talmai, are the same three the spies saw at Hebron in Numbers 13:22, when the report said the land "devours its inhabitants". The man who said the report was wrong takes the very city that produced it, at eighty-five.
Joshua 15:13
“And unto Caleb the son of Jephunneh he gave a part among the children of Judah,.... That is, Joshua gave it to him.”
3 more voices on this verse
Joshua 15:13
First, therefore, let us investigate why Caleb received the capital city, the capital of Anak, the one first called a capital among all the rest in the land of promise. Anak means "vain humility" or "vain reply." Therefore, Caleb received the capital of "vain humility." It is certain that there are two humilities. One is laudable, about which the Savior said, "Learn from me because I am meek and humble in heart; and you will find rest for your souls."
Origen of Alexandria · written before 253 · HOMILIES ON JOSHUA 20.5patristic
Joshua 15:13
“And unto Caleb - he gave a part - See the notes on Jos 14:14, etc.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Joshua 15:13
“According to the commandment of the Lord to Joshua. Though Caleb, in his petition, had made out a very good title to it by promise, yet, because God had ordered Joshua to divide the land by lot, he would not in this one single instance, no, not to gratify his old friend Caleb, do otherwise, without orders from God, whose oracle, it is probable, he consulted upon this occasion.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
three sons of Anak: Joshua 11:21 has already said that Joshua cut the Anakim off from Hebron, and Judges 1:10 credits the defeat of the same three names to Judah. Wesley reconciles the accounts by supposing the giants had recovered their towns or held out in the mountains. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown read them as Anakim chiefs.
Joshua 15:14
“These giants having either recovered their cities, or defended themselves in the mountains. Three sons of Anak - Either the same who are mentioned, Num. xiii, 33, and so they were long-lived men, such as mainly were in those times and places: or their sons, called by their father's names, which is very usual.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Kiriath-sepher means city of the book, and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown suggest that public records were kept there. Wesley reads the older name as added to set this Debir apart from the one Joshua took at 10:38, and Barnes names two more towns called Debir at 15:7 and 13:26. It later passed to the Levites at 21:15.
Joshua 15:15
“The name Debir belonged to two other places; namely,, that named in Jos 15:7, between Jerusalem and Jericho, and the Gadite town mentioned in Jos 13:26. The Debir here meant appears (and its site has been conjecturally placed at Dhaheriyeh (Conder)) to have been situated in the mountain district south of Hebron. It was one of the towns afterward assigned to the Levites.”
Joshua 15:16-19
Judges 1:12-15 tells this story again almost word for word, and the man who takes the town is Othniel, the first judge of Israel at Judges 3:9. Acsah is the only person in the chapter's sixty-three verses who asks for anything, and she asks for water, since land in the Negev without springs cannot be worked. Her father gives her "both the upper and lower springs".
Joshua 15:16
“Will I give Achsah my daughter - In ancient times fathers assumed an absolute right over their children, especially in disposing of them in marriage; and it was customary for a king or great man to promise his daughter in marriage to him who should take a city, kill an enemy, etc. So Saul promised his daughter in marriage to him who should kill Goliath, 1Sa 17:25; and Caleb offers his on this occasion to him who should take Kirjath-sepher. Profane writers furnish many similar examples.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The Berean reads Kenaz as Caleb's brother, which makes Othniel his nephew, and Judges 1:13 calls Kenaz the younger brother. Barnes and Gill take Othniel himself as the younger brother, and Gill admits that the relation raises an objection to the marriage. Othniel reappears as Israel's deliverer at Judges 3:9.
Joshua 15:17
“Othniel was probably Caleb’s younger brother; the expression “son of Kenaz” being only an equivalent for the “Kenezite” Jos 14:6.”
Judges 1:14 repeats the scene in the same words. Barnes reads her getting down from the donkey as a sign of respect, and Clarke takes the Hebrew verb to mean she alighted suddenly, as though she had something to ask. She urged Othniel to make the request, yet in verse 19 she makes it herself.
Joshua 15:18
“As she came - As she was now departing from the house of her father to go to that of her husband. She moved him - Othniel, to ask of her father a field, one on which she had set her heart, as contiguous to the patrimony already granted. She lighted off her ass - ותצנח vattitsnach, she hastily, suddenly alighted, as if she had forgotten something, or was about to return to her father’s house. Which being perceived by her father, he said, What wouldest thou? What is the matter? What dost thou want?”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Give me a blessing: Wesley reads blessing here as a gift, the sense it has at Genesis 33:11, where Jacob presses his present on Esau. The Negev was dry country, and Clarke takes the upper and lower springs as one district in the hills and another in the plain. Caleb gives more than was named.
Joshua 15:19
“A south land - This term (“negeb”) which is often equivalent to a proper name Jos 15:21, importing the well-defined district which formed the south of the promised land (Num 13:17 note), seems here used in its more general sense Psa 126:4, for a dry or barren land. The rendering of this passage adopted by Septuagint, several versions, and Commentators, etc., “thou hast given me into a south land,” i. e. “hast given me in marriage into a south land” is forced; the construction of the verb “to give,” with two accusatives, is natural and common to many languages.”
1 more voice on this verse
Joshua 15:19
“A blessing - That is, a gift, as that word signifies, Gen. xxxiii, 11. A south land - That is, a dry land, much exposed to the south wind, which in those parts was very hot and drying, as coming from the deserts of Arabia.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
The cities of Judah, and the Jebusite who stayed
Joshua 15:20-32
The cities are grouped by region rather than listed at random, and this run covers the dry south toward Edom. A list like this is a legal record of title, which is why later books can argue from it, and why a town's tribe can be settled by looking it up. Beersheba stands in the middle of it at verse 28, already old by Genesis 21:31.
Joshua 15:20
“This is the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Judah, according to their families. The general description of which is given in the preceding part of the chapter, as the particular cities belonging to it are enumerated in the following part; the account of the gift of Hebron to Caleb, and the taking of Debir by Othniel, with the request of Achsah, and the grant of it, are inserted between them, and stand as it were in a parenthesis.”
1 more voice on this verse
Joshua 15:20
“And when this was done there was a more equal dividend (either in quantity or quality) of the remainder among the seven tribes. And this, probably, was intended in that general rule which was given concerning this partition ( Num. xxxiii.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Barnes divides the list into four districts by the lie of the land: the Negev in verses 21 to 32, the lowland in 33 to 47, the hills in 48 to 60, and the wilderness in 61 and 62. The Negev, he says, was rocky and dry and never thickly settled. Edom lies beyond it.
Joshua 15:21
“List of the towns of the tribe of Judah. These are arranged in four divisions, according to the natural features of the district; namely,, those of the Negeb or south country Jos 15:21-32; of “the valley,” or “the plain” (“Shephelah”, Jos 15:33-47); of “the mountains” Jos 15:48-60; and of “the wilderness” Jos 15:61-62. Many of the identifications are still conjectural only. Jos 15:21-32. The Negeb was for the most part rocky and arid, and cannot have been at any time very thickly populated.”
The first run of names lies along the Edomite frontier named in verse 21. Gill takes Dimonah to be the Dibon where men of Judah lived after the exile, at Nehemiah 11:25, and finds Kinah and Adadah nowhere else. Many names in this district occur only here.
Gill identifies this Kedesh with Kadesh-barnea on the southern edge, and he separates this Hazor from Jabin's city in the north at 11:1. The name Hazor comes back twice more in verse 25. The Greek version, Gill adds, joins Hazor and Ithnan into one name.
Gill reads Telem as the Telaim where Saul numbered his troops at 1 Samuel 15:4. Clarke notes two towns named Ziph in Judah, this one and the Ziph of verse 55, and one of them gave its name to the wilderness where David hid from Saul at 1 Samuel 23:14. Bealoth appears nowhere else.
Gill's text reads four towns here, Hazor, Hadattah, Kerioth and Hezron, where the Berean joins them into two. Clarke warns at verse 32 that translators often separate compound names that belong together, and join names that should stand apart. That affects every count in the chapter.
Joshua 15:25
“And Hazor, Hadattah, and Kerioth, and Hezron, which is Hazor.”
Moladah passes to Simeon at 19:2, one of the towns Judah gave up when its share proved too large for it, as 19:9 explains. It was still inhabited after the exile, since Nehemiah 11:26 names it among the towns where Judah lived. Gill finds Amam nowhere else.
Gill follows Jerome in placing Hazar-gaddah on the far eastern edge of the southern district, above the Salt Sea. Beth-pelet returns at Nehemiah 11:26 as a place resettled by Judah after the exile. Heshmon is known only from this verse.
Beersheba and Hazar-shual both pass to Simeon at 19:2 and 19:3, so the southern end of Judah's list is shared ground. Clarke places Beersheba on the road between Canaan and Egypt. Judges 20:1 uses the phrase from Dan to Beersheba for the length of the whole land.
Joshua 15:28
“Beer-sheba - A city, famous in the book of Genesis as the residence of the patriarchs Abraham and Jacob, Gen 22:19; Gen 28:10; Gen 46:1. See the note on Gen 21:31. It lay on the way between Canaan and Egypt, about forty miles from Jerusalem.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Gill matches this Baalah with the Balah of 19:3 and the Bilhah of 1 Chronicles 4:29, so Simeon holds it too. It is a different town from the Baalah of verse 9, which is Kiriath-jearim. Ezem also passes to Simeon.
Hormah is the place to which Israel was routed in the wilderness at Numbers 14:45, and Judges 1:17 tells how Zephath was destroyed and called Hormah. Gill notes that all three towns of this verse pass to Simeon at 19:4. He takes Chesil to be the Bethul of that verse.
Ziklag is listed for Judah here and for Simeon at 19:5, yet Clarke says the Philistines held it until Achish gave it to David at 1 Samuel 27:6. From that day, 27:6 adds, it belonged to the kings of Judah. The Amalekites burned it at 1 Samuel 30:1.
Joshua 15:31
“Ziklag - The Philistines seem to have kept possession of this city till the time of David, who received it from Achish, king of Gath, 1Sa 27:6; after which time it remained in the possession of the kings of Judah.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Clarke counts thirty-eight names in verses 21 to 32 against a total of twenty-nine, and he and Matthew Henry explain the gap by the towns later handed to Simeon, which the total leaves out. Clarke offers a second answer, that compound names have been split or joined wrongly in translation. Gill joins Ain and Rimmon as the En-rimmon of Nehemiah 11:29.
Joshua 15:32
“All the cities are twenty and nine, with their villages - But on a careful examination we shall find thirty-eight; but it is supposed that nine of these are excepted; viz., Beersheba, Moladah, Hazarshual, Baalah, Azem, Hormah, Ziklag, Ain, and Rimmon, which were afterwards given to the tribe of Simeon. This may appear satisfactory, but perhaps the truth will be found to be this: Several cities in the promised land are expressed by compound terms; not knowing the places, different translations combine what should be separated, and in many cases separate what should be combined.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Joshua 15:33-47
The foothills come first, then the coast, where the difficulty sits. Ekron, Ashdod and Gaza are written into Judah's inheritance at verses 45 to 47, though Joshua 11:22 had just said that Anakim survived in Gaza and Ashdod. Zorah and Eshtaol open the list, where Samson is born and buried at Judges 13:2 and 16:31, and from here the border on paper and the ground held differ.
Joshua 15:33
“Eshtaol, and Zoreah - Here Samson was buried, it being the burial-place of his fathers; see Jdg 16:31. These places though first given to Judah, afterwards fell to the lot of Dan, Jos 19:41.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The lowland list opens with a group of towns closed by the count of fourteen at verse 36. Eshtaol and Zorah pass to Dan at 19:41, as Clarke notes. The residents of a Zanoah, this one or the hill town of verse 56, rebuilt the Valley Gate of Jerusalem at Nehemiah 3:13.
Jarmuth's king joined the league of five at 10:3. Clarke places David's fight with Goliath near Socoh, since the Philistines camped between Socoh and Azekah at 1 Samuel 17:1, and David later hid in the cave of Adullam at 1 Samuel 22:1.
Joshua 15:35
“Jarmuth - See the note on Jos 10:3. Adullam - See the note on Jos 12:15. Socoh - It was near this place that David fought with and slew Goliath, the champion of the Philistines, 1Sa 17:1.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The King James text names fifteen towns before the total of fourteen, and Matthew Henry and Clarke both take Gederah and Gederothaim as one place, which is how the Berean prints them. Shaaraim gives its name to the road where the Philistine dead lay after Goliath fell, at 1 Samuel 17:52. The count then agrees.
Joshua 15:36
“Gederah - See the note on Jos 12:13. Fourteen cities - Well reckoned, we shall find fifteen cities here; but probably Gederah and Gederothaim (Jos 15:36) are the same. See the note on Jos 15:32.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Gill marks this verse as the start of a second lowland group, closed by the count of sixteen at verse 41. The group holds Lachish, Eglon and Makkedah, three places of the southern campaign in chapter 10. The ground of that campaign becomes Judah's lowland.
Mizpeh names towns in several tribes, and Gill follows Jerome in placing this one south of Eleutheropolis on the way to Jerusalem. A different Joktheel appears at 2 Kings 14:7, where Amaziah gives that name to Sela in Edom. Gill finds nothing more on Dilan.
Lachish and Eglon were royal cities taken at 10:32 and 10:35, and Lachish stands again at 2 Kings 18:14 as the place where Hezekiah sent his submission to the king of Assyria. Bozkath was the home of Josiah's mother at 2 Kings 22:1.
Gill can give no account of these three towns, which are mentioned nowhere else. Clarke explains such gaps at the head of the chapter, where he says many ancient places have changed their names, lie buried under ruins, or have vanished. The list keeps the record of lost places.
Joshua 15:40
“And Cabbon, and Lahmam, and Kithlish. Cities of which we can give no account, not being mentioned elsewhere.”
Makkedah is the cave where the five kings hid at 10:16, and the list now counts it as a town of Judah. Clarke reads Beth-dagon as house of Dagon, the Philistine god of Judges 16:23 and 1 Samuel 5:2. Verses 37 to 41 name sixteen towns, matching the total.
Joshua 15:41
“Beth-dagon - The house or temple of Dagon. This is a well known idol of the Philistines, and probably the place mentioned here was in some part of their territories; but the situation at present is unknown.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
A third lowland group begins here and closes with nine towns at verse 44. Libnah was taken at 10:29 and rebelled against Judah at 2 Kings 8:22, while Ether and Ashan pass to Simeon at 19:7, as Clarke notes of Ether. Simeon's share keeps drawing on this list.
Joshua 15:42
“Libnah - See the note on Jos 10:29. Ether - From Jos 19:7 we learn that this city was afterwards given to the tribe of Simeon.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
This is the second Ashnah of the lowland, since verse 34 already named one, and Gill treats them as two towns. He follows Jerome in placing Nezib seven miles from Eleutheropolis on the road to Hebron. Gill finds Iphtah nowhere else.
David saved Keilah from the Philistines at 1 Samuel 23:1 and left when its people were ready to hand him to Saul, as Clarke recounts. Mareshah is where Asa met Zerah the Cushite at 2 Chronicles 14:9 and 14:10. The count of nine agrees with the names.
Joshua 15:44
“Keilah - This town was near Hebron, and is said to have been the burying-place of the prophet Habakkuk. David obliged the Philistines to raise the siege of it; (see 1Sa 23:1-13); but finding that its inhabitants had purposed to deliver him into the hands of Saul, who was coming in pursuit of him, he made his escape. See this remarkable case explained in the note on Deu 32:15 (note). Mareshah - Called also Maresheth and Marasthi; it was the birth-place of the prophet Micah.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Here the lowland list stops counting and names the Philistine cities with their dependent towns. Gill notes that Ekron was one of the five Philistine lordships and says Judah never held it, while Judges 1:18 says Judah captured it with Gaza and Ashkelon. The ark was later sent to Ekron at 1 Samuel 5:10.
Joshua 15:45
“Ekron, with her towns and her villages. One of the five principalities of the Philistines, which with two more next mentioned, though they fell to the lot of the tribe of Judah, were never possessed by them; for which reason perhaps Gath and Ascalon are not mentioned, and these are put for the rest; see Jos 13:3.”
The line runs from Ekron west to the sea and takes in every town near Ashdod. Ashdod is the city where the captured ark was set beside Dagon at 1 Samuel 5:1 and 5:2, and Gill and Clarke identify it with the Azotus of Acts 8:40. Philip preached there.
Joshua 15:46
“From Ekron even unto the sea,.... The Mediterranean sea, or the west, as the Targum: all that lay near Ashdod, with their villages; this is the Azotus of the New Testament, Act 8:40, another of the principalities of the Philistines, of which and Ekron See Gill on Amo 1:8 and See Gill on Zep 2:4.”
Verse 47 carries the list to the Brook of Egypt and the Great Sea, the same corner where the southern border ended in verse 4. Gaza is where the Philistines later bound Samson and set him to grind grain at Judges 16:21. Gill notes that Gath and Ashkelon go unnamed.
Joshua 15:47
“Ashdod - Called also Azotus, Act 8:40. Unto the river of Egypt - The Pelusiac branch of the Nile, or Sihor. But see on Jos 15:4 (note). The great sea - The Mediterranean.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)Methodist
Joshua 15:48-62
The hill country comes first, then the wilderness beside the Salt Sea. Bethlehem is absent from the list at verse 59, where the Septuagint carries eleven further towns including it, the largest textual variant in the chapter. The City of Salt and En-gedi close the run at verse 62, in the country where David later hides from Saul.
Joshua 15:48
“Socoh - See a town of this name, Jos 15:35 (note).”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Debir now carries a third name, since verse 15 called it Kiriath-sepher, and Gill takes all three names to bear much the same sense of learning or law. The Greek version renders it the city of letters. Clarke points back to the lowland Socoh of verse 35, a second town of the name.
Anab was one of the hill towns cleared of the Anakim at 11:21, and Gill refers back to that verse. Eshtemoh, spelled Eshtemoa elsewhere, was given to the Levites at 21:14 and received a share of David's spoil at 1 Samuel 30:28. Jerome, Gill reports, found Anim's people all Christians.
The first hill group closes here at eleven. Gill confirms that the number agrees with the names, and he identifies Giloh as the town of Ahithophel, David's counsellor who joined Absalom at 2 Samuel 15:12. This Goshen is the district in the south of Canaan named at 10:41, distinct from Goshen in Egypt.
A second hill group begins here and ends with Hebron in verse 54, nine cities in all. Gill follows Jerome in describing Dumah as a large village in the south, seventeen miles from Eleutheropolis. He has no account of Eshan.
Beth-tappuah means house of the apple tree, Clarke says, perhaps for the trees that grew there. Tappuah names several places in these chapters: a lowland town at verse 34, and a town on the border of Ephraim and Manasseh at 16:8 and 17:8. Gill notes several towns called Aphek.
Joshua 15:53
“Beth-tappuah - The house of the apple or citron tree. Probably a place where these grew in great abundance and perfection. Aphekah - See the note on Jos 12:18.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Hebron, already given to Caleb in verse 13, is also a town of Judah in this list, and it later becomes a city of refuge at 20:7 and a Levite city at 21:11. David reigned there seven years and six months, as 2 Samuel 2:11 records. The count of nine agrees.
Joshua 15:54
“Kirjath-arba - See the note on Jos 14:15.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
A third hill group of ten begins here. Nabal lived in Maon and sheared his flocks at Carmel at 1 Samuel 25:2, and Clarke separates this Carmel from the northern mountain and places Saul's monument of 1 Samuel 15:12 here. The Ziphites reported David's hiding place to Saul at 1 Samuel 23:19.
Joshua 15:55
“Maon - In a desert to which this town gave name, David took refuge for a considerable time from the persecution of Saul; and in this place Nabal the Carmelite had great possessions. See 1Sa 23:24, 1Sa 23:25; 1Sa 25:2. Carmel - Not the celebrated mount of that name, but a village, the residence of Nabal. See 1Sa 25:2. It was near Maon, mentioned above, and was about ten miles eastward of Hebron. It is the place where Saul erected a trophy to himself after the defeat of the Amalekites; see 1Sa 15:12. Ziph - See on Jos 15:24 (note).”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Gill separates this Jezreel of Judah from the northern town that gave its name to the great valley. Ahinoam of Jezreel, David's wife, is named at 1 Samuel 25:43 beside Abigail, whose first husband worked at the Carmel of verse 55. This Zanoah is a second town of the name.
This Gibeah lies in Judah, and Gill keeps it apart from Gibeah in Benjamin at Judges 20:4 and from Gibeah of Saul at 1 Samuel 11:4. He finds Kain nowhere else. Timnah here is the second of the chapter, after the border town of verse 10.
A fourth hill group of six begins here. Beth-zur was among the towns Rehoboam built up for defence at 2 Chronicles 11:5 to 11:7, and a ruler of half its district repaired Jerusalem's wall at Nehemiah 3:16. Clarke discusses the Greek addition of eleven towns in his note on Gedor.
Joshua 15:58
“Gedor - See the note on Jos 12:13. In this place the Alexandrian MS. of the Septuagint and the Codex Vaticanus add the eleven following towns: Theca, and Ephratha, (that is, Bethlehem), and Phagor, and Etan, and Kulon, and Tatam, and Thebes, and Karam, and Galam, and Thether, and Manocho; eleven cities and their villages. St. Jerome, on Mic 5:1, mentions them, so that we find they were in the copies he used.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Gill finds none of these three towns elsewhere, and he keeps Eltekon apart from the Eltekeh of Dan at 19:44. The count of six agrees with verses 58 and 59. After this verse the Greek copies read the eleven further towns that include Bethlehem.
Joshua 15:59
“And Maarath, and Bethanoth, and Eltekon,.... Of these cities we have no account elsewhere; only mention is made of Eltekeh, in the tribe of Dan, Jos 19:44, six cities with their villages; these were all in the mountainous part of Judea, as were the two following.”
Verse 9 called this town Baalah and Kiriath-jearim, and here it is Kiriath-baal. Gill cannot say why these two towns are counted by themselves, and he keeps this Rabbah apart from Rabbah of the Ammonites at 2 Samuel 12:26. Two towns make the smallest group.
Joshua 15:60
“But that city, which at the best was but little among the thousands of Judah ( Mic. v. 2 ), except that it was thus dignified, was now so little as not to be accounted one of the cities, but perhaps was one of the villages not named. Christ came to give honour to the places he was related to, not to receive honour from them.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
The last district is the wilderness beside the Salt Sea, and Gill notes that it held towns and villages. Beth-arabah, the first of them, stands both here and in Benjamin's list at 18:22, since it sits on the border the two tribes share. Six towns are named in verse 62.
the city of Salt, and En–gedi: Gill and Clarke report that some take the City of Salt to be Zoar, where Lot fled, and Gill prefers a town named for salt-making. En-gedi, the well of the kid in Clarke's gloss, is where David hid from Saul at 1 Samuel 24:1, and Ezekiel 47:10 pictures fishermen spreading nets there. The count of six agrees.
Joshua 15:62
“The city of Salt - Or of Melach. This city was somewhere in the vicinity of the lake Asphaltites, the waters of which are the saltest perhaps in the world. The whole country abounds with salt: see the note on Gen 19:25. Some suppose that it is the same as Zoar, the place to which Lot escaped after the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. En-gedi - The well of the kid: it was situated between Jericho and the lake of Sodom or Dead Sea.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The chapter ends on a failure, stated in the same book that says at 21:45 that none of the LORD's good promises failed. Judah could not drive out the Jebusites, who hold Jerusalem until David takes it at 2 Samuel 5:6-9, generations later. Judges 1:21 tells the same fact of Benjamin rather than Judah, and the two accounts stand together without either being corrected.
Joshua 15:63
“The Jebusites dwell - at Jerusalem unto this day - The whole history of Jerusalem, previously to the time of David, is encumbered with many difficulties. Sometimes it is attributed to Judah, sometimes to Benjamin, and it is probable that, being on the frontiers of both those tribes, each possessed a part of it.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Joshua 15:63
“Could not drive them out - Namely, because of their unbelief, as Christ could do no mighty work, because of the peoples unbelief, Mark vi, 5, 6 Matt. xiii, 58, and because of their sloth, and cowardice, and wickedness, whereby they forfeited God's help. The children of Judah - The same things which are here said of the children of Judah, are said of the Benjamites, Judg. i, 21.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
How this psalm is built
The form: A boundary list with a town list after it, and one short narrative set inside the two, as Barnes classes it.
The patterns in this chapter
| Device | What it does | Where to see it |
|---|---|---|
| The towns grouped by district | Albert Barnes states that the towns of Judah are arranged in four divisions according to the natural features of the district. He begins with those of the Negeb or south country. The Berean text in the store heads each division in turn. Verse 21 heads the southernmost cities toward the border of Edom, verse 33 the foothills, verse 48 the hill country and verse 61 the wilderness.Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments, 1832 to 1869, on Joshua 15:21. | Joshua 15:21, Joshua 15:33, Joshua 15:48, Joshua 15:61 |
| The total that closes each group | Every group of towns ends with its own total in the same words, so many cities along with their villages. The Berean text in the store carries that close ten times, at verses 32, 36, 41, 44, 51, 54, 57, 59, 60 and 62. John Wesley and Adam Clarke both stop at the first of them. The names read out before verse 32 come to more than the twenty nine the verse counts, and each commentator proposes which towns the total leaves out.John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament, 1765, on Joshua 15:32. | Joshua 15:32, Joshua 15:36, Joshua 15:41, Joshua 15:62 |
| The tribe named at the opening of the border and again at its close | Barnes reads verses 1 to 12 as the general boundary on all four sides, taken before anything inside it is named. The Berean text in the store opens that run at verse 1 with the allotment for the clans of the tribe of Judah. It closes the run at verse 12 with the boundaries around the clans of the descendants of Judah, and repeats the same formula at verse 20 to open the town lists. The circuit itself runs from the Salt Sea at verse 2 round to the Great Sea at verse 12.Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments, 1832 to 1869, on Joshua 15:1. | Joshua 15:1, Joshua 15:12, Joshua 15:20 |
The count at verse 32
26 more paragraphs on the patterns
The first total in the chapter is the one commentators stop at. Verse 32 closes the southern division with twenty nine cities. John Wesley counts thirty seven or thirty eight names read out before it (Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament, 1765, on Joshua 15:32). He offers two answers. The first is that only twenty nine properly belonged to Judah and the rest fell to Simeon's lot. The second is that the list carries names which were counted differently.
Adam Clarke counts thirty eight and names the nine he takes to be excepted. They are Beersheba, Moladah, Hazar-shual, Baalah, Ezem, Hormah, Ziklag, Ain and Rimmon, which were afterwards given to the tribe of Simeon (Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on Joshua 15:32). He then offers a second answer of his own. Several place names in the land are compound terms, and a translator who does not know the places joins what should be separated and separates what should be joined.
Wesley states elsewhere that the lot did not fix a portion so that it could never be increased or diminished. His evidence is that Simeon's lot was later taken out of Judah's at Joshua 19:9 (Explanatory Notes, 1765, on Joshua 15:3).
The historical value
The chapter is a title document, and three of its details can be checked against what stands outside the Bible. Lachish is written into the foothill division at verse 39. The dossier for this book names the destruction layers at Hazor and Lachish among the evidence for a thirteenth century conquest beginning about 1230 to 1200 BC. Kenneth Kitchen and the majority of current archaeologists hold that reading (On the Reliability of the Old Testament, 2003). The fifteenth century reading begins about 1406 BC and rests on 1 Kings 6:1 and Judges 11:26, held by Bryant Wood and John Bimson (Redating the Exodus and Conquest, 1978). The page states no verdict between them.
The Amarna letters are an Egyptian diplomatic archive of about 1360 to 1330 BC. They carry correspondence from Canaanite city rulers asking Egypt for help against roving groups called the habiru, and the dossier records that the letters from Abdi-Heba of Jerusalem complain that the land is being lost. The dossier reads the archive as a picture of Canaan matching Joshua's own, a country of many small kings rather than one nation. It adds that the habiru are a social category rather than an ethnic name, so the letters describe the same kind of world without identifying Israel in it.
The store's exposition of verses 20 to 32 points to Beersheba standing in the middle of the southern list at verse 28, a town already old by Genesis 21:31. That note reads the list as a legal record of title and cites Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1863 and Albert Barnes, Notes on the Old Testament.
Where the Greek and the Hebrew lists differ
The largest textual question in the chapter sits at verse 59. The store's exposition of verses 48 to 62 states that Bethlehem is absent from the King James list at that verse. It states that the Septuagint carries eleven further towns there including it, and that this is the largest textual variant in the chapter. That note cites Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1863 and Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible. The Berean text in the store carries the shorter list, closing verse 59 with six cities along with their villages.
The dossier's manuscripts section records the wider pattern behind that difference. Greek Joshua runs several percent shorter than the Hebrew overall. Emanuel Tov reads the shorter Greek as reflecting an earlier Hebrew edition rather than a translator's abridgement (Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible, third edition, 2012). Verse 59 runs the other way, with the Greek carrying more than the Hebrew. The chapter is therefore one place where each of the two witnesses holds material the other lacks.
Where the New Testament reads this country
Matthew Henry reads the absence at verse 59 against the town's later standing. He writes that the city was at best but little among the thousands of Judah, citing Micah 5:2. He adds that here it was so little as to be left out of the count of cities, and perhaps stood among the villages not named (Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, on Joshua 15:60). The store's Berean text of Micah 5:2 addresses Bethlehem Ephrathah as small among the clans of Judah, and says a ruler over Israel will come out of it.
The store's Berean text of Matthew 2:5 and 2:6 reports the answer given to Herod. The Messiah is born in Bethlehem in Judea, and the prophet's written words are quoted back. The chapter's own contribution is the ground. This is the district register in which Bethlehem sits, and the Hebrew list that leaves it out measures how small the town was when the register was made.
Whether the land was taken or much of it left
Verse 63 is one of the three verses the dossier sets against one another on this question. It records that Judah could not drive out the Jebusites living in Jerusalem, and that the Jebusites live there to this day among the descendants of Judah. The dossier sets it beside the campaign summary at 11:23, that Joshua took the whole land and the land had rest from war. It sets it beside 13:1 as well, where the LORD tells Joshua that very much of the land remains to be possessed.
The dossier answers from the text rather than by naming positions. It reads the two kinds of statement as describing two different things. The first is the decisive defeat of organised Canaanite coalitions, which Joshua's generation accomplished. The second is the tribe by tribe occupation of the territory, which that generation did not finish. The dossier adds that Joshua's own farewell assumes the unfinished work, and warns what the remaining nations will become at 23:13.
One holder stands beside that reading with a claim about idiom. K. Lawson Younger Jr. set Egyptian and Assyrian campaign annals beside Joshua and argued that the summarising idiom is shared (Ancient Conquest Accounts, 1990). On that argument a total victory formula in that world is followed in later years by fresh campaigns against the same people. The dossier records the argument and states no verdict on it.
John Wesley gives the reason he finds in the text for the failure at Jerusalem. He reads could not drive them out as meaning their unbelief, their sloth and their cowardice. He sets it beside Mark 6:5 and 6, where Christ could do no mighty work because of unbelief (Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament, 1765, on Joshua 15:63). Adam Clarke reads the history of Jerusalem before David as difficult on its own terms. The city is sometimes attributed to Judah and sometimes to Benjamin. Clarke takes it to have stood on the frontier of both, with each tribe holding a part (Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on Joshua 15:63).
Who wrote the notice at verse 63
The same verse carries weight in the question of who wrote the book. The dossier records that Joshua carries no superscription naming its writer. It records that the book reports Joshua writing at least part of it at 24:26. It also records his own death in the book, and the phrase unto this day repeated in a way that looks back from a later vantage.
The first position holds that Joshua wrote the book with a short later supplement. Its holders are the Babylonian Talmud at Bava Batra 14b to 15a, compiled about AD 500, the book's own notice at 24:26, and the historic Jewish and Christian reading before the modern critical period. The Talmud assigns the book to Joshua and gives the closing verses about his death to Eleazar and Phinehas. The dossier names verse 63 of this chapter as support. The note that the Jebusites still hold Jerusalem is a detail a later writer would have had no reason to invent once David had taken the city.
The second position holds that Joshua is the second volume of the Deuteronomistic History. Martin Noth proposed Deuteronomy through Kings as one exilic work shaped by a single editorial hand (Uberlieferungsgeschichtliche Studien, 1943). The critical tradition following him reads Joshua's covenant language, its charge to keep the book of the law and its summarising formulas as the work of a later editor. On that reading the editor wrote after the fall of Jerusalem, using older material. The page states no verdict.
The promise kept and the city still held
The theological weight of the chapter is in the pair it makes with the book's own thesis. The dossier's entry on the land as promise kept quotes 21:43, that the LORD gave Israel all the land He had sworn to give their fathers. It quotes 21:45 as well, that not one of all the LORD's good promises to the house of Israel had failed. The store's Berean text of those two verses carries that wording.
The store's exposition of verse 63 states that the chapter ends on a failure. It states that the failure stands in the same book which says nothing failed of any good thing the LORD had spoken. That note cites Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, and Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1863.
The dossier's entry on the inheritance given by lot holds the other half. The land is distributed by lot at Shiloh before the LORD at 19:51, which puts the allotment outside human negotiation. Caleb is the one exception who asks, and he asks for the hardest ground at 14:12. Both halves stand in this chapter, Caleb at verses 13 to 19 and the lot's own border at verses 1 to 12.
Keep studying
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The form and classifications
Albert Barnes; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament, 1765, on Joshua 15:1 and The published exposition of Joshua 15:20 to 32, the store's note on Joshua 15:20 to 32, which cites Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1863 and Albert Barnes, Notes on the Old Testament.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament (1748-1763); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible and The Berean Standard Bible, Joshua 15, with the verses cited in the note.
