Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Ezra

Summary

Chapter summary

Opposition arrives first as an offer of partnership: 'Let us build with you; for we seek your God, as ye do.' Zerubbabel refuses ('Ye have nothing to do with us in building a house unto our God') and the people of the land answer by weakening the hands of Judah and hiring counsellors against them from Cyrus's days even until Darius. The chapter then leaps ahead to the Aramaic correspondence: Rehum and Shimshai warn Artaxerxes that Jerusalem is a rebellious city which, once rebuilt, will pay him no tribute. The king orders search made, learns that mighty kings had reigned there, and stops the work by force of arms. So it ceased until the second year of Darius.

Context

History · EzraEzra overview

  • A. 1–5 Let us build with you: an offer refused, and counselors hired
  • B. 6–16 The letter to Artaxerxes: this rebellious and bad city
  • C. 17–24 The king's answer stops the work by force and power

The outline

  1. A.Let us build with you: an offer refused, and counselors hiredvv. 1 to 5

    Read vv. 1 to 5
  2. B.The letter to Artaxerxes: this rebellious and bad cityvv. 6 to 16

    Read vv. 6 to 16
  3. C.The king's answer stops the work by force and powervv. 17 to 24

    Read vv. 17 to 24

The world behind this chapter

Ezra 4
When
Opposition, told across several reigns at once · The main episode belongs to the reign of Cyrus and Darius (c. 536–520 BC); verses 6–23 jump forward to complaints under Xerxes and Artaxerxes, decades later — the chapter is organized by topic, not chronology, and it is fair to say so plainly
Where
The building site, and the imperial post between Jerusalem and the capital
Who first heard it
A community learning that the fight would be fought with letters, not swords

The history

It starts with an offer of help. "Let us build with you; for we seek your God as ye do." The people making the offer were descendants of populations Assyria had resettled in the north generations earlier, who worshiped the God of the land alongside their own gods. Zerubbabel refuses, and the offer turns instantly into obstruction.

The methods used are bureaucratic and effective: discouraging the people, weakening their hands, hiring counselors against them, and finally writing to the king. The work stopped and stayed stopped until the second year of Darius — about sixteen years, the exact stretch Haggai preached into.

Beginning at verse 8 the book switches into Aramaic and stays there for several chapters. That was not exotic; Aramaic was the working language of the Persian chancery, used for official correspondence from Egypt to India. Preserving these letters in their original language is the sort of thing an archive-based writer does.

The complaint sent to Artaxerxes is a shrewd piece of work. It never mentions religion. It says Jerusalem is a rebellious city with a long record, that if the walls go up the province will stop paying toll, tribute, and custom, and it suggests the king check the archives. Loss of revenue was the argument most likely to move a Persian treasury.

It worked. A decree came back ordering the work to cease, and the officials went up to Jerusalem "by force and power" and made them stop. That episode concerns the city walls in a later reign, which is why Nehemiah later hears that the wall is broken down and the gates burned.

What it meant to them

For the returnees this chapter said opposition would not usually look like an army. It looked like a friendly offer, then a rumor, then a lawyer, then a letter with the king's seal on it.

It also warned them about the cost of a right refusal. Saying no to the offer in verse 2 bought them sixteen years of stoppage — and the book still records the refusal as the correct decision.

Sources cited

  • Edwin Yamauchi, Persia and the Bible
  • K. A. Kitchen, On the Reliability of the Old Testament

Every work MannaFest builds on →

The text of this chapter

This page carries no textual note on Ezra 4. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →

This page draws on Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.