Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Acts

Summary

Chapter summary

Before Felix. Tertullus's charges; Paul's defense: 'the way which they call heresy.' Two years' detention; Drusilla; Felix hoped for a bribe. 'Go thy way for this time; when I have a convenient season, I will call for thee.'

Context

History · LukeActs overview

  • A. 1–9 Tertullus Accuses Paul Before Felix
  • B. 10–21 Paul's Answer: After the Way They Call a Sect
  • C. 22–27 Felix Trembles, Then Leaves Him Bound Two Years

The outline

  1. A.Tertullus Accuses Paul Before Felixvv. 1 to 9

    Read vv. 1 to 9
  2. B.Paul's Answer: After the Way They Call a Sectvv. 10 to 21

    Read vv. 10 to 21
  3. C.Felix Trembles, Then Leaves Him Bound Two Yearsvv. 22 to 27

    Read vv. 22 to 27

The world behind this chapter

Acts 24
When
Two years in custody at Caesarea · c. AD 57–59
Where
Caesarea Maritima — the governor's audience hall in Herod's old palace by the sea.
Who first heard it
Theophilus and Gentile readers, seeing a Roman court examine the Christian message and find no crime in it.

The history

Roman provincial trials worked by accusation: someone had to bring the charge and argue it. The high priest travels down with elders and hires Tertullus, a professional orator, whose opening flattery of the governor was standard courtroom technique — and, in Felix's case, close to satire.

Felix was a former slave who had risen through the imperial household to govern a province, which Roman aristocrats found scandalous. The historian Tacitus says he wielded the power of a king with the mind of a slave. Josephus records his brutality in suppressing unrest.

Drusilla, sitting with him, was a Jewish princess, daughter of the Herod Agrippa who died in Acts 12 — and Felix had taken her from her husband. That background explains why a discussion of righteousness, self-control, and coming judgment left him alarmed enough to end the conversation.

Felix hoping for a bribe was not unusual; provincial justice was widely purchasable, though extortion by officials was itself illegal. Keeping Paul for two years without verdict, then leaving him bound as a favour to the Jewish leaders when recalled, is exactly the behaviour a governor with a shaky record would show.

What it meant to them

The charge is worth noticing: ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes, a stirrer of riots, a temple-defiler. Paul answers by admitting the one thing they call a sect and denying the crimes — he worships the God of his fathers, believes everything in the Law and the Prophets, and came to Jerusalem bringing alms to his nation.

For readers weighing whether this faith was subversive, two years of Roman scrutiny producing no verdict was the point. And for believers waiting on God's timing, so was the picture of an apostle spending two years in a cell while the governor stalled.

Sources cited

Every work MannaFest builds on →

The text of this chapter

This page carries no textual note on Acts 24. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →

This page draws on Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.