Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Numbers 5:8

in Numbers 5

But if the man has no relative to whom restitution can be made for the wrong, the restitution belongs to the LORD and must be given to the priest along with the ram of atonement, by which the atonement is made for him.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV

ASV

But if the man have no kinsman to whom restitution may be made for the guilt, the restitution for guilt which is made unto Jehovah shall be the priest’s; besides the ram of the atonement, whereby atonement shall be made for him.

KJV

But if the man have no kinsman to recompense the trespass unto, let the trespass be recompensed unto the Lord, even to the priest; beside the ram of the atonement, whereby an atonement shall be made for him.

This verse in Numbers 5

Commentary

7 notes on this verse

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

If the man have no kinsman - The Jews think that this law respects the stranger and the sojourner only, because every Israelite is in a state of affinity to all the rest; but there might be a stranger in the camp who has no relative in any of the tribes of Israel.

This site's exposition

But if the man have no kinsman

Kinsman occurs here for the first time in Scripture, and the word behind it is the redeemer's word. It stands behind Boaz at Ruth 3:12 and behind the avenger of blood at Numbers 35:12, so one term covers the man who buys back a relative's land and the man who pursues a relative's killer. The case in view is a wronged man with nobody left to be paid, and the debt is transferred rather than cancelled, unto the Lord, even to the priest. Adam Clarke passes on the Jewish reading that this covers a stranger in the camp, since an Israelite has kin somewhere among the tribes.

The record, by era

The Puritans and the Awakening4 voices

A commentator

John Wesley

1703–1791

Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)

proposed

To the priest - Whom God appointed as his deputy to receive his dues, and take them to his own use, that so he might more cheerfully and entirely devote himself to the ministration of holy things. This is an additional explication to that law, Lev. vi, 2, and for the sake thereof it seems here to be repeated.
But if a man have no kinsman to recompense the trespass to,....

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

Note, Some work of piety or charity is a piece of necessary justice to be done by those who are conscience to themselves that they have done wrong, but know not how otherwise to make restitution; what is not our property will never be our profit.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

Satisfaction must be made for the offence done to God, whose law is broken, as well as for the loss sustained by our neighbour; restitution in this case is not sufficient without faith and repentance. Yet the sacrifices would not be accepted till full amends were made to the party wronged, not only the principal, but a fifth part added to it,

The Nineteenth Century1 voice

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

proposed

The difference between the law recorded in that passage and this is that the one was enacted against flagrant and determined thieves, the other against those whose necessities might have urged them into fraud, and whose consciences were distressed by their sin.

The words behind it

18 Hebrew words

Every Hebrew word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

  • וְאִם־and if

    veim-H5181069 times

  • אֵ֨יןnot

    ʾeinH369789 times

  • לָאִ֜ישׁ[belongs] to the person

    laishH3761663 times

  • גֹּאֵ֗לa kinsman-redeemer

    goelH1350104 times

  • לְהָשִׁ֤יבto repay

    lehashivH77251056 times

  • הָאָשָׁם֙the compensation

    haashamH81746 times

  • אֵלָ֔יוto him

    ʾelavH4135510 times

  • הָאָשָׁ֛םthe compensation

    haashamH81746 times

  • הַמּוּשָׁ֥בwhich is repaid

    hamushavH77251056 times

  • לַיהוָ֖ה[belongs] to Yahweh

    layahwehH30686520 times

  • לַכֹּהֵ֑ןfor the priest

    lakohenH3548750 times

  • מִלְּבַ֗ד<from> <to> besides

    milevadH905200 times

  • אֵ֚יל[the] ram of

    ʾeilH352187 times

  • הַכִּפֻּרִ֔ים<the> atonement<s>

    hakipurimH3725

  • אֲשֶׁ֥רwhich

    ʾasherH8345497 times

  • יְכַפֶּר־he will make atonement

    yekhaper-H3722102 times

  • בּ֖וֹby <the> it

    bo

  • עָלָֽיו׃on him

    ʾalavH59215755 times

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

3 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Leviticus 7:7

    The guilt offering is like the sin offering; the same law applies to both. It belongs to the priest who makes atonement with it.

    it leads to

    • Leviticus 6:25–26

      “Tell Aaron and his sons that this is the law of the sin offering: In the place where the burnt offering is slaughtered, the sin offering shall be slaughtered before the LORD; it is…

    • 1 Corinthians 9:13

      Do you not know that those who work in the temple eat of its food, and those who serve at the altar partake of its offerings?

    • Leviticus 14:13

      Then he is to slaughter the lamb in the sanctuary area where the sin offering and burnt offering are slaughtered. Like the sin offering, the guilt offering belongs to the priest; it is most…

Where this verse is studied

On this page

About Numbers

The Bronze Serpent, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.
The Bronze Serpent, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament (1748-1763); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.