Skip to content
mannafest.faith

James 2:20

in James 2

O foolish man, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is worthless?

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV

ASV

But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith apart from works is barren?

KJV

But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?

This verse in James 2

Commentary

12 notes on this verse

A commentator

Cyril of Alexandria

LETTERS 55.2 · Written before 444.

Just as faith without works is dead, so the reverse is also true. Therefore let integrity in faith shine forth along with the glories of upright living.

This site's exposition

shew me thy faith without thy works

on James 2:18-20

The challenge makes the frame explicit: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works, demonstration before men, which only works can give, since faith invisible is faith unprovable. The devils also believe, and tremble is the argument's darkest exhibit, monotheism confessed by demons, orthodoxy with shuddering and without surrender, per the letter's plain view of the unseen world. O vain man, empty man, wilt thou know that faith without works is dead, the KJV's reading, with the oldest copies reading idle, arge, workless; either way the demonstration follows.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers2 voices

A commentator

Oecumenius

Commentary on James · Written before 550.

proposed

But will you know O vain man, that faith without works is dead? James called a man vain who boasts of a bare faith, when he has obtained nothing of substance for completion through works.

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

ON THE CHRISTIAN LIFE 13 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

Holy Scripture should be interpreted in a way which is in complete agreement with those who understood it and not in a way which seems to be inconsistent to those who are least familiar with it. Paul said that a man is justified through faith without the works of the law, but not without those works of which James speaks.

The Medieval Church2 voices

A commentator

Bede

Commentary on the Catholic Epistles · Written before 735.

proposed

Do you want to know, O empty man, that faith without works is idle? Because the Apostle Paul, preaching that a man is justified by faith without works, was not well understood by those who took it to mean that once they believed in Christ, …

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on James · Written before 1107.

proposed

He calls the person empty who boasts of faith alone, because, not realizing it in deeds, he has acquired no fullness.

The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice

A commentator

John Wesley

1703–1791

Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)

But art than willing to know - Indeed thou art not: thou wouldest fain be ignorant of it. O empty man - Empty of all goodness. That the faith which is without works is dead - And so is not properly faith, as a dead carcase is not a man.
5 more voices on this verse

The Puritans and the Awakening2 voices

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

Faith without works is said to be dead, not only as void of all those operations which are the proofs of spiritual life, but as unavailable to eternal life: such believers as rest in a bare profession of faith are dead while they live. We are taught that a justifying faith cannot be without works, from two examples, Abraham and Rahab.
But wilt thou know, O vain man,....

The Nineteenth Century3 voices

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

proposed

wilt thou know--"Vain" men are not willing to know, since they have no wish to "do" the will of God.

quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — starts-lowercase

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

proposed

But wilt thou know - Art thou willing to be instructed in the nature of true saving faith? Then attend to the following examples.
But wilt thou know - Will you have a full demonstration of it; will you have the clearest proof in the case. The apostle evidently felt that the instances to which he was about to refer, those of Abraham and Rahab, were decisive. O vain man - The reference by this language is to a man who held an opinion that could not be defended. The word “vain” here used (κενε kene) means properly “empty,” as opposed to “full” - as empty hands, having nothing in them; then fruitless, or without utility or success; then false, fallacious. The meaning here, properly, would be “empty,” in the sense of being void of understanding; and this would be a mild and gentle way of saying of one that he was foolish, or that he maintained an argument that was without sense. James means, doubtless, to represent it as a perfectly plain matter, a matter about which no man of sense could have any reasonable doubt. If we must call a man foolish, as is sometimes necessary, let us use as mild and inoffensive a term as possible - a term which, while it will convey our meaning, will not unnecessarily wound and irritate. That faith without works is dead - That the faith which does not produce good works is useless in the matter of salvation. He does not mean to say that it would produce no effect, for in the case of the demons it did produce trembling and alarm; but that it would be valueless in the matter of salvation. The faith of Abraham and of Rahab was entirely different from this.

The words behind it

14 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Romans 1:21

    For although they knew God, they neither glorified Him as God nor gave thanks to Him, but they became futile in their thinking and darkened in their foolish hearts.

    it leads to

    • Ephesians 4:17–18

      So I tell you this, and insist on it in the Lord, that you must no longer walk as the Gentiles do, in the futility of their thinking.

  • Through

    James 2:26

    As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead.

    it leads to

    • James 2:14

      What good is it, my brothers, if someone claims to have faith, but has no deeds? Can such faith save him?

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • James 2:17

      So too, faith by itself, if it does not result in action, is dead.

  • Through

    Galatians 6:3

    If anyone thinks he is something when he is nothing, he deceives himself.

    it leads to

    • Proverbs 26:12

      Do you see a man who is wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.

    • 1 Corinthians 8:2

      The one who thinks he knows something does not yet know as he ought to know.

    • 1 Corinthians 3:18

      Let no one deceive himself. If any of you thinks he is wise in this age, he should become a fool, so that he may become wise.

  • Through

    James 2:17

    So too, faith by itself, if it does not result in action, is dead.

    it leads to

    • James 2:26

      As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead.

    • 2 Peter 1:5–9

      For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith virtue; and to virtue, knowledge;

Where this verse is studied

About James

The Feeding of the Multitude, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.
The Feeding of the Multitude, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.
This page draws on 12 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes on the New Testament; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Augustine of Hippo, ON THE CHRISTIAN LIFE 13; Bede, Commentary on the Catholic Epistles; Cyril of Alexandria, LETTERS 55.2; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Oecumenius, Commentary on James and Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on James.