Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Acts 18:13

in Acts 18

“This man is persuading the people to worship God in ways contrary to the law,” they said.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

saying, This man persuadeth men to worship God contrary to the law.

KJV

Saying, This fellow persuadeth men to worship God contrary to the law.

This verse in Acts 18

Commentary

9 notes on this verse
Saying, this fellow persuadeth men to worship God contrary to the law. Meaning either to the law of the Romans, which forbad the bringing in of any new gods, without the leave of the senate; See Gill on Act 16:21; or rather to the law of Moses: the Arabic version reads, "our law"; though this was false, for Moses in his law wrote of Christ, and ordered the children of Israel to hearken to him.

This site's exposition

While Gallio was proconsul of Achaia

on Acts 18:12-13

While Gallio was proconsul of Achaia, the Jews brought Paul before the judgment seat. An inscription found at Delphi dates Gallio's term to about AD 51 to 52, one of the few fixed dates for Paul's ministry.

This site's exposition

persuading the people to worship God

Each city on Paul's route brought its own charge. At Philippi the charge was customs unlawful for Romans, at 16:21, and at Thessalonica it was defying Caesar's decrees, at 17:7. At Corinth the accusers bring a charge about worship before a Roman judge.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers1 voice

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 39 · Written before 407.

proposed

"Saying, This fellow seduceth men contrary to the law to worship God. And when Paul was about to open his mouth, Gallio said: If indeed it were any wrong-doing or wicked lewdness, O ye Jews, reason would that I should bear with you. But if it be a question of words and names, and of your law, look ye to it; for I will be no judge of such matters. And he drave them from the judgment-seat." This Gallio seems to me to have been a sensible man. Thus observe, when these had said, "Against the law he seduceth men to worship God," he "cared for none of these things": and observe how he answers them: "If indeed it were" any matter affecting the city, "any wrong-doing or wicked lewdness," etc. And observe how prudent he is: for he does not say straightway, I care not, but, "If," says he, "it were a matter of wrong-doing or wicked lewdness, O ye Jews, reason would that I should bear with you; but if it be a question of doctrine and words and of your law, see ye to it, for I do not choose to be a judge of such matters." He taught them that not such are the matters which crave a judicial sentence, but they do all things out of order. And he does not say, It is not my duty, but, "I do not choose," that they may not trouble him again. Thus Pilate said in the case of Christ, "Take ye Him, and judge him according to your law." But they were just like men drunken and mad.

The Puritans and the Awakening2 voices

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

Thus when people are taught to worship God in Christ, and to worship him in the Spirit, they are ready to quarrel, as if they were taught to worship him contrary to the law; whereas this is indeed perfective of the law.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

They were unanimous in it: they came upon him with one accord; hand joined in hand to do this wickedness. They did it with violence and fury: They made an insurrection to the disturbance of the public peace, and hurried Paul away to the judgment-seat, and, for aught that appears, allowed him no time to prepare for his trial. How falsely Paul is accused before Gallio (

quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — unbalanced-parens

The Nineteenth Century2 voices

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

proposed

when Gallio was the deputy--"the proconsul." See on Ac 13:7. He was brother to the celebrated philosopher SENECA, the tutor of Nero, who passed sentence of death on both.

quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — starts-lowercase

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

proposed

Persuaded men to worship God contrary to the law - This accusation was very insidious. The Jews had permission by the Romans to worship their own God in their own way: this the laws allowed. The Roman worship was also established by the law. The Jews probably intended to accuse Paul of acting contrary to both laws. “He is not a Jew, for he does not admit of circumcision; he is not a Gentile, for he preaches against the worship of the gods. He is setting up a worship of his own, in opposition to all laws, and persuading many people to join with him: he is therefore a most dangerous man, and should be put to death.”
1 more voice on this verse

The Nineteenth Century1 voice

Contrary to the law - Evidently intending contrary to all law - the laws of the Romans and of the Jews. It was permitted to the Jews to worship God according to their own views in Greece; but they could easily pretend that Paul had departed from that mode of worshipping God.

The words behind it

12 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Acts 25:8

    Then Paul made his defense: “I have committed no offense against the law of the Jews or against the temple or against Caesar.”

    it leads to

    • Acts 6:13–14

      where they presented false witnesses who said, “This man never stops speaking against this holy place and against the law.

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • Acts 28:17

      After three days, he called together the leaders of the Jews. When they had gathered, he said to them, “Brothers, although I have done nothing against our people or the customs of our fathers,…

    • Acts 24:12

      Yet my accusers did not find me debating with anyone in the temple or riling up a crowd in the synagogues or in the city.

  • Through

    Acts 18:15

    But since it is a dispute about words and names and your own law, settle it yourselves. I refuse to be a judge of such things.”

    it leads to

    • Acts 23:29

      I found that the accusation involved questions about their own law, but there was no charge worthy of death or imprisonment.

    • Acts 25:19

      They only had some contentions with him regarding their own religion and a certain Jesus who had died, but whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

    • 1 Timothy 6:4

      he is conceited and understands nothing. Instead, he has an unhealthy interest in controversies and semantics, out of which come envy, strife, abusive talk, evil suspicions,

  • Through

    Acts 21:28

    crying out, “Men of Israel, help us! This is the man who teaches everywhere against our people and against our law and against this place. Furthermore, he has brought Greeks into the temple and…

    it leads to

    • Acts 24:5–6

      We have found this man to be a pestilence, stirring up dissension among the Jews all over the world. He is a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes,

  • Through

    Acts 6:13

    where they presented false witnesses who said, “This man never stops speaking against this holy place and against the law.

    it leads to

    • Acts 6:11

      Then they prompted some men to say, “We heard Stephen speak words of blasphemy against Moses and against God.”

Where this verse is studied

About Acts

The Pentecost, El Greco, about 1600, Museo del Prado. Public domain.
The Pentecost, El Greco, about 1600, Museo del Prado. Public domain.
This page draws on 9 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Chrysostom, Homily on Acts 39; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; R. J. Knowling, The Acts of the Apostles, Expositor's Greek Testament; W. M. Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveller and the Roman Citizen and William Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveller and the Roman Citizen.