Judgeschapter 18
31 verses · Samuel, by tradition · 11th century BC · History
Then the five men departed, and came to Laish, and saw the people that were therein, how they dwelt careless, after the manner of the Zidonians, quiet and secure; and there was no magistrate in the land, that might put them to shame in any thing; and they were far from the Zidonians, and had no business with any man.
Introduction
Samuel, by tradition, History, Judges Overview.
This chapter was written for Israelites who knew the sanctuary at Dan in the far north, and tradition gives the book to Samuel. It carries the household shrine of the last chapter out of its home in the hill country and into the hands of a whole tribe on the move. It asks what happens when a people chooses its land and its worship by what works. Listen for the questions put to the priest and the answers he gives. Notice how the town at the end of the road is described, and why that matters. The last verse sets the new shrine beside the house of God.
Context
- Who
- Israelites who knew the sanctuary at Dan and had not been told where it came from
- What
- An account of the tribe of Dan taking Micah's priest and images, conquering Laish, and setting up its own shrine there.
- Where
- From Zorah and Eshtaol on the Philistine border, past Micah's house in Ephraim, to Laish at the springs of the Jordan in the far north.
- When
- About 1350 BC, early in the judges period, on the same evidence as chapter 17.
- Why
- To show where the sanctuary of images at Dan began, in a time when Israel had no king.
Historical context
The account belongs to the tribe of Dan, and to the same Levite and the same householder as chapter 17. Six hundred armed Danites carry it out, with five scouts sent ahead.
Show the rest of the historical context, 4 more paragraphs
The time is early in the period, on the same evidence as chapter 17. Adam Clarke reads the camp of Dan at verse 12 as showing the migration happened before Samson's lifetime.
The places run the length of the country. Zorah and Eshtaol are on the Philistine border, the same two towns Samson is born and buried between. Laish stands at the far north, at the head of the Jordan near the springs, at the mound now called Tell el-Qadi, which Albert Barnes identifies.
The occasion is a tribe without room. Dan had an allotment given at Joshua 19:40 to 46, and Judges 1:34 records that the Amorites forced the Danites into the hill country and would not let them come down into the valley.
A first hearer knew two things this chapter turns on. He knew that asking counsel of God was done through the priest and the Urim, which Numbers 27:21 appoints, so an enquiry made at a private shrine before a homemade ephod was the wrong door. And he knew Laish by its position, cut off from Sidon and dealing with nobody, which is what left it with no one to call when six hundred men arrived.
Significance
The hearer who knew the sanctuary at Dan was being told its origin. It began as one man's household shrine in Ephraim and travelled north under armed guard.
Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph
Verse 31 dates that shrine by the tabernacle at Shiloh, so a hearer learned that the two stood at the same time. The place kept its function long enough for Jeroboam to set a calf there at 1 Kings 12:29.
This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.
How it is read
Rashi keeps the early dating running through the migration. On the opening note that no inheritance had fallen to Dan he reads it against the allotment in Joshua and says this too shows that the episode belongs to the very beginning of the period of the judges (Rashi on Judges 18:1:1, the Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J., CC-BY). When the five spies question the young Levite at Micah's house he finds a run of echoes of Moses at the bush in their words, matching the Hebrew of their questions to the words spoken to Moses, and taking the man's descent from Moses as the point of the comparison (Rashi on Judges 18:3:1, same edition). The answer the Levite gives them from the images he treats as worthless and the outcome as God's alone: the spies ask him to inquire through figures that "communicate by sorcery", and Rashi says of the reply they take away, "It is revealed before the Holy One, blessed is He, but these [figurines] are worthless" (Rashi on Judges 18:5:1 and 18:6:1, same edition). On the report brought back about Laish he explains the phrase about the people's security as a place where no one ever had to ask a neighbour for help and be turned away ashamed, and he notes his own source for the reading with the words "So I have heard" (Rashi on Judges 18:7:1, same edition). On the march he glosses the goods set in front of the column as the loads that moved slowly, which is why they were placed where they were, and the threat made to Micah as a warning about angry men in the company (Rashi on Judges 18:21:1 and 18:25:1, same edition). Radak, Malbim and Metzudat David comment across the chapter and the corpus holds no English version of them here, so they stand as citations: Radak on Judges 18:2:1, Radak on Judges 18:10:1, Radak on Judges 18:18:1, Radak on Judges 18:22:1, Malbim on Judges 18:11:1, Metzudat David on Judges 18:14:1, Metzudat David on Judges 18:17:1 and Metzudat David on Judges 18:19:1.
What the rabbis say
The corpus records forty rabbinic locators on this chapter, twenty-eight of them Midrash and twelve Talmud, each a locator without text. The questioning of the Levite draws Bava Batra 110a:3, Nazir 23a:16, Ein Yaakov, Bava Batra 8:3 and Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Bava Batra 8:3. The report on Laish draws Midrash Tehillim 19:2, and the six hundred armed men of Dan draw Eruvin 18b:5. The taking of the images draws Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sotah 1:20, and the answer given to Micah on the road draws Bekhorot 55a:17, Midrash Tanchuma, Ki Tisa 14:4, Midrash Tanchuma, Re'eh 16:1, Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Re'eh 14:1 and Pesikta DeRav Kahana 10:8. The renaming of the city draws Bereshit Rabbah 82:5 and Midrash Tannaim on Deuteronomy 33:22:3. The verse naming the priest and his line draws the heaviest cluster in these chapters, twenty-one locators in all, among them Bava Batra 109b:8, Jerusalem Talmud Berakhot 9:2:12, Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 11:5:7, Avot DeRabbi Natan 34:4, Avot DeRabbi Natan, Recension B 37:10, Seder Olam Rabbah 12:2, Seder Olam Rabbah 24:2, Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael, Tractate Amalek 3:11, Pesikta Rabbati 27:1 and Otzar Midrashim, Midrashim on Missing and Extra Letters 1:24, which is where the rabbinic treatment of the written form of the name is carried. The closing note about the house of God at Shiloh draws Shevuot 35b:12, Jerusalem Talmud Megillah 1:9:17, Tractate Soferim 4:7, Ein Yaakov, Shevuot 4:9 and Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Shevuot 4:5. The rabbis teach in these places, and this site reports them as their teaching rather than as a rule of the text.
Sources: Rashi, Rashi on Judges 18:1:1, 18:3:1, 18:5:1, 18:6:1, 18:7:1, 18:21:1 and 18:25:1, the Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J., CC-BY; Radak, Radak on Judges 18:2:1, 18:10:1, 18:18:1 and 18:22:1, cited only, no English version in the corpus; Malbim, Malbim on Judges 18:11:1, cited only; Metzudat David, Metzudat David on Judges 18:14:1, 18:17:1 and 18:19:1, cited only.
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
Danite spies find quiet, careless Laish
Judges 18:1-2
Here, as at 19:1, the book says “there was no king in Israel” without the clause about everyone doing what was right in his own eyes. Dan already had an allotment at Joshua 19:40-46, but the Amorites forced it into the hills at Judges 1:34. The five men go out “from Zorah and Eshtaol”, Samson's country at 13:2 and 16:31.
Judges 18:1
“There was no king in Israel - See Jdg 17:6 (note). The circumstances related here show that this must have happened about the time of the preceding transactions. The tribe of the Danites - That is, a part of this tribe; some families of it. All their inheritance - That is, they had not got an extent of country sufficient for them.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The Danites sent five men of valor, and Clarke notes that the Hebrew word for valor covers courage, judgment and wealth. Henry lists what the men were sent to learn, whether the land was good and whether its people could be taken. Their route passed Micah's house.
Judges 18:2
“Five men - men of valor - The Hebrew word חיל chayil has been applied to personal prowess, to mental energy, and to earthly possessions. They sent those in whose courage, judgment, and prudence, they could safely confide.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Judges 18:3-6
They know the Levite by his speech, which Gill takes for an accent they knew, while Barnes reads the Hebrew as hearing a voice and turning toward it. They ask him to “inquire of God”, as Israel does at 1:1 and 20:18 by the way Numbers 27:21 appoints, but at a private shrine. The priest answers “Go in peace”, and the chapter records no word from God behind it.
Judges 18:3
“When they were by the house of Micah,.... At their inn, which might be next to it, or as they were passing by it: they knew the voice of the young man the Levite; who had been in their country, and they had been in his company and conversation, and they knew the tone of his voice when they heard it; a particular brogue he might have.”
1 more voice on this verse
Judges 18:3
“It does not follow that they had known him before, and recognized his voice, though it may be so. But the Hebrew equally bears the sense that they heard the voice of the Levite; and, attracted by it, went into the chapel Jdg 18:18 where Jonathan was. They were probably just starting on their journey, but were still within the court or precincts of Micah’s house. Micah had evidently not told them of his house of God, and his Levite. Their questions indicate surprise.”
The Levite says Micah hired him to be his priest, and the terms were set at 17:10, ten shekels of silver a year with clothes and food. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown note that the Danites enlisted him at once. His next answer is for Dan.
Barnes holds that the sight of the ephod and household idols gave the Danites the idea of asking. Adam Clarke notes that they say God, Elohim, and the Levite answers with the LORD, YHWH, a name used of the true God alone. Both sides mean Israel's God.
Judges 18:5
“Ask counsel - of God - As the Danites use the word אלהים Elohim here for God, we are necessarily led to believe that they meant the true God; especially as the Levite answers, Jdg 18:6, Before the Lord (יהוה Yehovah) is your way. Though the former word may be sometimes applied to idols, whom their votaries clothed with the attributes of God; yet the latter is never applied but to the true God alone.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Go in peace: The priest says the LORD is watching over their way, and Barnes reads the words as a promise of favour, as in Ezra 8:21-22. Wesley says the priest either made the answer up to please the Danites or had it from the devil. It pleased them.
Judges 18:6
“9 And they said, Arise, that we may go up against them: for we have seen the land, and, behold, it is very good: and are ye still? be not slothful to go, and to enter to possess the land. 10 When ye go, ye shall come unto a people secure, and to a large land: for God hath given it into your hands; a place where there is no want of any thing that is in the earth.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
2 more voices on this verse
Judges 18:6
“Before the Lord ... - i. e. He looks favorably upon it. (Compare Ezr 8:21-22.)”
Judges 18:6
“Before the Lord - That is, your design is under the eye of God; that is, under his care, protection and direction. This answer he either feigns to gratify their humour; or, did indeed receive from the devil, who transformed himself into an angel of light, and in God's name gave him answers, and those not sometimes very true, which God suffered for the trial of his people.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Laish is described by what it lacks, with “no oppressive ruler”, “no alliance with anyone”, and nobody near enough in Sidon to come. Henry gives the literal sense of the Hebrew behind that ruler as heir of restraint, so no one held power to check anything. Barnes places the site at the head of the Jordan at Tell el-Qadi, whose Arabic name carries the sense of judge that Dan does.
Judges 18:7
“Laish - Afterward called “Dan” Jdg 18:29. The exact site has not been identified, but it was the northern extremity of Israel, near the sources of the Jordan, and about four miles from Panium, or Caesarea-Philippi. It is thought to have stood where the village Tell-el-Kadi now stands. After the manner of the Zidonians - The genius of the Zidonians being mechanical and commercial, not military, their colonists were apt to neglect fortifications and similar warlike precautions.”
1 more voice on this verse
Judges 18:7
“Put to shame - Or, that might rebuke or punish any thing, that is, any crime. Putting to shame seems to be used for inflicting civil punishment, because shame is generally the effect of it.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Judges 18:8-10
The report runs opposite to Numbers 13:31-33, where the men who had seen a good land said it could not be taken. These five say “it is very good” and press their brothers, “Do not hesitate”. Verse 10 turns the priest's word into a promise, “God has delivered it into your hand”, the language God uses at Joshua 6:2 and 8:1, spoken here with no word from God behind it.
Judges 18:8
“And they came unto their brethren to Zorah and Eshtaol,.... After they had well viewed the city, and made their remarks on the inhabitants of it, the condition and circumstances in which they were, and took notice of the goodness of the land about it, they returned to their brethren that sent them, particularly those that dwelt at the two places mentioned: and their brethren said unto them, what say ye? what tidings do you bring? what account of the place and country where you have been?”
Henry sets the report against the crowded hill country where the Philistines had penned Dan in. Clarke calls the speech plain and forceful. It moved the tribe at once, and Gill hears in it a call to go up to war with the land already counted as theirs.
Judges 18:9
“And they said, arise, that me may go up against them,.... That is, prepare for war, and go up in an hostile manner against the present possessors of the land, not doubting of being masters of it easily: for we have seen the land, and, behold, it is very good.”
John Wesley traces the claim that God had given the land to two sources, the answer of the Levite at verse 6 and a people left open as easy prey. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown describe Laish as a fertile valley, shut away and farming in peace. Its isolation made it rich and defenceless.
Judges 18:10
“Given - This they gather partly from God's promise which they supposed they had from the Levite's mouth; and partly from his providence, which had so disposed them, that they would be an easy prey.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Six hundred armed men take Micah's gods
Judges 18:11-13
Six hundred armed men is the number the book gives again at 20:47, where six hundred Benjamites survive the war on their tribe. They camp west of Kiriath-jearim, and the place keeps the name Mahaneh-dan, the camp of Dan, “to this day”. Judges 13:25 sets a Mahaneh-dan between Zorah and Eshtaol, and Clarke reads this verse as proof that the migration came before Samson.
Judges 18:11
“Six hundred men - These were not the whole, for we find they had children, etc., Jdg 18:21; but these appear to have been six hundred armed men.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Judges 18:11
“Their journey led them through the territory of Judah, and their first halting place was "behind," that is, on the west of Kirjath-jearim, on a spot called afterwards "the camp of Dan." Prosecuting the northern route, they skirted the base of the Ephraimite hills.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Kiriath-jearim means city of forests, and Barnes gives its other name as Kiriath-baal, on the road from Jaffa to Jerusalem. Henry takes the name Mahaneh-dan, the camp of Dan, as a sign that armed camps had grown rare in Israel. No other tribe marched with Dan.
Judges 18:12
“Mahaneh-dan - “The camp of Dan;” so called from the circumstance of this armament encamping there. See Jdg 13:25 (note), which affords some proof that this transaction was previous to the days of Samson.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The route runs north through Judah and then into the Ephraim hills, the way the five spies had gone before. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown have the column skirting the base of those hills. The road leads the army back to Micah's door.
Judges 18:13
“And they passed thence unto Mount Ephraim,.... Steering their coast still northward; this, according to Bunting (b), was eight miles from Kirjathjearim, or Mahanehdan, in which Micah's house was, for as yet they were not come to it, see Jdg 18:15. (b) Ibid. (Travels of the Patriarchs, &c. p. 112.)”
Judges 18:14-17
The four objects are the ones made at 17:3-5, a graven image and a molten idol from the mother's silver, with an ephod and household idols. The Hebrew word for these idols names the ones Rachel stole at Genesis 31:19, where the King James renders it images. The scouts carry them out while “six hundred Danites stood at the entrance of the gate”, one walled compound in Barnes's reading.
Judges 18:14
“Answered - That is, spake, the word answering being often used in scripture of the first speaker. These houses - That is, in one of these houses. What to do - Whether it be not expedient to take them for your farther use.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Judges 18:14
“In these houses - This agrees with what we saw at Jdg 18:2-3 that the “house of God” and Jonathan’s house were detached from Micah’s. There were other houses besides Jdg 18:22. The whole settlement was probably called Beth-Micah, contained in one court, and entered by one gate Jdg 18:16.”
The lodging of the Levite is called both his home and the house of Micah, and Barnes explains the double name as one court holding several houses behind a single gate. The five greet the priest first. Verse 17 shows why.
Gill places the gate at the entrance of the town around the house of Micah, and Barnes at the single gate of Micah's own court. Either way the armed men held the one way out. Matthew Henry asks how gods that could be carried off were ever to protect the men who stole them.
Judges 18:16
“And the six hundred men appointed with their weapons of war,.... Who were armed men, and marched with their armour about them: which were of the children of Dan; for no other were concerned in this expedition: stood by the entering of the gate; not of Micah's house, but of the city in which his house was; here they stood while the five men went up to the house.”
The list of four objects is given three times, at verses 14, 17 and 18, and verse 20 names only three of them as the priest takes them. Barnes has the priest talking with the six hundred at the gate while the five work inside. The shrine emptied without a fight.
Judges 18:17
“The five went back to Micah’s chapel (Micah’s house, Jdg 18:18) and took the ephod, teraphim, etc., and brought them to the gate where the priest was talking to the 600 men.”
Judges 18:18-20
The priest asks what they are doing as his shrine goes out the door, and the answer is an offer. Micah had hired him at 17:10 in the same words, and Dan repeats them, “be a father and a priest to us”, counting a tribe instead of coin. The priest was glad and went in the middle of the company, which Clarke reads as hiding from his old master.
Judges 18:18
“These went unto Micah’s house - The five men went in, while the six hundred armed men stood at the gate.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Putting a hand over the mouth was the sign for silence, and Clarke compares statues of Harpocrates, god of silence, with a finger on his lips. Henry spells out the offer, a priest for a tribe with more worshippers and more sacrifices. The priest needed little persuading.
Judges 18:19
“Lay thine hand upon thy mouth - This was the token of silence. The god of silence, Harpocrates, is represented on ancient statues with his finger pressed on his lips.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Matthew Henry notes that the Levite had no complaint against Micah, who had kept his word and his wage. Shiloh stood open to him under Deuteronomy 18, where a Levite could serve the priests and be welcome. Wesley names the motive as self-interest.
Judges 18:20
“Was glad - Being wholly governed by his own interest. The midst - Both for the greater security of such precious things, and that Micah might not be able to come at him, to injure or upbraid him; and, it may be, because that was the place where the ark used to be carried.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Judges 18:21-24
they turned and departed: The small children, the livestock and the possessions go in front, which Barnes reads as an order of march against the pursuit they expected. Micah's neighbours are called out of the houses near his, so the shrine had a settlement around it. His cry states the difficulty in his own words, “You took the gods I had made”, and Isaiah 44:14-17 and 46:1-2 later argue from that order.
Judges 18:21
And put the little ones, etc., before them - They expected a pursuit from Micah’s people, and arranged their order of march accordingly. The carriage - Rather, “the valuables.” Some interpret it “the heavy baggage.”
Matthew Henry notes how the pursuers caught up with a column slowed by children and cattle. Micah's men came to argue their case, too few to fight six hundred. Barnes renders the Hebrew as men called together.
Judges 18:22
“Were gathered together - literally, “were called together.” The men, who were all Micah’s workmen, were probably in the fields with their master at the time of the robbery. When the women saw what was done they gave the alarm, and Micah called the men together as quickly as possible, and pursued the Danites and overtook them.”
The Danites turn and ask Micah what is the matter, as if he had no cause to call out a company after them. Henry sets out the two sides, Micah pleading his right and the Danites their might. Might won.
Judges 18:23
“He argues with them, and pleads his right, which he thought should prevail; but they, in answer, plead their might, which, it proved, did prevail; for it is common that might overcomes right.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Adam Clarke holds that Micah worshipped Israel's God and meant by his gods the symbols of that presence, the ephod and the household idols. John Wesley reads the same words as lesser gods, mediators through which Micah sent his worship upward. Both readings leave him with nothing.
Judges 18:24
“Ye have taken away my gods - As Micah was a worshipper of the true God, as we have seen, he cannot mean any kind of idols by the word אלהי elohai here used. He undoubtedly means those representations of Divine things, and symbols of the Divine presence such as the teraphim, ephod, etc.; for they are all evidently included under the word elohai, which we translate my gods.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Judges 18:24
“I made - So far was he besotted with superstition and idolatry, that he esteemed those gods, which were man's work. But he could not be so stupid, as to think these were indeed the great Jehovah that made heaven and earth; but only a lower sort of gods, by whom, as mediators, he offered up his worship to the true God, as divers of the Heathen did.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Judges 18:25-26
The threat is put as advice, and “angry men” renders a Hebrew phrase meaning bitter of soul, the description given of the men who gathered to David at 1 Samuel 22:2. Clarke sets the exchange beside a highwayman's demand, since Micah is offered a choice between his goods and the lives of his household. Verse 26 closes it without comment, because Micah “saw that they were too strong for him”.
Judges 18:25
“Thy voice - Thy complaints and reproaches. Angry fellows - The soldiers, who are in themselves sharp and fierce, and will soon be enflamed by thy provoking words.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Micah goes home without his priest, the gods he made or the blessing he counted on at 17:13. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown picture him leading a sizeable band, still too small for six hundred. The chapter leaves him there.
Judges 18:26
“27 And they took the things which Micah had made, and the priest which he had, and came unto Laish, unto a people that were at quiet and secure: and they smote them with the edge of the sword, and burnt the city with fire. 28 And there was no deliverer, because it was far from Zidon, and they had no business with any man; and it was in the valley that lieth by Beth-rehob.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Laish burned, renamed Dan, an idol enshrined
Judges 18:27-28
The acts are the conquest's own, striking with the sword and burning the city, as Joshua 6:24 and 11:11 tell of Jericho and Hazor. Those accounts carry a command, and this chapter records no word from God, no priest of Aaron's line and no prophet. The two things that kept Laish safe, distance from Sidon and “no alliance with anyone”, leave it with “no one to deliver them”.
Judges 18:27
“The things which Micah had made - Rather, from Jdg 18:24, “the gods which Micah had made.” See Jdg 18:31; Deu 27:15; Exo 20:4.”
Barnes notes that Rehob marks the northern limit of the land the spies walked at Numbers 13:21, near the entrance to Hamath. Dan rebuilt the city it had burned. Charles Spurgeon preached this verse as a warning against careless security, the ease that left Laish without help.
Judges 18:28
“I HAVE for this evening's discourse what some of you may consider to be rather an amazing text. Let me, therefore, begin by briefly stating the circumstances surrounding it. The tribe of Dan found its portion to be rather too small, so the people held a council to decide what was to be done. They resolved to send a small body of men to spy out the land—these spies came, in due time, to a place called Laish, which they found to be inhabited by certain people who dwelt there carelessly, in supposed security, "after the manner of the Sidonians."”
Charles Spurgeon · written before 1892 · The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 2490: “The Danger of Carnal Security” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition)Particular Baptist
3 more voices on this verse
Judges 18:28
“God had graciously performed his promise, in putting them in possession of that which fell to their lot, obliging them thereby to be faithful to him who had been so to them. They inherited the labour of the people, that they might observe his statues, Ps. cv. But the first thing they do after they are settled is to break his statues.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Judges 18:28
“There was no deliverer - They had no succor, because the Sidonians, from whom they might have expected it, were at too great a distance.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Judges 18:28
“Rehob (as Dan afterward) is mentioned as the northernmost point of the land of Canaan Num 13:21, and its position is defined with reference to the entering in of Hamath. A city - Rather, “the” city. They rebuilt Laish, which they had burned down Jdg 18:29.”
Joshua 19:47 tells this conquest in a single verse and calls the town Leshem rather than Laish, and neither account corrects the other. The new name fixes the northern end of the map, and from Dan to Beersheba becomes the measure of the land, first at 20:1 and then through Samuel and Kings. Dan is the tribe missing from the twelve at Revelation 7:5-8, and Scripture gives no reason.
Judges 18:29
“Called the name of the city Dan - This city was afterwards very remarkable as one of the extremities of the promised land. The extent of the Jewish territories was generally expressed by the phrase, From Dan to Beer-Sheba; that is, From the most northern to the southern extremity.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Gershom is the son of Moses at Exodus 2:22, so this priest is the grandson of Moses. The Hebrew writes Manasseh here with the letter nun raised above the line, and without it the name reads Moses, which Clarke takes as genuine and Henry records. The phrase “the captivity of the land” means either the Assyrian deportation of 2 Kings 15:29 or, with verse 31, the fall of Shiloh.
Judges 18:30
“The children of Dan set up the graven image - They erected a chapel, or temple, among themselves, as Micah had done before; having the same implements and the same priest. And Jonathan the son of Gershom - Either this was the name of the young Levite; or they had turned him off, and got this Jonathan in his place. The son Manasseh - Who this Manasseh was, none can tell; nor does the reading appear to be genuine.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
3 more voices on this verse
Judges 18:30
“And the children of Dan set up the graven image,.... In their new city Dan, and very probably had a house built for it, peculiar to it, in the same place where Jeroboam, in later times, set up one of his golden calves.”
Judges 18:30
“Image - Having succeeded in their expedition according to the prediction which, as they supposed, they had from this image, they had a great veneration for it. The captivity - When the whole land of the ten tribes, whereof Daniel was one, was conquered, and the people carried captive by the Assyrian, 2 Kings xvii, 6, 23, which is called by way of eminency, the captivity.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Judges 18:30
“The vulgar Latin reads it Moses. And if indeed Moses had a grandson that was rakish, and was picked up as a fit tool to be made use of in the setting up of idolatry, it is not the only instance (would to God it were!) of the unhappy degenerating of the posterity of great and good men.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
the house of God was in Shiloh: Two houses of God stand in Israel at once, the tabernacle at Shiloh and Micah's image at Dan, which stood “the whole time the house of God was in Shiloh”. Psalm 78:60 and Jeremiah 7:12-14 look back at the fall of Shiloh as a warning. Jeroboam sets a calf at Dan at 1 Kings 12:29.
Judges 18:31
“And they set them up Micah's graven image, which he made,.... Which is repeated for the sake of the time of its continuance next expressed: all the time the house of God was in Shiloh; which, according to some Jewish writers (g), was three hundred and sixty years; that is, so long as the tabernacle was there, which was afterwards removed to Nob. (g) Maimon. in Misn. Zebachim, c. 14. sect. 6. & Bartenora in ib. sect. 7.”
1 more voice on this verse
Judges 18:31
“That these images continued till Samuel's time, for so long the ark of God was at Shiloh; and it is probable that in him time effectual care was taken to suppress and abolish this idolatry.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
How this psalm is built
The form: A migration narrative in five stages, told in the wording of the conquest accounts but with no command from God anywhere in it, as Keil and Delitzsch classes it.
The patterns in this chapter
| Device | What it does | Where to see it |
|---|---|---|
| There was no king in Israel | The second of the four statements stands at verse 1. This one and 19:1 carry only the first half of the line, without the clause about every man doing what was right in his own eyes, which falls at 17:6 and 21:25 alone.Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1863, on Judges 18:1. | Judges 18:1 |
| The conquest's own words with nothing behind them | Verse 27 says they struck the town with the sword and burned the city, which is what Joshua 6:24 and 11:11 say of Jericho and Hazor. What those accounts carry and this one does not is a command. No word from God, no priest of Aaron's line and no prophet stands anywhere in the chapter. Verse 10 turns the priest's Go in peace into a promise that God has given the land into their hands, which is the language God himself uses at Joshua 6:2 and 8:1.Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1863, on Judges 18:27. | Judges 18:10, Judges 18:27 |
| Asking counsel of God | Enquiry runs through this book at 1:1 and at 20:18, 20:23 and 20:27, where Israel asks at the house of God and the answer comes from the LORD. The appointed way was Eleazar and the Urim at Numbers 27:21. Here the enquiry is made at a private shrine, before an ephod and household idols a man had made for himself. The priest answers that their way is before the LORD, and the chapter records no word from God standing behind it.John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament, 1748 to 1763, on Judges 18:5. | Judges 18:5, Judges 18:6 |
| The offer raised | Micah hired the Levite at 17:10 with two words, a father and a priest, for ten shekels a year. At verse 19 the Danites repeat the offer word for word and raise it by counting the congregation instead of the coin. The priest's heart is glad, and he carries the ephod and the household idols and the graven image himself. He walks in the middle of the people, which is where Numbers 2:17 sets the tabernacle in the order of march.Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1708 to 1710, on Judges 18:19 to 20. | Judges 17:10, Judges 18:19, Judges 18:20 |
| My gods which I made | Micah's cry at verse 24 states the difficulty in his own words, that they have taken away the gods he made. The prophets later argue from that exact order. Isaiah 44:14 to 17 has a man carve a god out of the wood he cooked his dinner with, and Isaiah 46:1 and 46:2 have the gods themselves carried off into captivity.Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1708 to 1710, on Judges 18:24. | Judges 18:24 |
The structure
9 more paragraphs on the patterns
Five stages. Scouts sent at verses 1 to 6. The report at verses 7 to 10. The march, the raid on the shrine and Micah's pursuit at verses 11 to 26. The taking of Laish and the renaming at verses 27 to 29. The two closing notes at verses 30 and 31.
The chapter is built so that each thing Micah assembled in chapter 17 is carried out of his house in order: the graven image, the ephod, the household idols and the priest.
The four objects
The objects at verses 14 to 18 are the ones made at 17:3 to 17:5. The household idols are the word the King James renders as images at Genesis 31:19, where Rachel takes her father's household gods. What is done here to a shrine has an older instance behind it. Albert Barnes reads the layout of verses 14 to 18 as one walled compound with the house of God set apart from the dwelling.
Where the chapter reaches
The new name at verse 29 fixes the northern end of the map. From Dan to Beersheba becomes the standard measure of the land, first at 20:1 and then through Samuel and Kings.
Dan is where Jeroboam sets one of the two calves at 1 Kings 12:29, and the people go as far as Dan to worship before it. The place keeps this function for centuries after the six hundred men arrive.
Dan is the tribe missing from the twelve named at Revelation 7:5 to 8, where Manasseh is counted beside Joseph in its place. Scripture gives no reason for the omission.
Verse 31 dates the shrine at Dan by the tabernacle at Shiloh, so two houses of God stand in Israel at the same time through this stretch. Psalm 78:60 and Jeremiah 7:12 to 14 both look back at what became of Shiloh, and Jeremiah makes it the warning laid against Jerusalem.
Keep studying
Studies1
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The form and classifications
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1810 to 1826, on Judges 18:12; Barry G. Webb, The Book of Judges: An Integrated Reading, 1987, and the NICOT commentary, 2012; carried as a proposed structure in the site's Judges dossier and Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1863, on Judges 18:27.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes; Charles Spurgeon, The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 2490: “The Danger of Carnal Security”; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.
