Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Rembrandt, The Apostle Paul

New Testament · Book 56 of 66

Titus

Church order in Crete. Elder qualifications; the groups in a healthy congregation; the grace of God teaching godly life.

Rembrandt, The Apostle Paul: public domain

Rembrandt, The Apostle Paul

Rembrandt, The Apostle Paul: public domain

  • 3
    Chapters
  • Crete
    Setting
  • Sound
    Doctrine

For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world; Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.

Titus 2:11–14

If you only read a few chapters

Pastoral Epistle · Titus

Order, Adorn, Insist

Paul charges Titus to finish planting order in Crete: qualified elders against a documented culture of liars (ch. 1): then to teach every household group a doctrine that instructs godly living, hinged between grace's first appearing and the appearing of glory still to come (ch. 2). Salvation rests on mercy, not works (the washing of regeneration), and that same grace must produce a people careful to maintain good works (ch. 3).

Summary

A structural spine keys every verse of the letter's three chapters to its move, order, adorn, insist, with the two grace-appearing hinge passages marked gold. Christ's deity in 2:13 and three other contested points are given full-strength treatment with named positions and no verdict.

  • A per-verse spine colors all 46 verses of the letter by structural move, with 2:11-14 and 3:4-7 marked as the load-bearing hinge
  • Four Christ-in-Titus passages are laid out, including the Granville-Sharp reading of 2:13's the great God and our Saviour
  • Six load-bearing themes trace the letter's doctrine-to-ethics argument, from sound doctrine as health to good works as fruit, not ground
  • Eight Greek keynote words are given their own cards, each linking to its word page
  • Three contested points are argued at full strength with named positions: 2:13's grammar, the Cretan quotation of 1:12, and Pastoral authorship

Order, Adorn, Insist

every verse of the letter, keyed to its structural move

The letter's own argument names its shape. Chapter 1 sets order against a diagnosed error; chapter 2 adorns that order with a household code sandwiched: theologically, not just narratively: between two “appearings”: grace's at the incarnation, glory's at Christ's return; chapter 3 insists on the fruit, grounded in mercy rather than earned by it. The gold cells below are the letter's two grace-appearing hinge passages: 2:11–14 and 3:4–7: the load-bearing verses everything ethical hangs from.

I. OrderTitus 116 verses

1:1–4 An unusually doctrine-dense salutation: “hope of eternal life,” “God, who cannot lie” (1:2).

1:5–9 The charge: appoint elders in every city; the qualifications list.

1:10–16 The false teachers reproved; the Cretan quotation (1:12); “To the pure all things are pure” (1:15).

II. AdornTitus 215 verses

2:1–10 Sound doctrine applied by household group: older men, older women, young women, young men, Titus himself as model, bondservants.

2:11–12 Grace has appeared, instructing us to deny ungodliness and to live “soberly and righteously and godly in this present world.”

2:13–14 Looking for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ, who gave himself to redeem and to purify “a people for his own possession.”

2:15 “Speak these things as you encourage and rebuke with all authority. Let no one despise you.”

III. InsistTitus 315 verses

3:1–3 Christian civic conduct, grounded in remembering our own former state.

3:4–7 Not by works done in righteousness which we did ourselves, but according to his mercy: the washing of regeneration, the renewing of the Holy Spirit, justified by grace, heirs of eternal life.

3:8 “Faithful is the saying”: the fifth and last of the Pastorals' five faithful sayings: sealing the letter's ethical thesis: that believers “may be careful to maintain good works.”

3:9–11 Avoid foolish controversies, genealogies, strivings about the law; reject a factious man after admonition.

3:12–15 Personal instructions, travel logistics, closing greeting.

What Titus Alone Teaches

Truth that comes out as a way of living

The greeting is one long sentence and it makes a claim before it makes a request. Paul is an apostle 'according to the faith of God's elect, and the knowledge of the truth which is according to godliness' (1:1), and the hope in view rests on a God 'who cannot lie' (1:2). Two things are set up there for the rest of the letter. Truth in this book is measured by the life it produces, which is why the last verse of chapter 1 says of the false teachers that 'They profess that they know God; but by their works they deny him' (1:16). And a God who cannot lie is named in a letter that will shortly quote a line calling the local people liars, which is a contrast the readers would have felt.

Titus 1:1 · Titus 1:2 · Titus 1:16

Elders in every city

The first assignment is organizational and Paul gives the standard in full. An elder must be 'blameless, the husband of one wife, having children that believe' (1:6). The list then names the man's temper and his money before it names his skill: 'not self-willed, not soon angry, no brawler, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre' (1:7), and on the other side 'given to hospitality, a lover of good, sober-minded, just, holy, self-controlled' (1:8). One duty is spelled out, and it has two halves: he must hold to the faithful word 'that he may be able both to exhort in the sound doctrine, and to convict the gainsayers' (1:9). Encouragement and correction are one job. Worth noting is that 1:5 says elders and 1:7 says bishop about the same men in the space of two verses, which is the clearest evidence in the New Testament that the two words named one office at this stage.

Titus 1:5 · Titus 1:7 · Titus 1:9

Pure to the pure

The trouble on Crete had a religious shape and a financial motive. Teachers were pushing 'Jewish fables, and commandments of men who turn away from the truth' (1:14), and they were doing it for money (1:11). Paul answers with a sentence that cuts through every rule about clean and unclean things: 'To the pure all things are pure: but to them that are defiled and unbelieving nothing is pure; but both their mind and their conscience are defiled' (1:15). The problem is located in the person rather than in the object, which is the same answer he gave about food in the first letter to Timothy. Then the test that the whole letter runs on: profession is measured by works (1:16).

Titus 1:11 · Titus 1:14 · Titus 1:15

Teaching that fits each person in the house

Chapter 2 works through a congregation by age and station. Older men are to be 'temperate, grave, sober-minded, sound in faith, in love, in patience' (2:2). Older women are to be 'reverent in demeanor, not slanderers nor enslaved to much wine, teachers of that which is good' (2:3), with a stated purpose: 'that they may train the young women to love their husbands, to love their children' (2:4). Younger men get one word, and Titus himself is to be the demonstration of it, 'in all things showing thyself an ensample of good works' (2:7). Servants are told how to work and given the highest reason in the letter for doing it well, 'that they may adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour in all things' (2:10). The word for adorn is the one behind cosmetics, so ordinary honesty in a household is described as putting the teaching on display.

Titus 2:2 · Titus 2:3 · Titus 2:7 · Titus 2:10

The grace that appeared, and what it teaches

The doctrinal heart of the letter is four verses that state what has happened and what it produces. 'For the grace of God hath appeared, bringing salvation to all men' (2:11). Grace is described as an event with a date rather than as a disposition, and the verb is the one used of a light breaking or a god showing himself. Then grace goes to work as a teacher: it is 'instructing us, to the intent that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly and righteously and godly in this present world' (2:12). Three time frames sit in one paragraph. Grace appeared in the past, it trains in the present, and it points forward to the future, 'looking for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ' (2:13). The purpose is stated last: he 'gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a people for his own possession' (2:14).

Titus 2:11 · Titus 2:12 · Titus 2:13 · Titus 2:14

The washing of regeneration, and the Spirit poured out

The second grace paragraph tells the same story from the inside. It starts with an honest description of the readers before: 'we also once were foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures' (3:3). Then the turn: 'But when the kindness of God our Saviour, and his love toward man, appeared' (3:4), 'not by works done in righteousness, which we did ourselves, but according to his mercy he saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit' (3:5), 'which he poured out upon us richly, through Jesus Christ our Saviour' (3:6). All three persons of the Trinity act in one sentence, and the Spirit is described in the language of Pentecost, poured out and poured out richly. This site teaches that pouring as present and available, so 3:6 reads as a description of what God does for his people rather than as a report about a closed period. The result is stated in legal and family terms together: 'being justified by his grace, we might be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life' (3:7).

Titus 3:3 · Titus 3:5 · Titus 3:6 · Titus 3:7

Good works, and a short way with a quarrel

The letter ends practically. Believers are to be good citizens, 'to be in subjection to rulers, to authorities, to be obedient, to be ready unto every good work' (3:1), and good neighbors, 'to speak evil of no man, not to be contentious, to be gentle, showing all meekness toward all men' (3:2). Paul then rules out the arguments that had been eating the congregations: 'shun foolish questionings, and genealogies, and strifes, and fightings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain' (3:9), and gives Titus a procedure for a man who keeps splitting the church: 'A factious man after a first and second admonition refuse' (3:10). Twice the letter tells believers to work at good works (3:8, 3:14), and both times the ground given is the grace already described, so the works come out of the salvation rather than paying for it.

Titus 3:1 · Titus 3:8 · Titus 3:9 · Titus 3:10

Christ in Titus

  • ProphecyThe great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ. 'looking for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ' (2:13). The Greek construction joins two titles under one article, and a rule stated by Granville Sharp in 1798 holds that when two singular personal nouns are joined this way they name one person. On that reading the verse calls Jesus Christ the great God, and it is one of the clearest statements of his deity in the New Testament. Peter uses the same construction of 'our God and the Saviour Jesus Christ' (2 Peter 1:1). This site teaches the deity of Christ at full strength here and everywhere. The reading is confirmed by the letter's own habit, since Saviour is used three times of God the Father and three times of Christ across three chapters, with no seam between them. Titus 2:13
  • TypologyA people for his own possession. 'who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a people for his own possession, zealous of good works' (2:14). Every phrase reaches back into Israel's Scriptures. Redemption from iniquity is the language of the psalm that promises 'he will redeem Israel' (Psalms 130:8). A people for his own possession is the covenant word from Sinai, where God tells Israel 'ye shall be mine own possession from among all peoples' (Exodus 19:5), repeated at 'a people for his own possession' (Deuteronomy 14:2). The purifying is what a priest did before service. Paul takes the covenant vocabulary God used of Israel and says Christ is doing this now through his own self-giving. God's plan for Israel stands, and the language here describes what Christ has done for those he has purified. Titus 2:14
  • TypologyThe washing and the renewing. 'according to his mercy he saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit' (3:5). Two nouns describe one rescue. The washing is a bath rather than a rinse, and the word for regeneration means a birth over again. The renewing names what the Spirit does afterward. The verse denies any place to earning at the front of the sentence, 'not by works done in righteousness, which we did ourselves' (3:5), and grounds the whole thing in mercy. Then Christ is named as the channel of the outpouring: the Spirit was poured out 'through Jesus Christ our Saviour' (3:6). What the reader meets in these three verses is the Father's mercy, the Son's mediation, and the Spirit's work, in the order they happen. Titus 3:5
  • TypologySaviour, used of both and shared between them. Titus uses the title Saviour six times in three short chapters, and it alternates. God is 'God our Saviour' (1:3), then in the very next verse it is 'Christ Jesus our Saviour' (1:4). At 2:10 it is God our Saviour again, at 2:13 the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ, at 3:4 'the kindness of God our Saviour' (3:4), and at 3:6 'through Jesus Christ our Saviour' (3:6). The pattern runs three and three with no explanation offered, which is how a writer treats a title he assumes both persons hold. In a Roman province where the emperor was publicly called saviour and benefactor, a letter that gives the title to God and to Jesus Christ within four verses is making a claim in the open air. Titus 1:4
  • ProphecyThe blessed hope. 'looking for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory' (2:13) sets the Christian's posture as watching. The word for the appearing is the one these letters use for a public showing of a divine person, and it appears here for the future coming as it appeared at 2:11 for the first one. The hope is called blessed because of what it brings rather than because of how it feels, and the letter has already named the content: 'in hope of eternal life, which God, who cannot lie, promised before times eternal' (1:2). The letter closes the loop at 3:7, where those justified by grace are 'made heirs according to the hope of eternal life' (3:7). Grace appeared, grace trains, and grace will appear again. Titus 1:2

The Argument

the whole letter in three sentences

Author
Traditionally Paul (1:1); see Contested Points for the authorship question
Date
Mid-60s AD, after release from the Acts 28 imprisonment
Genre
Personal/pastoral letter: one of the three Pastoral Epistles
Shape
3 chapters · 46 verses · order → adorn → insist
  1. 1

    Paul charges Titus to finish planting order in Crete by appointing qualified elders and silencing false teachers whose profession is contradicted by their works (ch. 1).

  2. 2

    Every household group must be taught sound doctrine, because doctrine is meant to instruct godly, self-controlled living that makes the gospel attractive to a watching pagan culture: a life lived between grace's first appearing and the appearing of glory still to come (ch. 2).

  3. 3

    Salvation is grounded not in works done in righteousness which we did ourselves but in God's mercy, the washing of regeneration, and the renewing of the Holy Spirit, and that same grace must then produce a people careful to maintain good works, avoiding foolish controversies (ch. 3).

Where Titus Points to Christ

short in length, unusually dense in explicit Christology

“The great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ”: the deity of Christ2:13

The ASV reads “the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ.” On the standard Granville-Sharp reading of the Greek: a single article governing “great God” and “Saviour… Jesus Christ”: one Person is named twice: Jesus Christ is the great God and Savior whose glory the church watches for. Daniel Wallace's survey of the construction elsewhere in the NT (identically at 2 Peter 1:1) finds the pattern holds without exception for singular personal count nouns: plurals, impersonals, and proper names are the recognized exclusions. At full strength below.

Open the verse →
The interlocking Savior title1:3–4; 2:10, 13; 3:4, 6

“God our Saviour” and “Christ Jesus our Saviour” trade places six times in three short chapters: the highest density of any NT book relative to length. Whatever 2:13's grammar settles, the letter's own habit of speech moves the same title fluidly between Father and Son.

Christ doing what Yahweh did for Israel at Sinai2:14 → Exodus 19:5; Deuteronomy 14:2, 26:18

“Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a people for his own possession”: periousios, the adjective the ASV renders “for his own possession,” a NT hapax that is the Septuagint's own word for Israel as God's treasured possession at Sinai, now applied to Christ's redeemed church. The covenant-Lord's role is performed by Christ.

Open the verse →
A Trinitarian shape to salvation's application3:4–6

“The kindness of God our Saviour, and his love toward man, appeared” (3:4); he saved us through the renewing of the Holy Spirit (3:5); that Spirit “he poured out upon us richly, through Jesus Christ our Saviour” (3:6): Christ as the agent of the Spirit's outpouring, the washing of regeneration behind it.

Open the verse →

The Hinge

the two grace-appearing passages the letter hangs from

Titus 2:11–14 →

“For the grace of God hath appeared, bringing salvation to all men, instructing us, to the intent that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly and righteously and godly in this present world; looking for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a people for his own possession, zealous of good works.”

Titus 3:4–7 →

“But when the kindness of God our Saviour, and his love toward man, appeared, not by works done in righteousness, which we did ourselves, but according to his mercy he saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit, which he poured out upon us richly, through Jesus Christ our Saviour; that, being justified by his grace, we might be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.”

Grace's first appearing (2:11) and the appearing of glory still to come (2:13) bracket the household ethics of chapter 2; the same grace lands again as the ground of salvation in 3:4–7, just before the letter's closing insistence on good works (3:8). The two passages are the letter's theological hinge: everything ethical in Titus is framed by what has already appeared and what is still to come.

Titus 3:8: the fifth faithful saying →

“Faithful is the saying, and concerning these things I desire that thou affirm confidently, to the end that they who have believed God may be careful to maintain good works.”

The formula “faithful is the saying” occurs five times, and only in the Pastoral Epistles: three in 1 Timothy (1:15; 3:1; 4:9), one in 2 Timothy (2:11), and this one: the last of the five. It is worth noticing what Titus attaches it to. In 1 Timothy it seals Christ's coming to save sinners and the worth of the overseer's work; here it seals the insistence that saved people maintain good works. The letter has just spent 3:4–7 denying that works can save; the very next breath makes the doing of them a matter Titus is to “affirm confidently.” Fruit, not ground, and the Pastorals' most solemn formula stands behind it.

Themes

six load-bearing lines through the letter

01

Sound doctrine as health, not mere correctness

Titus 1:9, 13; 2:1, 2, 8

The hygiainō word-group: literally “healthy”: runs through the letter: doctrine is medicine for a life, not an academic exercise.

02

Doctrine and ethics are structurally inseparable

Titus 2:1, 10

The letter's organizing move: teach → train → live → adorn the gospel. Orthodoxy that does not produce orthopraxy has, in Titus's terms, simply not been rightly taught yet.

03

Grace as trainer, not only pardon

Titus 2:12

Paideuousa: grace “instructing us” to deny ungodliness and worldly lusts. Grace disciplines the way a father raises a son, not merely acquits.

04

The twin epiphanies bracket the Christian life

Titus 2:11, 13

Grace appeared at the incarnation; glory will appear at the return of Christ. The household ethics of 2:1–10 sit theologically between these two comings: a between-the-advents ethic.

05

Regeneration, not works, is the ground of salvation

Titus 3:5

“Not by works done in righteousness, which we did ourselves, but according to his mercy he saved us”: through the washing of regeneration and the renewing of the Holy Spirit.

06

Good works are the fruit and goal, never the ground, of salvation

Titus 1:16; 2:7, 14; 3:1, 8, 14

A refrain that brackets the letter: the false teachers are “unto every good work reprobate” (1:16); the believing community is to “be careful to maintain good works” (3:8) and to “learn to maintain good works for necessary uses” (3:14).

Author
Paul (1:1)
Date
c. AD 62–66, from Macedonia or Nicopolis
Audience
Titus on the island of Crete, setting churches in order

As the earliest witnesses report them; positions and holders under Who Wrote It.

The world behind this book

The book of Titus
Where
Written by Paul while traveling in Greece, to Titus, whom he had left behind on the island of Crete.

The history, and what it meant to them

The history

Crete had been Roman for about a century, run as part of a joint province with Cyrenaica in North Africa. Homer called it "the hundred-citied Crete," and that fragmented map is exactly the problem in this letter: Titus has to appoint elders "in every city," not organize one congregation in one town.

Cretans had a rough reputation across the Greek world. There was even a verb, kretizein — "to Cretanize" — meaning to lie. The island's history of piracy and mercenary soldiers fed the stereotype. When Paul quotes the old Cretan poet Epimenides ("Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, idle gluttons"), he is not inventing an insult; he is repeating one the Cretans themselves had coined, and using it the way he had already used a Greek poet on Mars Hill in Athens.

Jewish communities were settled on Crete by the first century, and the troublemakers Paul names are "of the circumcision" — Jewish-Christian teachers pushing myths and rules that produced arguments instead of changed lives.

Paul had preached on Crete and left before the organizing work was done. This letter is the rest of the job, sent in writing.

What it meant to them

Titus was being asked to build something out of nothing in a culture that assumed everyone was a liar. Paul's answer is startling in its ordinariness: appoint honest men whose households already work, and teach every group in the church — old and young, men and women, and even slaves — to live in a way that makes the message credible to the neighbors watching.

The heart of it lands in chapter 2 and 3: God's grace has already appeared, and it trains people. Salvation is not a reward for good behavior but God's mercy, "the washing of regeneration" — and that mercy is what produces a life worth watching, while the church waits for the "blessed hope."

Sources cited

Every work MannaFest builds on →

Who Wrote It, and When

Author
The letter names Paul, 'a servant of God, and an apostle of Jesus Christ' (1:1), and writes to a coworker the other letters know well. Titus was a Greek whom Paul took to Jerusalem, and Galatians reports the outcome of that visit: 'not even Titus who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised' (Galatians 2:3). He carried the hardest correspondence of Paul's career to Corinth and came back with good news, so that Paul writes 'he is my partner and my fellow-worker to you-ward' (2 Corinthians 8:23). Acts never mentions him once, which is a curious fact in its own right and one that bears on the authorship question, since a later writer inventing a companion would more likely have chosen a man Luke names. The three Pastoral letters are usually judged together, and the positions on all three are set out in the 1 Timothy dossier and in the difficulty below.
  • Paul wrote it after a release from the imprisonment Acts leaves him in

    held by the reception of the early church, and modern defenders including J. N. D. Kelly (A Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles, Black's New Testament Commentaries, 1963), Gordon D. Fee (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, New International Biblical Commentary, 1988), and William D. Mounce (Pastoral Epistles, Word Biblical Commentary, 2000)

    The work described at 1:5 requires a stay on Crete long enough to plant congregations in more than one city, and Acts records no such stay, so the traditional reading places it after Acts 28.

  • Paul's substance in a secretary's wording

    held by C. F. D. Moule, who proposed in 1965 that Luke wrote the three letters at Paul's direction, and commentators who take the vocabulary evidence seriously while keeping the letters Pauline

  • Written in Paul's name by a later disciple

    held by the critical tradition descending from Friedrich Schleiermacher (1807) and H. J. Holtzmann (1880), with the statistical case made by P. N. Harrison (The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles, 1921), and I. Howard Marshall (The Pastoral Epistles, International Critical Commentary, 1999), who prefers the term allonymity

    Jerome D. Quinn (The Letter to Titus, Anchor Bible, 1990) argued that Titus was composed first of the three and stands closest to Paul, which cuts across the usual grouping in a way worth knowing.

Date
On the traditional reading Paul worked on Crete after his release, left Titus there to finish what was begun, and wrote this letter while traveling, planning to spend the winter at Nicopolis on the Greek coast: 'give diligence to come unto me to Nicopolis: for there I have determined to winter' (3:12). That places it about AD 63 to 65, close in time to 1 Timothy and before 2 Timothy. On the pseudonymous reading it belongs with the other two, between about AD 90 and 110.
  • About AD 63 to 65, written on the road, with a winter at Nicopolis in view

    held by the traditional chronology followed by Kelly (1963), Fee (1988), and Mounce (2000), resting on the release tradition Eusebius reports and on the travel plans at 3:12

  • About AD 90 to 110, with the other Pastoral letters

    held by Harrison (1921) and the critical commentary tradition, arguing from vocabulary and from the church order the letter assumes

    Papyrus 32, a fragment of this letter copied around AD 200, is the earliest surviving witness to any of the three and shows Titus already circulating well before the fourth century.

Audience
Titus, and through him a scattered set of new congregations on Crete. The island had been a Roman province since 67 BC, joined administratively with Cyrene in North Africa, and Homer had already called it an island of many cities. That plurality is why the assignment reads as it does: 'appoint elders in every city, as I gave thee charge' (1:5). Cretan Jews were in Jerusalem at Pentecost, since Luke's list of the crowd includes 'Cretans and Arabians' (Acts 2:11), which may be part of how the gospel first reached the island. The letter also names a party inside the churches: 'there are many unruly men, vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision' (1:10), teaching 'Jewish fables, and commandments of men' (1:14).
  • Titus on Crete, with congregations in several cities

    held by the plain reading of 1:5 with 1:10-14, and the geography of an island whose Roman-period towns were many and scattered

Occasion
Work had been started on Crete and left unfinished. Paul states the assignment in one sentence: 'For this cause left I thee in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that were wanting, and appoint elders in every city' (1:5). Two pressures shape everything that follows. Teachers were doing damage for money, 'men who overthrow whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake' (1:11), and the island's reputation was bad enough that Paul quotes a line about it and agrees with the line (1:12-13). Against both he sets tested leaders, teaching that fits each part of a household, and the two paragraphs about grace that carry the letter's doctrine (2:11-14 and 3:4-7). The aim is stated in a phrase that sums up the whole book: that the servants of a household 'may adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour in all things' (2:10).

The Years of Titus

Titus timeline

  1. 6th century BC

    Epimenides of Crete, to whom later writers attribute the line quoted at 1:12, is placed in this period.

    Titus 1:12

  2. 3rd century BC

    Callimachus quotes the first half of the same line in his Hymn to Zeus, charging the Cretans over the tomb of Zeus.

  3. 67 BC

    Rome takes Crete; the island is later joined with Cyrene as one province governed from Gortyn.

  4. c. AD 30

    Cretan Jews are among the crowd at Pentecost in Jerusalem.

    Acts 2:11

  5. c. AD 49

    Paul takes Titus, a Greek, to Jerusalem, and he is not compelled to be circumcised.

    Galatians 2:3

  6. c. AD 56

    Titus carries Paul's correspondence to Corinth and brings back news that relieves him.

    2 Corinthians 7:6

  7. c. AD 59

    Paul's ship sails under the lee of Crete and stops at Fair Havens on the voyage to Rome.

    Acts 27:8

  8. c. AD 62-64

    On the traditional reading Paul works on Crete after his release and leaves Titus to finish the work.

    Titus 1:5

  9. c. AD 63-65

    This letter is written on the road, with a winter at Nicopolis planned.

    Titus 3:12

  10. c. AD 66-67

    Titus has gone to Dalmatia by the time Paul writes his last letter from Rome.

    2 Timothy 4:10

  11. c. AD 200

    Papyrus 32 is copied, carrying parts of Titus 1 and 2 and standing as the earliest manuscript of any Pastoral letter.

  12. c. AD 170-200

    The Muratorian list names the letter to Titus among the writings held in honor by the church.

  13. 1798

    Granville Sharp publishes the observation about the Greek construction that bears on 2:13.

Further Reading on Tituswith the work named
Chuck Misslerbrief quote

Learn the Bible in 24 Hours (2002)

the founder's formative teacher. His “integrated design” lens reads the hygiainō word-group's consistency across all three Pastorals as a mark of single-author coherence: one strand of the authorship case.

R. C. Sproulbrief quote

What Is Reformed Theology? (1997); The Holiness of God (1985)

Grace and holiness held together, not in tension: grace produces holiness, holiness without grace is legalism, grace without holiness is antinomianism: the natural Reformed register for 2:11–14 and 3:4–8.

John Piperbrief quote

Future Grace (1995)

Grace oriented toward what is coming, not only what has been forgiven: pairs naturally with 2:11–12's grace that instructs us now for what appears later.

Charles Spurgeonpublic domain

All of Grace (1886); the Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit corpus

All of Grace is his plainest statement of the 3:5–7 ground: mercy, not works done in righteousness; the Metropolitan Tabernacle corpus is where his sermon material on 2:11–14 lives.

Calvin · JFB · Wesley's Explanatory Notespublic domain

standard PD commentary on Titus

The public-domain floor beneath the page, and fullest exactly where Titus is densest: 1:5–9's elder qualifications, 2:11–14's twin appearings, and 3:4–7's washing of regeneration.

Four more roster voices work ground this letter stands on: J. C. Ryle on sanctification as the lifelong outworking of regeneration, John Bevere on repentance held together with grace, J. I. Packer on church government and the elder/overseer question of 1:5–7, Wesley Huff on the deity-of-Christ reading of 2:13 and on manuscript reliability. Each joins the list above as the specific work is named, so a reader always has somewhere to go. Within a tier, All voices are equal.

Contested Points

presented at full strength: positions named, no verdict

Titus 2:13: “appearing of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ”: one Person or two?

One Person (Granville Sharp)

A single article governs two singular, personal, non-proper nouns joined by kai: “great God” and “Saviour… Jesus Christ.” Granville Sharp (1798) codified that in this construction both nouns name the same Person, so the glory the church waits for is the glory of Jesus Christ, who is himself the great God and Savior. Daniel Wallace's exhaustive survey of every unambiguous NT parallel finds the rule holds without exception for singular personal count nouns: plurals, impersonals, and proper names are the recognized exclusions, and none of them apply here. Titus 2:13 and 2 Peter 1:1 (an identical construction) are on this reading among the clearest deity-of-Christ texts in the NT.

Two Persons (the older/critical reading)

The ASV's own wording gives this reading its footing: what appears is “the glory”, so the sentence can be heard as the appearing of the glory of the great God (the Father) and of our Saviour Jesus Christ, with “the glory” carrying over to both and no second article required to name a second Person. Some older interpreters, including historical Socinian and Arian polemicists, read it exactly that way. It matches the NT's more common pattern, in which unqualified “God” names the Father and “Saviour” is Christ's distinct title (e.g. 1 Tim 2:5), and it avoids resting a major Christological claim on the presence or absence of one article in one short verse.

Where the readings meet: The one-Person reading (Sharp's rule; Wallace's survey of the construction) rests on a single article governing two singular, personal titles joined by kai, so “great God” and “Saviour… Jesus Christ” name the same Person. The two-Persons reading takes “the glory” as the shared noun the article governs, keeping Father and Son as distinct referents under one appearing. Both readings agree the verse describes a single future appearing of Christ; where they part is how much weight one Greek article can carry.

The Cretan quotation (1:12): citing a pagan poet as “a prophet”

The concern

Paul quotes an unnamed Cretan source: “Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, idle gluttons”, and calls the source “a prophet of their own.” Read flatly, the verse can seem to endorse a blanket ethnic slur as inspired, timeless ethnography, and to grant a pagan poet revelatory status.

The rhetorical-convention reading

Paul is using a recognized Greco-Roman convention: citing a culture's own literature against itself: the identical move at Acts 17:28 (Epimenides/Aratus to the Athenians) and 1 Corinthians 15:33 (Menander to the Corinthians). The lying is not a generic insult but a pointed one: “to Cretanize” (kretizein) was already a current Greek idiom meaning “to lie,” and the standing example behind it was Crete's own claim that Zeus lay buried on the island (Mt. Ida, or Juktas): a god they had made mortal. The specific lie in view is a lie the Cretans told about their own god. “Prophet” is Paul's ad hominem term for a native cultural authority, not a claim of divine inspiration for Epimenides.

Where the readings meet: The pastoral point is immediate and local: “This testimony is true. For which cause reprove them sharply” (1:13): a diagnostic tool for Titus's specific mission field, not a timeless verdict on an ethnicity.

Pastoral Epistles authorship: Paul, or a later hand writing in his name?

The critical case

Since F. C. Baur and P. N. Harrison's The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles (1921), critical scholarship has argued the Pastorals are post-Pauline: a high proportion of vocabulary absent from the undisputed Paulines, a more formalized church order, opponents some read as proto-Gnostic, and a shift toward “sound doctrine” as a fixed deposit rather than Romans' or Galatians' mystical “in Christ” register.

The traditional case

The letters explicitly claim Pauline authorship (1:1) and the early church received them as Paul's without recorded dispute (the Muratorian Canon, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian). Defenders (Guthrie, Knight, Mounce) note the vocabulary argument rests on a small sample and ignores genre effects; style shifts fit Paul's known use of an amanuensis; and the false teaching combated fits mid-first-century Jewish-influenced speculation, not developed second-century Gnostic systems.

Where the readings meet: The traditional case rests on the letter's own claim (1:1) and the early church's undisputed reception of it as Paul's; the critical case rests on vocabulary and church-order patterns read as later development. Both agree the letter reflects real, dateable pastoral concerns for Crete's churches; they differ on whether Paul dictated them directly or a later hand wrote in his name.

Drafted from MannaFest's research brief on Titus — public-domain commentators (Calvin, JFB, Wesley's Explanatory Notes) and the founder's approved-voices roster, with modern voices briefly quoted.

The Book’s Shape

Two paragraphs of grace around a household made new

proposed structure
  1. AGreeting: truth according to godliness, and a God who cannot lie1:1-4
  2. BElders appointed in every city, and the Cretan trouble answered1:5-16
  3. CSound teaching for each person in the household2:1-10
  4. XThe grace of God appeared, trains us now, and will appear in glory2:11-14
  5. C'Conduct toward rulers and neighbors, and what we ourselves once were3:1-3
  6. B'The washing of regeneration, good works maintained, and the factious man refused3:4-11
  7. A'Travel plans, provision for Zenas and Apollos, and grace with all3:12-15

Mapped by proposed here from the letter's own shape. The two grace paragraphs at 2:11-14 and 3:4-7 are treated as the doctrinal core across the commentaries on Titus, including Jerome D. Quinn (The Letter to Titus, Anchor Bible, 1990) and William D. Mounce (Pastoral Epistles, Word Biblical Commentary, 2000), and the practical instruction is arranged around them.

Key Words, with Doors

  1. πρεσβύτεροςpresbýteroselder, an older man, and so an officer of a congregation

    The word at 1:5, where Titus is told to 'appoint elders in every city' (1:5). It is the ordinary Greek word for an older man, and Israel had used the same idea for the men who judged at the gate. What makes this letter important is that 1:7 calls the same man a bishop, the overseer word, two verses later. Acts shows the same overlap, where Paul calls the Ephesian leaders elders (Acts 20:17) and then tells them 'the Holy Spirit hath made you bishops' (Acts 20:28).

    Greek · G4245 · open the word study →

  2. σώφρωνsṓphrōnof sound mind, self-controlled

    The word at 1:8 in the elder's qualifications, and its family runs through this letter more than through any other. The related words appear of older men at 2:2, of the training older women give younger women at 2:5, of the younger men at 2:6, and of the way grace teaches all of them at 2:12. Greek moralists ranked this quality among the four great virtues. Paul takes the word his readers already prized and grounds it in what grace does.

    Greek · G4998 · open the word study →

  3. ἐπιφάνειαepipháneiaan appearing, a showing forth in public

    The noun at 2:13 behind 'appearing of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ' (2:13). In the Greek world it named a god becoming visible, and Hellenistic cities used it of a ruler's state arrival. The related verb carries 2:11, 'the grace of God hath appeared' (2:11), and 3:4, so the letter uses one family of words for the first coming and the second. The Pastorals use this noun more than the rest of the New Testament together.

    Greek · G2015 · open the word study →

  4. περιούσιοςperioúsiosbelonging to one specially, held as a personal possession

    One occurrence in the New Testament, at 2:14, behind 'a people for his own possession' (2:14). The Greek translators of the Old Testament had used this word family for Israel at Sinai and in Deuteronomy, so Paul is reaching for a covenant term his readers would know from the Scriptures. Older English Bibles render it with the word peculiar, and the old sense of that word was property held as one's own.

    Greek · G4041 · open the word study →

  5. παλιγγενεσίαpalingenesíaa being born again, a making new

    Two occurrences in the New Testament. Here it is personal, 'the washing of regeneration' (3:5). The other is cosmic, where Jesus speaks of 'the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit on the throne of his glory' (Matthew 19:28), meaning the renewal of the world itself. The same word covers a person made new and a creation made new, which is a large claim carried by one noun.

    Greek · G3824 · open the word study →

The Hard Questions, Honestly

The places a careful reader stops, with the readings named and their holders.

When was Paul in Crete?

Acts records Paul near Crete once, and as a prisoner. The ship carrying him to Rome 'sailed under the lee of Crete' (Acts 27:7), stopped at 'a certain place called Fair Havens' (Acts 27:8), and left when the crew judged the harbor unsuitable for wintering (Acts 27:12).

The evidence, and the readings

That visit gives no room for the work this letter describes, since 1:5 assumes congregations already in several cities and needing only elders appointed. Three answers are given. The traditional one is that Paul was released from the imprisonment Acts ends with, traveled east, worked on Crete with Titus, and left him there. A second proposes an unrecorded visit during the long Ephesian ministry, since Crete is a short sail from the Asian coast and Acts records only a fraction of Paul's movements. The third takes the letter as written later in Paul's name, in which case the setting is a frame rather than a report. The evidence is thin on all sides, and the honest statement is that the New Testament records a stay on Crete only in this letter.

  • After a release from the imprisonment of Acts 28, about AD 62 to 64

    held by the tradition Eusebius reports in his Ecclesiastical History, and the commentators who accept Pauline authorship, including Kelly (1963), Fee (1988), and Mounce (2000)

    This reading also accounts for 2 Timothy 4:20, where Paul says he left Trophimus at Miletus sick, a movement that fits nowhere in Acts either.

  • An unrecorded visit during the years based at Ephesus

    held by commentators who note that Acts compresses the Ephesian period heavily and that Crete lay within easy reach of the Asian ports

  • A setting supplied by a later writer

    held by the critical tradition following Harrison (1921), which reads the personal details of all three Pastoral letters as part of the literary frame

Who Wrote the Pastoral Letters

Did Paul call a whole people liars?

'One of themselves, a prophet of their own, said' (1:12), and then the line: 'Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, idle gluttons' (1:12). Paul adds four words that make it worse before they make it better: 'This testimony is true' (1:13). Two things need saying about the source, and both are usually stated too confidently. Ancient writers, including Clement of Alexandria and Jerome in his commentary on this letter, attribute the full hexameter line to Epimenides, a Cretan seer of the sixth century BC. No work of Epimenides survives to check it against. What does survive is the first half, quoted by the poet Callimachus in his Hymn to Zeus in the third century BC, where he throws it at the Cretans for claiming to have the tomb of Zeus on their island. So the attribution to Epimenides is a tradition rather than a text, and the first half of the line is certainly ancient and certainly aimed at Crete. On the sense: the Greek verb meaning to lie could be formed from the island's name, which shows how fixed the reputation was. Paul quotes the line about a specific problem, since the very next words apply it to the teachers he is answering, and the point of the whole letter is that people on Crete are being changed. He quotes pagan writers elsewhere the same way, taking a true sentence from a source he does not otherwise endorse.

  • A pointed quotation aimed at the false teachers, using a line the readers already knew

    held by the reading required by 1:13-14, where the sharp reproof has a stated purpose, 'that they may be sound in the faith' (1:13), and by the letter's own confidence that Cretan believers will adorn the teaching (2:10)

  • A proverb about a national reputation, quoted as evidence rather than as revelation

    held by commentators who note that Paul calls the writer a prophet of their own and grants the line truth without granting the writer authority, as he does with the Greek poets at Athens

Paul and the Poets

Does 2:13 call Jesus God?

'looking for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ' (2:13). The question is whether the verse names one person or two. In Greek a single article governs both nouns, and Granville Sharp published in 1798 the observation that when two singular personal nouns of this kind are joined by and under one article, they refer to one person. Later study by Daniel B. Wallace tested the rule across the New Testament and found it holds for that specific construction. Two further supports come from the letter and from Peter. Titus uses Saviour of God three times and of Christ three times, moving between them without explanation, and 2 Peter opens with the same construction, 'our God and the Saviour Jesus Christ' (2 Peter 1:1). This site teaches the deity of Christ at full strength here. The older objection was that Paul does not otherwise call Jesus God, and the answer is that he comes to the same point by other roads, most plainly in Colossians 2:9 and Philippians 2:6, and that John, Hebrews, and Thomas in the upper room say it outright.

  • One person: Jesus Christ is named as the great God and our Saviour

    held by the construction Granville Sharp described in 1798, the testing of it by Daniel B. Wallace, the parallel at 2 Peter 1:1, and the pattern of the title Saviour across this letter; this is the site's reading and the reading of the great majority of modern versions and commentaries

  • Two persons: the glory of the great God, and of our Saviour Jesus Christ

    held by the rendering of the King James Version and of translators who read the phrase as two subjects

    The grammatical case for this rendering has weakened as the construction has been studied across a wider body of Greek. It is recorded here because it stands in a translation many readers use.

The Deity of Christ

What is 'the washing of regeneration' at 3:5?

'according to his mercy he saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit' (3:5). The word for washing names a bath, and the ancient church read the verse in connection with baptism from very early on. What is argued is how tight the connection is and what carries the saving. The sentence itself settles two things before the argument starts. Salvation comes 'not by works done in righteousness, which we did ourselves' (3:5), which rules out treating the rite as a work that earns anything, and the source named is mercy. Beyond that the readings differ, and honored teachers hold each of them.

  • The new birth, with baptism as its outward sign

    held by the reading of most evangelical and Protestant commentary, which takes the washing as a picture of the cleansing the Spirit works and connects it with the water and Spirit of John 3:5

    Support is drawn from Ephesians 5:26, where Christ cleanses the church 'by the washing of water with the word' (Ephesians 5:26), and from the fact that the agent named in Titus 3:5 is the Holy Spirit.

  • Baptism itself, as the appointed occasion of the new birth

    held by the reading of the ancient church fathers, and of the Catholic, Orthodox, Lutheran, and Anglican traditions since

    The strength of this reading is the plainness of the noun, since a bath is a bath, and the early and near-unanimous connection with baptism in the writers of the first centuries.

  • One event described from two sides, the washing and the renewing being a single work of the Spirit

    held by commentators who note that the two nouns share one preposition and one article, so the grammar joins them rather than dividing them into two stages

Regeneration

What does 2:3-5 say about women teaching?

Scripture first. Older women are to be 'reverent in demeanor, not slanderers nor enslaved to much wine, teachers of that which is good' (2:3), 'that they may train the young women to love their husbands, to love their children' (2:4), 'to be sober-minded, chaste, workers at home, kind, being in subjection to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed' (2:5). The passage gives women a stated teaching office in the congregation with a named subject and named students. What is argued is its scope. Read next to 1 Timothy 2:12 some take it as the boundary, so that women teach women. Others take it as one example of a wider ministry, pointing to Priscilla teaching Apollos with her husband (Acts 18:26), to Philip's four daughters who prophesied (Acts 21:9), to Phoebe called a servant of her church (Romans 16:1), and to Paul's own statement that in Christ 'there can be no male and female' (Galatians 3:28). The phrase rendered workers at home describes the sphere most ancient women actually worked in, and readers differ on whether it prescribes that sphere or describes it. Honored teachers hold different positions here, Derek Prince among them in Women In The Church, Pts. 1-2, and unity is essential.

  • A specific commission for older women, and one example of the ministry women carry

    held by commentators who read 2:3-5 with Acts 18:26, Acts 21:9, Romans 16:1, and Galatians 3:28; this site's own tradition stands here

    The site's heritage has acted on this reading for two centuries: John Wesley allowed Sarah Crosby and Mary Bosanquet to preach under an extraordinary call, the Azusa Street mission's twelve elders included six women, the Assemblies of God lifted its restrictions on ordaining women in 1935, and Aimee Semple McPherson opened Angelus Temple in 1923 and founded the Foursquare Church.

  • A pattern that also marks the boundary, with women teaching women

    held by Douglas J. Moo, Thomas R. Schreiner, and Andreas J. Köstenberger, whose case on the related passage is set out in Women in the Church: A Fresh Analysis of 1 Timothy 2:9-15 (1995)

    The strength of this reading is that Titus 2 gives a specific teaching assignment to women and names its students, which would be a strange thing to specify if the field were open.

  • Instruction shaped by the reputation of the gospel in that society

    held by commentators who take the purpose clause of 2:5 as the key, since the stated aim is that the word of God not be spoken against, and the same reason is given to servants at 2:10 and to citizens at 3:1

Women in Ministry

Must an elder's children be believers?

Titus requires a man 'having children that believe, who are not accused of riot or unruly' (1:6). The parallel in the first letter to Timothy sets a different-sounding standard, 'one that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity' (1 Timothy 3:4). The Greek word at Titus 1:6 can mean believing or faithful, and English versions split on it. If it means believing, the qualification reaches to the children's own faith, which no father can guarantee. If it means faithful, it describes children who are trustworthy and orderly, which matches the Timothy list and matches the rest of the same verse, since Paul immediately explains it by conduct rather than by profession. The practical stakes are real, because churches have disqualified good men over a grown child's choices.

  • Faithful and orderly children, described by their conduct

    held by commentators who read the second half of 1:6 as Paul's own explanation of the first, and who take the parallel at 1 Timothy 3:4 as the controlling one

  • Children who are themselves believers

    held by readers who take the ordinary sense of the word in Paul, where it usually means one who believes, and who understand the requirement as a household already won to the faith

  • Both readings agree on the point being tested, which is whether a man's own house shows he can lead

    held by commentators who note that the question in view is the man's household leadership, tested at the age when his children are still under his roof

Elders and Deacons

The Text and the Spade

  • Papyrus 32 (Rylands Greek Papyrus 5)c. AD 200

    A small fragment of a codex leaf carrying parts of Titus 1:11-15 and 2:3-8, and the earliest surviving manuscript of any Pastoral letter. It matters for the authorship debate, since the argument from the absence of these letters in Papyrus 46 has to be set beside a copy of Titus circulating at about the same date. The text it preserves agrees with the later codices.

  • Codex Sinaiticus4th century

    Carries Titus complete and is the oldest continuous Greek witness to the whole letter. The text of Titus is quiet, with no disputed reading touching 2:11-14 or 3:4-7, the two paragraphs the letter is known for.

  • Codex Alexandrinus and Codex Ephraemi5th century

    Two more of the great parchment Bibles carrying the letter, agreeing closely with Sinaiticus. Their agreement across three chapters written in a distinctive vocabulary is one reason the text of Titus is considered secure whatever is concluded about who wrote it.

  • Codex Claromontanus6th century, Greek with a facing Latin column

    A Western witness carrying all three Pastoral letters. Inserted into it before Hebrews is an early list of biblical books which names the letter to Titus, and the Latin column shows how these chapters were read in the West at the time Jerome was writing his commentary on this letter.

  • The Muratorian listcommonly dated to the late 2nd century, though a 4th-century date has been argued

    The damaged Latin list of accepted books published by Ludovico Antonio Muratori in 1740 names the letter to Titus with the two letters to Timothy and says they were written from personal affection and are held in honor by the church. It also states that Marcion's collection left them out, which agrees with what Tertullian reports.

  • Gortyn, the Roman capital of Cretethe great law code inscribed in the 5th century BC; the Roman city excavated from 1884 onward

    Gortyn was the seat of the Roman governor of the joint province of Crete and Cyrene, and it preserves the longest surviving Greek law inscription, twelve columns cut in stone and still standing. The Roman city had a praetorium, a theatre, and later Christian basilicas. It shows what one of the cities of 1:5 looked like as an administrative center, and it gives the scale of the assignment, since Crete held many such towns and Titus was to appoint elders in each.

  • Fair Havens and Lasea on the south coastthe Roman-period anchorage and town; the sites identified in the 19th century

    The small bay Luke names as 'Fair Havens' (Acts 27:8) with the town of Lasea beside it is still identifiable on the southern coast, and the description of it as a poor place to winter matches the exposure of the anchorage. It is the one place on Crete the New Testament puts Paul with certainty, and it marks how little Acts tells us about his contact with the island.

  • Nicopolis in Epirusfounded by Augustus after the battle of Actium in 31 BC; excavated through the 20th century

    The city Paul planned to winter in (3:12) was Augustus's victory foundation on the Greek coast, with an aqueduct, a theatre, an odeon, and the victory monument above the town. It was a natural place to spend a season and a natural crossroads for someone moving between Greece, Italy, and the east, which fits a letter written on the road.

  • Knossos and the Roman towns of central Cretethe Roman colony of Colonia Julia Nobilis Cnossus, on the Minoan site excavated by Arthur Evans from 1900

    Roman Crete was a settled province with colonies, roads, and a working economy, and the excavations show towns in continuous use through the first century. That is the practical background to a letter assuming congregations in more than one city and an island reputation known across the Greek world.

The Cretan reputation and the tomb of Zeus

Greek, on Crete and about CreteEpimenides is placed in the 6th century BC; Callimachus wrote in the 3rd century BC

The parallel

Greek writers used the Cretans as a byword for lying, and a verb formed from the island's name meant to lie. Callimachus opens his Hymn to Zeus by charging the Cretans with the claim that Zeus was buried on their island, and quotes the line that they are always liars. The full hexameter Paul quotes at 1:12 is attributed to Epimenides by Clement of Alexandria and by Jerome in his commentary on Titus.

Read honestly

The reputation is genuine and ancient, and the first half of the line is certainly attested before Paul. The attribution of the whole line to Epimenides rests on later writers, since no work of his survives to check. Readers should be told that much and no more. What the parallel does establish is that Paul quoted a saying his readers knew by heart, and that the sting in it was old.

Instruction addressed to a household by station

Greek and Roman, with Jewish examples as wellfrom Aristotle in the 4th century BC through the Roman period

The parallel

Ancient moral writers arranged advice by the position a person held: husbands and wives, parents and children, masters and servants, older and younger. Chapter 2 follows that shape almost exactly, working through older men, older women, young women, younger men, and servants, with a duty named for each.

Read honestly

The form is shared and the ground under it is different. Where the ancient codes appealed to nature or to the good order of the city, Paul puts the whole chapter on one foundation and names it in the next paragraph, that 'the grace of God hath appeared' (2:11). He also gives a slave the most dignified motive in the letter, that his ordinary honesty puts the teaching on display (2:10).

Imperial titles: saviour, benefactor, and the ruler's appearing

Roman, across the eastern provinces including Crete and Cyrenefrom the late Republic through the first century AD

The parallel

Greek cities honored emperors and kings as saviour and benefactor on inscriptions and coins, and used the word for appearing when a ruler arrived in state or a god was held to have shown himself. Titus uses saviour six times and the appearing word three times in three chapters.

Read honestly

The vocabulary was genuinely in the air, and a Cretan reader would have heard it. What the letter does with it is the point. The titles the province gave to Caesar are given to God and to Jesus Christ, and 2:13 puts them in the same clause. The parallel explains why the words carried weight without suggesting the letter borrowed its content from the cult.

The Pulpit on Titus

  • Five Links in a Golden Chain

    The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 2439: “Five Links in a Golden Chain” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition)

    Charles SpurgeonTitus 1:4

  • A Searching Test

    The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 3521: “A Searching Test” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition)

    Charles SpurgeonTitus 1:15

  • The Two Appearings and the Discipline of Grace

    The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 1894: “The Two Appearings and the Discipline of Grace” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition)

    Charles SpurgeonTitus 2:13

Where Titus leads

The heaviest chapters, the distinctive words, and the studies that cite Titus

Every study that reaches into Titus

11 studies, grouped by shelf

The Cast

a short letter's small, tightly-drawn circle

PaulAuthor, writing as a free man between imprisonments, in the mid-60s AD after his release from the first Roman imprisonment recorded in Acts 28.
TitusA Gentile convert (Gal 2:3), Paul's “true child after a common faith” (1:4), a proven troubleshooter previously sent to steady the Corinthian crisis: now left in Crete to finish the organizing work.
Epimenides of KnossosThe semi-legendary 6th-century BC Cretan sage-poet Paul quotes, unnamed, as “a prophet of their own” (1:12). See Contested Points.
Zenas and ApollosTravelers Titus is to help on their journey (3:13): the only NT mention of “Zenas.”
Artemas and TychicusPaul's proposed replacements for Titus in Crete, freeing him to come to Paul (3:12).

Places

Crete“The hundred-citied Crete” (Homer, Iliad 2.649): a Roman province fragmented into many small city-states, explaining Titus's mandate to appoint elders “in every city” (1:5).
NicopolisMost plausibly Augustus's Nicopolis in Epirus, northwestern Greece: where Paul intends to winter (3:12).

Read Titus

three chapters: order, adorn, insist

Open the Titus reader: all 3 chapters →