Joshuachapter 17
18 verses · BSBJoshua book hub →
Key verse
Now this was the allotment for the tribe of Manasseh as Joseph’s firstborn son, namely for Machir the firstborn of Manasseh and father of the Gileadites, who had received Gilead and Bashan because Machir was a man of war.
It stands in scene A of the chapter, verses 1 to 6.
The chapter
Chapter summary
Manasseh's portion covers Gilead and Bashan for Machir's line and ten shares west of Jordan, including, notably, the daughters of Zelophehad, who come before Eleazar and Joshua and receive an inheritance among their father's brethren, exactly as Numbers 27 promised. Again the failure is recorded: Manasseh could not drive out the inhabitants of Beth-shean and the valley towns, for they had chariots of iron. When the house of Joseph complains that one lot is too small for so great a people, Joshua sends them up to clear the forest and take the valleys too, thou shalt drive out the Canaanites, though they have chariots of iron.
Context
History · Joshua · Joshua overview
Where the chapter sits
Joshua 17 falls in Tribal allotments (chapters 13–22). The east-of-Jordan and west-of-Jordan inheritances; Levitical cities; cities of refuge; the altar of Ed and the east-tribe controversy.
Before it: Conquest campaigns, chapters 6–12. After it: Covenant renewal at Shechem, chapters 23–24.
The whole shape of Joshua→The world behind this chapter
Joshua 17The history
The daughters of Zelophehad appear here to collect. Their father died without sons, and they had gone to Moses and secured a ruling that daughters could inherit in that case. Now Eleazar and Joshua give them land among their father's brothers. In a society where property moved through sons, this was a real legal precedent, and the chapter records it being honored.
The rest of the history, and what it meant to them
Manasseh's territory brushed the edge of the Jezreel valley, the broad flat plain that carried the main international road across the country. The towns named there, Beth-shan, Taanach, Megiddo, Dor and their villages, sit on that plain and at its edges, and Manasseh could not take them.
The reason given is iron chariots. In flat valley country a chariot force is decisive against infantry, and the valley towns had them. Iron here likely means iron fittings on the wheels and body rather than an iron vehicle, but the effect was the same, Israel held the hills and the Canaanites held the plains and the roads.
The tribe complains that it is a numerous people and its allotment is one portion. Joshua's answer is practical to the point of bluntness: if you are so numerous, go up into the forest and clear it for yourselves. The highlands of that era were far more wooded than today, and clearing and terracing a wooded ridge is exactly how the hill country was settled.
What it meant to them
First hearers heard a leader refuse to solve a problem for a tribe that could solve it itself. The land was there; the work was the price.
And they heard the honest answer to the chariots: you shall drive out the Canaanites, though they have iron chariots and are strong. The obstacle is named, not denied, and the promise stands over it.
Sources cited
- John H. Walton, Victor H. Matthews & Mark W. Chavalas, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament
- Roland de Vaux, Ancient Israel: Its Life and Institutions
A. Zelophehad's daughters claim their inheritance
1. (vv. 1-2)
Joshua 17:1, 3 voicesWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.
Joshua 17:1
“Manasseh, as the “first-born,” was to receive not only the territory on the east of Jordan won by the valor of the Machirites, but also a portion with the other tribes on the west of Jordan, the holy land of promise strictly so called. Thus, though Ephraim took precedence of Manasseh, according to the prediction of Joseph Gen 48:20, yet Manasseh received “the double portion” which was the special privilege of the first-born Deu 21:17.”
Joshua 17:1
“Machir--his descendants. the father of Gilead--Though he had a son of that name (Nu 26:29; 27:1), yet, as is evident from the use of the Hebrew article, reference is made, not to the person, but the province of Gilead. "Father" here means lord or possessor of Gilead.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Joshua 17:1
“It is here said that the lot came to Manasseh, for he was the first-born of Joseph. Bishop Patrick thinks it should be translated, though he was the first-born of Joseph, and then the meaning is plain, that the second lot was for Manasseh, because, though he was the first-born, yet Jacob had preferred Ephraim before him.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Joshua 17:2, 2 voices
Joshua 17:2
“The rest of the children of Manasseh - That is, his grandchildren; for it is contended that Manasseh had no other son than Machir; and these were very probably the children of Gilead, the son of Machir.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Joshua 17:2
“The most remarkable person of this half tribe in after-time was Gideon, whose great actions were done within this lot. He was of the family of Abiezer; Cesarea was in this lot, and Antipatris, famed in the latter ages of the Jewish state.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
a.Manasseh is called the firstborn of Joseph here and still receives his lot after Ephraim, which is Genesis 48:14-20 working itself out on a map, where Jacob crossed his hands and set the younger before the elder. Machir already held Gilead and Bashan, granted by Moses at Numbers 32:39-40 and Deuteronomy 3:15 for taking them, so half of this tribe was settled before anyone crossed the Jordan. The six families of verse 2 are the same six counted at Numbers 26:30-32, and Gideon comes out of the first of them, Abiezer, at Judges 6:11.
2. (vv. 3-6)
Joshua 17:3, 1 voice
Joshua 17:3
“But Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, had no sons, but daughters,.... The descent of this man is particularly given, to show the truth and reality of it, upon which his daughters made their request, and that granted and now claimed: and these are the names of his daughters, Mahlah, and Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah; by the same names, and in the same order they are called in Num 26:33; the order is a little different in Num 36:11.”
Joshua 17:5, 2 voices
Joshua 17:5
“Ten portions - i. e. five for the five families descended from the male children of Gilead, and five others for the five daughters of Zelophehad, who represented the sixth family, the Hepherites.”
Joshua 17:5
“Ten portions - Five for the sons, and five for the daughters; for as for Hepher, both he and his son Zelophehad was dead, and that without sons, and therefore had no portion; but his daughters had several portions allotted to them.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Joshua 17:6, 1 voice
Joshua 17:6
“Because the daughters of Manasseh had an inheritance among his sons,.... Which occasioned such a number of portions; the daughters of Zelophehad are meant, who descended from Manasseh: and the rest of Manasseh, some had the land of Gilead; that is, those besides the six families before expressed, namely, the two families of the Machirites and Gileadites, Num 26:29.”
a.Numbers 27:1-11 heard this case in the wilderness and Numbers 36 refined the ruling, requiring the daughters to marry inside their father's tribe so the land stayed where it fell. Verse 4 is the discharge of it, and the five names are given again in full, Mahlah and Noah and Hoglah and Milcah and Tirzah, so a case argued before Moses is settled by name a generation later. They come near before Eleazar, Joshua and the princes, which is the court of Numbers 27:2 with Moses gone, and Eleazar is the one man standing in both scenes. How the ten portions of verse 5 are counted is disputed, Barnes reckoning five families from Gilead's male line and five for the daughters of Zelophehad, and other readers dividing them otherwise.
B. Manasseh's towns, and the Canaanites who would not go
1. (vv. 7-11)
Joshua 17:7, 1 voice
Joshua 17:7
“Asher - Not the tribe so called, but a place somewhere toward the eastern end of the boundary line here drawn: perhaps “Teyasir,” on the road from Sichem to Beth-shean.”
Joshua 17:8, 1 voice
Joshua 17:8
“Now Manasseh had the land of Tappuah,.... The whole territory that went by that name, from a city of note in it, next mentioned; all the fields and villages in it belonged to the tribe of Manasseh: but Tappuah on the border of Manasseh belonged to the children of Ephraim; and was one of those separate cities they had among the inheritance of the children of Manasseh; though it seems they had only the city, not the territory adjacent to it, and which was named from it.”
Joshua 17:9, 2 voices
Joshua 17:9
“These cities ... - The text is possibly corrupt. The intention seems to be to state that the cities lying south of the river, though within the limits of Manasseh, were in fact made over to Ephraim, and were among the “separate cities” Jos 16:9. On the contrary, the north bank of the river, both land and towns, belonged to Manasseh exclusively.”
Joshua 17:9
“Thus the river was in the territory of Manasseh; but the cities which were upon the river, though all were within the limits of Manasseh's possessions, were assigned partly to Ephraim, and partly to Manasseh; those on the south side being given to the former; those upon the north to the latter [KEIL].”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Joshua 17:10, 2 voices
Joshua 17:10
“They met together in Asher on the north - The tribe of Asher extended from the Mediterranean Sea to Mount Carmel, Jos 19:26, and the tribe of Manasseh extended to Dor and her towns, (see the following verse, Jos 17:11 (note)), which were in the vicinity of Carmel; and thus it appears that these two tribes formed a junction at the Mediterranean Sea. This may serve to remove the difficulties in this verse; but still it does appear that in several cases the tribes were intermingled; for Manasseh had several towns, both in Issachar and in Asher, see Jos 17:”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Joshua 17:10
“His border - Manasseh's, whose portion is here described, and whose name was last mentioned. In Asher - That is, upon the tribe of Asher; for though Zebulon came between Asher and them for the greatest part of their land; yet it seems there was some necks of land, both of Ephraim's and of Manasseh's, which jutted out farther than the rest, and touched the borders of Asher.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Joshua 17:11, 3 voices
Joshua 17:11
“Perhaps Beth-shean (in Issachar) and the other five towns (in Asher) were given to the Manassites in compensation for towns in the Manassite territory allotted to the Ephraimites. (See Jos 17:9. Compare Jos 21:9.) To the wall of Beth-shean, or Bethshah (“Beisan,” about 5 miles west of the Jordan), the bodies of Saul and his sons were fastened by the Philistines after the battle on Mount Gilboa. After the exile it received the Greek name of Scythopolis, perhaps because it was principally tenanted by a rude and pagan population, styled in contempt Scythians.”
Joshua 17:11
“Beth-shean and her towns--Greek, "Scythopolis" (now Beisan), in the valley of the Jordan, towards the east end of the plain of Jezreel. "Beth-shean" means "house of rest," so called from its being the halting place for caravans travelling between Syria or Midian, and Egypt, and the great station for the commerce between these countries for many centuries.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Joshua 17:11
“Inhabitants of Dor - Not the places only, but the people; whom they spared and used for servants. Three countries - The words may be rendered, the third part of that country; and so the meaning may be, that the cities and towns here mentioned are a third part of that country, that is, of that part of Issachar's and Asher's portion, in which those places lay.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
a.The line between the two sons of Joseph is drawn so that each tribe holds towns inside the other, Ephraim keeping cities within Manasseh at 16:9 and Manasseh keeping six towns inside Issachar and Asher here. All six of verse 11 have later history in the text: Taanach and Megiddo are where the kings of Canaan fight Deborah and Barak at Judges 5:19, Endor is where Saul finds the woman with a familiar spirit at 1 Samuel 28:7, and the Philistines fasten Saul's body to the wall of Bethshean at 1 Samuel 31:10. The words rendered three countries at the close of verse 11 are read by some as a district of high ground and by others as a third part of that region, and the Hebrew leaves the question open.
2. (vv. 12-13)
Joshua 17:12, 1 voice
Joshua 17:12
“Could not drive out, etc. - They had neither grace nor courage to go against their enemies, and chose rather to share their territories with those whom the justice of God had proscribed, than exert themselves to expel them. But some commentators give a different turn to this expression, and translate the passage thus: But the children of Manasseh could not (resolve) to destroy those cities, but the Canaanites consented to dwell in the land.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
a.Judges 1:27-28 tells this again with the same six towns and the same outcome, that Manasseh did not drive them out and put them to tribute once Israel grew strong. Two statements of this book stand beside each other and neither is softened, since 21:45 says there failed not ought of any good thing which the Lord had spoken, and verse 12 says the Canaanites would dwell in that land. Tribute is payment taken from people left where they are, so verse 13 records a settlement with the inhabitants rather than a removal of them, and Judges 2:1-3 is where that arrangement is answered.
C. Too great for one lot? Then clear the forest
1. (vv. 14-18)
Joshua 17:14, 1 voice
Joshua 17:14
“Seeing I am a great people - The assertion can hardly have been warranted by facts, for at the census Num. 26 the two tribes of Manasseh and Ephraim together were not greatly more numerous than the single tribe of Judah; and now that half the Manassites were provided for on the eastern side of Jordan, the remaining children of Joseph could hardly be stronger than the Danites or the Issacharites. The children of Joseph seem therefore to exhibit here that arrogant and jealous spirit which elsewhere characterises their conduct (Jdg 8:1; Jdg 12:1; 2Sa 19:41; 2Ch 28:7 etc.).”
Joshua 17:15, 1 voice
Joshua 17:15
“Joshua was himself of the tribe of Ephraim, but far from supporting the demands of his kinsmen he reproves them, and calls upon them to make good their great words by corresponding deeds of valor. He bids them clear the country of its woods and thus make room for settling their people. The “wood country” means probably the range which runs along the northern border of Manasseh, and which connects the mountains of Gilboa with Carmel.”
Joshua 17:16, 2 voices
Joshua 17:16
“The hill is not enough for us - The mountain of Gilboa being that which had fallen to them by lot. Chariots of iron - We cannot possess the plain country, because that is occupied by the Canaanites; and we cannot conquer them, because they have chariots of iron, that is, very strong chariots, and armed with scythes, as is generally supposed.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Joshua 17:16
“Is not enough - Hebrew. the hill will not be found, that is, obtained by us; those fierce and strong people the Perizzites and the giants will easily defend themselves, and frustrate our attempts, having the advantage of the woods and mountains.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Joshua 17:17, 1 voice
Joshua 17:17
Thou shalt not have one lot only - i. e. by dispossessing the Canaanites, thou shalt double the portion of land at thy disposal. The “but” with which the King James Version begins Jos 17:18 should be “for.”
Joshua 17:18, 2 voices
Joshua 17:18
For if at last we come to perfection, then the Canaanite is said to have been exterminated by us and handed over to death. But as to how this is accomplished in our flesh, hear the apostle saying, "Mortify your members that are upon the earth: fornication, impurity," and the other things that follow. And again it says, "For those who belong to Christ have crucified their flesh with its vices and lusts."
Origen of Alexandria· written before 253· HOMILIES ON JOSHUA 22.2patristic
Joshua 17:18
“WHEN the children of Israel had come to Canaan and by God's good care had entered into the land that flowed with milk and honey they were not immediately at rest. The Canaanites were there—there in possession, there in strong cities—which seemed to be walled up to Heaven. And they had to drive out these Canaanites before they could possibly possess the country. In fact, this was the reason why they were sent there. The Canaanites had been outlawed by God. They had been guilty of such horrible offenses that He had adjudged their race to destruction.”
a.Joshua is himself an Ephraimite, named of that tribe among the spies at Numbers 13:8, and his answer to his own kinsmen sends them up to clear the wood country in the land of the Perizzites and of the giants, the Rephaim of Genesis 14:5 and Deuteronomy 3:11. Their reply names the obstacle exactly, chariots of iron in the valley and at Jezreel, and that same phrase becomes the reason Judah could not take the valley at Judges 1:19 and the strength of Sisera's nine hundred at Judges 4:3. Barnes reads the claim of verse 14 against the census of Numbers 26, where Ephraim and Manasseh together are not much larger than Judah alone, and sets its tone beside the complaints the same house makes at Judges 8:1 and 12:1. Joshua grants the greatness and gives no second lot, telling them in verse 18 to take the mountain, cut down the wood, and drive out the Canaanites though they have iron chariots.
The text of this chapter
This page carries no textual note on Joshua 17. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →
This page draws on 9 works. Open for the list.
This page draws on Adam Clarke; Albert Barnes; Charles Spurgeon, The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 2049: “Driving Out the Canaanites and Their Iron Chariots” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition) (1888); Jamieson, Fausset & Brown; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament (1748-1763); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765); Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth; Matthew Henry and Origen of Alexandria, HOMILIES ON JOSHUA 22.2.
