Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.

1 Samuelchapter 26

25 verses · Samuel, Nathan and Gad, by tradition · 10th century BC · History

Now therefore, I pray thee, let my lord the king hear the words of his servant. If the Lord have stirred thee up against me, let him accept an offering: but if they be the children of men, cursed be they before the Lord; for they have driven me out this day from abiding in the inheritance of the Lord, saying, Go, serve other gods.

Introduction

Samuel, Nathan and Gad, by tradition, History, 1 Samuel Overview.

This chapter was kept beside the account of the cave at En-gedi, and its first hearers were meant to set the two side by side. Once again David has the king in his power, and once again a companion urges him to strike. Listen for what is different this time, who makes the choice and how it is carried out. Listen to David's words about the ways God can end a man's life and reign. Hear the last words Saul ever speaks to David, and the fear David voices about being driven from the LORD's land.

Context

Who
Israelites weighing whether the two sparings were one event or two
What
An account of David entering Saul's sleeping camp by night, taking the spear and the water jug, and sparing him a second time.
Where
The hill of Hachilah in the wilderness of Ziph, inside Saul's camp and then across the valley on a far hilltop.
When
The text gives no date; on the common reckoning it falls about 1014 BC.
Why
To show that David's refusal to kill the LORD's anointed was a settled principle.

Historical context

The chapter belongs to David, who is still an outlaw with a price on him, and to Saul, who is still the reigning king of Israel. Abishai son of Zeruiah, David's nephew and Joab's brother, goes down into the camp with him.

Show the rest of the historical context, 5 more paragraphs

The time is close to the end of the wilderness years, after the affair at Carmel and before the crossing to Gath. The site places it about 1014 BC, and the text gives no date.

The place is the wilderness of Ziph, southeast of Hebron toward the Dead Sea. The hill of Hachilah stands opposite Jeshimon, and the Ziphites had already given David away on that same ground at 23:19.

The occasion is a report and a muster. The Ziphites tell Saul where David is, and Saul brings three thousand chosen men.

A first hearer knew how an ancient camp was laid out, and the chapter depends on it. The commander slept at the centre with his troops circled around him, and his spear was thrust upright in the ground at his head. Yigael Yadin describes the standing spear as the mark of where a leader slept, the way a standard marks a headquarters. Lifting that spear and the water jug from beside him is proof of how close a man came, and it is a public humiliation of Abner, who commanded the guard.

A first hearer also understood the fear behind David's complaint at verse 19. Being driven out of the land meant being driven from the place where the LORD was worshipped, which is what he says men have done to him.

Significance

Saul's last words to David in the whole book are a blessing, and then each man goes back to his own place. They never meet again.

Show the rest of the significance, 2 more paragraphs

For Israel the point lay in the repetition. Once could be a moment of restraint, and twice, planned and carried out at night, was a settled principle.

That principle is what made the dynasty that followed defensible. The man who took the throne had never lifted a hand against the man who held it.

This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.

How it is read

The commentators read the second sparing of Saul as the deliberate act the first might have been mistaken for. On David's oath at the camp Rashi gives two readings of what he swore. Some say he swore against his own temptation, which is what many righteous men did, and Rashi points to the Midrash Tanchuma on Beha'aloscha 10. Others say he swore to Abishai, that if Abishai killed Saul his blood would be mingled with Saul's (Rashi on I Samuel 26:10:1, the Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J., CC-BY). On the spear at Saul's head he glosses the verb as thrust, and on the vessel taken beside it he gives a jug (Rashi on I Samuel 26:7:1 and 26:11:1, same edition). On David's question about who has incited the king he reads the word as inciting throughout Scripture, with Devarim 13:7 beside it (Rashi on I Samuel 26:19:1, same edition). On the bird David compares himself to he names the partridge, and he brings Yirmiyahu 17:11 and Maseches Chulin 140b on its habits. The bird sits on eggs it did not lay, and the young return to the mother that bore them. On Rashi's reading David sets Saul's hold on the kingship beside that (Rashi on I Samuel 26:20:1, same edition). On David's closing word about the LORD repaying each man he reads it of each righteous man, citing Radak. He takes David to be asking that his own life be as precious to God as Saul's was to him (Rashi on I Samuel 26:23:1, same edition). Radak stands as a citation at I Samuel 26:2:1, 26:4:1, 26:5:1, 26:8:1, 26:12:1, 26:14:1, 26:15:1 and 26:22:1. Metzudat David stands at 26:1:1, 26:3:1, 26:6:1, 26:9:1, 26:13:1, 26:16:1, 26:21:1, 26:24:1 and 26:25:1, and Malbim at 26:18:1. The corpus holds no English version of them.

What the rabbis say

The corpus records forty rabbinic locators on this chapter, thirty-four of them Midrash and six Talmud, each a locator without text. Saul's descent to the wilderness of Ziph draws Midrash Tehillim 7:19. Abishai's offer to strike draws Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sanhedrin 11:21 and Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sotah 8:3. David's refusal to touch the anointed draws Midrash Tehillim 58:1. His oath draws the largest cluster of the chapter, because the rabbis read it as a case of a man swearing against himself. It draws Bamidbar Rabbah 15:16, Midrash Shmuel 25:2, Midrash Tanchuma, Beha'alotcha 10:1, Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Beha'alotcha 19:2 and Midrash Tanchuma, Vayetzei 13:3. It also draws Midrash Tannaim on Deuteronomy 6:6:7, Midrash Tehillim 7:2, Pesikta Rabbati 11:1, Midrash Lekach Tov on Ruth 3:13:2 and Ruth Rabbah (Lerner) 6:8:1. The spear and the jug taken from the camp draw Bamidbar Rabbah 19:2, Jerusalem Talmud Peah 1:1:47, Vayikra Rabbah 26:2, Midrash Tanchuma, Chukat 4:1 and Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Chukat 8:2. The deep sleep from the LORD draws Bereshit Rabbah 17:5, Bereshit Rabbah 44:17, Tractate Kallah Rabbati 6:10, Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sanhedrin 6:20 and Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 77:10. David's call across the valley draws Jerusalem Talmud Sotah 1:8:10 and Pesikta DeRav Kahana 4:2. His rebuke of Abner draws Kohelet Rabbah 9:11:1 and Midrash Sekhel Tov, Bereshit 27:33:3. Saul recognising his voice draws Midrash Tehillim 17:14. David's word about being driven from the LORD's inheritance draws Ketubot 110b:24, Berakhot 62b:11, Avot DeRabbi Natan 26:2, Ein Yaakov, Ketubbot 13:7 and Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Ketubot 13:11. The same verse draws Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Vayetze 3, Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Berakhot 9:14, Midrash Lekach Tov on Ruth 1:6:1, Midrash Lekach Tov, Deuteronomy 5:28:1 and Midrash Lekach Tov, Genesis 28:21:2. David's last word to Saul draws Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 814:1. The rabbis teach in these places, and this site reports them as their teaching rather than as a rule of the text.

Sources: Rashi, Rashi on I Samuel 26:7:1, 26:10:1, 26:11:1, 26:19:1, 26:20:1 and 26:23:1, the Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J., CC-BY; Radak, Radak on I Samuel 26:2:1, 26:4:1, 26:5:1, 26:8:1, 26:12:1, 26:14:1, 26:15:1 and 26:22:1, cited only, no English version in the corpus; and Radak on each righteous man as Rashi carries him; Metzudat David, Metzudat David on I Samuel 26:1:1, 26:3:1, 26:6:1, 26:9:1, 26:13:1, 26:16:1, 26:21:1, 26:24:1 and 26:25:1, cited only; Malbim, Malbim on I Samuel 26:18:1, cited only.

The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.

The spear and cruse taken from beside Saul's head

1 Samuel 26:1-2

the hill of Hachilah: The Ziphites bring Saul the same report in nearly the same words they used at 23:19, naming the same hill of Hachilah where they had already betrayed David once. Saul again musters three thousand chosen men, the same number he led into the wilderness of Engedi in the previous chapter. The repetition marks David's exile as a settled pattern: no hiding place stays hidden long, and no relenting of Saul's outlasts the next report.

1 Samuel 26:1

The incident related in this chapter of the meeting between Saul and David bears a strong general resemblance to that recorded in 1 Sam. 24, and is of a nature unlikely to have occurred more than once. Existing discrepancies are explained by the supposition that one narrative relates fully some incidents on which the other is silent. On the whole the most probable conclusion is that the two narratives relate to one and the same event.

three thousand chosen men of Israel: Adam Clarke notes the odds, three thousand picked men against David's six hundred, and reads the size of the force as Saul's respect for David's skill as a commander. Saul had hunted in this wilderness before. At 23:28 a Philistine raid called him away from it.

1 Samuel 26:2

Three thousand chosen men - Though they knew that David was but six hundred strong, yet Saul thought it was not safe to pursue such an able general with a less force than that mentioned in the text; and, that he might the better depend on them, they were all elect or picked men out of the whole of his army.

1 Samuel 26:3-5

David abode in the wilderness: David sends spies rather than act on a report alone, then goes himself to see the ground before he decides anything. He finds Saul asleep inside the ring of wagons that formed the camp's night defense, Abner the captain lying at his side, and the whole army pitched around them. The picture sets up the chapter's question: two men lie within reach of each other, and only one of them will ask what he may lawfully do about it.

John Gill sees faith and caution working together, a man sure the Lord would protect his life who still sent spies to learn where Saul had camped. Matthew Henry adds a gentler reading. David wanted proof before he believed that Saul had come searching for him again.

1 Samuel 26:4

David therefore sent out spies,.... To observe if he was coming or come, and where he was, that he might not be surprised by him; for though David knew the Lord was and would be his protection, he thought proper to be upon his guard, and to make use of means for his safety: and understood that Saul was come in very deed; that he was most certainly come, and come to some certain place; which he himself went to reconnoitre, as in 1Sa 26:5.

Jamieson, Fausset and Brown describe the usual camp of that country, a circle of baggage and troops with the chief lying at its center. Saul lay at the point hardest to reach. Adam Clarke notes that David and his men knew the wilderness and could watch the camp unseen.

1 Samuel 26:5

Saul lay in the trench, and the people pitched round about him--Among the nomad people of the East, the encampments are usually made in a circular form. The circumference is lined by the baggage and the men, while the chief's station is in the center, whether he occupy a tent or not.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

1 more voice on this verse

1 Samuel 26:5

David arose - As David and his men knew the country, they had many advantages over Saul and his men; and no doubt could often watch them without being discovered. Saul lay in the trench - The word במעגל bammaegal, which we translate in the trench, and in the margin in the midst of his carriages, is rendered by some in a ring of carriages, and by others in the circle, i.e., which was formed by his troops. Luther himself translates it wagenburg, a fortress formed of wagons or carriages.

The whole record on this verse

1 Samuel 26:6-8

Who will go down with me to Saul to the camp?: David asks who will go down with him into the camp, and Abishai, his sister's son and Joab's brother, answers at once. Once inside, Abishai reads the sleeping king and the spear at his head as a verdict already handed down, God hath delivered thine enemy into thine hand, and offers to end it in one stroke and never need a second. His words echo the exact language David's own men used in the cave at Engedi in chapter 24, and David's answer will echo his own from that same chapter.

1 Samuel 26:6

Ahimelech the Hittite - Only mentioned here. Uriah was also a Hittite. Abishai - He was son of Zeruiah, David’s sister, but probably about the same age as David. He because very famous as a warrior 2Sa 23:18, but was implicated with his brother Joab in the murder of Abner in retaliation for the death of their brother Asahel 2Sa 3:30.

Saul had thrown his spear at David at 18:11 and 19:10, and now it stands in the ground within David's reach. Basil of Caesarea marks how easy a victim the sleeping king made for David. John Gill adds that David took only Abishai, for secrecy.

1 Samuel 26:7

So David and Abishai came to the people by night,.... Josephus (l) wrongly says, that he took with him both Abishai and Ahimelech; he chose to have but one, for the greater secrecy.

1 more voice on this verse

1 Samuel 26:7

If Saul had been asked the reason for his hostility, he would have been compelled to admit that it was the favors received from David's hand. Moreover, even though Saul had been found asleep by David during the very time that the latter was being pursued, and although Saul lay, an easy victim, before his enemy, his life was again spared by that just man, for he refrained from doing him violence.

Basil of Caesarea · written before 379 · CONCERNING ENVYpatristic

The whole record on this verse

Matthew Henry states Abishai's case at its strongest: the deep sleep on the camp looked like a providence meant to be used. Abishai makes the same offer against Shimei at 2 Samuel 16:9. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown answer that waiting on providence was the dutiful course.

1 Samuel 26:8

Besides, he was the sovereign; Though God had rejected him from the kingdom, it was in every way the best and most dutiful course, instead of precipitating his fall by imbruing their hands in his blood and thereby contracting the guilt of a great crime, to wait the awards of that retributive providence which sooner or later would take him off by some sudden and mortal blow.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

1 more voice on this verse

1 Samuel 26:8

The last advantage he had of this kind was indeed but accidental, when Saul happened to be in the cave with him at the same time. But in this there was something extraordinary; the deep sleep that had fallen on Saul and all his guards was manifestly from the Lord, so that it was a special providence which gave him this opportunity; he ought not therefore to let it slip.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse

1 Samuel 26:9-11

who can stretch forth his hand: David's refusal turns on one clause, repeated at 26:9, 26:11, and again at 26:16: who can stretch forth his hand against the Lord's anointed and be guiltless. The same restraint held him back in the cave at Engedi in chapter 24, and it will hold him back again over the Amalekite's claim at 2 Sam 1:14 and over Shimei at 2 Sam 19:21. David leaves Saul's death to three named outcomes, the Lord's own stroke, a natural day to die, or a fall in battle, and takes only the spear and the cruse instead of a life he has no right to.

1 Samuel 26:9

But this is marvelous not only for the fact that he grants life to the one who is doing everything against his life, but because David, although he had been anointed to the office of king and knew that he would not otherwise partake of that position unless Saul were out of the way, judged it better to suffer ill patiently in his private low estate than to enter upon the kingship by satisfying his anger against the one who had caused him grief.

Gregory of Nyssa · written before 395 · ON THE INSCRIPTIONS OF THE PSALMS 2.16.266patristic

1 more voice on this verse

1 Samuel 26:9

And he gave two reasons for it:-- 1. It would be a sinful affront to God's ordinance. Saul was the Lord's anointed, king of Israel by the special appointment and nomination of the God of Israel, the power that was, and to resist him was to resist the ordinance of God, Rom. xiii.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse

David has just seen the first of these, a stroke of divine judgment in Adam Clarke's words, when the Lord struck Nabal dead at 25:38. Of the three, the last is the one that comes. Saul falls in battle on Mount Gilboa at 31:4.

1 Samuel 26:10

The Lord shall smite him - He shall die by a stroke of the Divine judgment; or his day shall come to die - he shall die a natural death; which in the course of things must be before mine, and thus I shall get rid of mine enemy; or he shall descend into the battle, and perish - he shall fall by the enemies of his country. These are the three ordinary ways by which man accomplishes, as a hireling, his day.

John Gill reads the spear as Saul's scepter, the sign of his rule. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown note that a jug of water was kept near a sleeper in warm country for the night. Both objects prove how close David stood to the king.

1 Samuel 26:11

This common custom of Arab sheiks was also the practice of the Hebrew chiefs. at his bolster--literally, "at his head"; perhaps, Saul as a sovereign had the distinguished luxury of a bolster carried for him. A "cruse of water" is usually, in warm climates, kept near a person's couch, as a drink in the night time is found very refreshing.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

a deep sleep from the Lord was fallen upon them: The narrator names the cause outright: a deep sleep from the Lord had fallen on the whole camp, not the ordinary heaviness after a long watch. Whom God means to disable he can bind with a spirit of slumber, and here he binds an army so completely that a man can lift the king's own spear from beside him and no one wakes. The providence that keeps David from sin at verse 9 is the same providence that supplies him the proof he will use at verse 16.

1 Samuel 26:12

David took the spear and the cruse - The spear, we have already seen, was the emblem of power and regal dignity. But it is usual, in Arab camps, for every man to have his lance stuck in the ground beside him, that he may be ready for action in a moment. The cruse of water resembled, in some measure, the canteens of our soldiers.

1 more voice on this verse

1 Samuel 26:12

It was a deep sleep from the Lord, who has the command of the powers of nature, and makes them to serve his purposes as he pleases. Whom God will disable, or destroy, he binds up with a spirit of slumber, Rom. xi. How helpless do Saul and all his forces lie, all, in effect, disarmed and chained! and yet nothing is done to them; they are only rocked asleep.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse

David calls across the hill to Abner

1 Samuel 26:13-16

stood on the top of an hill afar off: From a hill with a wide ravine between them, close enough for a voice to carry in that clear air but far enough to be safe, David wakes the camp with one question, Answerest thou not, Abner? He shames the captain of the guard by name, calling him and his men worthy to die for the one watch they failed, then holds up the proof, the king's own spear and the cruse that stood at his head. The distance David keeps even now, after showing he could have closed it forever, answers Abishai's counsel from a few verses earlier: mercy resting on God does not need to stand near enough to be struck back.

Abner's reply guards the king's dignity even while the king lies unguarded. Matthew Henry suggests Abner held David too cheap to fear and so set no proper watch. David calls to Abner first, the man answerable for Saul's safety.

1 Samuel 26:14

"It is I," says David, and then he upbraids him with his sleeping when he should have been upon his guard. Perhaps Abner, looking upon David as a despicable enemy and one that there was no danger from, had neglected to set a watch; however, he himself ought to have been more wakeful.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Albert Barnes hears real praise inside the irony, for Abner's standing as a warrior is confirmed by David's lament over him at 2 Samuel 3:33 and 3:38. Barnes also thinks David blamed Abner in part for Saul's pursuit. Abner had reason to dread a rival in the young champion.

1 Samuel 26:15

This incidental testimony to Abner’s great eminence as a warrior is fully borne out by David’s dirge at Abner’s death 2Sa 3:31-34, 2Sa 3:38, as well as by his whole history. At the same time David’s bantering tone in regard to Abner, coupled with what he says in 1Sa 26:19, makes it proable that David attributed Saul’s persecution of him in some degree to Abner. Abner would be likely to dread a rival in the young conqueror of Judah (compare 2Sa 2:8).

David charges the guards with a death penalty for the very watch the Lord had closed at verse 12. Adam Clarke notes that their failure came through a sleep sent from the Lord. He thinks Saul's softened mood alone saved them from punishment.

1 Samuel 26:17-18

Is this thy voice, my son David?: Saul calls him my son before David has said a word in his own defense, the same address he used at the cave's mouth in chapter 24 and will use again at verse 21, words that cost him nothing to speak and nothing to keep. David answers with two questions of his own, what have I done, and what evil is in mine hand, the same appeal to a clean record Saul had already conceded at 24:17, Thou art more righteous than I. A king who has already granted the verdict once is being asked to hold to it a second time.

1 Samuel 26:17

In the same manner he had expressed his relentings, ch. xxiv. He had given his wife to another and yet calls him son, thirsted after his blood and yet is glad to hear his voice. Those are bad indeed that have never any convictions of good, nor ever sincerely utter good expressions.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

David speaks of himself in the third person as the king's servant, the language of a subject at court, even while he stands across a ravine from an army sent to kill him. Matthew Henry hears the grievance underneath. A man who would gladly serve is hunted as a rebel.

1 Samuel 26:18

He had lately had Saul's own testimony concerning him ( ch. xxiv. 17 ): Thou art more righteous than I. It was very unreasonable and wicked for Saul to pursue him as a criminal, when he could not charge him with any crime.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

If the Lord have stirred thee up against me: David names two possible causes for the whole pursuit and settles neither: either the Lord himself has stirred Saul against him, a trial to be met with an offering, or human hands are behind it, men who deserve a curse for driving him from the land of the Lord's own inheritance into a country where other gods are served. Barnes reads the first clause against the evil spirit sent on Saul back at 16:14, one persecution with two possible sources named in a single breath. David does not choose between them; he leaves the judgment to God rather than pass it himself, and this driven-out complaint is the sharpest word he speaks against his own exile in either sparing chapter.

1 Samuel 26:19

If the Lord have stirred thee up - The meaning is clear from the preceding history. “An evil spirit from God troubling him” was the beginning of the persecution. And this evil spirit was sent in punishment of Saul’s sin 1Sa 16:1, 1Sa 16:14. If the continued persecution was merely the consequence of this evil spirit continuing to vex Saul, David advises Saul to seek God’s pardon, and, as a consequence, the removal of the evil spirit, by offering a sacrifice.

1 more voice on this verse

1 Samuel 26:19

Saul himself could not say that justice put him on thus to persecute David, or that he was obliged to do it for the public safety. David was not willing to say (though it was very true) that Saul's own envy and malice put him on to do it; and therefore he concludes it must be attributed either to the righteous judgment of God or to the unrighteous designs of evil men.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse

as when one doth hunt a partridge: David's closing image is self-deprecation aimed to disarm: the king of Israel, with three thousand chosen men, come out after a single flea, hunted the way men hunt a partridge in the mountains, put up again and again until it tires enough to be clubbed. Every figure in the speech shrinks David and enlarges the disproportion of Saul's whole campaign, from a flea to a bird that only flies rather than fights. The plea that his blood not fall before the face of the Lord ties the whole appeal back to the inheritance he says he has been driven out of a verse earlier.

1 Samuel 26:20

As when one doth hunt a partridge - It is worthy of remark that the Arabs, observing that partridges, being put up several times, soon become so weary as not to be able to fly; they in this manner hunt them upon the mountains, till at last they can knock them down with their clubs. It was in this manner that Saul hunted David, coming hastily upon him, and putting him up from time to time, in hopes that he should at length, by frequent repetitions of it, be able to destroy him. See Harmer.

1 more voice on this verse

1 Samuel 26:20

He compares himself to a partridge, a very innocent harmless bird, which, when attempts are made upon its life, flies if it can, but makes no resistance. And would Saul bring the flower of his army into the field only to hunt one poor partridge? What a disparagement was this to his honour!

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse

I have played the fool: Saul's last words to David

1 Samuel 26:21-22

I have sinned: return, my son David: Saul's confession here goes further than the one he gave at the cave in chapter 24, naming himself a fool and owning that he has erred exceedingly, but Henry notes it is not the first such word from him and asks what a confession is worth without a change in the life behind it. David does not answer with trust; he keeps his distance still, telling one of Saul's own young men to come and fetch the spear rather than approach the king himself. The spear handed back is also a message: David could have kept the very weapon that names a king's rule, and chooses instead to return it whole.

1 Samuel 26:21

I have sinned - Perhaps the word חטאתי chatathi, “I have sinned,” should be read, I have erred, or, have been mistaken. I have taken thee to be a very different man from what I find thee to be. Taken literally it was strictly true. He often purposed the spilling of David’s blood; and thus, again and again, sinned against his life.

1 more voice on this verse

1 Samuel 26:21

Saul gets information of David's movements and acts offensively. The Ziphites came to him and told him where David now was, in the same place where he was when they formerly betrayed him, ch. xxiii. Perhaps (though it is not mentioned) Saul had given them intimation, under-hand, that he continued his design against David, and would be glad of their assistance.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse

Saul's promise of verse 21 gets no reply at all. Matthew Henry judges that Saul meant it when he spoke, though it came from no true repentance. David's next words, at 27:1, show what he made of it.

1 Samuel 26:22

And David answered and said, behold the king's spear!....

1 Samuel 26:23-24

The Lord render to every man his righteousness: David's closing appeal moves from the human court he has argued before Abner and Saul to the divine one, the Lord render to every man his righteousness and his faithfulness, the same court he trusts to settle what Saul's own promises have already failed to settle once. Verse 24 turns the appeal personal, asking that his own life be held as precious in the eyes of the Lord as Saul's life was just now held in his hand and spared. The prayer closes the chapter's whole argument in one line: the anointed does not defend himself by force because he has already appealed to a higher bench.

1 Samuel 26:23

He appeals to God as judge of the controversy: The Lord render to every man his righteousness. David, by faith, is sure that he will do it because he infallibly knows the true characters of all persons and actions and is inflexibly just to render to every man according to his work, and, by prayer, he desires he would do it.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

At verse 21 Saul said David had held his life precious. David turns that word into a prayer, asking the Lord to value his own life the same way. Augustine of Hippo counts this gentleness toward a merciless enemy among the marks of David's strength.

Blessed be thou, my son David: Saul's last blessing to David in either book foretells great things and continued prevailing, and neither man rests his weight on the words; each returns to his own place rather than to one road together. Barnes reads this chapter as a second telling of the encounter in the cave at Engedi, one event carried by more than one source; Keil and Delitzsch and most of the bench read the differences, a night camp instead of a cave, a spear and cruse instead of a severed skirt, Abishai present instead of David alone, as evidence of two separate sparings rather than one confused into two. Either way this is the last time Saul and David meet as living men; David hears of him next from an Amalekite messenger, over a body already dead.

1 Samuel 26:25

Thou shalt both do great things, and also shalt still prevail. - The Hebrew is גם עשה תעשה וגם יכל תוכל gam asoh thaaseh, vegam yachol tuchal; “Also in doing thou shalt do, and being able thou shalt be able; which the Targum translates, also in reigning thou shalt reign, and in prospering thou shalt prosper; which in all probability is the meaning. There is a vast deal of dignity in this speech of David, arising from a consciousness of his own innocence.

2 more voices on this verse

1 Samuel 26:25

He foretels his victories, and his elevation at last: Thou shalt do great things. Note, Those who make conscience of doing that which is truly good may come, by the divine assistance, to do that which is truly great. He adds, " Thou shalt also still prevail, more and more," he means against himself, but is loth to speak that out.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 Samuel 26:25

So David went on his way--Notwithstanding this sudden relenting of Saul, David placed no confidence in his professions or promises, but wisely kept at a distance and awaited the course of Providence.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

How this psalm is built

The form: Narrative, a night raid that ends in a shouted dialogue across a valley, the second of David's two refusals to take Saul's life, as Keil and Delitzsch classes it.

The patterns in this chapter

The devices this chapter is built on, what each one does, and one verse where it stands.
DeviceWhat it doesWhere to see it
Who can lift a hand against the LORD's anointedThe clause stands three times in this chapter, at verses 9, 11 and 16, and twice more in chapter 24. The store's exposition note on verses 9 to 11 records that the same restraint governs David again over the Amalekite's claim at 2 Samuel 1:14 and over Shimei at 2 Samuel 19:21. It is the one rule David states for himself and keeps in every later case.John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament, 1748 to 1763, on 1 Samuel 26:9.1 Samuel 26:9, 1 Samuel 26:11, 1 Samuel 26:16, 1 Samuel 24:6
The Ziphites again, the three thousand again, the same hill againVerses 1 and 2 repeat the report of 23:19 in nearly the same words, name the same hill of Hachilah, and muster the same three thousand chosen men Saul led to En-gedi. The store's exposition note on verses 1 to 2 reads the repetition as the settled pattern of David's exile. No hiding place stays hidden, and no relenting of Saul's outlasts the next report.Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on 1 Samuel 26:1.1 Samuel 26:1, 1 Samuel 26:2, 1 Samuel 23:19, 1 Samuel 24:2
A spear and a water jug, taken and handed backThe spear at Saul's head is the weapon he threw at David twice in his own house and at Jonathan once. David lifts it at verse 12, holds it up as proof at verse 16, and returns it whole at verse 22. The store's exposition note on verses 21 to 22 reads the return as a message, since David could have kept the object that names a king's rule.Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, on 1 Samuel 26:22.1 Samuel 26:7, 1 Samuel 26:12, 1 Samuel 26:16, 1 Samuel 26:22
The speech across the valleyFrom verse 14 David argues in the open air to three hearers at once, to Abner, to Saul and to the whole army listening. He shames the captain by name, puts two questions to the king, and closes at verse 23 by moving the case to a higher bench. The store's exposition note on verses 13 to 16 records that he keeps the ravine between them even after proving he could have closed it.Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, 1871, on 1 Samuel 26:13.1 Samuel 26:14, 1 Samuel 26:15, 1 Samuel 26:19, 1 Samuel 26:23
A flea and a partridgeAt verse 20 David shrinks himself twice over, to a flea and to a partridge hunted in the mountains. Adam Clarke, in the store's exposition note on verse 20, explains the second figure as a bird put up again and again until it tires enough to be clubbed. Both images measure the disproportion between three thousand chosen men and the one man they are after.Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on 1 Samuel 26:20.1 Samuel 26:20, 1 Samuel 24:14

The historical value

11 more paragraphs on the patterns

The chapter is unusually precise about a camp. Verses 5 and 7 place Saul inside the inner circle, with the troops lying around him and his spear stuck in the ground at his head. The store's exposition note on verses 3 to 5 describes the ring of wagons that formed the night defence. The spear planted at the head of a sleeping commander is the chapter's own detail, and it is the object David takes as proof.

The ground is named. Hachilah lies opposite Jeshimon in the wilderness of Ziph, the same place the Ziphites had given away at 23:19. The hilltop of verse 13 with a wide gulf between it and the camp is the terrain the whole second half depends on, since a voice has to carry across it.

The debated concept

Whether this chapter and chapter 24 record one event or two is the standing question. The store's exposition note on verse 25 sets the two positions out. Albert Barnes reads chapter 26 as a second telling of the encounter in the cave at En-gedi, one event carried by more than one source. Keil and Delitzsch and most of the older bench read the differences as evidence of two separate sparings. The setting is a night camp rather than a cave. The tokens are a spear and a water jug rather than a cut corner of a robe, and Abishai is present where David had been alone. The site takes no verdict, and both readings are held by named writers.

What David means at verse 19 is read two ways. Albert Barnes, quoted in the store's pool on that verse, takes the stirring up as the evil spirit from God of 16:14, sent in punishment of Saul's sin. He reads David as advising a sacrifice to have it removed. Matthew Henry, quoted on the same verse, reads David as refusing to name the cause at all, since he was unwilling to say plainly that Saul's own envy put him on to it. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown read the driving out as exposure to the seductions of idolatry in a foreign country. John Wesley reads the phrase go serve other gods as the language of their actions rather than of their mouths.

Whether Saul's confession at verse 21 is worth anything is the third question. Matthew Henry, cited in the store's note on verses 21 to 22, observes that it goes further than the one at the cave. Saul calls himself a fool and owns that he has erred greatly. Henry then asks what a confession is worth without a change in the life behind it, and notes it is the second such word from the same man. David's own answer is to keep his distance.

The divine connection

Verse 12 states a cause the reader would otherwise have to guess. The narrator says a deep sleep from the LORD had fallen on the whole camp. The store's exposition note on that verse reads it as the providence that both keeps David from sin at verse 9 and supplies the proof he uses at verse 16. The text makes the claim directly, and the chapter offers no account of how the sleep came.

Verse 23 turns the whole case over to a court David cannot convene. He asks the LORD to repay every man for his righteousness and faithfulness, and at verse 24 he asks that his own life be valued as he has just valued Saul's. The store's note on verses 23 to 24 reads the prayer as the close of the chapter's argument, that an anointed man declines to defend himself by force because he has already appealed higher.

How the rest of Scripture reads this chapter

The New Testament does not cite 1 Samuel 26. The rule David states here is what the later narrative tests. At 2 Samuel 1:14 he puts the same question to the Amalekite who claims to have killed Saul, and executes him on the answer. At 2 Samuel 19:21 he refuses to let Abishai, the same man who offered the spear here, kill Shimei for cursing the LORD's anointed. The two sons of Zeruiah are on the wrong side of the rule both times.

Keep studying

Sources for this chapter

The summary

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.

The form and classifications

Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on 1 Samuel 26:25; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments, 1832 to 1869, on 1 Samuel 26:25; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament, 1748 to 1763, on 1 Samuel 26:10 and Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Books of Samuel, cited in the store's exposition note on verse 25.

The exposition

Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes; Augustine of Hippo, AGAINST FAUSTUS, A MANICHAEAN 22.66; Basil of Caesarea, CONCERNING ENVY; Bede, Commentary on Samuel; Jamieson Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Books of Samuel and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.