Its road into both canons was slower than most books, and the record is worth stating plainly. In the rabbinic literature, the Babylonian Talmud preserves a discussion of whether Esther renders the hands impure, the technical question of canonical status (tractate Megillah 7a, Bavli, redacted roughly AD 500 to 600), and the tradition settles firmly in favor of the scroll. Maimonides (1138 to 1204) later wrote in the Mishneh Torah, Laws of the Megillah, that the Scroll of Esther and the days of Purim would never be annulled. In the church, Melito of Sardis' canon list of about AD 170, preserved in Eusebius (Ecclesiastical History 4.26), omits Esther, as does Athanasius' Thirty-Ninth Festal Letter of AD 367; Luther is reported in the Table Talk as wishing the book had never come down at all. Both communities ended up receiving it, and it has been read as Scripture in both ever since.
Fully canonical, in Jewish and Christian reception alike
held by the settled rabbinic ruling reflected at Megillah 7a and in Maimonides' Mishneh Torah, and the church's own councils and canon lists from the fourth century onward
A book of second rank, kept but held at a distance
held by Melito of Sardis (c. AD 170), Athanasius (AD 367), Gregory of Nazianzus, and Luther in the Table Talk
The Jewish Writings→