Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Luke 3:19

in Luke 3

But when he rebuked Herod the tetrarch regarding his brother’s wife Herodias and all the evils he had done,

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV

ASV

but Herod the tetrarch, being reproved by him for Herodias his brother’s wife, and for all the evil things which Herod had done,

KJV

But Herod the tetrarch, being reproved by him for Herodias his brother Philip’s wife, and for all the evils which Herod had done,

This verse in Luke 3

Commentary

15 notes on this verse

A commentator

Origen of Alexandria

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 253.

But we marvel at John, because among them that are born of women there was not a greater than he, for by his good deeds he had been exalted to so high a fame for virtue, that by many he was supposed to be Christ. But what is much more marvellous he feared not Herod, nor dreaded death, as it follows, But Herod the tetrarch being reproved by him.

This site's exposition

many other things in his exhortation

on Luke 3:18-20

And many other things in his exhortation preached he unto the people signals that Luke has been giving a representative sample rather than a complete transcript of John's preaching. But Herod the tetrarch, being reproved by him for Herodias his brother Philip’s wife, and for all the evils which Herod had done, added yet this above all, that he shut up John in prison closes John's public ministry with the reason for his arrest, Herod Antipas's unlawful marriage to his brother's wife openly rebuked by the preacher. The commentators note Luke places this notice of imprisonment here for narrative closure on John's whole story before returning to Jesus, even though the baptism described in the very next verse must have happened before Herod's arrest of John, an ordinary feature of ancient historical writing that groups a character's story together rather than insisting on strict chronological sequence throughout.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers2 voices

A commentator

Eusebius of Caesarea

ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY 3.24 · Written before 339.

proposed

Luke too, before beginning the acts of Jesus, makes a similar observation, saying that Herod added one more offense to his other crimes by shutting up John in jail.

A commentator

Eusebius of Caesarea

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 339.

proposed

(non occ.) He is called the tetrarch, to distinguish him from the other Herod, in whose reign Christ was born, and who was king, but this Herod was tetrarch. Now his wife was the daughter of Aretas, king of Arabia, but he had sacrilegiously married his brother Philip's wife, though she had offspring by his brother. For those only were allowed to do this whose brothers died without issue. For this the Baptist had censured Herod. First indeed he heard him attentively, for he knew that his words were weighty and full of consolation, but the desire of Herodias compelled him to despise the words of John, and he then thrust him into prison. And so it follows, And he added this above all, that he shut up John in prison.

The Medieval Church3 voices

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Luke · Written before 1107.

proposed

The Evangelist aptly inserted here the account concerning Herod. He speaks as if to say: although the people thought very highly of John, Herod, "being reproved by him," to all his evil deeds "added this also, that he shut him up in prison." He narrates …

A commentator

Bede

On the Gospel of Luke · Written before 735.

proposed

However, Herod the tetrarch, being reproved by him concerning Herodias, the wife of his brother, and concerning all the evil deeds which Herod had done, added this above all, and shut John up in prison. These matters are more fully recounted by Matthew and Mark, …

A commentator

Bede

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 735.

proposed

But John was not imprisoned in those days. According to St. John's Gospel it was not till after some miracles had been performed by our Lord, and after His baptism had been noised abroad; but according to Luke he had been seized beforehand by the redoubled malice of Herod, who, when he saw so many flock to the preaching of John, and the soldiers believing, the publicans repenting, and whole multitudes receiving baptism, on the contrary not only despised John, but having put him in prison, slew him.
8 more voices on this verse

The Medieval Church1 voice

A commentator

Bonaventure

Commentary on Luke, Chapter 3 · Written in the 13th century.

proposed

As regards the rebuke of the transgressing ruler, it is added: But Herod the tetrarch, about whom it was treated above in the same chapter, when he was rebuked by him concerning Herodias, the wife of his brother: Matthew fourteen: "John said to Herod: It …

The Puritans and the Awakening2 voices

But Herod the tetrarch being reproved by him,.... By John, as the Syriac, Arabic, and Persic versions add: for Herodias his brother Philip's wife; for taking her to wife, whilst his brother Philip was living. The account, which the Jewish chronologer (x) gives, of this Herod, and of this fact of his, and John's reproving him for it, and the consequence of it, perfectly agrees with this of the evangelist.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

The evangelist mentioned John's imprisonment before Christ's being baptized, though it was nearly a year after it, because he would finish the story of John's ministry, and then introduce that of Christ. A short account of Christ's baptism, which had been more fully related by St. Matthew. Jesus came, to be baptized of John, and he was so,

The Nineteenth Century5 voices

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

(Also see on Mt 3:12.) and for all the evils which Herod had done--important fact here only mentioned, showing how thoroughgoing was the fidelity of the Baptist to his royal hearer, and how strong must have been the workings of conscience in that slave of passion when, notwithstanding such plainness, he "did many things and heard John gladly" (Mr 6:20, 26).
We learn, firstly, from these verses — that one effect of a faithful ministry, is to set men thinking. We read concerning John the Baptist's hearers, that "the people were in expectation, and all men mused in their hearts about John — whether he might be the Christ." The cause of true religion has gained a giant step in a parish, or congregation, or family — when people begin to think . Thoughtlessness about spiritual things is one great feature of unconverted men. It cannot be said, in many cases, that they either like the Gospel, or dislike it.
We learn, firstly, from these verses — that one effect of a faithful ministry, is to set men thinking. We read concerning John the Baptist's hearers, that "the people were in expectation, and all men mused in their hearts about John — whether he might be the Christ." The cause of true religion has gained a giant step in a parish, or congregation, or family — when people begin to think . Thoughtlessness about spiritual things is one great feature of unconverted men. It cannot be said, in many cases, that they either like the Gospel, or dislike it. But they do not give it a place in their thoughts. They never "consider." (Isaiah 1:3.) Let us always thank God when we see a spirit of reflection on religious subjects, coming over the mind of an unconverted man. Thinking and deliberation are the high road to conversion. The truth of Christ has nothing to fear from sober examination . We invite inquiry . We desire to have its claims fully investigated. We know that its fitness to supply every need of man's heart and conscience, is not appreciated in many cases — simply because it is not known. Thinking, no doubt, is not faith and repentance. But it is always a hopeful symptom. When hearers of the Gospel begin to "muse in their hearts" — then we ought to bless God and take courage. We learn, secondly, from these verses — that a faithful minister will always exalt Christ. We read that when John saw the state of mind in which his hearers were, he told them of a coming One, far mightier than himself. He refused the honor which he saw the people ready to give him, and referred them to Him who had the "winnowing fork in his hand" — the Lamb of God, the Messiah. Conduct like this will always be the characteristic of a true "man of God." He will never allow anything to be credited to him, or his office — which belongs to his divine Master.

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

proposed

Herod the tetrarch - See this subject explained at large, Mat 14:1 (note), etc., and Mar 6:21, Mar 6:23 (note).
See the notes at Mat 14:1-13. “Added this above all.” To all his former crimes he added this; not implying that this was the “worst” of his acts, but that this was “one” of his deeds, of like character as the others. The event here mentioned did not take place until some time after this, but it is mentioned here to show what was the end of John’s preaching, or to “fill out” the account concerning him.

The words behind it

23 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Matthew 11:2

    Meanwhile John heard in prison about the works of Christ, and he sent his disciples

    it leads to

    • Mark 6:17

      For Herod himself had ordered that John be arrested and bound and imprisoned, on account of his brother Philip’s wife Herodias, whom Herod had married.

    • Matthew 14:3

      Now Herod had arrested John and bound him and put him in prison on account of Herodias, his brother Philip’s wife,

  • Through

    Proverbs 15:12

    A mocker does not love to be reproved, nor will he consult the wise.

    it leads to

    • Amos 5:10

      There are those who hate the one who reproves in the gate and despise him who speaks with integrity.

  • Through

    Luke 3:1

    In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, while Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, Herod tetrarch of Galilee, his brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias tetrarch of Abilene,

    it leads to

    • Luke 23:6–11

      When Pilate heard this, he asked if the man was a Galilean.

    • Genesis 49:10

      The scepter will not depart from Judah, nor the staff from between his feet, until Shiloh comes and the allegiance of the nations is his.

    • Luke 2:1

      Now in those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that a census should be taken of the whole empire.

    • Acts 4:27

      In fact, this is the very city where Herod and Pontius Pilate conspired with the Gentiles and the people of Israel against Your holy servant Jesus, whom You anointed.

    • Luke 9:7

      When Herod the tetrarch heard about all that was happening, he was perplexed. For some were saying that John had risen from the dead,

Where this verse is studied

About Luke

The Return of the Prodigal Son, Gustave Doré. Public domain.
The Return of the Prodigal Son, Gustave Doré. Public domain.
This page draws on 13 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Bede, On the Gospel of Luke; Bede, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Bonaventure, Commentary on Luke, Chapter 3; Eusebius of Caesarea, ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY 3.24; Eusebius of Caesarea, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; J.C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Luke (lightly modernized text, Grace Gems edition); Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Origen of Alexandria, Catena Aurea by Aquinas and Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Luke.