Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.

Joshuachapter 13

33 verses · Joshua, by tradition · 15th or 13th century BC · History

Now Joshua was old and stricken in years; and the Lord said unto him, Thou art old and stricken in years, and there remaineth yet very much land to be possessed.

Introduction

Joshua, by tradition, History, Joshua Overview.

This chapter opens the second half of the book, where the land is divided rather than fought for. The book is credited to Joshua by tradition, and he is now an old man with the work still unfinished. Its first hearers were tribes who would live on this ground for centuries, and a family's claim to a field rested on records like these. Listen for the land named as still unconquered, and for the tribe that receives no land at all. Much of the chapter is a survey of boundaries and towns east of the Jordan. Read it as a deed of gift from the LORD to His people.

Context

Who
A nation being told plainly what it had not yet taken
What
A list of the land still to be taken, followed by the portions east of the Jordan given to Reuben, Gad and half the tribe of Manasseh.
Where
The Philistine coast and the Lebanon, still unconquered, and the land east of the Jordan from the Arnon to Bashan.
When
Late in Joshua's life, about 1400 BC on the traditional dating, when he was old and advanced in years.
Why
To show that the whole land, taken and untaken, was to be divided, and to record the eastern shares Moses had already granted.

Historical context

The book carries no superscription naming its writer, and it reports Joshua writing at least part of it at 24:26. The Babylonian Talmud at Bava Batra 14b to 15a assigns the whole book to him, while Martin Noth read it as the second volume of an exilic Deuteronomistic History.

Show the rest of the historical context, 4 more paragraphs

The chapter opens with God telling an old man that very much land remains to be possessed, and the list that follows is honest. It names the whole coastal strip held by the Philistines with their five ruling cities, the Geshurites, the Lebanon country north to Hamath, and the Sidonian coast.

The five Philistine cities were Gaza, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Gath and Ekron, on the flat fertile coastal plain along the trade road running from Egypt to the north. That plain was the most valuable and most defensible ground in the country, and Israel fought over it for centuries.

The Transjordan allotment is then recorded in detail, with Reuben on the southern plateau, Gad in Gilead with the towns along the Jordan valley, and half of Manasseh in Bashan. Balaam is noted in passing as having been killed with the sword among the slain.

Levi receives no territorial allotment, and the formula used twice here is that the offerings made by fire to the LORD are their inheritance, and that the LORD Himself is their inheritance. A first hearer knew what that meant in practice, since a landless priestly tribe scattered among the others was a structural choice with large consequences.

Significance

The first hearers were handed a map with holes in it. God's word to Joshua is to divide the whole land as an inheritance anyway, including what was not yet held. The allotment rested on the promise rather than on the current front line.

Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph

That framing shaped how they read their own failures later. What went unpossessed was land God had given and Israel had not taken.

This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.

How it is read

Rashi takes the opening of the chapter as a statement about what one lifetime could finish. He reads the land that remains as land already promised, "Of the land I promised to Avrohom, much remains to be possessed [as an inheritance], for it has not been conquered", and then turns the sentence on Joshua himself, "And since you are old, you will not be able to do so in your lifetime" (Rashi on Joshua 13:1:1, the Metsudah Publications translation of 1997, CC-BY). At the sixth verse he reads the promise to drive the nations out as an act God keeps for after Joshua has died (Rashi on Joshua 13:6:1).

The boundary detail is read the same way, as a record of how far the conquest actually reached. Rashi identifies Shichor with the Nile, places it close to the southwestern border, and draws his conclusion from the geography, that "in Yehoshua’s lifetime, he did not conquer the entire southern border except from the wilderness of Tzin" (Rashi on Joshua 13:3:1). He reads the fourth verse as the width of that same unconquered strip from south to north, and the fifth as the northern end of the eastern border left in other hands (Rashi on Joshua 13:4:1 and 13:5:1).

On the lists themselves Rashi works as a surveyor. He explains the order of the chapter, that it describes the whole land beyond the Jordan first and then the boundary of each tribe in turn (Rashi on Joshua 13:9:1). He names who holds it, the tribes of Reuben and Gad with the first half of the tribe of Manasseh (Rashi on Joshua 13:8:1). He limits the claim on Ammon to "Half the land they conquered from the Bnei Amon and from Sichon" (Rashi on Joshua 13:25:1), reads the cities and their villages as cities surrounded by walls (Rashi on Joshua 13:28:1), glosses the mountain of the valley as the mountain of the plain (Rashi on Joshua 13:19:1), and takes the remnant of the giants as those "who were slain by Kedorlaomeir and the kings who were aligned with him" (Rashi on Joshua 13:12:1). At the second verse he reaches past Hebrew altogether and glosses the word for the borders with one word of old French, marche (Rashi on Joshua 13:2:1).

Radak and Metzudat David comment across this chapter as well. The corpus carries their refs with the reason that Sefaria holds no English version of them, so they stand here cited and unquoted: Metzudat David on Joshua 13:1:1, 13:7:1, 13:14:1, 13:15:1, 13:23:1, 13:32:1 and 13:33:1, and Radak on Joshua 13:18:1, 13:21:1, 13:22:1 and 13:31:1.

What the rabbis say

The corpus carries forty rabbinic locators for this chapter and the text of none, so each is cited and linked here rather than quoted. Thirteen of the forty stand on one verse, the twenty-second, where the text records the death of Balaam son of Beor the diviner. Two are in the Babylonian Talmud at Sanhedrin 106a:17 and 106b:1, with Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 10:2:18 and Avot DeRabbi Natan 36:5 beside them. The midrashic run on the same verse is Bamidbar Rabbah 20:19, Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael, Tractate Vayehi Beshalach 3:2, Midrash Tanchuma, Balak 12:1, Midrash Tanchuma, Mishpatim 8:6, Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Balak 17:3, Sifrei Bamidbar 157:5, and Yalkut Shimoni on Torah at 230:17 and 765:34, with Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sanhedrin 11:100.

Four more sit on the verse before it, where the princes of Midian are named: Bamidbar Rabbah 20:4, Midrash Tanchuma, Balak 4:1, Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Balak 4:4, and Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 765:12. Four sit on the last verse, where the LORD himself is the inheritance of Levi: Bamidbar Rabbah 5:2, Midrash Tanchuma, Bamidbar 22:1, Midrash Tanchuma, Masei 13:1, and Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Bamidbar 27:2.

The rest follow the boundary verses. On the Jordan and its border at the twenty-seventh verse the corpus carries four locators from the Jerusalem Talmud alone, at Ketubot 2:7:3, Peah 4:3:1, Sheviit 6:1:9 and Yoma 8:2:2. On Shichor at the third verse it carries Chullin 60b:9, Ein Yaakov, Khullin 3:20, Yalkut Shimoni on Nach 22:8 and Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 809:1. On the first verse it carries Aggadat Bereshit 32:1 and Bereshit Rabbah 59:6; on the sixth, Jerusalem Talmud Megillah 1:1:4; on the seventh, Jerusalem Talmud Peah 2:1:6; on the twelfth, Bamidbar Rabbah 19:32 and Midrash Tanchuma, Chukat 25:1; on the thirteenth, Midrash Lekach Tov, Deuteronomy 31:16:1; on the fifteenth, Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Vayechi 13; on the seventeenth, Jerusalem Talmud Sheviit 9:2:5; on the twenty-fourth, Bereshit Rabbah 71:9; and on the twenty-fifth, Midrash Sekhel Tov, Bereshit 30:11:1. What each of them teaches is a saying of the rabbis, and is reported as theirs wherever this site quotes one. The quotations wait on a fetch that carries the text.

Sources: Rashi, Rashi on Joshua 13:1:1 to 13:28:1, The Book of Joshua, Metsudah Publications, 1997, CC-BY; Radak, Radak on Joshua 13:18:1, 13:21:1, 13:22:1 and 13:31:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; Metzudat David, Metzudat David on Joshua 13:1:1, 13:7:1, 13:14:1, 13:15:1, 13:23:1, 13:32:1 and 13:33:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; The Sefaria corpus, scripts/data/sources/sefaria/joshua/13.json, the 40 Talmud and Midrash locators of this chapter.

The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.

Old and well stricken: and much land yet unpossessed

Joshua 13:1-7

Joshua 21:45 says none of the LORD's good promises failed, verse 1 says "very much of the land remains to be possessed", and both stand in one book. Adam Clarke reads the remainder against the condition of obedience, noting that the Sidonians of verse 6 were never expelled and were only subdued under David and Solomon. Other readers take Joshua to speak of the land as granted rather than occupied.

Joshua 13:1

“Now Joshua was old and stricken in years--He was probably above a hundred years old; for the conquest and survey of the land occupied about seven years, the partition one; and he died at the age of one hundred ten years (Jos 24:29).”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

2 more voices on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.

Joshua 13:1

“It is said that Joshua was old and stricken in years, and he and Caleb were at this time the only old men among the thousands of Israel, none except them of all those who were numbered at Mount Sinai being now alive.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Joshua 13:1

“Joshua is bidden to allot the whole of the promised land among the twelve tribes in faith that God would perfect in due time that expulsion of the Canaanites which Joshua himself could not carry further (see Jos 11:23).”

The whole record on this verse →

Verses 2 to 6 survey the unconquered land. Albert Barnes divides it between the Philistine south of verses 2 and 3 and the northern districts of verses 4 to 6. John Wesley reads the survey as land Israel could still take if it kept faith.

Joshua 13:2

“The borders of the Philistines, and all Geshuri - The borders of the Philistines may mean the land which they possessed on the sea-coast, southwest of the land of Canaan. There were several places named Geshuri, but that spoken of here was probably the region on the south of Canaan, towards Arabia, or towards Egypt. - Calmet. Cellarius supposes it to have been a country in the vicinity of the Amalekites.”

1 more voice on this verse

Joshua 13:2

“Both included that portion of the country "from Sihor, which is before Egypt," a small brook near El-Arish, which on the east was the southern boundary of Canaan, to Ekron, the most northerly of the five chief lordships or principalities of the Philistines. 3, 4. also the Avites: From [on] the south--The two clauses are thus connected in the Septuagint and many other versions.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

The bracketed words settle Israel's claim to the Philistine coast. John Wesley explains that the Philistines had taken it from its earlier people, citing Deuteronomy 2:23 and Amos 9:7. The first of those verses names the Avvites of this verse as the people the Caphtorites destroyed.

Joshua 13:3

“Counted to the Canaanites - That is, which though now possessed by the Philistines, who drove out the Canaanites the old inhabitants of it, Deut. ii, 23 Amos ix, 7, yet is a part of the land of Canaan, and therefore belongs to the Israelites.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

Albert Barnes reads to the south with the verse before, so that it closes the Philistine district. Mearah means the cave, and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown place it in the cave country of Upper Galilee. They put this Aphek east in Lebanon.

Joshua 13:4

“The land of the Canaanites - This lay on the south of the country of the Philistines, towards the sea-coast. Mearah - Supposed to be the city Maratha, on the Mediterranean Sea. - Calmet. Or the river Majora, which falls into the Mediterranean Sea, between Sidon and Berytus. See Pliny, Hist. Nat. lib. v., c. 20. Aphek - See on Jos 12:18 (note).”

The Gebalites are the people of Gebal on the Phoenician coast. Albert Barnes notes their trades from two later passages, preparing stone for Solomon's temple at 1 Kings 5:18 and repairing ships at Ezekiel 27:9. Lebo-hamath is the northern point Numbers 34:8 set for the land.

Joshua 13:5

“Giblites - The people of Gebal (“Jebail”, 22 miles north of Beyronut). They were “stone-squarers” 1Ki 5:18 and (ship) “caulkers” Eze 27:9.”

God takes the driving out on Himself. John Wesley reads the promise as one that still required Israel to go up against these peoples. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown call its fulfilment conditional, and Judges 1:31 records that Asher failed to drive out the people of Sidon.

Joshua 13:6

“Misrephoth-maim - See on Jos 11:7 (note). These will I drive out - That is, if the Israelites continued to be obedient; but they did not, and therefore they never fully possessed the whole of that land which, on this condition alone, God had promised them: the Sidonians were never expelled by the Israelites, and were only brought into a state of comparative subjection in the days of David and Solomon.”

1 more voice on this verse

Joshua 13:6

“I will do it by my word; so the Chaldee here, as in many other places: by the eternal word, the captain of my host. But the promise of driving them out from before the children of Israel, supposes that the Israelites must use their own endeavours, must go up against them. If Israel, thro' sloth or cowardice let them alone, they are not likely to be driven out.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The whole record on this verse →

Adam Clarke explains the count of nine and a half tribes from the earlier grants to Reuben, Gad and half of Manasseh. Numbers 34:13 gave Moses the same count. Matthew Henry notes that the land came to them as an inheritance and was to pass to their children.

Joshua 13:7

“The nine tribes, and the half tribe of Manasseh - The other half tribe of Manasseh, and the two tribes of Reuben and Gad, had got their inheritance on the other side of Jordan, in the land formerly belonging to Og king of Bashan, and Sihon king of the Amorites.”

The east-bank grant, and Levi's portion of fire

Joshua 13:8-14

The east side is land Moses had already given, so Sihon and Og's defeat and the request of Numbers 32 stand without being reopened. Verse 13 admits that Geshur and Maacath "dwell among the Israelites to this day", and Matthew Henry lays that on Israel's faith, prayers and endeavours rather than on God's promise. Verse 14 gives Levi the offerings made by fire, carrying over Deuteronomy 18:1.

Joshua 13:8

“The writer appends to the command of God Jos 13:1-7 a statement that the other two tribes and a half had already had their inheritance marked out for them by Moses in the land east of Jordan. The boundaries of this territory as a whole are first set forth Jos 13:8-14, and afterward the portions assigned within it to the two tribes and a half are severally described Josh. 13:15-33. Jos 13:14 See Deu 18:1-5 and notes. Jos 13:15-24 Inheritance of the tribe of Reuben.”

1 more voice on this verse

Joshua 13:8

“Moses settled this matter, and, as Moses settled it, so shall it rest; Joshua will not, under any pretence whatsoever, go about to alter it. And a reason is intimated why he would not, because Moses was the servant of the Lord, and acted in this matter by secret direction from him and was faithful as a servant.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse →

The city in the middle of the valley is left unnamed. Albert Barnes, commenting on Joshua 12:2, identifies it with Ar of Moab and cites Deuteronomy 2:36, which uses the same description. The same southern edge of Sihon's kingdom is given again for Reuben at verse 16.

John Gill identifies the Ammonite border with the Jabbok River, following Deuteronomy 3:16. Deuteronomy 2:19 had forbidden Israel any Ammonite land. Adam Clarke reconciles this with verse 25, where Gad receives half the land of the Ammonites, by reading it as land Sihon had already taken from Ammon.

Joshua 13:10

“And all the cities of Sihon king of the Amorites, which reigned in Heshbon,.... A city he took from the Moabites, and made it his royal seat, Num 21:26, unto the border of the children of Ammon; which was the river Jabbok, Deu 3:16.”

Mount Hermon marks the northern end of the eastern grant. John Gill notes its other names from Deuteronomy 3:9, where the Sidonians call it Sirion and the Amorites call it Senir. John Wesley reads the land of the Geshurites and Maacathites as granted before Israel held it, which verse 13 confirms.

John Gill joins Og's line to the Rephaim defeated at Ashteroth-karnaim in Genesis 14:5. He takes the words struck them down and dispossessed them to cover the people of Og's kingdom as well as the giants. He then notes the exception that verse 13 makes.

Joshua 13:12

“All the kingdom of Og in Bashan, who reigned in Ashtaroth and in Edrei,.... See Gill on Jos 12:4, who remained of the remnant of the giants; was descended from those that remained in Ashtaroth, after the rest were cut off by Chedorlaomer, Gen 14:5; called there the Rephaim, as here: for these did Moses smite, and cast them out: that is, not only the giants, but the inhabitants of the above kingdom, the greatest part of them; for the Geshurites and the Maachathites are excepted in Jos 13:13.”

The words to this day place the writer at a time when Geshur and Maacath still stood apart inside Israel's borders. John Gill notes that both later had kings of their own. The king of Maacah is hired against David at 2 Samuel 10:6.

Joshua 13:13

“Nevertheless, the children of Israel expelled not the Geshurites, nor the Maachathites,.... Neither in the times of Moses, nor in the times of Joshua: but the Geshurites and the Maachathites dwell among the Israelites until this day: in full possession of their cities unmolested; yea, in later times they became separate and distinct kingdoms; for we read both of the king of Geshur, and of the king of Maachah, 2Sa 3:3.”

1 more voice on this verse

Joshua 13:13

“They had not leisure to reduce all the remote and obscure corners of the country in Moses's time, and afterwards they had no mind to it, being easy with what they had. Thus those who are not straitened in God's promises are yet straitened in their own faith, and prayers, and endeavours.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

John Wesley takes the offerings made by fire to stand for the whole support of the Levites, tithes and firstfruits included. He reads the repetition as a protection for them against the greed of the other tribes. Matthew Henry adds that their towns lay scattered through every tribe.

Joshua 13:14

“Neither Moses nor Jesus [Joshua], however, gave an inheritance to the Levites, because "the Lord God himself is their inheritance." What else can we understand by this, except that in the church of the Lord there are certain persons who precede all the rest by the strength of their spirit and on account of their merits? The Lord himself is said to be their inheritance. And if it is proper to venture into such things and unveil a profound secret, let us see what the figure of priests or Levites secretly discloses, in case there is something.”

Origen of Alexandria · written before 253 · HOMILIES ON JOSHUA 17.2patristic

2 more voices on this verse

Joshua 13:14

“Made by fire - Which are here put for all the sacrifices and oblations, including first-fruits and tithes, that were assigned to the Levites; and this passage is repeated, to prevent those calumnies and injuries which God foresaw the Levites were likely to meet with, from the malice, envy and covetousness of their brethren.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

Joshua 13:14

“If they had been appointed to a lot entire by themselves, Moses would have served them first, not because it was his own tribe, but because it was God's; but they must be provided for in another manner; their habitations must be scattered in all the tribes, and their maintenance brought out of all the tribes, and God himself was the portion both of their inheritance and of their cup, Deut. x.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Reuben, Gad, and half Manasseh measured out

Joshua 13:15-23

Reuben's towns carry the names of gods Israel had fallen to: Bamoth-baal, Beth-baal-meon and Beth-peor, the Peor of Numbers 25:1-3. Verse 22 is the only verse that calls Balaam a diviner, and it sets his death among the slain of Midian, closing Numbers 31:8. Heshbon had been Moab's before Sihon took it at Numbers 21:26, and Isaiah 16:8 and Jeremiah 48 find Moab holding these towns again.

Joshua 13:15

“And Moses gave unto the tribe of the children of Reuben inheritance according to their families. According to the number of them, and sufficient for them.”

1 more voice on this verse

Joshua 13:15

“According to their families - Dividing the inheritance into as many parts as they had families; but this is only spoken of the greater families; for the lesser distributions to the several small families was done by inferior officers, according to the rules which Moses gave them.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

Reuben's southern line repeats the description of Sihon's kingdom at verse 9, from Aroer on the Arnon. John Gill concludes that Reuben received Sihon's land, though only part of it. The rest goes to Gad at verse 27.

Joshua 13:16

“And their coast was from Aroer that is on the bank of the river Arnon,.... As the country of Sihon is described, Jos 13:9; from whence it appears that it was his country which was given to Reuben, though not all of it: and the city that is in the midst of the river; See Gill on Jos 13:9, and all the plain by Medeba; which reached unto Dibon, Jos 13:9.”

Bamoth-baal is where Balak took Balaam to look down on Israel's camp at Numbers 22:41, as John Gill notes. Gill also observes that the Gadites built up Dibon at Numbers 32:34, though it stands here in Reuben's list. He suggests it lay on the border between them.

Joshua 13:17

“Heshbon, and all her cities that are in the plain,.... Which was by Medeba, and reached to Dibon: Dibon, and Bamothbaal, and Bethbaalmeon; Dibon was rebuilt by Gad, though it belonged to Reuben, and perhaps was inhabited by both, being on the borders of each; and Bamothbaal signifies the high places of Baal; see Num 22:41; perhaps this is the same with Bamoth in the valley, Num 21:20; and Bethbaalmeon is the same with Baalmeon in Num 32:38; where it is highly probable was a temple of Baal, since both "beth" signifies an house, and "meon" an habitation.”

Each town carries its own history. Jahaz is where Sihon fought Israel at Numbers 21:23, and from the Wilderness of Kedemoth Moses sent his offer of peace at Deuteronomy 2:26, as John Gill notes. Adam Clarke adds that these towns later went to the Levites, and Joshua 21:36 to 37 lists all three.

Joshua 13:18

“Jahaza - A city near Medeba and Dibon. It was given to the Levites, 1Ch 6:78. Kedemoth - Mentioned Deu 2:26; supposed to have been situated beyond the river Arnon. Mephaath - Situated on the frontiers of Moab, on the eastern part of the desert. It was given to the Levites, Jos 21:37.”

Adam Clarke follows Kiriathaim through its owners, from the Emites of Shaveh-kiriathaim in Genesis 14:5 to Moab, the Amorites and then Reuben. Moab held it again by the time of Jeremiah 48:1 and Ezekiel 25:9. Sibmah was known for its vines.

All three lie where Israel waited before crossing. John Gill points to Deuteronomy 3:29, where Israel stayed in the valley opposite Beth-peor. The slopes of Pisgah already bound the Arabah on the east at Deuteronomy 3:17.

The five Midianite chiefs are the kings of Midian named in the same order at Numbers 31:8. Joshua calls them princes of Sihon, which John Wesley explains as rulers subject to Sihon who lived in their own land. Adam Clarke points to Numbers 31 for the war.

Joshua 13:21

“The princes of Midian - See the history of this war, Num 31:1, etc.; and from that place this and the following verse seem to be borrowed, for the introduction of the death of Balaam here seems quite irrelevant.”

John Wesley explains why Balaam's death is told again after Numbers 31:8. His failed curse on Israel was meant to be remembered. Deuteronomy 23:5 says the same, that the LORD turned the curse into a blessing.

Joshua 13:22

“Were slain by them - This was recorded before, Num. xxxi, 8, and is here repeated, because the defeating of Balaam's purpose to curse Israel, and the turning that curse into a blessing, was such an instance of the power and goodness of God, as was fit to be had in everlasting remembrance.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

John Gill traces Reuben's line from Aroer on the Arnon to the Jordan on the west. Adam Clarke reads the villages as open settlements where herds were fed and penned, much like Bedouin encampments. That suits herdsmen, as Numbers 32:1 describes Reuben and Gad.

Joshua 13:23

“The cities and the villages - By villages, חצרים chatserim, it is likely that moveable villages or tents are meant, such as are in use among the Bedouin Arabs; places where they were accustomed to feed and pen their cattle.”

Joshua 13:24-31

Gad inherits Jacob's ground, since Mahanaim at verse 26 is where Jacob met the angels of God at Genesis 32:1-2, and Succoth at verse 27 is where he built shelters for his livestock. Adam Clarke identifies Ramath-mizpeh with Ramoth-gilead, a city of refuge at Joshua 20:8 and the field where Ahab dies. Manasseh receives the sixty towns of Jair, named by Jair at Numbers 32:41.

This Aroer lies near Rabbah, the city of the Ammonites named at Deuteronomy 3:11, and differs from the Aroer on the Arnon in verse 16. John Wesley reads all the cities of Gilead as the main towns of Gad's part of Gilead. Half of Gilead goes to Manasseh at verse 31.

Joshua 13:25

“Half the land on the children of Ammon - This probably was land which had been taken from the Ammonites by Sihon, king of the Amorites, and which the Israelites possessed by right of conquest. For although the Israelites were forbidden to take the land of the Ammonites, Deu 2:37, yet this part, as having been united to the territories of Sihon, they might possess when they defeated that king and subdued his kingdom.”

Mahanaim appears in both Gad's line and Manasseh's. John Wesley settles it by reading Gad's border as stopping short of the town, which he places in Manasseh beyond the Jabbok. Joshua 21:38, however, lists Mahanaim among the Levite towns taken from Gad.

Joshua 13:26

“Ramath-mizpeh - Called Ramoth-Gilead, or Ramoth in Gilead. Mahanaim - Exclusively; for Mahanaim was in the portion of Manasseh, beyond Jabbok, which was the border of Gad and Manasseh.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

1 more voice on this verse

Joshua 13:26

“Ramath-mizpeh - The same as Ramoth-gilead. It was one of the cities of refuge, Jos 20:8; Deu 4:47. Mahanaim - Or the two camps. Situated on the northern side of the brook Jabbok, celebrated for the vision of the two camps of angels which Jacob had there; see Gen 32:2.”

The whole record on this verse →

Gad's share runs up the Jordan valley to the lake, which John Wesley calls the northern part of Sihon's kingdom. Adam Clarke records that Herod later rebuilt Beth-haram and named it Livias. Matthew Henry recalls Succoth from Gideon's story at Judges 8:5.

Joshua 13:27

“Beth-aram - This city was rebuilt by Herod, and called Livias, in honor of Livia, the wife of Augustus. Josephus calls it Julias, Julia being the name which the Greeks commonly give to Livia. - Calmet. Succoth - A place between Jabbok and Jordan where Jacob pitched his tents, from which circumstance it obtained its name, see Gen 33:17.”

The closing formula matches verse 23 for Reuben, and John Gill reads the villages as the smaller places attached to each named city. Matthew Henry follows Gad's land into later history. David waited at Mahanaim during Absalom's revolt, recorded at 2 Samuel 17:24.

Joshua 13:28

“This is the inheritance of the children of Gad, after their families,.... As described in Jos 13:27, the cities and their villages; the cities given them, some of which are mentioned by name, and the villages adjacent and belonging to them were included in them.”

Numbers 32:1 has only Reuben and Gad asking for land east of the Jordan. Manasseh enters the grant at Numbers 32:33 with no recorded request. John Gill leaves open whether the half-tribe asked, and Adam Clarke thinks Moses assigned it because the tribe was large and had much cattle.

Joshua 13:29

“And Moses gave inheritance unto the half tribe of Manasseh,.... Whether at their request or of himself, there being land enough for them, and the two tribes of Gad and Reuben, is not certain: and this is the possession of the half tribe of Manasseh, by their families; which is after related and described.”

1 more voice on this verse

Joshua 13:29

“The half tribe of Manasseh - When the tribes of Reuben and Gad requested to have their settlement on the east side of Jordan, it does not appear that any part of the tribe of Manasseh requested to be settled in the same place. But as this tribe was numerous, and had much cattle, Moses thought proper to appoint one half of it to remain on the east of Jordan, and the other to go over and settle on the west side of that river.”

The whole record on this verse →

Jair belonged to two tribes. Adam Clarke traces him through 1 Chronicles 2:21 to 22, where Hezron of Judah marries a daughter of Machir and their grandson is Jair. Deuteronomy 3:4 counts the same sixty cities in the region of Argob, the kingdom of Og.

Joshua 13:30

“Of Jair - Who, though of the tribe of Judah, by the father, 1 Chron. ii, 21, 22, yet is called the son of Manasseh, Num. xxxii, 41, because he married a daughter of Manasseh, and wholly associated himself with those valiant Manassites; and with their help took sixty cities or great towns, Deut. iii, 4, 14, which thence were called the towns of Jair.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The eastern half of Manasseh is named by Machir, whom John Wesley takes as the most eminent son of Manasseh, citing Numbers 26:29. Numbers 32:39 to 40 records that Machir's clans took Gilead and received it from Moses. The rest of Manasseh is provided for at Joshua 17:2.

Joshua 13:32-33

Moses distributed the whole east side on the plains of Moab, across the Jordan from Jericho, though he never crossed the river himself. The chapter ends where verse 14 began: verse 14 gives Levi the offerings made by fire, and verse 33 gives Levi the LORD, the God of Israel, as its inheritance. Numbers 18:20 stands behind both, and Deuteronomy 10:9 says it again to the whole nation.

Joshua 13:32

“These are the countries which Moses did distribute for inheritance in the plains of Moab,.... Which is particularly described, that each might know their proper portion: on the other side Jordan by Jericho eastward; of the land of Canaan; of Jordan by Jericho; see Gill on Num 22:1.”

1 more voice on this verse

Joshua 13:32

“Which Moses did distribute - Moses had settled every thing relative to these tribes before his death, having appointed them to possess the territories of Og king of Bashan, and Sihon king of the Amorites. For particulars on this chapter, the reader, if he judge it of consequence, may consult Calmet.”

The account of the eastern tribes opened with Levi at verse 14 and closes with Levi here. John Gill observes that Levi was Moses's own tribe. Moses gave it no land, which Gill reads as proof that he kept to his instructions without favouring his own family.

Joshua 13:33

“But unto the tribe of Levi Moses gave not any inheritance,.... Neither on the other side Jordan, nor did he order them any in Canaan; but expressly declared they were to have no part in the division of it, though they were his own tribe; which shows him to be a disinterested man, that he faithfully observed the orders and instructions the Lord gave him: the Lord God of Israel was their inheritance, as he said unto them; what was given to the Lord out of the sacrifices, and the tithes, and firstfruits, that were theirs; see Num 18:20.”

How this psalm is built

The form: A boundary list, opened by a speech of the LORD and closed on the portion of Levi, as Joshua classes it.

The patterns in this chapter

The devices this chapter is built on, what each one does, and one verse where it stands.
DeviceWhat it doesWhere to see it
The land that remains, named piece by pieceVerses 2 to 6 list what is still to be taken as a series of territories rather than as one word. The list runs through the Philistine ground under its five rulers, the Geshurites and the Avvites, and the Canaanite land from Mearah to Aphek. It ends with the Gebalites, Lebanon to Lebo-hamath, and the hill country to Misrephoth-maim. The published exposition note on verses 1 to 7 records that verse 3 is the first place in Scripture that gives the Philistine chiefs the title of lords. The same note records the five running on through Judges 16 and 1 Samuel 5.Adam Clarke, with Keil and Delitzsch, the published exposition note on Joshua 13:1-7, which names Commentary on the Bible and Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth.Joshua 13:2, Joshua 13:3, Joshua 13:6
The portion of Levi opening and closing the allotmentVerse 14 and verse 33 say the same thing in different words and stand on either side of the three tribal lists. Verse 14 gives Levi the offerings made by fire as their inheritance and verse 33 gives Levi the LORD, the God of Israel, as their inheritance. The published exposition note on verses 32 and 33 records that the chapter ends where verse 14 began, with Numbers 18:20 standing behind both and Deuteronomy 10:9 saying it again to the whole nation.John Gill, with Matthew Henry, the published exposition note on Joshua 13:32-33, which names Exposition of the Old Testament and Commentary on the Whole Bible.Joshua 13:14, Joshua 13:33
The formula that opens each tribe's portionThe same sentence opens the record of each eastern tribe, that this is what Moses had given to the clans of that tribe. It stands three times in the Berean text of the store's dump for this chapter, at verses 15, 24 and 29. Each section then closes on the same kind of line, the inheritance of the clans with its cities and villages at verses 23 and 28. The repeated wording is what makes the three grants read as one legal record rather than as three accounts.Counted in the Berean text from the store, the store's dump of Joshua 13, verses 15, 24 and 29.Joshua 13:15, Joshua 13:24, Joshua 13:29

The question the chapter puts: was the land taken, or was much of it left

16 more paragraphs on the patterns

This is the chapter where the book's two kinds of statement meet. The dossier answers the question from the text itself rather than by naming positions (src/components/book/dossier-content/joshua.ts, the difficulties section, "Was the land taken, or was much of it left?").

The campaign summaries are absolute. Joshua took the whole land and the land had rest from war (11:23). Four chapters later the LORD tells him that very much of the land remains to be possessed (13:1). The allotment lists then record failures, among them that the Jebusites live among the descendants of Judah to this day (15:63). Judges then opens with the same peoples still in place. The dossier reads the two together as describing two different things: the decisive defeat of organized Canaanite coalitions, which Joshua's generation accomplished, and the tribe-by-tribe occupation of the territory, which it did not finish. Joshua's own farewell assumes the unfinished work and warns what the remaining nations will become (23:13).

The published exposition note on verses 1 to 7 sets the same pair side by side, Joshua 21:45 and verse 1 standing in the one book, and records two readings of the remainder. Adam Clarke reads the remainder against the condition of obedience. He notes that the Sidonians of verse 6 were only brought into subjection under David and Solomon (Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on Joshua 13:6). Albert Barnes reads the command as allotment made in faith. On his reading Joshua allots the whole promised land among the twelve tribes, in the faith that God would in due time perfect the expulsion Joshua could not carry further. He points back to Joshua 11:23 (Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments, 1832 to 1869, on Joshua 13:1). John Wesley reads the promise of verse 6 as requiring Israel's own endeavours. He holds that if Israel through sloth or cowardice lets the nations alone, they are not to look for the promise (Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament, 1765, on Joshua 13:6).

The same verse in the debate over the ban

Verse 1 is also one of the two verses the herem debate turns on. The dossier's ancient Near East section records the work of K. Lawson Younger Jr. (Ancient Conquest Accounts, 1990). He set Joshua beside Egyptian and Assyrian campaign annals of about 1500 to 700 BC. Their total-victory formulas report a king annihilating a people, and are followed in later years by fresh campaigns against the same people. The dossier states that this bears directly on how Joshua 10:40 sits in the same book as Joshua 13:1. The other position, which is this site's own reading, holds the ban to be judgment on a ripened wickedness delayed four centuries. It rests on the text's own stated reasons at Genesis 15:16, Leviticus 18:24-28 and Deuteronomy 9:5, and on the exemptions of Rahab and Gibeon. This page states no verdict.

The historical value: names that reappear

The Philistine chiefs of verse 3 are given their title here for the first time in Scripture. The published exposition note on verses 1 to 7 records that the same five cities run on through Judges 16 and 1 Samuel 5. Gaza, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Gath and Ekron are all named in the verse.

Verse 13 records the exception the chapter admits, that Israel did not drive out the Geshurites or the Maacathites and that they dwell among Israel to this day. The published exposition note on verses 8 to 14 records where that leads. Geshur later has a king whose daughter Maacah bears Absalom at 2 Samuel 3:3, and who shelters him for three years at 2 Samuel 13:37.

Reuben's town list carries the same kind of afterlife. The published exposition note on verses 15 to 23 records that Heshbon at the head of the list had been Moab's, before Sihon took it at Numbers 21:26. The same note records Isaiah 16:8 and Jeremiah 48 finding Moab in these towns again, long after Reuben is gone. Gad's list runs over Jacob's ground. The note on verses 24 to 31 records Mahanaim at verse 26 as the place Jacob met the angels of God at Genesis 32:1-2. It records Succoth at verse 27 as the place he built booths for his cattle at Genesis 33:17.

The names of the gods in the town list

The published exposition note on verses 15 to 23 records that Reuben's towns carry the names of the gods Israel had fallen to a generation before. It names Bamoth-baal and Beth-baal-meon at verse 17, and Beth-peor at verse 20. The same note records Numbers 25:1-3 for what Israel did at Baal-peor, and Deuteronomy 34:6 burying Moses in a valley over against Beth-peor. The same note records that verse 22 is the only place in Scripture that calls Balaam a soothsayer and that it sets his death among the slain of Midian, closing Numbers 31:8. John Wesley teaches verse 22 as a memorial. He holds that the defeating of Balaam's purpose to curse Israel was an instance of the power and goodness of God. The turning of that curse into a blessing was fit to be had in everlasting remembrance (Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament, 1765, on Joshua 13:22).

The portion of Levi

The chapter states Levi's portion twice, at verse 14 and verse 33, and the two statements differ. The first gives the offerings made by fire, and the published exposition note on verses 8 to 14 records that this is the wording of Numbers 18:20 and Deuteronomy 18:1 carried over. The second gives the LORD, the God of Israel, himself. The dossier's word study covers nachalah, the word governing chapters 13 to 21. It states the same point in its own terms, that Levi receives no territorial nachalah, because the priesthood's portion is the LORD's service (src/components/book/dossier-content/joshua.ts, the word section).

John Wesley teaches verse 14 as a guard rather than a deprivation, holding that the passage is repeated to prevent the injuries God foresaw the Levites were likely to meet from their brethren. Matthew Henry teaches the same verse by the shape of the provision. The Levites' habitations were scattered in all the tribes and their maintenance drawn out of all the tribes, and God himself was their portion (Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, on Joshua 13:14).

The divine connection: rest that is given and still owed

The dossier's theology entry on rest records that Moses promised rest before the crossing (1:13). It records the northern campaign ending with the note that the land had rest from war (11:23), and the division of the inheritance ending with the LORD giving rest on every side (21:44). It states that rest here means an end to war and a settled place, and that Hebrews later reads even this fulfillment as partial, holding out a rest still ahead (src/components/book/dossier-content/joshua.ts, the theology section). Joshua 13:1 is the sentence inside the book that keeps that reading honest, since the same book that reports rest reports unpossessed land.

Keep studying

Sources for this chapter

The summary

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.

The form and classifications

Matthew Henry, with John Gill, the published exposition note on Joshua 13:8-14, which names Commentary on the Whole Bible and Exposition of the Old Testament; The dossier's theology section, src/components/book/dossier-content/joshua.ts, the entry "The Inheritance Given by Lot", anchored on Joshua 14:12 and 19:51; This site's published classification of Joshua, docs/lanes/joshua-study-9-16/DESIGN-BLOCK.md, the genre line under "This book's own needs", which names the forms a Joshua study row may use and records that nine chapters of the book are boundary and city lists and This site's published guide to Joshua, src/components/book/guides/joshua/JoshuaGuide.tsx, movement III "Dividing the Land" at chapters 13 to 21, whose line reads that every tribe receives a specific, named, legally binding portion.

The exposition

Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.