Deuteronomychapter 14
29 verses · Moses, by tradition · 15th to 13th century BC · The Law
Ye are the children of the Lord your God: ye shall not cut yourselves, nor make any baldness between your eyes for the dead.
Introduction
Moses, by tradition, The Law, Deuteronomy Overview.
Moses gave these rules on the plains of Moab to households that would keep flocks, hunt game and bring in harvests in their own land. Mourning, meat and the yearly tenth were the stuff of daily life, and the chapter takes them in turn as parts of one subject. Before it gives a single rule it tells the people who they are, and every rule rests on that. The lists of animals run close to those of Leviticus 11, and a careful reader will compare the two. Listen for the reason given before the rules, and for the guests invited to eat at the end.
Context
- Who
- Households that would keep flocks, hunt game and bring a tenth of a harvest
- What
- Rules for mourning the dead, for the animals Israel may eat and for the yearly tenth of the harvest, eaten at the chosen place and in the third year shared at home.
- Where
- The plains of Moab, with the rules set for the table and the funeral of households in the land ahead.
- When
- The fortieth year after the Exodus, about 1406 BC on the early date this site keeps.
- Why
- To mark Israel as a holy people and the LORD's sons in the most ordinary acts of life, and to teach the people to fear Him and feed the poor.
Historical context
The speech is Moses in the first person, and the chapter addresses the whole nation as sons of the LORD before it gives a single rule.
Show the rest of the historical context, 6 more paragraphs
The setting is the plain east of the Jordan in the fortieth year, at about 1406 BC on the frame this site keeps.
The occasion is ordinary life in the land, which is why the chapter runs from mourning to meat to the tithe without changing subject.
A first hearer knew that cutting the body and shaving the head for the dead were normal mourning in the region. The prophets of Baal cut themselves at 1 Kings 18:28, and Jeremiah 16:6 and 41:5 show Israelites doing it anyway.
He knew the animals by name. The ten clean beasts of verses 4 and 5 include seven kinds of wild game, which fits a people allowed since 12:15 to hunt and eat at home.
He knew that a tenth was an ordinary due, and Numbers 18:21 had given the tithe to the Levites. What surprised him here is that the tenth of verses 22 to 27 is eaten by the man who brings it.
He knew what distance cost. The permission at verse 25 to sell the produce and carry the money assumes a road too long to walk with a harvest on your back.
Significance
Every rule in the chapter came with a reason about who the people were. Israel did not cut itself for the dead because Israel was a family of sons.
Show the rest of the significance, 2 more paragraphs
The tithe arrived as a feast rather than as a payment, and the text says the feast itself is how a man learns to fear God.
Every third year the tenth stayed in the town, and the four who came and ate were the Levite, the foreigner, the fatherless and the widow.
This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.
What is done
This chapter is the ground of the food laws a Jewish household keeps every day. Rashi on Deuteronomy 14:3:1 reads the word for abomination as covering whatever God has declared forbidden, and gives boiling meat in milk as one of his two examples. He points to Exodus 23:19, Exodus 34:26 and the end of this chapter, and cites Chullin 114b. The separation of meat and milk in a Jewish kitchen rests on that line of verses. On the animals themselves, Rashi on Deuteronomy 14:4:1 draws a rule of reading from the list. Scripture names the clean animals here because the unclean are more numerous, and a text naming one of two classes names the smaller, from Sifrei Devarim 100:3 and Chullin 63a. Rashi on Deuteronomy 14:13:1 finds the opposite balance among birds, where the unclean are named because the clean outnumber them. He also explains why one bird is forbidden under three of its names, so that nobody may argue a species clean by calling it something else, citing Chullin 63b. The chapter also forbids two mourning customs. Rashi on Deuteronomy 14:1:1 reads the ban on cutting the flesh and tearing the hair for the dead as a ban on an Amorite practice. The reason he gives is that a child of God should be comely, from Sifrei Devarim 96:11.
How it is read
The commentary reads the second half of this chapter as the law of the tithes. Rashi on Deuteronomy 14:23:1 identifies the tithe eaten at the chosen place as the second tithe. He distinguishes it from the first tithe, which Numbers 18:26 gives to the Levites and Numbers 18:31 allows them to eat anywhere. Rashi on Deuteronomy 14:27:1 then reads the charge about the Levite as the giving of that first tithe. Rashi on Deuteronomy 14:24:1 reads the permission to convert the tithe into money as a provision for a harvest too large to carry to Jerusalem. On the placing of the tithe law right after the food laws, Rashi on Deuteronomy 14:22:1 carries the tradition's own answer. God tells Israel that withholding the tithe will bring the east wind on the grain before it ripens, and Rashi reads 2 Kings 19:26 with it, citing Midrash Tanchuma, Re'eh 17. Rashi on Deuteronomy 14:21:1 reads the stranger who may be given carrion as the resident sojourner. That is a man who has given up idol worship while the rest of the law still sits outside his keeping, from Sifrei Devarim 104:2. The Rashi entries are from corpus entries marked kept, the Rosenbaum and Silbermann edition, public domain. Ibn Ezra on Deuteronomy 14:9:1 and 14:25:1 is a linked entry, cited by ref alone.
What the rabbis say
The rabbis asked why the clean and unclean creatures are listed again here when Leviticus 11 has already named them. Rashi on Deuteronomy 14:7:1 gives their answer, that two creatures absent from the Leviticus list appear here, one among the quadrupeds and one among the birds, citing Chullin 63b. They teach that the ban on touching a carcass binds at the festival seasons, when every man came up to the sanctuary and had to be clean. Rashi on Deuteronomy 14:8:1 gives the argument from the lighter case to the heavier that they used to fix it, citing Sifra, Shemini, Chapter 4 8-9. They teach that the general permission to eat clean birds covers the bird set free at the cleansing of a leper, which Rashi gives on Deuteronomy 14:11:1 from Sifrei Devarim 103:1 and Kiddushin 57a. The corpus also holds the Midrash and the Talmud on this chapter as locators without their text. Among them are Avot DeRabbi Natan 15:3 at verse 1, Avodah Zarah 66a:10 at verse 3 and Chullin 59b:1-2 at verse 5. Others are Bekhorot 6b:19 at verses 7 and 8, Makkot 16b:8 at verse 10, Bava Metzia 53b:1 at verse 24 and Bamidbar Rabbah 8:9 at verse 29.
Sources: Rashi, Rashi on Deuteronomy 14:1:1, 14:2:1, 14:3:1, 14:4:1, 14:7:1, 14:8:1, 14:11:1, 14:13:1, 14:20:1, 14:21:1, 14:22:1, 14:23:1, 14:24:1 and 14:27:1, Pentateuch with Rashi's commentary by M. Rosenbaum and A. M. Silbermann, public domain, 1929 to 1934; Ibn Ezra, Ibn Ezra on Deuteronomy 14:9:1 and 14:25:1, cited by ref alone, CC-BY-NC; Midrash and Talmud, Avot DeRabbi Natan 15:3, Avodah Zarah 66a:10, Chullin 59b:1-2, Bekhorot 6b:19, Makkot 16b:8, Bava Metzia 53b:1 and Bamidbar Rabbah 8:9, cited by ref alone; The Sefaria corpus on disk, scripts/data/sources/sefaria/deuteronomy/14.json, fetched 2026-09-19, 2026.
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
Do not cut yourselves; you are his children
Deuteronomy 14:1-3
The ban on cutting the flesh and shaving the forehead for the dead is grounded in sonship. Leviticus 21:5 laid that rule on the priests and Leviticus 19:28 on the people, and here the whole nation is addressed as sons before it is told to keep it. The “prized possession” of verse 2 answers Exodus 19:5, and Titus 2:14 and 1 Peter 2:9 take the phrase up for the church.
Deuteronomy 14:1
“Make any baldness between your eyes - i. e. by shaving the forepart of the head and the eyebrows. The practices named in this verse were common among the pagan, and seem to be forbidden, not only because such wild excesses of grief (compare 1Ki 18:28) would be inconsistent in those who as children of a heavenly Father had prospects beyond this world, but also because these usages themselves arose out of idolatrous notions.”
Verse 2 repeats 7:6 almost word for word and makes it the ground of the food laws: a people holy to the LORD eat as His chosen possession. Matthew Henry says God chose Israel so that it might become holy by His grace. Ephesians 1:4 says the same of believers.
Deuteronomy 14:2
“Not for their own merit, nor for any good works foreseen, but because he would magnify the riches of his power and grace among them. He did not choose them because they were by their own dedication and subjection a peculiar people to him above other nations, but he chose them that they might be so by his grace; and thus were believers chosen, Eph. i.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
What may be eaten on land, in sea, on wing
Detestable is the word over the whole list that follows, the animals, water creatures and birds Israel must not eat, and verse 21 closes it with the carcass and the young goat. Albert Barnes sets the list beside Leviticus 11. Daniel 1:8 shows the rule kept in exile.
Deuteronomy 14:3
“Among the Jews, frugality was made a matter of precept by a very wise dispensation of the law. The Educator forbade them the use of innumerable things. He explained the reasons, the spiritual ones hidden, the material ones obvious, but all of which they trusted. Some animals [were forbidden] because they were [not] cloven-footed; others, because they did not ruminate their food; a third class, because they, alone among all the fish of the seas, had no scales; until finally there were only a few things left fit for food.”
Clement of Alexandria · written before 215 · The Instructor Book 2patristic
Deuteronomy 14:4-8
Leviticus 11:2-8 gave the two tests and named only four animals that fail them. Deuteronomy names ten clean beasts outright, seven of them wild game, which fits the permission at 12:15 to eat the gazelle and deer at home. Readers have differed over the claim that the camel and the rabbit chew the cud, some holding that it reports what a herdsman watching the animal sees.
Deuteronomy 14:4
“These are the beasts which they shall eat,.... That is, which they might lawfully eat of, which were allowed for their food; for they were not obliged to eat of them if they did not choose it: the ox, the sheep, and the goat; which were creatures used in sacrifice, and the only ones, yet nevertheless they might be used for food if chosen.”
The seven wild animals of this verse carry Hebrew names that English versions render in different ways. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown hold that the King James fallow deer is an antelope, the fallow deer being unknown in Western Asia. Albert Barnes takes the pygarg for a gazelle.
Deuteronomy 14:5
“The hart - איל aiyal, the deer, according to Dr. Shaw: see the note on Deu 12:15. The roebuck - צבי tsebi, generally supposed to be the antelope, belonging to the fifth order Pecora, genus Mammalia, and species 38. It has round twisted spiral horns, hairy tufts on the knees, browses on tender shoots, lives in hilly countries, is fond of climbing rocks, and is remarkable for its beautiful black eyes. The flesh is good and well flavoured.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Deuteronomy 14:5
“The hart--(see on De 12:15). fallow deer--The Hebrew word (Jachmur) so rendered, does not represent the fallow deer, which is unknown in Western Asia, but an antelope (Oryx leucoryx), called by the Arabs, jazmar. It is of a white color, black at the extremities, and a bright red on the thighs.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
An animal must carry both marks, the divided hoof and the chewed cud. The ox, the sheep and the goat of verse 4 pass both, and John Gill notes that they were also the only beasts used in sacrifice. Verses 7 and 8 then give the hard cases.
Leviticus 11:4-6 names the same three animals and gives each one its own verse and the same reason. Each chews the cud and lacks the divided hoof. Clement of Alexandria counted such animals as the first class the law forbade, those without the cloven foot.
The pig reverses the case of verse 7, with the divided hoof and without the cud. The phrase unclean for you lays the rule on Israel, and Matthew Henry reads it as a mark of Israel's separate calling that the gospel has since repealed. Mark 7:19 declares all foods clean.
Deuteronomy 14:9-20
Water creatures get a test and no list, “fins and scales”, so the rule reaches species nobody has named. The birds are handled the other way, by naming what is forbidden, and this list runs to twenty-one where Leviticus 11:13-19 gives twenty. Leviticus 11:21-22 allowed four kinds of leaping insect, and the Targum of Jonathan and Aben Ezra supply that exception to verse 19.
Deuteronomy 14:9
“These ye shall eat of, all that are in the waters,.... The fishes there, even such as have fins and scales, but they that have not were not to be eaten: See Gill on Lev 11:9, Lev 11:10, Lev 11:11, Lev 11:12.”
Leviticus 11:10-12 gives this rule three verses and calls such creatures detestable and an abomination. Deuteronomy says it in one clause with the word unclean. Clement of Alexandria named fish without scales as a class of their own among the foods the law forbade.
Any clean bird may be eaten. Verses 12 to 18 name the unclean birds, and the law gives no mark of a clean one. John Gill reports the marks the Targum supplies: a craw, a naked crop and a spare talon.
Deuteronomy 14:11
“Of all clean birds ye shall eat. Which the Targum of Jonathan describes, everyone that has a craw, and whose crop is naked, and has a superfluous talon, and is not rapacious; but such as are unclean are expressed by name in the following verses, so that all except them might be reckoned clean and fit for food. Maimonides (p) observes, that only the number of the unclean are reckoned, so that all the rest are free. (p) Hilchot. Maacolot Asurot, c. 1. sect. 14.”
Leviticus 11:13 opens with the same three birds, the eagle, the bearded vulture and the black vulture. The Targum, in John Gill's report, counts a bird that preys on others as unclean. These three head the unclean birds Israel may not eat.
Adam Clarke separates two Hebrew names here, daah at Leviticus 11:14 and daiyah in this verse, and takes them for different birds. He holds that daah means a kite or glede, and that the King James was wrong to render it vulture. The Berean reads kite in both places.
Deuteronomy 14:13
“The vulture after his kind - The word דאה daah is improperly translated vulture Lev 11:14, and means a kite or glede. The word דיה daiyah in this verse is not only different from that in Leviticus, but means also a different animal, properly enough translated vulture. See the note on Lev 11:14.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The words any kind of widen one name to a whole family of birds, and they return with the hawk and the heron. John Gill reports the remark of Maimonides that only the unclean birds are numbered, so these family names carry the count further than the list looks. Ravens fed Elijah at 1 Kings 17:6.
Leviticus 11:16 names the ostrich, the screech owl, the gull and the hawk in the same order. Albert Barnes explains the small differences between the two lists of unclean birds by the time and circumstances of the speaker. Lamentations 4:3 calls a cruel people like an ostrich in the wilderness.
Three owls stand in this verse, the little, the great and the white, of the five owls on the list. Isaiah 34:11 and Zephaniah 2:14 set the desert owl and the screech owl in ruined places. Clement of Alexandria held that such laws hid their spiritual reasons.
The cormorant stands between the little owl and the great owl at Leviticus 11:17, and here it closes the verse after the osprey. Clement of Alexandria read lists like this as frugality made a matter of law, leaving few things fit to eat. Only the order has moved.
Leviticus 11:19 closes with the same four, the bat last. Jeremiah 8:7 praises the stork for knowing her appointed seasons, and sets it against a people who do not know what the LORD requires. The Targum of Jonathan, as John Gill reports it, describes the insects of verse 19 as creatures that fly as birds.
Leviticus 11:20 gives the rule for flying insects that walk on all fours, and here it follows the birds. The Targum, in John Gill's report, names flies and wasps. It counts them unclean, and they may not be eaten.
Deuteronomy 14:19
“And every creeping thing that flieth is unclean,.... Which the Targum of Jonathan thus paraphrases;"all flies and wasps (or hornets), and worms of lentiles and of beans, which are separated from food, and fly as birds, they are unclean;''See Gill on Lev 11:20; see Gill on Lev 11:21.”
The permission to eat any clean bird returns here after the list of unclean birds and flying insects, closing what verse 11 opened. John Gill reports that the Targum counts the clean locust of Leviticus 11:22 among the clean flying things. John the Baptist ate locusts at Mark 1:6.
Deuteronomy 14:20
“But of all clean fowls ye may eat. Even of all fowls, but those before excepted; Aben Ezra instances in the locust, as being a clean fowl, that might be eaten; and so the Targum of Jonathan is"every clean locust ye may eat;''see Lev 11:22.”
One verse carries three rules and ties them to the reason that Israel is a holy people. A carcass may go to a foreigner, while Leviticus 17:15 puts uncleanness on native and foreigner alike, and both accounts stand. The ban on cooking “a young goat in its mother’s milk” comes a third time, after Exodus 23:19 and 34:26, and Clarke passes on Calmet's reading that it concerns the offering.
Deuteronomy 14:21
“Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother’s milk - Mr. Calmet thinks that this precept refers to the paschal lamb only, which was not to be offered to God till it was weaned from its mother; but see the note on Exo 23:19.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Deuteronomy 14:21
“They might feed upon that which an Israelite might not touch, which is a plain instance of their peculiarity, and their being a holy people. [2.] It is plain in the gospel that they are now antiquated and repealed.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Eat your tithe before him; the third-year store
Deuteronomy 14:22-27
Numbers 18:21 gave the tithe to the Levites, and the tithe here is eaten by the man who brings it at the chosen place. The older Jewish reckoning, which Josephus and Clarke follow, counts a second tithe, while others read one tithe seen from another angle. The meal's stated reason is “so that you may learn to fear the LORD your God always”, which makes the feast itself the lesson.
Grain, new wine and oil are the three crops named with the tithe at 12:17, which forbids eating it within your gates. Adam Clarke places this meal at the sanctuary in the first and second years of every three. Verse 28 gives the third year its own rule.
Deuteronomy 14:23
“And thou shalt eat before the Lord thy God, in the place which he shall choose to place his name there,....”
The same allowance for distance stands at 12:21, where a man too far from the place may slaughter at home. Here the distance turns the tenth into money, and the man still goes to the place the LORD will choose. John Gill calls money the lighter and easier carriage.
The money is carried in the hand to the place the LORD will choose. John Gill reports a reading that it was tied up to keep it apart from other money, and he takes it as a purse for the road. Leviticus 27:31 adds a fifth when a man redeems his tenth.
Deuteronomy 14:25
“Thou shalt then turn it into money,.... The tithe, which would be lighter and easier carriage: and bind up the money in thine hand; put it into a bag or purse, and tie it up and carry it in the hand; which some think was ordered, that it might not be mixed with other money; but it seems only to have respect to journeying, and making it fit for that.”
Strong drink is allowed at this feast and forbidden to the priests on duty at Leviticus 10:9, and Adam Clarke sends the reader there for its meaning. Clarke reads the verse as provision for the comfort and happiness of the people. The household rejoices together.
Deuteronomy 14:26
“Or for strong drink - What the sikera or strong drink of the Hebrews was, see in the note on Lev 10:9 (note). This one verse sufficiently shows that the Mosaic law made ample provision for the comfort and happiness of the people.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
John Gill, following Jarchi, reads this as a second duty to the Levite: he had his first tithe already, and he was to be taken to the feast as well. Deuteronomy 12:19 gives the same charge. Nehemiah 13:10-11 finds the Levites gone back to their fields when their portions were withheld.
Deuteronomy 14:27
“And the Levite that is within thy gates, thou shalt not forsake him,.... As not from giving him the first tithe, as Jarchi remarks, so he was not to forget him in this; he was not to leave him behind, but take him with him to partake of this entertainment: for he hath no part nor inheritance with thee in the land: see Deu 12:12.”
Deuteronomy 14:28-29
Every third year the tithe is laid up “within your gates”, and 26:12 calls that year the year of the tithe. The Levite, the foreigner, the fatherless and the widow come and eat, as they do together at 16:11, 16:14 and 26:12-13. So the man who serves the sanctuary eats from the provision that feeds the widow, and James 1:27 keeps the widow at the centre of religion.
Deuteronomy 14:28
“Compare the marginal references. The tithe thus directed in the third year to be dispensed in charity at home, was not paid in addition to that in other years bestowed on the sacred meals, but was substituted for it. The three years would count from the sabbatical year (see the next chapter), in which year there would of course be neither payment of tithe nor celebration of the feasts at the sanctuary. In the third year and sixth year of the septennial cycle the feasts would be superseded by the private hospitality enjoined in these verses.”
1 more voice on this verse
Deuteronomy 14:28
“At the end of three years - That is, in the third year, as it is, expressed, chap. xxvi, 12. The same year - This is added to shew that he speaks of the third year, and not of the fourth year, as some might conjecture from the phrase, at the end of three years.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
eat and be satisfied: Albert Barnes counts the three years from the sabbatical year, which puts this tithe for the poor in the third and sixth years of every seven. The promise that the LORD will bless the work of your hands returns at 24:19 over the sheaf left for the foreigner and the widow. The giver is the one blessed.
Deuteronomy 14:29
“And the Levite (because he hath no part nor inheritance - And hence much of his support depended on the mere freewill-offerings of the people. God chose to make his ministers thus dependent on the people, that they might be induced (among other motives) to labor for their spiritual profiting, that the people, thus blessed under their ministry, might feel it their duty and privilege to support and render them comfortable.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
How this psalm is built
The form: Law, the household rules of a people described as sons and as holy, as 14 classes it.
The patterns in this chapter
| Device | What it does | Where to see it |
|---|---|---|
| Holy to the LORD, at the head and at the turn | Verse 2 says Israel is a people holy to the LORD, chosen as His prized possession. Verse 21 closes the food rules with the same sentence. The reason stands on both sides of the list.This site's published exposition of Deuteronomy 14, the note on verses 1 to 3, and the note on verse 21. | Deuteronomy 14:2, Deuteronomy 14:21 |
| The clean beasts named one by one | Leviticus 11:2-8 gave two tests and named only the animals that fail them. This chapter names ten clean beasts outright, and seven of the ten are wild game, which fits the permission at 12:15 to kill and eat the deer and the gazelle at home.This site's published exposition of Deuteronomy 14, the note on verses 4 to 8, which cites Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, and Keil and Delitzsch. | Deuteronomy 14:4, Deuteronomy 14:5 |
| A test for the water and a list for the air | Water creatures get a test and no list, fins and scales, so the rule reaches species nobody has named. The birds are handled the other way, by naming what is forbidden and leaving all the rest clean.This site's published exposition of Deuteronomy 14, the note on verses 9 to 20, which cites John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament, and Albert Barnes, Notes on the Old Testament. | Deuteronomy 14:9, Deuteronomy 14:10, Deuteronomy 14:11, Deuteronomy 14:12 |
| The four who come and eat | Verse 29 names the Levite, the foreigner, the fatherless and the widow. The published note records that those same four stand together again at 16:11, 16:14 and 26:12-13. The Levite is listed with the poor because he has no portion of his own.This site's published exposition of Deuteronomy 14, the note on verses 28 and 29, which cites Albert Barnes and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710. | Deuteronomy 14:29, Deuteronomy 16:11, Deuteronomy 16:14 |
The New Testament's use
11 more paragraphs on the patterns
The phrase behind a people for His prized possession is the phrase of Exodus 19:5. Titus 2:14 and 1 Peter 2:9 take it up for the church, which the published note on verses 1 to 3 records.
The four named at verse 29 are the same four the book keeps naming, and James 1:27 puts the fatherless and the widow at the centre of religion God accepts.
Where the lists differ from Leviticus
The bird list here runs to twenty-one where Leviticus 11:13-19 gives twenty, the kite being the addition. Leviticus 11:21-22 allowed four kinds of leaping insect, the locust among them, and verse 19 forbids every flying insect without repeating that exception. The published note records that the Targum of Jonathan and Aben Ezra supply the exception from the earlier text.
Verse 21 lets what died of itself be given to the foreigner in the gates or sold to a foreigner. Leviticus 17:15 puts washing and uncleanness on the native and the foreigner alike. Both accounts stand in the canon and the published note leaves the difference visible.
The animals that chew the cud
The camel, the rabbit and the rock badger are all described as chewing the cud. Readers have differed over the words. Some hold that they report what a herdsman watching the animal sees rather than describing its stomach. The published note on verses 4 to 8 carries that reading and states no verdict on the zoology.
The kid in its mother's milk
The rule is given here for the third time, after Exodus 23:19 and Exodus 34:26, and none of the three gives a reason. Adam Clarke passes on Calmet's reading that the rule concerns the offering rather than ordinary cooking. The published note records that the later separation of meat from milk in Jewish practice rests on the repetition.
One tithe or two
Readers have taken the tithe of verses 22 to 27 two ways. The older Jewish reckoning, which Josephus and Adam Clarke follow, counts a second tithe distinct from the tenth given to the Levites. Others read one tithe described from another angle in another book. The published note on verses 22 to 27 names both and settles neither.
Keep studying
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The form and classifications
The Jewish annual reading cycle, src/lib/hebraic/readings.ts, portion 47; This site's published exposition of Deuteronomy 14, the note on verses 1 to 3, which reads the ban on cutting and shaving as grounded in sonship and This site's published structure of Deuteronomy, src/components/book/guides/deuteronomy/DeuteronomyGuide.tsx, which places the chapter inside the second address at 4:44 to 26:19.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes; Clement of Alexandria, The Instructor Book 2; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.
