Skip to content
mannafest.faith

1 Timothy 6:16

in 1 Timothy 6

He alone is immortal and dwells in unapproachable light. No one has ever seen Him, nor can anyone see Him. To Him be honor and eternal dominion! Amen.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

who only hath immortality, dwelling in light unapproachable; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honor and power eternal. Amen.

KJV

Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen.

This verse in 1 Timothy 6

Commentary

37 notes on this verse
How could the Son not have immortality who has life in himself? He has it in his nature. He has it in his essential Being. God has it not as a temporal grace but owing to his eternal Godhead. He has it not by way of a gift as a servant but by peculiar right of his generation, as the coeternal Son. He has life in the same way that the Father has life.

This site's exposition

before Pontius Pilate

on 1 Timothy 6:13-16

The charge is given before God and Christ Jesus, who made the good confession before Pontius Pilate at the trial of John 18 and 19. It holds until the appearance of our Lord Jesus Christ, the timing kept in the Father's hand as at Acts 1:7.

This site's exposition

He alone is immortal

Gill notes that angels and human souls are immortal only as God gives it, while He alone has life in Himself. Ambrose answers those who used this verse against Christ's deity. The Son has life in Himself by nature, as John 5:26 says.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers5 voices

A commentator

Oecumenius

COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY · Written before 550.

proposed

which in its own times he will show, the blessed and only Sovereign, the King of kings and Lord of lords, who alone has immortality, dwelling in unapproachable light, whom no man has seen nor can see; to whom be honor and eternal power. Amen. …

A commentator

Ambrose of Milan

The Six Days of Creation 1.9.33 · Written before 397.

proposed

For it would be in vain, if it were not seen. Indeed, God Himself was in the light, because He dwells in inaccessible light, and He was the true light, which enlightens every person coming into this world: but He wished that light to be made, which could be perceived by bodily eyes. Whoever desires to construct a building worthy of a father's dwelling, before laying the foundations, explores from where to pour in light, and this is the first grace, which, if lacking, the whole house horrifies with its ugly neglect. Light is what adorns the other decorations of the house.

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

LETTERS 147.18.44 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

This, then, is charity, however small a thing it appears to us, as it inheres in our will; "it is not seen in any locality, nor sought by bodily eyes, nor limited by our sight, nor held by touch, nor heard by its utterance, nor perceived in its approach." How much more true this is of God, of whom charity is the pledge within us! If our interior man is an image of him—insignificant, indeed—not begotten of him but created by him, and, although it is still renewed day by day, it now dwells in such light that no faculty of corporeal sight comes near to it, and if those things which we perceive with the eyes of the heart by means of that light are distinguished from each other and separated by no intervals of space, how much more is this true of God, who inhabits light inaccessible to the bodily senses, to whom there can be no approach except for the clean of heart!

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

SERMONS 7.4 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

God, Father Son and Holy Spirit, is in his own proper nature invisible. But he has appeared when he wished and to whom he wished; not as he is but in whatever way he wished, being served after all by all creation. If your mind, though it is invisible in your body, can appear by uttering your voice, and the voice in which your mind appears when you speak is not the substance of your mind, it means that mind is one thing and voice another, and yet mind becomes apparent in a thing which in itself is not. So too God, if he appeared in fire, is all the same not fire; if he appeared in smoke, still he isn't smoke; if he appeared in a sound, he isn't a sound. These things are not God, but they indicate God. If we bear this in mind, we may safely believe that it could have been the Son who appeared to Moses and was called both Lord and angel of the Lord.

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

Confessions 12.11.11 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

Already you have told me, O Lord, by means of a loud voice in my interior ear, that you are eternal, alone possessing immortality, since you change in relation neither to any form nor to motion. Your will is not altered in regard to periods of time, because no will is immortal if it is now one way and now another. In your sight this is clear to me. May it become more and more clear, I pray, and may I continue to live soberly under your protecting wings, within the influence of this revelation.
29 more voices on this verse

The Church Fathers20 voices

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

LETTERS 143.1.7 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

Those words, however, so carefully selected by me to avoid committing myself to any one of the four opinions or theories regarding the soul's origin, are liable to censure only from those who think that my hesitation as to any definite view in a matter so obscure is blameworthy; against whom I do not defend myself by saying that I think it right to pronounce no opinion whatever on the subject, seeing that I have no doubt either that the soul is immortal—not in the same sense in which God is immortal, who alone hath immortality, but in a certain way peculiar to itself—or that the soul is a creature and not a part of the substance of the Creator, or as to any other thing which I regard as most certain concerning its nature.

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

Sermons 65.4 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

So if God alone has immortality, is the soul mortal? That's why I said the soul is immortal after its own fashion. You see, it can also die. Your graces must try to understand, and then the problem will be solved. I make bold to say, the soul can die, can be killed. Certainly it's immortal. So there you are; I make bold to say it is both immortal in one sense and capable of being killed in another sense. And that's why I said there is a kind of immortality, that is to say, an absolute and total unchangeableness, which God alone has, as it says of him, "Who alone has immortality."

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

LETTERS 147.15.37 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

If you ask whether he can also be seen at any time as he is, I answer that this was promised to his sons, of whom it is said, "We know that when he shall appear, we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is." If you ask by what means we shall see him, I answer: as the angels see, for we shall then be equal to them, as the angels see those things which are called visible; but no one has ever seen God nor can see him, because "he inhabits light inaccessible," and his nature is invisible as it is immortal.

A commentator

Origen of Alexandria

Commentary on John 2.123 · Written before 253.

proposed

To be fully alive belongs to God, more fully than to any creature. The apostle considered the superiority of the life of God to be beyond comparison. It is with this in mind that Scripture says "Surely as I live, all the earth will be filled with the glory of the Lord." This is God, "Who alone has immortality," because none of the living beings with God has the life whose aliveness is absolutely unchangeable and immutable.

A commentator

Origen of Alexandria

COMMENTARY ON THE SONG OF SONGS, PROLOGUE.2.28 · Written before 253.

proposed

We must understand, therefore, that this charity, which God is, in whoever it exists loves nothing earthly, nothing material, nothing corruptible. It is against its nature to love anything corruptible, seeing that it is itself the fount of incorruption. For, because God, "who only has immortality and inhabits light inaccessible," is charity, it is charity alone that possesses immortality.

A commentator

Gregory of Nyssa

Against Eunomius 2 · Written before 395.

proposed

But we, even when we are told that God "only hath immortality," understand by "immortality" the Son. For life is immortality, and the Lord is that life, Who said, "I am the Life." And if He be said to dwell "in the light that no man can approach unto," again we make no difficulty in understanding that the true Light, unapproachable by falsehood, is the Only-begotten, in Whom we learn from the Truth itself that the Father is. Of these opinions let the reader choose the more devout, whether we are to think of the Only-begotten in a manner worthy of the Godhead, or to call Him, as heresy prescribes, perishable and temporary.

A commentator

Tertullian

AGAINST PRAXEAS 15 · Written before 220.

proposed

There is a certain emphatic saying by John, "No man has seen God at any time"; meaning, of course, at any previous time. But he has indeed taken away all question of time, by saying that God has never been seen. The apostle confirms this statement. For, speaking of God, he says, "Whom no man has seen, nor can see," because the man indeed would die who should see him. But the very same apostles testify that they had both seen and "handled" Christ. Now, if Christ is himself both the Father and the Son, how can he be both the Visible and the Invisible?… It is evident that he was always seen from the beginning, who became visible in the end; and that he, on the contrary, was not seen in the end who had never been visible from the beginning; and that accordingly there are two—the Visible and the Invisible. It was the Son, therefore, who was always seen.… For the Father acts by mind and thought, while the Son, who is in the Father's mind and thought, gives effect and form to what he sees.

A commentator

Tertullian

Against Praxeas · Written before 220.

proposed

The apostle confirms this statement; for, speaking of God, he says, "Whom no man hath seen, nor can see; " because the man indeed would die who should see Him.

A commentator

Tertullian

Against Praxeas · Written before 220.

proposed

Of the Father, however, he says to Timothy: "Whom none among men hath seen, nor indeed can see; "and he accumulates the description in still ampler terms: "Who only hath immortality, and dwelleth in the light which no man can approach unto." It was of Him, too, that he had said in a previous passage: "Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, to the only God; " so that we might apply even the contrary qualities to the Son Himself-mortality, accessibility-of whom the apostle testifies that "He died according to the Scriptures," and that "He was seen by himself last of all," -by means, of course, of the light which was accessible, although it was not without imperilling his sight that he experienced that light.

A commentator

Tertullian

Against Praxeas · Written before 220.

proposed

What, again, if He was One who was "crowned with glory and honour," and He Another by whom He was so crowned, -the Son, in fact, by the Father? Moreover, how comes it to pass, that the Almighty Invisible God, "whom no man hath seen nor can see; He who dwelleth in light unapproachable; " "He who dwelleth not in temples made with hands; " "from before whose sight the earth trembles, and the mountains melt like wax; " who holdeth the whole world in His hand "like a nest; " "whose throne is heaven, and earth His footstool; " in whom is every place, but Himself is in no place; who is the utmost bound of the universe;-how happens it, I say, that He (who, though) the Most High, should yet have walked in paradise towards the cool of the evening, in quest of Adam; and should have shut up the ark after Noah had entered it; and at Abraham's tent should have refreshed Himself under an oak; and have called to Moses out of the burning bush; and have appeared as "the fourth" in the furnace of the Babylonian monarch (although He is there called the Son of man),-unless all these events had happened as an image, as a mirror, as an enigma (of the future incarnation)? Surely even these things could not have been believed even of the Son of God, unless they had been given us in the Scriptures; possibly also they could not have been believed of the Father, even if they had been given in the Scriptures, since these men bring Him down into Mary's womb, and set Him before Pilate's judgment-seat, and bury Him in the sepulchre of Joseph.

A commentator

Gregory of Nazianzus

ORATIONS 40.5 · Written before 390.

proposed

God is Light: the highest, the unapproachable, the ineffable, That can neither be conceived in the mind nor uttered with the lips, That giveth life to every reasoning creature. He is in the world of thought, what the sun is in the world of sense; presenting Himself to our minds in proportion as we are cleansed; and loved in proportion as He is presented to our mind; and again, conceived in proportion as we love Him; Himself contemplating and comprehending Himself, and pouring Himself out upon what is external to Him. That Light, I mean, which is contemplated in the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost, Whose riches is Their unity of nature, and the one outleaping of Their brightness.

A commentator

Apostolic Constitutions

CONSTITUTIONS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES · Written before 380.

proposed

Let the bishop add this prayer, and say: O God Almighty, the true God, to whom nothing can be compared, who art everywhere, and present in all things, and art in nothing as one of the things themselves; who art not bounded by place, nor grown old by time; who art not terminated by ages, nor deceived by words; who art not subject to generation, and wantest no guardian; who art above all corruption, free from all change, and invariable by nature; who inhabitest light inaccessible.

A commentator

Cassiodorus

EXPLANATION OF THE PSALMS 33.6 · Written before 585.

proposed

Since Paul says, "Only he that has immortality and inhabits inaccessible light," how can the psalmist say here, "Come to him, and be enlightened? But the problem is solved by this brief statement of the truth: his light is said to be inaccessible when the …

A commentator

Methodius of Olympus

THE BANQUET OF THE TEN VIRGINS 6.1 · Written before 311.

proposed

We have all come into this world, O virgins, endowed with singular beauty, which has a relationship and affinity to divine wisdom. For the souls of men do then most accurately resemble Him who begat and formed them, when, reflecting the unsullied representation of His likeness, and the features of that countenance, to which God looking formed them to have an immortal and indestructible shape, they remain such. For the unbegotten and incorporeal beauty, which neither begins nor is corruptible, but is unchangeable, and grows not old and has need of nothing, He resting in Himself, and in the very light which is in unspeakable and inapproachable places, embracing all things in the circumference of His power, creating and arranging, made the soul after the image of His image. Therefore, also, it is reasonable and immortal.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

ON THE INCOMPREHENSIBLE NATURE OF GOD 3.2 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

And pay heed to the accuracy with which Paul speaks. He did not say, "Who is an unapproachable light" but "Who dwells in unapproachable light." Why? So that you may learn that if the dwelling is unapproachable, so much more so is the God that dwells in it. But Paul did not say this to make you suspect that there is a house or place surrounding God. Rather, he wished you to have a deeper and superior knowledge that God is beyond our comprehension.… A thing is unapproachable which, from the start, cannot be investigated nor can anyone come near to it. We call the sea incomprehensible because, even when divers lower themselves into its waters and go down to a great depth, they cannot find the bottom. We call that thing unapproachable which, from the start, cannot be searched out or investigated.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

HOMILIES ON JOHN 15.1-2 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

And wonder not that Paul saith in another place, "God was manifested in the Flesh"; because the manifestation took place by means of the flesh, not according to (His) Essence. Besides, Paul shows that He is invisible, not only to men, but also to the powers above, for after saying, "was manifested in the Flesh," he adds, "was seen of angels." So that even to angels He then became visible, when He put on the Flesh; but before that time they did not so behold Him, because even to them His Essence was invisible. "How then," asks some one, "did Christ say, `Despise not one of these little ones, for I tell you, that their angels do always behold the face of My Father which is in heaven'? Hath then God a face, and is He bounded by the heavens?" Who so mad as to assert this? What then is the meaning of the words? As when He saith, "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God," He means that intellectual vision which is possible to us, and the having God in the thoughts; so in the case of angels, we must understand that by reason of their pure and sleepless nature they do nothing else, but always image to themselves God. And therefore Christ saith, that "No man knoweth the Father, save the Son." What then, are we all in ignorance? God forbid; but none knoweth Him as the Son knoweth Him. As then many have seen Him in the mode of vision permitted to them, but no one has beheld His Essence, so many of us know God, but what His substance can be none knoweth, save only He that was begotten of Him.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on 1 Timothy 18 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

"Dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto." Is He then Himself one Light, and is there another in which He dwells? is He then circumscribed by place? Think not of it. By this expression is represented the Incomprehensibleness of the Divine Nature. Thus he speaks of God, in the best way he is able. Observe, how when the tongue would utter something great, it fails in power. "Whom no man hath seen nor can see." As, indeed, no one hath seen the Son, nor can see Him. "To whom be honor and power everlasting. Amen." Thus properly, and much to the purpose, has he spoken of God. For as he had called Him to witness, he speaks much of that Witness, that his disciple may be in the greater awe. In these terms he ascribes glory to Him, and this is all we can do, or say. We must not enquire too curiously, who He is. If power everlasting is His, fear not. Yea though now it take not place, to Him is honor, to Him is power evermore.

A commentator

Hippolytus of Rome

Hippolytus Dogmatical and Historical Fragments · Written before 235.

proposed

7. The beloved generates love, and the light immaterial the light inaccessible.

A commentator

Clement of Alexandria

The Stromata Book 6 · Written before 215.

proposed

How then shall the Greeks any longer disbelieve the divine appearance on Mount Sinai, when the fire burned, consuming none of the things that grew on the mount; and the sound of trampets issued forth, breathed without instruments? For that which is called the descent on the mount of God is the advent of divine power, pervading the whole world, and proclaiming "the light that is inaccessible." For such is the allegory, according to the Scripture. But the fire was seen, as Aristobulus says, while the whole multitude, amounting to not less than a million, besides those under age, were congregated around the mountain, the circuit of the mount not being less than five days' journey. Over the whole place of the vision the burning fire was seen by them all encamped as it were around; so that the descent was not local. For God is everywhere.

A commentator

Clement of Alexandria

The Stromata Book 6 · Written before 215.

proposed

But the Gnostic does not share either in those affections that are commonly celebrated as good, that is, the good things of the affections which are allied to the passions: such, I mean, as gladness, which is allied to pleasure; and dejection, for this is conjoined with pain; and caution, for it is subject to fear. Nor yet does he share in high spirit, for it takes its place alongside of wrath; although some say that these are no longer evil, but already good. For it is impossible that he who has been once made perfect by love, and feasts eternally and insatiably on the boundless joy of contemplation, should delight in small and grovelling things. For what rational cause remains any more to the man who has gained "the light inaccessible," for revering to the good things of the world? Although not yet true as to time and place, yet by that gnostic love through which the inheritance and perfect restitution follow, the giver of the reward makes good by deeds what the Gnostic, by gnostic choice, had grasped by anticipation through love.

The Medieval Church5 voices

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on 1 Timothy · Written before 1107.

proposed

That is, at a fitting, predetermined time. Therefore do not grieve that it has not yet come. And the apostle says this for consolation, so that Timothy would not look upon the seemingly blissful goods of this world, but would fix his gaze upon the …

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on 1 Timothy · Written before 1107.

proposed

Can He really be defined by place? Or is the light one thing and He Himself another? Of course, He Himself is also light. Do you see to what degree language becomes feeble when we wish to utter something great? This light is unapproachable, because, …

A commentator

Bonaventure

Collations on the Hexaemeron, Collation 12 · Written in the 13th century.

proposed

Such light is beyond reach and is yet the closest to the soul, even more than it is to itself. It is also unconfinable, and yet supremely intimate. This can be seen by none but a man suspended beyond himself in a lofty vision; and …

A commentator

Bonaventure

Disputed Questions on the Knowledge of Christ, Question 4 · Written in the 13th century.

proposed

In the last chapter of First Timothy it is said of God: *Who alone has immortality and dwells in inaccessible light, whom no man has seen, nor can see.* But everything by which or in which we know is accessible to the knower: therefore that …

A commentator

Thomas Aquinas

Commentary on 1 Timothy · Written before 1274.

proposed

In regard to the third he says, who alone has immortality and inhabits light inaccessible. God's incomprehensibility is clear from two things: first, because he transcends whatever is comprehensible in creatures; second, because, being God, he is too great for anyone's comprehension. He shows the …

The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice

Who only hath immortality,.... Angels are immortal, and so are the souls of men, and so will be the bodies of men after the resurrection; but then neither of these have immortality of themselves, they have it from God; who only has it, of himself, originally, essentially, and inderivatively.

The Nineteenth Century3 voices

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

Who only hath immortality - All beings that are not eternal must be mutable; but there can be only one eternal Being, that is God; and he only can have immortality. Dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto - All this is said by the apostle in three words φως οικων απροσιτον, inhabiting unapproachable light. Such is the excessive glory of God, that neither angel nor man can approach it. It is indeed equally unapproachable to all created beings.

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

The term used in the New Testament for "immortal," which does not occur, is "incorruptible." "Immortality" is found in 1Co 15:53, 54. dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto--After life comes mention of light, as in Joh 1:4. That light is unapproachable to creatures, except in so far as they are admitted by Him, and as He goes forth to them [BENGEL].
Who only hath immortality - The word here - ἀθανασία athanasia - properly means “exemption from death,” and seems to mean that God, in his own nature, enjoys a perfect and certain exemption from death. Creatures have immortality only as they derive it from him, and of course are dependent on him for it. He has it by his very nature, and it is in his case underived, and he cannot be deprived of it. It is one of the essential attributes of his being, that he will always exist, and that death cannot reach him; compare the expression in Joh 5:26, “The Father hath life in himself,” and the notes on that passage. Dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto - Greek, “Inhabiting inapproachable light.” The light where he dwells is so brilliant and dazzling that mortal eyes could not endure it. This is a very common representation of the dwelling place of God. See examples quoted in Pricaeus, in loc. Heaven is constantly represented as a place of the most pure and brilliant light, needing not the light of the sun, or the moon, or the stars Rev 21:23-24; Rev 22:5, and God is represented as dwelling in that light, surrounded by amazing and inapproachable glory compare Rev 4:6; Eze 1:4; Heb 1:3. Whom no man hath seen nor can see - notes on Joh 1:18. To whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen - see the notes on Rom 11:36.

The words behind it

20 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Colossians 1:15

    The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.

    it leads to

    • Hebrews 1:3

      The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of His nature, upholding all things by His powerful word. After He had provided purification for sins, He sat down at the…

    • John 14:9

      Jesus replied, “Philip, I have been with you all this time, and still you do not know Me? Anyone who has seen Me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the…

    • John 1:1

      In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

  • Through

    1 John 1:5

    And this is the message we have heard from Him and announce to you: God is light, and in Him there is no darkness at all.

    it leads to

    • John 8:12

      Once again, Jesus spoke to the people and said, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows Me will never walk in the darkness, but will have the light of life.”

    • James 1:17

      Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, with whom there is no change or shifting shadow.

  • Through

    John 1:18

    No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is Himself God and is at the Father’s side, has made Him known.

    it leads to

    • Colossians 1:15

      The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.

    • John 6:46

      not that anyone has seen the Father except the One who is from God; only He has seen the Father.

    • Matthew 11:27

      All things have been entrusted to Me by My Father. No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses…

Where this verse is studied

About 1 Timothy

Saint Paul Writing, Pier Francesco Sacchi, the 1520s, National Gallery, London. Public domain.
Saint Paul Writing, Pier Francesco Sacchi, the 1520s, National Gallery, London. Public domain.
This page draws on 32 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Ambrose of Milan, Exposition of the Christian Faith 5.2.35; Ambrose of Milan, The Six Days of Creation 1.9.33; Apostolic Constitutions, CONSTITUTIONS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES; Augustine of Hippo, LETTERS 147.18.44; Augustine of Hippo, SERMONS 7.4; Augustine of Hippo, Confessions 12.11.11; Augustine of Hippo, LETTERS 143.1.7; Augustine of Hippo, Sermons 65.4; Augustine of Hippo, LETTERS 147.15.37; Bonaventure, Collations on the Hexaemeron, Collation 12; Bonaventure, Disputed Questions on the Knowledge of Christ, Question 4; Cassiodorus, EXPLANATION OF THE PSALMS 33.6; Clement of Alexandria, The Stromata Book 6; Gregory of Nazianzus, ORATIONS 40.5; Gregory of Nyssa, Against Eunomius 2; Hippolytus of Rome, Hippolytus Dogmatical and Historical Fragments; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Chrysostom, ON THE INCOMPREHENSIBLE NATURE OF GOD 3.2; John Chrysostom, HOMILIES ON JOHN 15.1-2; John Chrysostom, Homily on 1 Timothy 18; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Methodius of Olympus, THE BANQUET OF THE TEN VIRGINS 6.1; Oecumenius, COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY; Origen of Alexandria, Commentary on John 2.123; Origen of Alexandria, COMMENTARY ON THE SONG OF SONGS, PROLOGUE.2.28; Tertullian, AGAINST PRAXEAS 15; Tertullian, Against Praxeas; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on 1 Timothy and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on 1 Timothy.