Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Leviticus 22:12

in Leviticus 22

If the priest’s daughter is married to a man other than a priest, she is not to eat of the sacred contributions.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

And if a priest’s daughter be married unto a stranger, she shall not eat of the heave-offering of the holy things.

KJV

If the priest’s daughter also be married unto a stranger, she may not eat of an offering of the holy things.

This verse in Leviticus 22

Commentary

6 notes on this verse
If the priest's daughter also be married to a stranger,.... Not to an Heathen, but to any Israelite, that is, a common man, or a layman, as the Targums of Onkelos and Jonathan, one that is not a priest; but is married either to a Levite, or an Israelite, as Jarchi: she may not eat of an offering of the holy things; the heave shoulder or wave breast, &c. being removed into another family by marriage, she is not reckoned of her father's family, and so had no more a right to eat of the holy things.

This site's exposition

No one outside a priest’s family may eat the sacred offering

on Leviticus 22:10-16

Membership in the priest's household draws the line: a slave bought or born in his house eats, and a guest or hired hand does not. A daughter married outside the priestly families eats again only if she returns "widowed or divorced" with no children.

This site's exposition

married to a man other than a priest

John Gill reads the man as any layman, a Levite or an ordinary Israelite. John Wesley noted the mirror case: a priest's wife from another family ate, and a wife passed into her husband's name, state and privileges. The daughter leaves her father's table by the same rule.

The record, by era

The Puritans and the Awakening2 voices

A commentator

John Wesley

1703–1791

Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)

A stranger - To one of another family, who is no priest. Yet the priest's wife, though of another family, might eat. The reason of which difference is, because the wife passeth into the name, state and privileges of her husband, from whom the family is denominated.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

If those whom Providence has made sorrowful widows, and who are dislodged from the rest they had in the house of a husband, yet find it again in a father's house, they have reason to be thankful to the widows' God, who does not leave them comfortless. Here is a demand of restitution to be made by him that had no right to the holy things, and yet should eat of them unwittingly,

The Nineteenth Century1 voice

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

proposed

There shall no stranger eat the holy thing--The portion of the sacrifices assigned for the support of the officiating priests was restricted to the exclusive use of his own family. A temporary guest or a hired servant was not at liberty to eat of them; but an exception was made in favor of a bought or homeborn slave, because such was a stated member of his household.

The words behind it

11 Hebrew words

Every Hebrew word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

  • וּבַת־and a daughter of

    uvat-H1323 →588 times

  • כֹּהֵ֔ןa priest

    kohenH3548 →750 times

  • כִּ֥יif

    kiH3588 →4482 times

  • תִהְיֶ֖הshe will belong

    tihyehH1961 →3559 times

  • לְאִ֣ישׁto a man

    leishH376 →1663 times

  • זָ֑רstrange

    zarH2114 →77 times

  • הִ֕ואshe

    hi'H1931 →1879 times

  • בִּתְרוּמַ֥תin [the] contribution of

    bitrumatH8641 →76 times

  • הַקֳּדָשִׁ֖יםthe holy things

    hakodashimH6944 →469 times

  • לֹ֥אnot

    lo'H3808 →5168 times

  • תֹאכֵֽל׃she will eat

    tokhelH398 →810 times

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

5 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Isaiah 40:13

    Who has directed the Spirit of the LORD, or informed Him as His counselor?

    it leads to

    • 1 Corinthians 2:16

      “For who has known the mind of the Lord, so as to instruct Him?” But we have the mind of Christ.

    • Romans 11:34

      “Who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been His counselor?”

    • Job 36:22–23

      Behold, God is exalted in His power. Who is a teacher like Him?

    • Job 21:22

      Can anyone teach knowledge to God, since He judges those on high?

    • Luke 10:22

      All things have been entrusted to Me by My Father. No one knows who the Son is except the Father, and no one knows who the Father is except the Son and those to…

Where this verse is studied

About Leviticus

The Scapegoat, William Holman Hunt, 1854. Public domain.
The Scapegoat, William Holman Hunt, 1854. Public domain.

This page draws on Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament (1748-1763); John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.