1 Samuelchapter 21
15 verses · Samuel, Nathan and Gad, by tradition · 10th century BC · History
So the priest gave him hallowed bread: for there was no bread there but the shewbread, that was taken from before the Lord, to put hot bread in the day when it was taken away.
Introduction
Samuel, Nathan and Gad, by tradition, History, 1 Samuel Overview.
This chapter belongs to the book that tells how Israel passed from its judges to its kings, and it was kept for a nation that later honoured David as its greatest king. Here that king is a hunted man with no weapon and no bread. He meets a priest and then a foreign ruler, and in each place he must decide what to say about himself. Listen for whether what he says is true. Listen too for a man in the background who says nothing yet. Jesus drew on this chapter when His disciples were accused of breaking the Sabbath.
Context
- Who
- Israelites who knew the rules about the bread of the Presence and knew Gath as the champion's city
- What
- An account of David's first days as a fugitive, at the sanctuary of Nob and then at the court of Achish king of Gath.
- Where
- Nob, the priests' town just north of Jerusalem, and then Gath, a Philistine city on the coastal plain.
- When
- The text gives no date; on the common reckoning of Saul's reign it falls about 1019 BC, in the first days of David's flight.
- Why
- To show the anointed king in want and in fear, and to set up the cost of the lie he tells at Nob.
Historical context
The chapter belongs to David, a fugitive travelling without escort, and to Ahimelech the priest of Nob, who is of Eli's line and serves at the sanctuary that took in the priesthood after Shiloh fell. Doeg the Edomite, Saul's chief herdsman, is present and is named in one verse. The time is the first days of the flight, about 1019 BC on the same traditional conservative reckoning.
Show the rest of the historical context, 4 more paragraphs
The place is first Nob, a priestly settlement north of Jerusalem, and then Gath, one of the Philistine cities and the home town of the champion David killed in the valley of Elah. The occasion is need: a man leaving the kingdom with no food, no weapon and no company asks a priest for both, then crosses the border to the one court where Saul cannot reach him.
A first hearer knew what the bread was, since twelve loaves were set out in two rows on a gold table in the sanctuary each Sabbath and eaten by the priests in a holy place. Handing them to a layman stood outside the Law's provision, and the priest gives them anyway, asking only that the men be ritually clean.
He knew what a dedicated weapon was, since captured arms were kept at sanctuaries across the ancient world as memorials, and Goliath's sword lay at Nob wrapped in a cloth behind the ephod.
And he knew how the insane were treated, since a man out of his mind was widely held to be touched by a god and was left alone rather than harmed. That is why scratching at the gate doors and letting spittle run into his beard gets a hunted man out of an enemy city alive.
Significance
The anointed king of Israel begs bread from a priest, borrows a dead giant's sword and drools in an enemy gate. First hearers were being shown what the road to the throne actually looked like.
Show the rest of the significance, 2 more paragraphs
The chapter also records David's one plain lie, that the king had sent him on urgent business, and it gets him bread and a sword. The man who heard it stands in the sanctuary and reports it two chapters later, and eighty five priests pay for it.
Two psalm titles in Israel's songbook set their psalms at this scene, which is how the nation remembered a man singing about God's protection while pretending to be out of his mind.
This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.
How it is read
The commentators read this chapter as a case in the law of the holy bread, and then as a scene at a foreign court. On David's request Rashi explains why he asked for five loaves. He cites Talmud Yerushalmi Succah 5:8 for the reason (Rashi on I Samuel 21:4:1, the Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J., CC-BY). The priestly family which had just finished its service received five loaves of the showbread as its share (same ref). On the priest's condition he gives the rule as the priest held it. The bread could be given to men who were not priests only with difficulty, and to unclean men it could not be given at all (Rashi on I Samuel 21:5:1, same edition). On the bread exchanged that day he hands on the Rabbis' teaching that it stayed warm from the day it was arranged to the day it was removed. He cites Maseches Menachos 96a and Chagigah 26b for the miracle (Rashi on I Samuel 21:7:1, same edition). On the men who ate it he reads the phrase about their garments as a statement of purity (Rashi on I Samuel 21:6:2, same edition). On the Edomite detained at the sanctuary he reads the phrase as tarrying before the Tent of Meeting to study Torah. He reads the title given him as head of the tribunal rather than a keeper of flocks (Rashi on I Samuel 21:8:1 and 21:8:2, same edition). On the sword kept behind the ephod he glosses the verb as wrapped, with I Melachim 19:13 beside it (Rashi on I Samuel 21:10:1, same edition). On the servants of Achish he supplies their argument. The terms set in the valley of Elah made David king of the land, so Achish must give up his throne (Rashi on I Samuel 21:12:1, same edition). Radak stands as a citation at I Samuel 21:2:1, 21:5:1, 21:7:1, 21:11:1 and 21:13:1. Metzudat David stands at 21:1:1, 21:2:1, 21:4:1 and 21:15:1. The corpus holds no English version of them.
What the rabbis say
The corpus records forty rabbinic locators on this chapter, twenty-nine of them Midrash and eleven Talmud, each a locator without text. David's arrival at Nob draws Pesikta Rabbati 11:1, and his request for the loaves draws Jerusalem Talmud Sukkah 5:8:4. The priest's answer about the holy bread draws Menachot 95b:10. The showbread itself draws the largest cluster of the chapter, because the rabbis work its law and its miracle at length. It draws Menachot 29a:10, Menachot 95b:13, Menachot 96b:10, Chagigah 26b:7 and Aggadat Bereshit 3:1. It also draws Ein Yaakov, Menakhot 3:5, Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Menachot 3:1, Ein Yaakov, Khagigah 3:4 and Ein Yaakov, Yoma 1:29. Three Jerusalem Talmud passages stand with them. They are Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 10:2:19, Jerusalem Talmud Shekalim 6:3:2 and Jerusalem Talmud Yoma 8:5:2. Doeg the Edomite draws Sanhedrin 93b:5, Midrash Tehillim 3:4, Midrash Tehillim 52:3, Ein Yaakov, Sanhedrin 11:20 and Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sanhedrin 11:21. The same verse draws Midrash Aggadah, Leviticus 14:2:2, Midrash Lekach Tov, Leviticus 14:2:3, Midrash Sekhel Tov, Bereshit 49:24:3 and Midrash Sekhel Tov, Shemot 16:31:1. It draws Midrash Tanchuma, Shoftim 1:1 and Midrash Tanchuma, Shoftim 2:1. Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Shoftim 2:1 stands beside them. The sword of Goliath draws Bereshit Rabbah 78:14, Midrash Lekach Tov, Exodus 7:11:3, Midrash Lekach Tov, Genesis 33:12:2, Midrash Tanchuma, Behar 3:1, Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Behar 8:3 and Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 133:19. The flight to Achish draws Bamidbar Rabbah 23:1, Midrash Tanchuma, Masei 1:1 and Midrash Tehillim 34:1. The servants naming David king draws Yalkut Shimoni on Nach 131:1 and Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 964:5. David feigning madness draws Shevuot 45b:12 and Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sanhedrin 3:5. The rabbis teach in these places, and this site reports them as their teaching rather than as a rule of the text.
Sources: Rashi, Rashi on I Samuel 21:4:1, 21:5:1, 21:6:2, 21:7:1, 21:8:1, 21:8:2, 21:10:1 and 21:12:1, the Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J., CC-BY; Radak, Radak on I Samuel 21:2:1, 21:5:1, 21:7:1, 21:11:1 and 21:13:1, cited only, no English version in the corpus; Metzudat David, Metzudat David on I Samuel 21:1:1, 21:2:1, 21:4:1 and 21:15:1, cited only.
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
The showbread and Goliath's sword at Nob
1 Samuel 21:1-2
David reaches Nob alone, and Ahimelech trembles and asks why no one is with him, exposing the change before David explains anything. Ahimelech later tells Saul at 22:10 that he inquired of the LORD for David at this visit, though it is not narrated here. The mission David invents for the king is the first outright lie of his exile, and the older writers read it as fear overtaking faith.
1 Samuel 21:1
“Ahimelech the priest is surprised to see him in so poor an equipage; having heard that he had fallen into disgrace at court, he looked shy upon him, as most are apt to do upon their friends when the world frowns upon them. He was afraid of incurring Saul's displeasure by entertaining him, and took notice how mean a figure he now made to what he used to make: Why art thou alone?”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 more voice on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.
1 Samuel 21:1
“Nob was a city of the priests, the high priest resided there, and the tabernacle was pitched there 1Sa 21:4, 1Sa 21:6,1Sa 21:9; 1Sa 22:10. It was situated on the road from the north to Jerusalem, near Anathoth, and within sight of the holy city Isa 10:32; Neh 11:32. But the site has not been identified with certainty.”
The mission is invented, and Barnes sets it beside the excuse David gave Jonathan for Saul at 20:6. It costs the priests of Nob their lives at 22:18. Wesley and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown both hear David's later prayer against the way of lying in Psalm 119:29.
1 Samuel 21:2
“The king hath commanded me a business - All said here is an untruth, and could not be dictated by the Spirit of the Lord; but there is no reason to believe that David was under the influence of Divine inspiration at this time. It is well known that from all antiquity it was held no crime to tell a lie, in order to save life.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
3 more voices on this verse
1 Samuel 21:2
“People should be free with their faithful ministers. David was a man of great faith and courage, and yet now both failed him, and he fell thus foully through fear and cowardice, and both owing to the weakness of his faith. Had he trusted God aright, he would not have used such a sorry sinful shift as this for his own preservation.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Samuel 21:2
“No wonder that these dispensations were uprightly made use of in the Old Testament and that holy men sometimes lied in praiseworthy or at least in pardonable fashion, since we see that far greater things were permitted them because it was a time of beginnings.”
John Cassian · written before 435 · CONFERENCE 17.18.1-2patristic
1 Samuel 21:2
“David probably supposed, like many other persons, that a lie is quite excusable which is told for the sole purpose of saving the speaker's life. But what is essentially sinful, can never, from circumstances, change its immoral character; and David had to repent of this vice of lying (Ps 119:29).”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 Samuel 21:3-4
David asks Ahimelech for whatever bread is at hand, five loaves or anything present, provision for a flight he will not explain. Ahimelech has no common bread, only the bread set apart for the priests, and he makes it conditional on the young men having kept themselves from women. The condition is real law and not delay: eating consecrated bread required the same ritual cleanness the priests themselves kept in the tabernacle service.
1 Samuel 21:3
“Even if they accuse, yet Christ excuses, and he makes the souls that he wishes, that follow him, similar to David, who ate the loaves of proposition outside of the law—for even then he foresaw in his mind the prophetic mysteries of a new grace.”
Ambrose of Milan · written before 397 · On Isaac and the Soul, 6.56patristic
Common bread means bread for ordinary use. Barnes, citing the same distinction at Acts 10:14, reads the lack of it as a sign of how poor the priesthood at Nob had become. Wesley and Gill add that the priest had bread at his house, yet David would not wait for it with Doeg watching.
1 Samuel 21:4
“And the priest answered David, and said, there is no common bread under mine hand,.... In the tabernacle, though he might have such in his own house; which was common for any man to eat of, even such as were not priests; but he had none there, and David was in haste to be gone because of Doeg, and could not stay till such was fetched: but there is hallowed bread; such as was devoted to sacred use.”
1 more voice on this verse
1 Samuel 21:4
“Common - As opposed to holy. (See the marginal references, and compare the use of the word in Act 10:14-15, Act 10:28.) It gives an idea of the depressed and poor condition of the priesthood at that time, that Ahimelech should have had no bread at hand except the showbread.”
1 Samuel 21:5-6
David answers that his men have been kept from women and that "the equipment of the young men is holy," and the priest gives him "the Bread of the Presence" just replaced with hot bread. This bread was lawful only for the priests under Leviticus 24:9. Jesus cites this episode at Matthew 12:3 to 4, arguing from David’s case that mercy outweighs the ceremonial law in real need.
1 Samuel 21:5
“Vessels - That is, Either, 1. Their garments, or other utensils for their journey. The bread - Hebrew. and this bread; is in a manner common: that is, considering the time, and our necessity, this maybe used in a manner, like common bread.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
The loaves were changed each Sabbath under Leviticus 24:8, so the bread David received was the old bread, newly removed for the priests to eat. Henry suggests the enquiry of the LORD that Ahimelech mentions at 22:10 concerned giving this bread away. Augustine saw the king here acting as a priest.
1 Samuel 21:6
“So the priest gave him hallowed bread - To this history our Lord alludes, Mar 2:25, in order to show that in cases of absolute necessity a breach of the ritual law was no sin. It was lawful for the priests only to eat the shew-bread; but David and his companions were starving, no other bread could be had at the time, and therefore he and his companions ate of it without sin.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
1 Samuel 21:6
“So the priest gave him hallowed bread,.... Being satisfied with the account he gave of himself, and his young men, and of the lawfulness of it in case of necessity, acts of mercy being to be preferred to ritual services.”
Doeg the Edomite is in the sanctuary that day, detained before the Lord on some errand or vow the text does not name, and he sees everything that has just happened. He is introduced here as Saul's chief herdsman, a servant with every reason to report what he witnessed. The reader is meant to hold the name: it returns at 22:9 as an accusation and at 22:18 as a massacre of the priests of Nob.
1 Samuel 21:7
“Detained before the Lord - Either to fulfill a vow Act 21:23-27, or on account of uncleanness, or under the law of lepers Lev 13:4, Lev 13:11, Lev 13:21, or as a proselyte. It is not impossible that Doeg may have been in custody or in sanctuary for some crime.”
1 Samuel 21:8-9
David has come without weapons, by his cover story "because the king’s business was urgent," and asks for "a spear or sword" from the priest. The only sword at the sanctuary is Goliath’s, "wrapped in a cloth behind the ephod" since chapter 17. David answers, "There is none like it; give it to me," and the boy who fought with no sword takes up the giant’s.
wrapped in a cloth behind the ephod: Barnes takes the cloth to be Goliath's military cloak, part of the trophy kept behind the ephod where only the high priest could reach it. Wesley adds that David was tall and strong enough to wield the giant's sword. Each look would remind him what God had done.
1 Samuel 21:9
“Wrapped in a cloth behind the ephod - Rather, “in the cloak,” Goliath’s military cloak, which was part of the dedicated trophy. The ephod was naturally hung up where the high priest alone could get at it.”
2 more voices on this verse
1 Samuel 21:9
“Note, What we devote to God's praise, and serve him with, is most likely to redound, one way or other, to our own comfort and benefit. Thus was David well furnished with arms and victuals; but it fell out very unhappily that there was one of Saul's servants then attending before the Lord, Doeg by name, that proved a base traitor both to David and Ahimelech.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Samuel 21:9
“The giant's sword was deposited in that safe custody as a memorial of the divine goodness in delivering Israel. There is none like that--not only for its size and superior temper, but for its being a pledge of the divine favor to him, and a constant stimulus to his faith.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Scrabbling on the gate of Gath, feigning madness
1 Samuel 21:10-12
David flees to Achish king of Gath, Goliath’s own city, carrying the sword of its champion. The servants of Achish greet him with Israel’s song, "Saul has slain his thousands, and David his tens of thousands," the words that turned Saul against him at 18:7. David is "very much afraid of Achish," and the titles of Psalms 34 and 56 set those psalms in this scene.
1 Samuel 21:10
“Went to Achish the king of Gath - This was the worst place to which he could have gone: it was the very city of Goliath, whom he had slain, and whose sword he now wore; and he soon found, from the conversation of the servants of Achish, that his life was in the most imminent danger in this place.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
2 more voices on this verse
1 Samuel 21:10
“The king elect is here an exile: anointed to the crown, and yet forced to run his country. So do God's providences sometimes run counter to his promises, for the trial of our faith, and the glorifying his name in accomplishing his counsels, notwithstanding the difficulties that lie in the way.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
1 Samuel 21:10
“In this place his person must have been known, and to venture into that country, he their greatest enemy, and with the sword of Goliath in his hand, would seem to have been a perilous experiment; but, doubtless, the protection he received implies that he had been directed by the divine oracle. Achish was generous (1Sa 27:6).”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
The servants of Achish call David king of the land. Barnes reads it as the title the Philistines gave their own lords. Wesley thinks news of Saul's rejection and of David's choosing as the next king had reached Gath, so the men of Achish saw in him the coming king of Israel.
1 Samuel 21:11
“King of the land - Of Canaan. They call him king, either more generally for the governor, the most eminent captain and commander, or, as the king elect, the person designed to be king: for, by this time, the fame of Saul's rejection, and David's destination to the kingdom, was got abroad among the Israelites, and from them, probably to the Philistines.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Henry and Wesley both point to the sword at David's side. Goliath's sword was likely known in Gath, and its bearer now stood in the champion's own city. Gill adds a second fear, that Achish would hand him back to Saul.
1 Samuel 21:12
“Was afraid - Lest either their revenge or policy should prompt them to kill him. Perhaps he was the more apprehensive, because he wore Goliath's sword, which was probably well known at Gath.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
1 Samuel 21:13-15
David "feigned madness," scratching on the doors of the gate and letting his saliva run down his beard, and Achish turns him away as insane. The older writers weigh the deception honestly, some reading it as a sinful shift of weak faith like the lie at Nob, others as a lesser evil that cost no life. Psalm 34’s title sets its writing here, calling the king Abimelech, a throne name.
1 Samuel 21:13
“Scrabbled - literally, made marks (margin), namely, the mark of the “tau” (t), which in the ancient Hebrew and Phoenician was in the shape of a cross. (See Eze 9:4.) On the doors of the gate - The gate of Achish’s palace-yard or court, in which the attendants waited. The house itself stood in this court. (Compare Est 2:19, Est 2:21.)”
Henry reads these words as spoken for the servants to hear. Achish may have wished to shelter David, and calling him insane told the court the man was harmless. Wesley holds the same view, and Achish receives David at Gath again at 27:2.
Gill hears a dry joke in the king's question, as if the house of Achish had madmen enough already. Clarke quotes Chandler, who praised David for deceiving the men of Gath with feigned madness. Clarke finds neither force nor morality in it.
1 Samuel 21:15
“Shall this fellow come into my house? - I will not take into my service a man who is liable to so grievous a disease. Chandler, who vindicates David’s feigning himself, mad, concludes thus: “To deceive the deceiver is in many instances meritorious, in none criminal. And what so likely to deceive as the very reverse of that character which they had so misconstrued? He was undone as a wise man, he had a chance to escape as a madman; he tried, and the experiment succeeded.” I confess I can neither feel the force nor the morality of this.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
1 Samuel 21:15
“Mad men - It is highly probable, Achish was aware, that this madness was counterfeit. But being desirous to preserve David, he speaks as if he thought it real.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
How this psalm is built
The form: A flight narrative in two scenes, a sanctuary and an enemy court, each turning on what David says about himself, as 2 classes it.
The patterns in this chapter
| Device | What it does | Where to see it |
|---|---|---|
| The sword given back to the man who took it | David asks for a spear or a sword at verse 8, and the only weapon at the sanctuary is Goliath's own. That sword lies wrapped in a cloth behind the ephod since the victory of chapter 17, and it is kept there as a trophy of what the LORD did that day. The exposition note holds that David's answer, that there is none like it, closes a circle set up three chapters earlier. The boy who fought with no sword in his hand now takes up the weapon he stripped from the giant.The site's published exposition note on 1 Samuel 21:8 to 9, data/commentary/1-samuel-21-exposition.json, catchword "spear or sword", citing Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1708 to 1710, and Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Books of Samuel. | 1 Samuel 17:51, 1 Samuel 21:8, 1 Samuel 21:9 |
| The song sung back to him in the enemy's gate | The servants of Achish greet David at verse 11 with the song Israel sang after the valley of Elah, that Saul has slain his thousands and David his ten thousands. The exposition note records that these are the same words that first turned Saul against him at 18:7. The same note records that David lays them up in his heart and grows afraid of the king whose champion he killed. One song drives him out of Israel and meets him at the gate of Gath.The site's published exposition note on 1 Samuel 21:10 to 12, data/commentary/1-samuel-21-exposition.json, catchword "fled that day for fear of Saul", citing Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1708 to 1710, and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, 1871. | 1 Samuel 18:7, 1 Samuel 21:11, 1 Samuel 21:12 |
| The man named in one verse and left standing there | The narrator stops the scene at verse 7 to say that Doeg the Edomite, Saul's chief herdsman, was detained before the LORD that day and saw everything. Nothing in this chapter needs the sentence. The exposition note states plainly that the reader is meant to hold the name, because it returns at 22:9 as an accusation and at 22:18 as a massacre of the priests of Nob.The site's published exposition note on 1 Samuel 21:7, data/commentary/1-samuel-21-exposition.json, catchword "the chiefest of the herdmen", citing Albert Barnes, Notes on the Old Testament, 1832 to 1869, and John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament, 1765. | 1 Samuel 21:7, 1 Samuel 22:9, 1 Samuel 22:18 |
| Holy bread and holy men | Ahimelech has no common bread at verse 4, and he makes the holy bread conditional on the young men having kept themselves from women. David answers at verse 5 that the vessels of the young men are holy. The exposition note holds that the condition is real law rather than delay, since eating consecrated bread required the same ritual cleanness the priests kept in the tabernacle service. The word that describes the loaves is turned on the men who will eat them.The site's published exposition notes on 1 Samuel 21:3 to 4 and 21:5 to 6, data/commentary/1-samuel-21-exposition.json, catchwords "give me five loaves of bread" and "the vessels of the young men are holy", citing John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament, 1748 to 1763, Albert Barnes, Notes on the Old Testament, 1832 to 1869, and Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1810 to 1826. | 1 Samuel 21:4, 1 Samuel 21:5, 1 Samuel 21:6 |
| One king under two names | The king of Gath is called Achish through verses 10 to 15. The exposition note records that the title standing over Psalm 34 sets that psalm at this scene, in words close to verse 13 of this chapter. The title reads that he changed his behaviour before Abimelech, using a throne name for the same king. The same note records that Psalm 56's title also sets its psalm here. The note also records that this database stores the Psalms apart from their Hebrew titles, so the link cannot be shown from the floor by query.The site's published exposition notes on 1 Samuel 21:10 to 12 and 21:13 to 15, data/commentary/1-samuel-21-exposition.json, catchwords "fled that day for fear of Saul" and "feigned himself mad in their hands", citing Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1708 to 1710, and John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament, 1765. | 1 Samuel 21:10, 1 Samuel 21:13, 1 Samuel 21:14 |
Where the chapter stands in the book's argument
12 more paragraphs on the patterns
The site's published guide puts this chapter inside the third act, David anointed and tested, drawn as a secret anointing, a decade of persecution and a throne not yet possessed. Chapter 20 ends with David leaving the court for good, and this chapter is the first working out of that state, since he reaches Nob alone, hungry and unarmed. What it hands to chapter 22 is a witness, since the man standing in the sanctuary at verse 7 is the man who speaks at 22:9.
The guide's cast names Ahimelech as the priest of Nob, killed with his household for unwittingly aiding the fugitive David. The same cast names Doeg the Edomite as Saul's informer, the one man willing to slaughter the priests of Nob at the king's word. Both entries are written from the far side of chapter 22, which is how the book means this chapter to be read a second time.
The New Testament's use
The exposition note on verses 5 and 6 names the bread as the showbread of Exodus 25:30, lawful only for the priests to eat under Leviticus 24:9. The bread is given here to a fugitive and his hungry men. The same note records that Jesus cites this exact episode by name at Matthew 12:3 to 4, arguing from David's case that mercy outweighs the ceremonial law when real need is at stake.
The site's drafted exposition on Mark carries the same scene at Mark 2:25 to 26, under the catchword "Have ye never read what David did". It reads Jesus as answering Scripture with Scripture, and points to this chapter where David, fleeing Saul and genuinely hungry, ate the bread reserved for the priests and gave it to his men. The Pharisees themselves accepted that precedent as legitimate. The site's drafted exposition on Luke carries it at Luke 6:3 to 5 under the catchword "what David did". It reads the precedent as an argument from the greater to the lesser. If human need excused David from a ceremonial restriction on holy bread, it excuses the disciples from a traditional restriction on ordinary grain.
Mark's account names Abiathar where this chapter names Ahimelech, and the site's published dossier for the Gospel of Mark carries the question as a hard question with two readings and no house settlement. The first reading takes the Greek phrase to mean in the time of Abiathar. It is held by C. E. B. Cranfield in The Gospel According to Saint Mark, Cambridge Greek Testament Commentary, 1959, and by most commentators. They read it as the ordinary Greek way of dating an episode. They also point out that Abiathar is the priest a first-century hearer would attach to the whole episode, since he alone survives the slaughter at Nob and carries the priesthood forward through David's reign. The second reading takes the phrase to point to the passage about Abiathar. It is held by R. T. France in The Gospel of Mark, New International Greek Testament Commentary, 2002. France reads it as Mark's way of naming a place in the scroll, as Mark does again at 12:26 when he sends a reader to the place in Exodus by naming the bush. On that reading the words locate the story, and the priest who hands over the bread is still Ahimelech. The dossier records that Matthew and Luke give the same argument without naming a priest, and it states no verdict. This page states none either.
The historical value
The site's published dossier for this book carries Tell es-Safi, identified as ancient Gath and excavated by Aren Maeir from 1996 to the present. The dossier lists it as one of the largest Philistine cities of the Iron Age, matching the prominence Gath carries in this book. The dossier records among its finds an inscribed sherd from about 900 BC bearing two non-Semitic personal names, transcribed there as ʼlwt and wlt. The dossier calls those names philologically close to the name Goliath, and records their publication by Maeir and colleagues in 2005. The dossier states the limit plainly: the sherd does not name the Philistine of chapter 17, and it does show that names of that form were in use in that city. The city David walks into at verse 10 is a real and excavated place.
The site's published historical layer for this chapter records that Nob is where the priesthood relocated after Shiloh fell, and that Ahimelech is of Eli's line. The same layer records that the sword was kept at the sanctuary wrapped in a cloth, the way captured arms were dedicated at sanctuaries throughout the ancient world.
Where the chapter reaches
The sword of verse 9 comes from chapter 17 and the song of verse 11 from 18:7, so both halves of this chapter reach back to the day in the valley of Elah. The name in verse 7 reaches forward to 22:9 and 22:18.
The exposition note on verses 10 to 12 records that two psalm titles set their psalms in this scene, Psalm 34 and Psalm 56. The same note records that this database stores the Psalms without their Hebrew titles, so the link cannot be shown from the floor by query. The door for that thread is the feature page on David's life in the Psalms.
Keep studying
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The form and classifications
The site's published exposition note on 1 Samuel 21:1 to 2, data/commentary/1-samuel-21-exposition.json, the note at 21:1 to 2, catchword "Why art thou alone, and no man with thee", citing Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1708 to 1710, and Albert Barnes, Notes on the Old Testament, 1832 to 1869; The site's published guide for the book of 1 Samuel, src/components/book/guides/1-samuel/Book1SamuelGuide.tsx, the act entry keyed david, range 16:1 to 31:13 and The site's published historical layer for 1 Samuel 21, scripts/data/historical-context/ch3-jdg-rut-1sa.mjs, the 1sa chapter 21 row, citing Roland de Vaux, Ancient Israel: Its Life and Institutions, and John H. Walton, Victor H. Matthews and Mark W. Chavalas, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes; Augustine of Hippo, HARMONY OF THE GOSPELS 1.3.5; Jamieson Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Books of Samuel and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.
