Romans 1:22
in Romans 1Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools,
BSB
The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾
ASV
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
KJV
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
⋯
This verse in Romans 1
Commentary
26 notes on this verseProfessing themselves to be wise - This is most strikingly true of all the ancient philosophers, whether Greeks or Romans, as their works, which remain, sufficiently testify. The word φασκοντες signifies not merely the professing but the assumption of the philosophic character. In this sense the word φασκειν is used by the best Greek writers. See Kypke. A dispassionate examination of the doctrine and lives of the most famed philosophers of antiquity, of every nation, will show that they were darkened in their mind and irregular in their conduct.
This site's exposition
although they knew God
on Romans 1:21-23
They knew God and withheld worship and thanks, the root failure before a single idol is carved. Claiming wisdom, they became fools and traded the glory of the immortal God for images of man, birds, animals and reptiles. The list descends from man to reptiles, reversing Genesis 1.
This site's exposition
they became fools
The wise of the Greek world claimed wisdom as their boast, and Barnes notes that philosopher means a lover of wisdom. Theodoret sees the claim itself exposing them as fools. Augustine names the root as pride.
The record, by era
The Church Fathers5 voices
They imagined that they were wise because they thought they had explored the natural sciences, investigating the courses of the stars and the quantities of the elements, while rejecting the God who made them. Therefore they are fools, for if these things are worthy of …
It is pride that turns man away from wisdom, and folly is the consequence of turning away from wisdom.
A commentator
Origen of AlexandriaCOMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS · Written before 253.
proposed
For his invisible things, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, and also his eternal power and divinity; so that they are inexcusable, because when they had known God, they did not magnify him as God, nor give thanks; but they became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened. For saying that they were wise, they became fools, and they changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of the image of corruptible man, and of birds, and of four-footed beasts, and of serpents. Almost every one of these points has already been discussed above. For we said that these things, although they pertain to all human beings in whom there is natural reason, nevertheless look chiefly to the wise men of this world and to those who are named philosophers, whose particular discipline it is to examine the creatures of the world and all the things that have been made in it, and through the things that are seen to gather by reasoning the things that are not seen. Yet it must be known that the invisible things which he here names, he speaks of concerning created things; about which the same Apostle also writes in another place: that all things were made through him, that is, through Jesus Christ, whether the things that are in heaven or the things that are on earth, visible and invisible. And therefore, besides those things which he called invisible, he adds: And his eternal power and divinity. Therefore the power of God, which is eternal, and the divinity, which is no less eternal, is recognized from inferences drawn from the creature. Power is that by which he governs all things; divinity that by which he fills the universe. […]
A commentator
Theodoret of CyrusINTERPRETATION OF THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS · Written before 458.
proposed
They increased their guilt by their claim, for in calling themselves wise they showed that in fact they were fools.
They say that the heaven which they call a body contains the whole world, and stoutly maintain that outside of it nothing whatever exists; and yet they define angels and demons and souls, which are parts of the world as uncircumscribed, neither containing the heaven, …
18 more voices on this verse
The Church Fathers3 voices
A commentator
Lucius Caecilius Firmianus LactantiusThe Divine Institutes Book 2, Chapter III · Written before 325.
proposed
But (as I have said) pardon may be granted to those who are ignorant and do not own themselves to be wise; but it cannot be extended to those who, while they profess wisdom, rather exhibit folly. I am not, indeed, so unjust as to imagine that they could divine, so that they might find out the truth by themselves; for I acknowledge that this is impossible. But I require from them that which they were able to perform by reason itself. For they would act more prudently, if they both understood that some form of religion is true, and if, while they attacked false religions, they openly proclaimed that men were not in possession of that which is true.
For having some great conceit of themselves, and not enduring to go the way which God had commanded them, they were plunged into the reasonings of senselessness. And then to show and give in outline, what a rueful surge it was, and how destitute of excuse...
For both the law and the Gospel are the energy of one Lord, who is "the power and wisdom of God;" and the terror which the law begets is merciful and in order to salvation. "Let not alms, and faith, and truth fail thee, but hang them around thy neck." In the same way as Paul, prophecy upbraids the people with not understanding the law. "Destruction and misery are in their ways, and the way of peace have they not known." "There is no fear of God before their eyes." "Professing themselves wise, they became fools."
The Medieval Church4 voices
How then did they come to such error, that in everything they relied on their own reasoning? Because they imagined themselves wise, which is why they became fools. For what is more foolish than worshiping stones and trees?
A commentator
BonaventureCollationes de Septem Donis, Collation 4 · Written in the 13th century.
proposed
Grant that a man possess natural and metaphysical knowledge, which extends itself to the highest substances, and that a man arrive there so as to rest there: it is impossible that he not fall into error, unless he be aided by the light of faith—namely, …
A commentator
BonaventureCollations on the Hexaemeron, Collation 4 · Written in the 13th century.
proposed
The philosophers have offered nine sciences and promised a tenth: contemplation. But many philosophers, while attempting to avoid the darkness of error, have themselves become involved in major errors. While professing to be wise, they have become fools. Because they boasted of their knowledge, these …
Then when he says professing themselves he explains his statement. And first, how they became futile in their thinking, when he says professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. Professing themselves, i.e., ascribing wisdom to themselves as of themselves: woe to those who are …
The Puritans and the Awakening4 voices
We shall the less wonder at the inefficacy of these natural discoveries to prevent the idolatry of the Gentiles if we remember how prone even the Jews, who had scripture light to guide them, were to idolatry; so miserably are the degenerate sons of men plunged in the mire of sense.
Thus the world by wisdom knew not God, 1 Cor. i. As a profession of wisdom is an aggravation of folly, so a proud conceit of wisdom is the cause of a great deal of folly. Hence we read of few philosophers who were converted to Christianity; and Paul's preaching was no where so laughed at and ridiculed as among the learned Athenians, Acts xvii.
To glorify him as God is to worship him with spiritual worship; but they made images of him. Not to glorify God as God is in effect not to glorify him at all; to respect him as a creature is not to glorify him, but to dishonour him.
Professing themselves to be wise,....
The Nineteenth Century1 voice
A commentator
Albert Barnes1798–1870
Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869)
proposed
Professing themselves to be wise - This was the common boast of the philosophers of antiquity. The very word by which they chose to be called, “philosophers,” means literally “lovers of wisdom.” That it was their boast that they were wise, is well known; compare Rom 1:14; 1Co 1:19, 1Co 1:20, 1Co 1:22; 1Co 3:19; 2Co 11:19. They became fools - Compare Jer 8:8-9. They became really foolish in their opinions and conduct. There is something particularly pungent and cutting in this remark, and as true as it is pungent. In what way they evinced their folly, Paul proceeds immediately to state. Sinners of all kinds are frequently spoken of as fools in the Scriptures. In the sense in which it is thus used, the word is applied to them as void of understanding or moral sense; as idolaters, and as wicked; Psa 14:1; Pro 26:4; Pro 1:17, Pro 1:22; Pro 14:8-9. The senses in which this word here is applied to the pagan are, (1) That their speculations and doctrines were senseless; and, (2) That their conduct was corrupt.
Modern Voices6 voices
Henceforward, when the modern philosophers come to me with their new religions (and there is always a kind of queue of them waiting all the way down the street) I shall anticipate their circumlocutions and be able to cut them short with a single inspired …
I remember once arguing with an honest young atheist, who was very much shocked at my disputing some of the assumptions which were absolute sanctities to him (such as the quite unproved proposition of the independence of matter and the quite improbable proposition of its …
The Renan-France method is simply this: you explain supernatural stories that have some foundation simply by inventing natural stories that have no foundation. ... It is no exaggeration to say that this is the manner of M. Anatole France in dealing with Joan of Arc. …
Heavens! to think of the dull rut of the sceptics who go on asking whether we possess a future life. The exciting question for real scepticism is whether we possess a past life. What is a minute ago, rationalistically considered, except a tradition and a …
Now, one of these four or five paradoxes which should be taught to every infant prattling at his mother's knee is the following: That the more a man looks at a thing, the less he can see it, and the more a man learns a …
Evolution really is mistaken for explanation. It has the fatal quality of leaving on many minds the impression that they do understand it and everything else; just as many of them live under a sort of illusion that they have read the Origin of Species.
The words behind it
4 Greek wordsEvery Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.
| Greek | Sound | Meaning | Word study | In the Bible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| φάσκοντες | phaskontes | Professing | G5335 → | |
| εἶναι | einai | to be | G1511 → | 123 times |
| σοφοὶ | sophoi | wise | G4680 → | 19 times |
| ἐμωράνθησαν | emoranthesan | they became fools | G3471 → |
φάσκοντεςProfessing
phaskontesG5335 →
εἶναιto be
einaiG1511 →123 times
σοφοὶwise
sophoiG4680 →19 times
ἐμωράνθησανthey became fools
emoranthesanG3471 →
A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.
The walk
8 stopsEach card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.
Through
Romans 11:25I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers, so that you will not be conceited: A hardening in part has come to Israel, until the full number of the Gentiles…
it leads to
- Luke 21:24
They will fall by the edge of the sword and be led captive into all the nations. And Jerusalem will be trodden down by the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.
- Romans 12:16
Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but enjoy the company of the lowly. Do not be conceited.
Reached by 2 separate paths from here.
- 2 Corinthians 3:14–16
But their minds were closed. For to this day the same veil remains at the reading of the old covenant. It has not been lifted, because only in Christ can it be removed.
- Romans 16:25
Now to Him who is able to strengthen you by my gospel and by the proclamation of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery concealed for ages past
- Luke 21:24
Through
Proverbs 26:12Do you see a man who is wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.
it leads to
- 1 Corinthians 3:18–19
Let no one deceive himself. If any of you thinks he is wise in this age, he should become a fool, so that he may become wise.
- Proverbs 29:20
Do you see a man who speaks in haste? There is more hope for a fool than for him.
- Proverbs 26:5
Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he become wise in his own eyes.
- Proverbs 28:11
A rich man is wise in his own eyes, but a poor man with discernment sees through him.
- 1 Corinthians 3:18–19
Where this verse is studied
On this page
About Romans

This page draws on 23 works. Open the list of works
This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Ambrosiaster, COMMENTARY ON PAUL'S EPISTLES; Augustine of Hippo, ON FREE WILL 24.72; Bonaventure, Collationes de Septem Donis, Collation 4; Bonaventure, Collations on the Hexaemeron, Collation 4; Clement of Alexandria, The Stromata Book 1; Cosmas Indicopleustes, The Christian Topography, Book 1; GK Chesterton, All Things Considered, The Methuselahite (1908); GK Chesterton, All Things Considered, The Error of Impartiality (1908); GK Chesterton, All Things Considered, The Maid of Orleans (1908); GK Chesterton, Tremendous Trifles, The Extraordinary Cabman (1909); GK Chesterton, Tremendous Trifles, The Twelve Men (1909); GK Chesterton, The Everlasting Man, Chapter I: The Man in the Cave (1925); John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Epistle to the Romans; John Chrysostom, Homily on Romans 3; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Lucius Caecilius Firmianus Lactantius, The Divine Institutes Book 2, Chapter III; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Origen of Alexandria, COMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS; Theodoret of Cyrus, INTERPRETATION OF THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Romans and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Romans.
