Jonah, Angry Enough to Die

“You tell me that I have given a wrong translation of some word in Jonah, and that a worthy bishop narrowly escaped losing his charge through the clamorous tumult of his people, which was caused by the different rendering of this one word. At the same time, you withhold from me what the word was which I have mistranslated; thus taking away the possibility of my saying anything in my own vindication, lest my reply should be fatal to your objection. Perhaps it is the old dispute about the gourd which has been revived, after slumbering for many long years since the illustrious man, who in that day combined in his own person the ancestral honours of the Cornelii and of Asinius Pollio, brought against me the charge of giving in my translation the word ‘ivy’ instead of ‘gourd.’ I have already given a sufficient answer to this in my commentary on Jonah. At present, I deem it enough to say that in that passage, where the Septuagint has ‘gourd,’ and Aquila and the others have rendered the word ‘ivy’ (κίσσος), the Hebrew manuscript has ‘ciceion,’ which is in the Syriac tongue, as now spoken, ‘ciceia.’ It is a kind of shrub having large leaves like a vine, and when planted it quickly springs up to the size of a small tree, standing upright by its own stem, without requiring any support of canes or poles, as both gourds and ivy do. If, therefore, in translating word for word, I had put the word ‘ciceia,’ no one would know what it meant; if I had used the word ‘gourd,’ I would have said what is not found in the Hebrew. I therefore put down ‘ivy,’ that I might not differ from all other translators. […]”