Skip to content
mannafest.faith

1 Corinthians 12:17

in 1 Corinthians 12

If the whole body were an eye, where would the sense of hearing be? If the whole body were an ear, where would the sense of smell be?

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling?

KJV

If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling?

This verse in 1 Corinthians 12

Commentary

9 notes on this verse
If the whole body ... - The idea in this verse is, that all the parts of the body are useful in their proper place, and that it would be as absurd to require or expect that all the members of the church should have the same endowments, as it would be to attempt to make the body “all eye.” If all were the same; if all had the same endowments, important offices which are now secured by the other members would be unknown.

This site's exposition

For the body does not consist

on 1 Corinthians 12:14-17

Paul answers Corinth's drift toward a favored few gifts: the body does not consist of one part, but of many. Verse 17 presses the logic to its end, where uniformity would destroy the body the member wanted to join.

This site's exposition

If the whole body were an eye

The questions picture a body made of one huge eye, able to see and unable to hear or smell. Hodge and Matthew Henry apply it to Corinthians who wanted every member to have the same prized gift. A church of one gift loses every other function.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers2 voices

A commentator

Theodoret of Cyrus

COMMENTARY ON THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS 247 · Written before 458.

proposed

Even if the body had only its most important member, it would still be useless without the others.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on 1 Corinthians 30 · Written before 407.

proposed

"If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling?" Thus, because, having fallen upon the difference of the members, and having mentioned feet, and hands, and eyes, and ears, he led them to the consideration of their own inferiority and superiority: see how again he consoles them, intimating that so it was expedient: and that their being many and diverse, this especially causeth them to be a body. But if they all were some one, they would not be a body. Wherefore, he saith, "If they were all one member, where were the body?" This however, he mentions not till afterwards; but here he points out also something more; that besides the impossibility of any one being a body, it even takes away the being of the rest. "For if the whole were hearing, where were the smelling," saith he.

The Medieval Church2 voices

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on 1 Corinthians · Written before 1107.

proposed

Since he mentioned the eye and the foot, the ear and the hand, and presented them as reasoning about elevation and degradation, and through this the Corinthians would naturally again come to grief rather than consolation, he now shows that it is useful and necessary …

A commentator

Thomas Aquinas

Commentary on 1 Corinthians · Written before 1274.

proposed

Then when he says, If the whole body were an eye, he proves by leading to two awkward conclusions, the first of which is the removal of necessary things from the body; the second is the removal of bodily completeness (v. 19). In regard to …

The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice

If the whole body were an eye,....
1 more voice on this verse

The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

He tells us that the church is the body of Christ, and the members are variously gifted for the benefit of the whole body, and each particular member,

The words behind it

14 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Psalms 94:9

    He who affixed the ear, can He not hear? He who formed the eye, can He not see?

    it leads to

    • Exodus 4:11

      And the LORD said to him, “Who gave man his mouth? Or who makes the mute or the deaf, the sighted or the blind? Is it not I, the LORD?

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • Jeremiah 23:23–24

      “Am I only a God nearby,” declares the LORD, “and not a God far away?”

    • Psalms 44:21

      would not God have discovered, since He knows the secrets of the heart?

    • Proverbs 20:12

      Ears that hear and eyes that see—the LORD has made them both.

    • Psalms 11:4

      The LORD is in His holy temple; the LORD is on His heavenly throne. His eyes are watching closely; they examine the sons of men.

  • Through

    Proverbs 20:12

    Ears that hear and eyes that see—the LORD has made them both.

    it leads to

    • Matthew 13:13–16

      This is why I speak to them in parables: ‘Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand.’

    • Psalms 94:9

      He who affixed the ear, can He not hear? He who formed the eye, can He not see?

    • Psalms 119:18

      Open my eyes that I may see wondrous things from Your law.

Where this verse is studied

About 1 Corinthians

The Last Supper, Leonardo da Vinci, 1495 to 1498. Public domain.
The Last Supper, Leonardo da Vinci, 1495 to 1498. Public domain.
This page draws on 10 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Charles Hodge, An Exposition of the First Epistle to the Corinthians; John Chrysostom, Homily on 1 Corinthians 30; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Theodoret of Cyrus, COMMENTARY ON THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS 247; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on 1 Corinthians and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on 1 Corinthians.