
Estherchapter 5
14 verses · unknown · 5th century BC · History
“If it pleases the king,” Esther replied, “may the king and Haman come today to the banquet I have prepared for the king.”
Introduction
unknown, History, Esther Overview.
This chapter was written for Jews who knew how quickly a powerful man's favour could turn. It sets the queen and the king's favourite side by side on the same day and lets the hearer compare them. Everything in it is governed by the manners of the Persian court, and timing matters more than speech. Listen for what Esther asks and for what she holds back. Then follow Haman home and listen to what he says about his own happiness. The chapter closes on a plan made in anger, and the night that follows it will change everything.
Context
- Who
- Jews who knew how quickly a favourite's mood could turn deadly
- What
- Esther is received by the king and invites him and Haman to two banquets, and Haman, enraged by Mordecai, has a gallows built to hang him on.
- Where
- The inner court and the royal rooms of the palace at Susa, and Haman's house in the city.
- When
- The third day of the fast, in the twelfth year of Ahasuerus, about 474 BC.
- Why
- To set the patience of the queen against the pride of Haman on the eve of the reversal.
Historical context
Everything in the opening scene is protocol. Esther puts on her royal clothing, the visible sign of her office, and stands in the inner court where the king can see her from the throne room. The sceptre is extended, and touching its tip is the accepted gesture of receiving mercy. Only then may she speak.
Show the rest of the historical context, 3 more paragraphs
The king's offer of half the kingdom was a stock royal flourish, not a real transfer of territory; Persian kings were known for extravagant promises made at table. Esther does not take it. She asks for a private meal, then asks for a second one, stretching out an evening in a court where timing was everything.
A Persian 'banquet of wine' was the drinking stage that followed the food, the relaxed hour when business got done. Serving it twice, with the king and only one guest, gave Esther what she needed: a setting in which the king was at ease, Haman was flattered into the open, and one more night could pass before she spoke.
The stake Haman erects is usually pictured as a gallows for hanging, but Persian executions of this kind were impalements, the body raised on a tall pole for public display. Darius's own inscription at Behistun boasts of impaling rebel leaders. Fifty cubits is around seventy-five feet, likely counting the height of the mound or house it stood on; the point is that all Susa was meant to see it.
Significance
Hearers would have followed the two men and enjoyed the contrast. Haman goes home 'joyful and with a glad heart', counts his money, his sons, and his invitations, and then admits that all of it is worth nothing while one man refuses to stand up. That is what the chapter says pride is: never enough, and permanently unsafe.
Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph
Meanwhile the queen risks her life and then does something that must have looked like cowardice, she serves dinner and says nothing. The night she buys is the night the story turns.
This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.
What is done
This chapter is heard inside the whole scroll at Purim. The site's own table in src/lib/hebraic/readings.ts records that the scroll is read twice, in the evening and again the next morning, from a handwritten roll, and that the congregation is expected to hear every word. Haman's name returns through this chapter, and the table records the Ashkenazi custom of answering it with noisemakers after the reader has said it. Sephardi and Mizrahi communities keep the day with much less noise or none. The table cites Mishnah Megillah 2, Babylonian Talmud Megillah 18a and the Rema's gloss to Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 690:17.
How it is read
Rashi is the one commentator on this chapter whose English the corpus carries, quoted here from The Metsudah Five Megillot, Lakewood, N.J., 2001, which Sefaria reports as CC-BY. The edition prints its own numbered notes inside his words, and a note is named here as the edition's. Esther's royal clothing is read in two ways. The plain sense is regal dress. Rashi then reports that the Rabbis said Divine Inspiration enwrapped her, and he supports it from the spirit that enwrapped Amasai, which the edition's note locates at 1 Chronicles 12:19 (Rashi on Esther 5:1:1). This site's row for 1 Chronicles 12 records that Rashi, commenting there, reads that same word of Amasai as a will or a desire. The two notes stand in different books, and both are Rashi's.
The king's offer of half the kingdom is read two ways as well. Rashi's first reading, which the edition's note sends to Maseches Megillah 15b, takes it as something at the midpoint of the empire, the Temple. Koresh had begun to build it and then stopped the work, and Achashveirosh stopped it too. The simple meaning, Rashi adds, is that the king would give her even half his empire (Rashi on Esther 5:3:1).
Why Esther invited Haman is left open on purpose. "Our Rabbis listed many reasons for the matter" (Rashi on Esther 5:4:1). He names two. One is to make the king and the princes jealous of Haman. The other is so that the king would think Haman desired her and kill him. The edition's note adds a third from Megillah 15b. The Jews might rely on her place at court, so she seemed to side with Haman, and they turned fully to prayer.
The smaller notes are exact. Every feast is called by a word for drinking because wine is its chief feature (Rashi on Esther 5:4:2). What Esther promised for the morrow was to reveal her people and her lineage (Rashi on Esther 5:8:1). Haman held back his anger because he feared to take revenge without the king's leave (Rashi on Esther 5:10:1). His complaint that all his honour was worth nothing to him Rashi glosses plainly (Rashi on Esther 5:13:1). Rashi then reports what the Rabbis said lay behind it. Mordechai would show him a deed by which Haman had sold himself as a slave for food. Both men had commanded troops in the same war (Rashi on Esther 5:13:2).
The corpus carries sixteen further notes on this chapter without an English text, each marked linked because Sefaria holds no English version of the ref. Seven stand cited and unquoted at Ibn Ezra on Esther 5:1:1, 5:3:1, 5:5:1, 5:8:1, 5:9:1, 5:10:1 and 5:11:1. Eight stand at Malbim on Esther 5:1:1, 5:2:1, 5:6:1, 5:7:1, 5:9:1, 5:11:1, 5:12:1 and 5:14:1, and one at a further note of Rashi on Esther 5:5:1.
What the rabbis say
The corpus carries forty rabbinic locators on this chapter and the text of none, so each is cited and linked here rather than quoted. Thirty-three are Midrash and seven are Talmud. On the first verse it holds Bereshit Rabbah 56:1, Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Megillah 1:30 and 1:33, and Esther Rabbah 9:1 and 9:2. On the second it holds Megillah 15b:9 with Midrash Tehillim 22:21 and 22:9. On the third it holds Megillah 15b:10-11 and 15b:11, and on the fourth Megillah 15b:12. On the fifth it holds Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Vayechi 32 and Sifrei Aggadah on Esther, Midrash Panim Acherim, Version II 5:2 and 5:3.
Haman's day carries the rest. On the ninth verse the corpus holds Aggadat Bereshit 2:2, Midrash Mishlei 26:4, Midrash Tehillim 100:1, Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 50:6 and Sifrei Aggadah on Esther, Midrash Panim Acherim, Version II 5:4. On the tenth it holds Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Miketz 22, Midrash Sekhel Tov, Bereshit 43:31:3, and the same Version II at 5:5 and 5:6. On the eleventh it holds Megillah 15b:17, Midrash Lekach Tov on Esther, Introduction 1, Midrash Tanchuma, Mishpatim 8:4, Otzar Midrashim, Midrashim on Missing and Extra Letters 1:29, and Shemot Rabbah 31:3. On the twelfth it holds Bereshit Rabbah 19:2, Esther Rabbah 9:3, Midrash Aggadah, Genesis 3:1:3 and Midrash Lekach Tov, Genesis 3:1:3. On the thirteenth it holds Megillah 15a:22 and 15b:2, Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 25:10 and Version II at 5:7. On the fourteenth it holds Esther Rabbah 9:4, Midrash Mishlei 10:1 and 11:5, and Midrash Sekhel Tov, Shemot 10:26:4. What each of them teaches is a saying of the rabbis, and is reported as theirs wherever this site quotes one.
Sources: Rashi, Rashi on Esther 5:1:1 to 5:13:2, The Metsudah Five Megillot, Lakewood, N.J., 2001, reported CC-BY; Rashi on Esther 5:5:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; Ibn Ezra, Ibn Ezra on Esther 5:1:1, 5:3:1, 5:5:1, 5:8:1, 5:9:1, 5:10:1 and 5:11:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; Malbim, Malbim on Esther 5:1:1, 5:2:1, 5:6:1, 5:7:1, 5:9:1, 5:11:1, 5:12:1 and 5:14:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; The Sefaria corpus, scripts/data/sources/sefaria/esther/5.json, the 40 Talmud and Midrash locators of this chapter; The site's own files, src/lib/hebraic/readings.ts, the FESTIVAL_READINGS entry for esther at Purim, and scripts/data/hebraic-context/1-chronicles-1-15.mjs, the row for 1 Chronicles 12 on Rashi's reading of the word used of Amasai.
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
The golden sceptre held out, and a banquet prepared
Esther 5:1-3
Esther put on her royal attire: The three days of fasting commanded at 4:16 end here. Esther goes uncalled into the inner court, her life resting on whether the king extends the scepter. The king's offer, "Even up to half the kingdom," is read as courtly idiom, since he repeats the same words at 7:2.
Esther 5:1
“Over against the gate - This is the usual situation of the throne in the “throne-room” of an Oriental palace. The monarch, from his raised position, can see into the court through the doorway opposite to him, which is kept open.”
2 more voices on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.
Esther 5:1
“When the heart is enlarged in communion with God it will be emboldened in doing and suffering for him. Some think that the three days' fast was only one whole day and two whole nights, in all which time they did not take any food at all, and that this is called three days, as Christ's lying in the grave so long is.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Esther 5:1
“In such a situation the Persian king was seated. The seat he occupied was not a throne, according to our ideas of one, but simply a chair, and so high that it required a footstool. It was made of gold, or, at least, inlaid with that metal, and covered with splendid tapestry, and no one save the king might sit down on it under pain of death.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
As soon as the king saw: Wesley reads the gold scepter as pardon for Esther, who stood uncalled, and her touch on its tip as thanks and submission. Clarke notes that the Greek expands the scene, with the king angry at first and the queen fainting before he takes her up. The Hebrew keeps it brief.
Esther 5:2
“She obtained favor in his sight - The Septuagint represents “the king as being at first greatly enraged when he saw Esther, because she had dared to appear before him unveiled, and she, perceiving this, was so terrified that she fainted away; on which the king, touched with tenderness, sprung from his throne, took her up in his arms, laid the golden scepter on her neck, and spoke to her in the most endearing manner.” This is more circumstantial than the Hebrew, but is not contrary to it.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
2 more voices on this verse
Esther 5:2
“Held out - In testimony that he pardoned her presumption, and was ready to grant her petition. Touched - In token of her thankful acceptance of the king's favour, and of her reverence and submission.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Esther 5:2
“On the Khorsabad reliefs the rod is painted red, doubtless to represent gold; proving that "the golden sceptre" was a simple wand of that precious metal, commonly held in the right hand, with one end resting on the ground, and that whether the king was sitting or walking. "The gold sceptre" has received little alteration or modification since ancient times [GOSS].”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
What is it, Queen Esther?” the king: The offer follows a Persian custom, which Jamieson, Fausset and Brown trace to royal favorites given whole cities for their bread, wine and clothing. Barnes records that Xerxes once offered one of his wives any request at all. The king saw that Esther had come with a request.
Esther 5:3
“It shall be given - God in his providence often prevents the fears and outdoes the hopes of his servants. To the half of the kingdom - A proverbial expression: that is, nothing in reason shall be denied.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
2 more voices on this verse
Esther 5:3
“It shall be even given thee ... - Xerxes, on another occasion, when pleased with one of his wives, offered to grant her any request whatever, without limitation. Compare the margin reference.”
Esther 5:3
“She had a law against her; we have a promise, many a promise, in favour of us: Ask, and it shall be given you. She had no friend to introduce her, or intercede for her, while on the contrary he that was then the king's favourite was her enemy; but we have an advocate with the Father, in whom he is well pleased. Let us therefore come boldly to the throne of grace.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Esther 5:4-5
Esther's petition is an invitation: she answers the king's offer with a banquet, the first of two delays before she names her cause. The commentators read the caution as prudence born of the danger she has just walked through rather than indecision.
Esther 5:4
“And Esther answered, if it seem good unto the king,.... She humbly submits it to his pleasure, suggesting it would be exceeding grateful to her, could it be granted: let the king and Haman come this day unto the banquet that I have prepared for him; for the king; and supposing it would be acceptable to him, and the rather engage him to come to it, she invited his favourite; and chiefly, that she might have an opportunity of accusing him before the king to his face, and when alone.”
1 more voice on this verse
Esther 5:4
“Let the king and Haman come this day unto the banquet - It was necessary to invite Haman to prevent his suspicion, and that he might not take any hasty step which might have prevented the execution of the great design.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Hurry,” commanded the king: Henry reads the king’s hurry to bring Haman as a sign of the kindness he still held for Esther. Gill notes the wisdom of the banquet she prepared, with the king cheerful with wine and her adversary there alone with him. Haman came at the king’s command.
Esther 5:5
“Then the king said, cause Haman to make haste, that he may do as Esther hath said,.... That is, he ordered some of his servants to make haste and acquaint Haman with the queen's invitation, and to press him to make haste to comply with it: so the king and Haman came to the banquet that Esther had prepared; which was wisely done, to prepare for what she had to say to the king, when cheerful with wine, and when she had her adversary with him alone.”
Esther 5:6-8
And as they drank their wine: The king repeats his offer, and Esther defers a second time. It is sound statecraft, giving her time to judge Haman's temper and the king's mood. It also makes room for the story, since this postponement leaves the king with unfinished business on the very night that follows.
Esther 5:6
“The banquet of wine - After the meats were removed, it was customary in Persia to continue the banquet for a considerable time with fruits and wine. During this part of the feast, the king renewed his offer.”
Esther replied, “This is my petition: Esther replied with her petition and request, then put both off until tomorrow. Henry allows that her courage may have failed here, and he reads the delay as time for prayer and as reverence the king would welcome. Rabanus Maurus sees patience in it.
Esther 5:7
“Perhaps her heart failed her now when she was going to make her request, and she desired to take some further time for prayer, that God would give her a mouth and wisdom. The putting of it off thus, it is likely, she knew would be well taken as an expression of the great reverence she had for the king, and her unwillingness to be too pressing upon him.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
If I have found favor: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown note that a Persian king ate alone, so a place at the queen’s table was a rare honor. Haman read it that way in verse 12. Adam Clarke sees Esther still securing the king’s favor before she spoke.
Esther 5:8
“I will do to-morrow - She saw she was gaining on the king’s affections; but she was not yet sufficiently confident; and therefore wished another interview, that she might ingratiate herself more fully in the king’s favor, and thus secure the success of her design. But Providence disposed of things thus, to give time for the important event mentioned in the succeeding chapter.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
All this avails me nothing: a gallows fifty cubits high
That day Haman went out: Haman leaves the banquet joyful, and the sight of one man who "did not rise or tremble in fear at his presence" undoes it. Mordecai does nothing at all. He simply keeps his seat, and the stillness accomplishes what no insult could.
Esther 5:9
“He stood not up, nor moved for him - This was undoubtedly a serious breach of Persian etiquette, and may well have angered Haman.”
Esther 5:10-12
Nevertheless, Haman restrained himself: Haman empties his heart at home, counting his riches, his many sons, and every mark of promotion above the king's own princes and servants. He closes with the one honor that outranks the rest in his own eyes, being the queen's sole guest besides the king, twice running.
Esther 5:10
“Nevertheless Haman refrained himself,.... From showing any outward resentment to Mordecai, from laying hands upon him or taking revenge on him, as being too much below him to avenge himself on a single person, when the whole body of the people Mordecai belonged to would shortly feel the power of his hand for such insolent treatment of him: and when he came home, he sent and called for his friends, and Zeresh his wife; who, the Targum says, was the daughter of Tatnai, the governor on the other side the river, Ezr 5:3.”
1 more voice on this verse
Esther 5:10
“What a struggle had he in his own bosom between his anger, which required Mordecai's death immediately ( O that I had of his flesh! 31 ), and his malice, which had determined to wait for the general massacre! Thus thorns and snares are in the way of the froward.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Haman recounted to them his glorious wealth: Haman recounted his many sons beside his wealth and the favor of the king. Barnes cites Herodotus: in Persia, many sons counted as the highest proof of manhood after prowess in arms. Haman had ten sons, named at 9:7-9.
Esther 5:11
“The multitude of his children - Herodotus tells us that, next to prowess in arms, it was regarded as the greatest proof of manly excellence in Persia to be the father of many sons.” Haman had ten sons (see the margin reference).”
What is more,” Haman added, “Queen Esther: Haman boasts of the one invitation that will ruin him. Henry puts it sharply: Queen Esther invited him to accuse him, and her call to the banquet was a call to the bar. Wesley draws the lesson that the wise often rejoice when they have most cause to fear.
Esther 5:12
“Note, Self-admirers and self-flatterers are really self-deceivers. Haman pleased himself with the fancy that the queen, by this repeated invitation, designed to honour him, whereas really she designed to accuse him, and, in calling him to the banquet, did but call him to the bar.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 more voice on this verse
Esther 5:12
“Am I - Thus he makes that matter of glorying which was the occasion of his utter ruin. So ignorant are the wisest men, and subject to fatal mistakes, rejoicing when they have most cause of fear, and sorrowing for those things which tend to joy and comfort.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Yet none of this satisfies me: Haman sums up his day: "Yet none of this satisfies me as long as I see Mordecai the Jew sitting at the king’s gate". Every honor he owns is cancelled by the one man. Wealth, promotion and a queen's favor cannot outweigh one unbending posture at a gate.
Esther 5:13
“Yet all this availeth me nothing - Pride will ever render its possessor unhappy. He has such a high opinion of his own worth, that he conceives himself defrauded by every one who does not pay him all the respect and homage which he conceives to be his due. The soul was made for God, and nothing but God can fill it and make it happy. Angels could not be happy in glory, when they had cast off their allegiance to their Maker.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Zeresh and Haman's friends supply the instrument: a gallows fifty cubits high, built that same night, so the morning needs only the king's word. Haman builds the reversal engine with his own hands, and the chapter ends with the means of his fall already standing in his own courtyard.
Esther 5:14
“Let a gallows be made of fifty cubits high - The word עץ ets, which we translate gallows, signifies simply wood, a tree, or pole; and this was to be seventy-five feet high, that he might suffer the greater ignominy, and be a more public spectacle. I believe impaling is here also meant. See the note, Est 2:23 (note).”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Keep studying
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Jamieson Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil, The Books of Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Rabanus Maurus, EXPLANATION ON THE BOOK OF ESTHER 8 and W. F. Adeney, Ezra, Nehemiah and Esther (Expositor's Bible).
