Romans 7:15
in Romans 7I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do, I do not do. But what I hate, I do.
BSB
The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾
ASV
For that which I do I know not: for not what I would, that do I practise; but what I hate, that I do.
KJV
For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
⋯
This verse in Romans 7
Commentary
16 notes on this verse"For what I work, I do not know. For I do not do what I will; but what I hate, this I do." Now as to what he says, that "I do not know what I work," it is not the thing itself which one works that he is ignorant of, though he be carnal, but he is said to be ignorant of the cause of the thing which he does.
This site's exposition
the law is spiritual
on Romans 7:14-16
Verse 14 sets a spiritual law against a speaker sold as a slave to sin, and the tense turns to the present. Verse 15 describes a divided will, and verse 16 treats that struggle as agreement that the law is good.
This site's exposition
I do not understand what I do
Understand renders ginosko, and Augustine and Barnes take it as approve: the man knows what he does and cannot approve it. Origen agrees that he knows the deed itself. Theodoret holds that desire overcomes him and he does the evil he hates, with no compulsion.
The record, by era
The Church Fathers5 voices
A commentator
Theodoret of CyrusINTERPRETATION OF THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS · Written before 458.
proposed
We do not sin from necessity or by compulsion; rather we are overcome by desire and do things which in principle we detest.
A commentator
Diodorus of TarsusPAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH · Written before 390.
proposed
Paul is not condemning himself here but describing the common lot of mankind, which he sees in himself.
A commentator
Methodius of OlympusMethodius From the Discourse on the Resurrection · Written before 311.
proposed
Hence evil, as though besieging me, cleaves to me and dwells in me, justice giving me up to be sold to the Evil One, in consequence of having violated the law. Therefore also the expressions: "That which I do, I allow not," and "what I hate, that do I," are not to be understood of doing evil, but of only thinking it. For it is not in our power to think or not to think of improper things, but to act or not to act upon our thoughts. For we cannot hinder thoughts from coming into our minds, since we receive them when they are inspired into us from without; but we are able to abstain from obeying them and acting upon them.
A commentator
Cyril of AlexandriaEXPLANATION OF THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS · Written before 444.
proposed
It appears that this refers to the ignorant Gentiles, whose thoughts Paul is reproducing. For having consigned their destiny and future to their own lusts even to the point of regarding vain idols as having some power over our lives, they deprive man of his glory, which is the ability to live freely, and to have full and complete control over his own will to do whatever he wishes.… It may be that someone who is forced to act against his will cannot be blamed for it, but at the same time no rational person will praise him for his godliness and righteousness either. For why should somebody be praised for doing things against his own will, even if he is forced to do so by a power over which he has no control?
What does the "I know not" mean?-I am ignorant. And when could this ever happen? For nobody ever sinned in ignorance. Seest thou, that if we do not receive his words with the proper caution, and keep looking to the object of the Apostle, countless incongruities will follow? For if they sinned through ignorance, then they did not deserve to be punished. As then he said above, "for without the Law sin is dead," not meaning that they did not know they were sinning, but that they knew indeed, but not so distinctly; wherefore they were punished, but not so severely: and again; "I should not have known lust;" not meaning an entire ignorance of it, but referring to the most distinct knowledge of it; and said, that it also "wrought in me all manner of concupiscence, not meaning to say that the commandment made the concupiscence, but that sin through the commandment introduces an intense degree of concupiscence; so here it is not absolute ignorance that he means by saying, "For what I do, I know not;" since how then would he have pleasure in the law of God in his inner man? What then is this, "I know not?" I get dizzy, he means, I feel carried away, I find a violence done to me, I get tripped up without knowing how. Just as we often say, Such an one came and carried me away with him, without my knowing how; when it is not ignorance we mean as an excuse, but to show a sort of deceit, and circumvention, and plot. "For what I would, that I do not: but what I hate, that I do." How then canst thou be said not to know what thou art doing? For if thou willest the good, and hatest the evil, this requires a perfect knowledge. Whence it appears that he says, "that I would not," not as denying free will, or as adducing any constrained necessity. For if it was not willingly, but by compulsion, that we sinned, then the punishments that took place before would not be justifiable.
8 more voices on this verse
The Church Fathers2 voices
A commentator
Lucius Caecilius Firmianus LactantiusThe Divine Institutes Book 4, Chapter XXIV · Written before 325.
proposed
Come, let us now consider whether a teacher sent from heaven can fail to be perfect. Let us suppose that some one were to be sent from heaven to instruct the life of men in the first principles of virtue, and to form them to righteousness. No one can doubt but that this teacher, who is sent from heaven, would be as perfect in the knowledge of all things as in virtue, lest there should be no difference between a heavenly and an earthly teacher. For in the case of a man his instruction can by no means be from within and of himself. For the mind, shut in by earthly organs, and hindered by a corrupt body, of itself can neither comprehend nor receive the truth, unless it is taught from another source. How then can one practise what he teaches, unless he is like him whom he teaches? For if he be subject to no passion, a man may thus answer him who is the teacher: It is my wish not to sin, but I am overpowered; for I am clothed with frail and weak flesh: it is this which covets, which is angry, which fears pain and death. And thus I am led on against my will; and I sin, not because it is my wish, but because I am compelled. I myself perceive that I sin; but the necessity imposed by my frailty, which I am unable to resist, impels me. What will that teacher of righteousness say in reply to these things? How will he refute and convict a man who shall allege the frailty of the flesh as an excuse for his faults, unless he himself also shall be clothed with flesh, so that he may show that even the flesh is capable of virtue?
This may appear to the less discerning to contradict [verse 13]. How can sin be made manifest if it is not understood? But here "I do not understand" means "I do not approve." For instance, darkness cannot be seen, but it is perceived in contrast to light; in other words, to perceive darkness is not to see it. Likewise sin, because it is not made clear by the light of righteousness, is discerned by not understanding in the way that darkness is perceived by not seeing. "Who understands his own transgressions?
The Medieval Church2 voices
Then he clarifies what he had stated, when he says, for that which I work: first, that the law is spiritual; second, that man is carnal, sold under sin, now then it is no more. In regard to the first he does two things: first, …
Here he speaks not of complete ignorance, for if they sinned in ignorance, then for what would they be punished? What then does he say? I remain in darkness, I am carried away, I do not know how sin carries me away. Therefore, when he …
The Puritans and the Awakening2 voices
4 Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God. 5 For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death.
quarantine:scripture (2026-07-29) — verbatim-scripture
For that which I do, I allow not,.... The apostle having cleared the law from the charge of being the cause either of sin or death, and taken the blame to himself, proceeds to give an account of the struggle and combat he found in himself between the flesh and spirit; "that which I do, I allow not".
The Nineteenth Century2 voices
A commentator
Albert Barnes1798–1870
Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869)
For that which I do - That is, the evil which I do, the sin of which I am conscious, and which troubles me. I allow not - I do not approve; I do not wish it; the prevailing bent of my inclinations and purposes is against it. Greek, “I know not;” see the margin. The word “know,” however, is sometimes used in the sense of approving, Rev 2:24, “Which have not known (approved) the depths of Satan;” compare Psa 101:4, I will not know a wicked person.” Jer 1:
For, that which I do, I allow not, etc. - The first clause of this verse is a general assertion concerning the employment of the person in question in the state which the apostle calls carnal, and sold under sin. The Greek word κατεργαξομαι which is here translated I do, means a work which the agent continues to perform till it is finished, and is used by the apostle, Php 2:12, to denote the continued employment of God’s saints in his service to the end of their lives. Work Out your own salvation; the word here denotes an employment of a different kind; and therefore the man who now feels the galling dominion of sin says, What I am continually labouring at I allow not, ου γινωσκω, I do not acknowledge to be right, just, holy, or profitable. But what I hate, that do I - I am a slave, and under the absolute control of my tyrannical master: I hate his service, but am obliged to work his will. Who, without blaspheming, can assert that the apostle is speaking this of a man in whom the Spirit of the Lord dwells? From Rom 7:7 to this one the apostle, says Dr. Taylor, denotes the Jew in the flesh by a single I; here, he divides that I into two I’s, or figurative persons; representing two different and opposite principles which were in him. The one I, or principle, assents to the law that it is good, and wills and chooses what the other does not practice, Rom 7:16. This principle he expressly tells us, Rom 7:22, is the inward man; the law of the mind, Rom 7:23; the mind, or rational faculty, Rom 7:25; for he could find no other inward man, or law of the mind, but the rational faculty, in a person who was carnal and sold under sin. The other I, or principle, transgresses the law, Rom 7:23, and does those things which the former principle allows not. […]
The words behind it
16 Greek wordsEvery Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.
| Greek | Sound | Meaning | Word study | In the Bible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ὃ | ho | What | G3739 → | 1405 times |
| γὰρ | gar | for | G1063 → | 1039 times |
| κατεργάζομαι | katergazomai | I do | G2716 → | 22 times |
| οὐ | ou | not | G3756 → | 1664 times |
| γινώσκω· | ginosko | I understand; | G1097 → | 221 times |
| οὐ | ou | not | G3756 → | 1664 times |
| γὰρ | gar | for | G1063 → | 1039 times |
| ὃ | ho | what | G3739 → | 1405 times |
| θέλω | thelo | I want | G2309 → | 208 times |
| τοῦτο | touto | this | G3778 → | 1381 times |
| πράσσω, | prasso | I do, | G4238 → | 39 times |
| ἀλλ᾽ | all᾽ | but | G235 → | 635 times |
| ὃ | ho | what | G3739 → | 1405 times |
| μισῶ | miso | I hate | G3404 → | |
| τοῦτο | touto | this | G3778 → | 1381 times |
| ποιῶ. | poio | I do. | G4160 → | 569 times |
ὃWhat
hoG3739 →1405 times
γὰρfor
garG1063 →1039 times
κατεργάζομαιI do
katergazomaiG2716 →22 times
οὐnot
ouG3756 →1664 times
γινώσκω·I understand;
ginoskoG1097 →221 times
οὐnot
ouG3756 →1664 times
γὰρfor
garG1063 →1039 times
ὃwhat
hoG3739 →1405 times
θέλωI want
theloG2309 →208 times
τοῦτοthis
toutoG3778 →1381 times
πράσσω,I do,
prassoG4238 →39 times
ἀλλ᾽but
all᾽G235 →635 times
ὃwhat
hoG3739 →1405 times
μισῶI hate
misoG3404 →
τοῦτοthis
toutoG3778 →1381 times
ποιῶ.I do.
poioG4160 →569 times
A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.
The walk
8 stopsEach card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.
Through
Nahum 1:7The LORD is good, a stronghold in the day of distress; He cares for those who trust in Him.
it leads to
- 2 Timothy 2:19
Nevertheless, God’s firm foundation stands, bearing this seal: “The Lord knows those who are His,” and, “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord must turn away from iniquity.”
- John 10:27
My sheep listen to My voice; I know them, and they follow Me.
- Lamentations 3:25
The LORD is good to those who wait for Him, to the soul who seeks Him.
- John 10:14
I am the good shepherd. I know My sheep and My sheep know Me,
- Psalms 91:1–2
He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will abide in the shadow of the Almighty.
- 2 Timothy 2:19
Through
James 3:2We all stumble in many ways. If anyone is never at fault in what he says, he is a perfect man, able to control his whole body.
it leads to
- James 1:26
If anyone considers himself religious and yet does not bridle his tongue, he deceives his heart and his religion is worthless.
- Proverbs 13:3
He who guards his mouth protects his life, but the one who opens his lips invites his own ruin.
- 1 Peter 3:10
For, “Whoever would love life and see good days must keep his tongue from evil and his lips from deceitful speech.
- James 1:26
Where this verse is studied
On this page
Studies3
On this verse
On this chapter
About Romans

This page draws on 16 works. Open the list of works
This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Augustine of Hippo, AUGUSTINE ON ROMANS 43.; Cyril of Alexandria, EXPLANATION OF THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS; Diodorus of Tarsus, PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Chrysostom, Homily on Romans 13; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Lucius Caecilius Firmianus Lactantius, The Divine Institutes Book 4, Chapter XXIV; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Methodius of Olympus, Methodius From the Discourse on the Resurrection; Origen of Alexandria, COMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS; Theodoret of Cyrus, INTERPRETATION OF THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Romans and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Romans.
