Leviticuschapter 6
30 verses · Moses, by tradition · 15th to 13th century BC · The Law
Command Aaron and his sons, saying, This is the law of the burnt offering: It is the burnt offering, because of the burning upon the altar all night unto the morning, and the fire of the altar shall be burning in it.
Introduction
Moses, by tradition, The Law, Leviticus Overview.
Here the instruction turns from the worshipper to the men who serve at the altar. It opens with the last case of the guilt offering, a wrong done to a neighbour in business, and then gives the earlier offerings again from the priest's side. It was heard first by Aaron and his sons, newly set apart and answerable for all that the nation brought. Listen for the command about the altar fire given three times, for the order in which a wrong is put right, and for the rules on what a holy thing touches. It shows the priests bound by rules as close as the people's.
Context
- Who
- Aaron and his sons, told how to handle what the nation brings, with the restitution law of verses 1 to 7 still addressed to everyone
- What
- The last case of the guilt offering, wrongs done to a neighbour, followed by the laws of the burnt, grain and sin offerings given to the priests.
- Where
- The tabernacle at Sinai: the altar whose fire never goes out, the court where the priests ate, and the clean place outside the camp for the ashes.
- When
- About 1445 BC on the traditional dating, at Sinai in the first month of the second year after the Exodus, while other scholars date the writing of the priestly laws later.
- Why
- To settle wrongs between neighbours before the altar, and to teach the priests how to handle what the nation brought.
Historical context
Four speeches open in this chapter, at verses 1, 8, 19 and 24, which is more than any other chapter of Leviticus carries. From verse 8 the addressee changes, and the offerings of chapters 1 to 5 are given again to the men who handle them.
Show the rest of the historical context, 4 more paragraphs
The Hebrew text ends chapter 5 at what English Bibles print as verse 7 here and begins chapter 6 at verse 8. Adam Clarke and John Gill both record the division, so a reader working from a Hebrew Bible meets the restitution law in the previous chapter.
The wrongs listed at verses 2 and 3 are ordinary business. A deposit denied, a partnership cheated, goods taken by force, a lost thing found and kept. Verse 5 fixes the repayment on the day the guilt offering is presented, so the neighbour is settled with before the altar is.
A first hearer would have been struck by what the priests are told to do first. Before any offering is described, Aaron carries out the ashes, changes his garments and takes them outside the camp to a clean place.
Around that stands the one command this passage gives three times, at verses 9, 12 and 13, that the fire on the altar is kept burning and never goes out. Leviticus 9:24 is where that fire began, so the wood laid on each morning feeds a fire no priest kindled.
Significance
For Israel the chapter meant that the priesthood was bound by rules as tight as the ones the nation kept. The men who received the offerings were told what to wear, what to eat, where to eat it and what to break afterwards.
Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph
For a man who had cheated a neighbour it meant something plainer. The wrong was called a wrong against the LORD, and it was settled with the neighbour first and the altar second.
This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.
What is done
This chapter is about the priest's working day, and the tradition describes it closely. He wore a linen tunic cut to his own measure, and linen drawers against the skin with nothing between (Rashi on Leviticus 6:3:1 and 6:3:2). Rashi is quoted from the Pentateuch with Rashi's commentary translated by M. Rosenbaum and A. M. Silbermann, 1929 to 1934, which the corpus marks public domain. Lifting a panful of ashes off the altar was a daily duty. Carrying the ash heap out was done when the heap grew too large for the woodpile (Rashi on Leviticus 6:4:2). The change of clothes before carrying the ashes out was a matter of decency rather than law. Rashi gives the reason in a servant's terms. A man who boiled his master's pot puts on other clothes before he pours his master's wine (Rashi on Leviticus 6:4:1). Fat portions and limbs could be burned through the whole night (Rashi on Leviticus 6:2:2). The fire on the altar burned without a break, and the lamps of the lampstand were lit from it (Rashi on Leviticus 6:6:1). The priests ate their share of the grain offering unleavened, inside the enclosure of the Tent of Meeting (Rashi on Leviticus 6:9:1 and 6:10:1). A priest with a bodily blemish ate and also took his share in the division (Rashi on Leviticus 6:11:1). An earthen pot in which a sin offering had been boiled was broken (Rashi on Leviticus 6:21:1). None of this has been done since the Temple fell in AD 70, a break this site records on its feasts layer (src/lib/hebraic/feasts.ts).
How it is read
The opening word is read as pressure rather than instruction. Rashi holds that a command in this form urges the hearer on, takes effect at once and binds the generations after. He carries the saying of Rabbi Simeon that Scripture presses hardest where obeying costs money (Rashi on Leviticus 6:2:1). The heading of each paragraph in this chapter is read as a general rule covering its whole class. From the first heading the tradition learns which disqualified offerings stay on the altar once they have been brought up (Rashi on Leviticus 6:2:2). From the heading of the grain offering it learns that the oil and the frankincense are required of a priest's offering as well as an Israelite's (Rashi on Leviticus 6:7:1).
Two paragraphs are read as setting the priesthood apart from the people it serves. The priest's own grain offering is burned whole, with no portion kept back for any priest to eat (Rashi on Leviticus 6:16:1). An ordinary priest brings such an offering on the day he enters service, and the high priest brings one every day of his life (Rashi on Leviticus 6:13:1). The word for its preparation is read as scalding with hot oil until it is soaked through (Rashi on Leviticus 6:14:1).
The chapter's last paragraph is read as a law of contact. Rashi takes the flesh of the sin offering to pass its holiness to any food that touches it and takes in its substance (Rashi on Leviticus 6:20:1). He explains the breaking of the earthen vessel by what the clay has absorbed, which would be left over past its time (Rashi on Leviticus 6:21:1). He reads the priest who performs the blood rite as the one who makes the animal a sin offering (Rashi on Leviticus 6:19:1). The verse naming all the males of the priesthood then shows that the earlier verse shut out only the priests unfit to serve at that hour (Rashi on Leviticus 6:22:1). A sin offering whose blood was carried inside when it belonged on the outer altar was void and had to be burned (Rashi on Leviticus 6:23:1).
Ibn Ezra stands on the eighteenth verse, and the corpus keeps no text of him because the licence Sefaria reports does not permit it (Ibn Ezra on Leviticus 6:18:1). Malbim stands on the first, and Sefaria holds no English version of it (Malbim on Leviticus, Tzav 1:1).
What the rabbis say
The corpus carries forty Midrash and Talmud locators on this chapter and the text of none of them. Each is cited here rather than quoted, and what each teaches is reported as the teaching of the rabbis.
The Jerusalem Talmud carries seventeen of them, more than on any other chapter in this part of the book. Four stand in Horayot, at 3:2:6, 3:2:1, 3:2:29 and 1:8:2. Two stand in Challah, at 3:5:4 and 4:4:17, two in Sotah, at 3:7:1 and 2:1:9, and two in Kiddushin, at 1:7:1 and 2:6:3. The last seven stand at Berakhot 1:1:1, Bikkurim 3:4:7, Yevamot 1:1:3, Eruvin 6:8:6, Shekalim 7:3:5, Nedarim 1:1:14 and Gittin 5:9:3. Fourteen Babylonian locators stand beside them. Horayot carries four, at 2b:17, 9a:4, 11b:11 and 12a:15. Chullin carries three, at 132a:1, 131b:21 and 99a:1. Arakhin carries two, at 3b:11 and 4a:8. The rest are Bava Metzia 55a:4, Bava Kamma 111a:13, Bekhorot 33b:15, Menachot 19a:18 and Avodah Zarah 76a:6 on the broken vessel.
Nine midrashic locators run beside them. Bamidbar Rabbah carries four, at 13:2 on the command, at 4:20 on the linen, and at 11:6 and 4:17 on the fire. Ein Yaakov carries three, at Shabbat 15:3 in the Glick Edition and in its own text, and at Menakhot 13:5. The others are Eikhah Rabbah, Petichta 11, and Esther Rabbah 3:6.
Sources: Rashi, Rashi on Leviticus 6:2:1 to 6:23:1, the Pentateuch with Rashi's commentary translated by M. Rosenbaum and A. M. Silbermann, 1929 to 1934, public domain; Ibn Ezra, Ibn Ezra on Leviticus 6:18:1, cited by ref because the licence Sefaria reports does not permit the text; Malbim, Malbim on Leviticus, Tzav 1:1, cited by ref because Sefaria holds no English version; MannaFest, the feasts layer, src/lib/hebraic/feasts.ts, on the Temple's fall in AD 70; The Sefaria corpus, scripts/data/sources/sefaria/leviticus/6.json, the 40 Midrash and Talmud locators of this chapter.
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
Give it back, and add a fifth
Leviticus 6:1-8
A wrong done to a neighbour is called acting unfaithfully against the LORD, and the wrongs listed are a deposit denied, extortion and lost property kept. Restitution in full with a fifth is paid to the owner on the day he acknowledges his guilt, and then the ram goes to the priest. In the Hebrew text verses 1 to 7 close chapter 5, as Adam Clarke and John Gill record.
Leviticus 6:1
“And the Lord spake unto Moses,.... Continuing his speech with him, for the same law of the trespass offering is still discoursed of, only with respect to different persons: saying: as follows.”
2 more voices on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.
Leviticus 6:1
“In the Hebrew Bible Lev 6:1-7 form part of Lev. 5. It is evident that they ought to do so.”
Leviticus 6:1
“Concerning the meal- offerings, ver. 14-18. Particularly that at the consecration of the priests, ver. 19-23. Concerning the sin-offering, ver. 24-30.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Adam Clarke pictures goods left in a neighbor's keeping with no witness to the handing over, so the keeper could deny he ever received them. Matthew Henry gives the reason such a wrong is counted against the LORD, since an injury to a neighbor affronts the neighbor's Maker. The verse also names theft and extortion, where the goods were taken by force or fraud.
Leviticus 6:2
“Or in fellowship - Hebrew. Or in putting of the hand: that is, commerce or fellowship in trading, which is very usual when one man puts any thing into another's hand, not to keep it, but to improve it for the common benefit of them both, in which cases of partnership it is easy for one to deceive the other, and therefore provision is made against it.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
2 more voices on this verse
Leviticus 6:2
“Lie unto his neighbor, etc. - This must refer to a case in which a person delivered his property to his neighbor to be preserved for him, and took no witness to attest the delivery of the goods; such a person therefore might deny that he had ever received such goods, for he who had deposited them with him could bring no proof of the delivery.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Leviticus 6:2
“Though all the instances relate to our neighbour, yet it is called a trespass against the Lord, because, though the injury be done immediately to our neighbour, yet an affront is thereby given to his Maker and our Master. He that speaks evil of his brother is said to speak evil of the law, and consequently of the Law-maker, Jam. iv.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
A man who finds lost property, denies having it and swears falsely to cover the denial falls under the same law. Adam Clarke sets beside it a maxim of Roman law, that a finder who kept property for his own use was a thief whether or not he knew the owner. The closing clause extends the law to any such sin a man might commit.
Leviticus 6:3
“Have found that which was lost - The Roman lawyers laid it down as a sound maxim of jurisprudence, “that he who found any property and applied it to his own use, should be considered as a thief whether he knew the owner or not; for in their view the crime was not lessened, supposing the finder was totally ignorant of the right owner.” Qui alienum quid jacens lucri faciendi causa sustulit, furti obstringitur, sive scit, cujus sit, sive ignoravit; nihil enim ad furtum minuendum, facit, quod, cujus sit, ignoret - Digestor, lib. xlvii., Tit. ii., de furtis, Leg.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Once he has sinned and becomes guilty, each item named in verses 2 and 3 goes back to its owner: the stolen goods, the goods taken by extortion, the deposit and the lost property. John Wesley reads becomes guilty as guilt shown by the man's own confession out of remorse. He sets that voluntary confession against conviction, which carried a heavier payment.
Leviticus 6:4
“Is guilty - This guilt being manifested by his voluntary confession upon remorse, whereby he reapeth this benefit, that he only restores the principal with the addition of a fifth part; whereas if he were convicted of his fault, he was to pay double, Exod. xxii, 9.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Restitution covers anything he swore falsely about as well as the cases already named, paid in full with a fifth of the value added, and it goes to the owner. John Wesley insists it must not be delayed, since keeping what was wrongly taken continues the wrong. He holds that forgiveness cannot be looked for until restitution is made as far as a man is able.
Leviticus 6:5
“In the day - It must not be delayed, but restitution to man must accompany repentance towards God. Wherever wrong has been done, restitution must be made, and till it is made to the utmost of our power we cannot look for forgiveness; for the keeping of what is unjustly got, avows the taking: And both together make but one continued act of unrighteousness.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
After the owner is repaid, the man brings the same unblemished ram of proper value that Leviticus 5:15 required for a wrong in holy things. Matthew Henry holds that the offering could not satisfy for sin by itself and drew its worth from the atonement of Christ, noting that Isaiah 53 uses the same word.
Leviticus 6:6
“This trespass-offering could not, of itself, make satisfaction for sin, nor reconciliation between God and the sinner, but as it signified the atonement that was to be made by our Lord Jesus, when he should make his soul an offering or sin, a trespass-offering; it is the same word that is here used, Isa. liii.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
The priest makes atonement before the LORD with the ram, and the man is forgiven for anything he did to incur guilt. The promise closes the wrongs against a neighbor with the words that closed the cases at Leviticus 5:10, 13, 16 and 18. Matthew Henry, on verse 6, reads that forgiveness as resting on what the ram signified, the atonement Christ would make.
The fire that must never go out
This speech opens the priest's instructions for the offerings, and the next verse is addressed to Aaron and his sons. Adam Clarke notes that the Jews begin the twenty-fifth section of the law at this verse. John Wesley, on verse 9, marks the turn in subject, since the chapters before prescribed the sacrifices and the verses that follow give the manner of handling them.
Leviticus 6:8
“And the Lord spake unto Moses - At this verse the Jews begin the 25th section of the law; and here, undoubtedly, the 6th chapter should commence, as the writer enters upon a new subject, and the preceding verses belong to the fifth chapter. The best edited Hebrew Bibles begin the 6th chapter at this verse.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Leviticus 6:9-13
This is the law of the burnt offering: The offerings are now given from the side of the priest, and his first duty is the ashes, removed in his linen robe and carried outside the camp in other clothes. One command stands at verses 9, 12 and 13, that the fire must be kept burning. At Leviticus 9:24 fire came out from the presence of the LORD to consume the first offering on that altar.
Leviticus 6:9
“Rather, “This, the burnt-offering, shall be upon the fire on the altar all night unto the morning.” See Exo 29:38-46, with the notes.”
1 more voice on this verse
Leviticus 6:9
“And the Lord spake - Hitherto he hath prescribed the sacrifices themselves; now he comes to the manner of them. The burnt- offering - The daily one, which Exod. xxix, 38, Num. xxviii, 3, as the following words shew. This was to be so managed and laid on piece after piece, that the fire might be constantly maintained by it.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
The priest dresses in the linen robe and undergarments of Exodus 28:39-42 to take up the ashes, and he sets them down beside the altar before they are carried out. Matthew Henry reads the care as honour to the altar and to the sacrifices burnt on it. Even the ashes were kept, he says, to show the regard God had for the burnt offering.
Leviticus 6:10
“God would have this done, for the honour of his altar and the sacrifices that were burnt upon it. Even the ashes of the sacrifices must be preserved, to testify the regard God had to it; by the burnt-offering he was honoured, and therefore thus it was honoured, and therefore thus it was honoured.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Adam Clarke explains the change of clothes: the holy garments were used only in the holy place, so the priest put on others for the walk outside. He describes the clean place as ground where no carcasses, dung or filth lay, since the ashes were the remains of offerings made by fire. Leviticus 4:12 sends the remains of the sin offering bull to the same kind of place.
Leviticus 6:11
“And put on other garments - The priests approached the altar in their holiest garments; when carrying the ashes, etc., from the altar, they put on other garments, the holy garments being only used in the holy place. Clean place - A place where no dead carcasses, dung, or filth of any kind was laid; for the ashes were holy, as being the remains of the offerings made by fire unto the Lord.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The morning wood is followed by the burnt offering arranged on the fire and then the fat of any peace offerings. John Wesley holds that the evening is also meant, and that morning is named because the altar was then cleared of its ashes. He reads the fat as laid upon the burnt offering, which was then consumed sooner to make room for other sacrifices.
Leviticus 6:12
“Every morning - Though the evening also be doubtless intended, yet the morning is only mentioned, because then the altar was cleansed, and the ashes taken away, and a new fire made. Thereon - Upon the burnt- offering, which thereby would be sooner consumed, that the way might be made for other sacrifices.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
The third statement of the command adds the word continually, so the fire burns through the day as well as through the night of verse 9. Matthew Henry supposes that extraordinary sacrifices were offered every day between the morning and evening lambs, which would keep the fire fed from morning to night. The daily lambs themselves are set out in Exodus 29:38-42.
Leviticus 6:13
“We may suppose that no day passed without some extraordinary sacrifices, which were always offered between the morning and evening lamb; so that from morning to night the fire on the altar was kept up of course.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
The priests' portion of the grain
Leviticus 6:14-18
A handful of fine flour and olive oil, with all the frankincense, goes up as the memorial portion, and the rest is eaten without leaven in the courtyard. Verse 17 gives the reason: I have assigned it as their portion of My offerings made by fire. Verse 18 ends with holiness passing by contact, Anything that touches them will become holy, and the clause returns at verse 27.
Leviticus 6:14
“Of the meal-offering - Of that which was offered alone, and that by any of the people, not by the priest, for then it must have been all burnt. This law before delivered, is here repeated for the sake of some additions made to it.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
The handful burned is taken from an offering with a set minimum. Adam Clarke gives the smallest grain offering as an omer, a tenth of an ephah and about three quarts, usually brought with a log of oil of a little more than half a pint. The worshipper could bring more, and only the handful with all the frankincense went to the altar.
Leviticus 6:15
“His handful of the flour - An omer of flour, which was the tenth part of an ephah, and equal to about three quarts of our measure, was the least quantity that could be offered even by the poorest sort, and this was generally accompanied with a log of oil, which was a little more than half a pint. This quantity both of flour and oil might be increased at pleasure, but no less could be offered.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The courtyard of the Tent of Meeting is named as the holy place where the remainder is eaten. Matthew Henry treats the eating itself as a sacred rite by which the priests honoured God, so that carrying any of it out of the court was a great crime. The same courtyard is named for eating the sin offering at verse 26.
Leviticus 6:16
“See Lev 2:1-10; Exo 29:40-41. Lev 6:16 With unleavened bread shall it be eaten - This should be, it (the remainder) shall be eaten unleavened.”
1 more voice on this verse
Leviticus 6:16
“It was a great crime to carry any of it out of the court. The very eating of it was a sacred rite, by which they were to honour God, and therefore it must be done in a religious manner, and with a holy reverence, which was preserved by confining it to the holy place.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
The ban on leaven repeats the rule of Leviticus 2:11, now applied to the portion the priests eat. The verse ranks this grain offering with the sin offering and the guilt offering as most holy, the class that Leviticus 6:25 and 7:1 give to those two. Matthew Henry, on verse 16, treats the priests' eating of it as a sacred rite held within the court.
Only the males of Aaron's line eat this permanent portion. Matthew Henry explains the limit. The daughters of priests could eat the less holy things, such as firstfruits, tithes and the breast and shoulder of the peace offerings, which could be carried out of the court, while the most holy things were eaten at the tabernacle by the sons alone.
Leviticus 6:18
“Of the less holy things, as the first-fruits and tithes, and the shoulder and breasts of the peace-offerings, the daughters of the priests might eat, for they might be carried out of the court; but this was of the most holy things, which being to be eaten only in the tabernacle, the sons of Aaron only might eat of it.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
The high priest's daily cake, wholly burned
Leviticus 6:19-24
Every other grain offering feeds a priest, and the priest's own feeds nobody: a tenth of an ephah, half in the morning and half in the evening, burned completely. Adam Clarke reads on the day he is anointed as the start of a standing duty, since verse 20 calls it a regular grain offering. A fourth speech of the LORD to Moses in this chapter begins at verse 24.
Leviticus 6:19
“And the Lord spake unto Moses,.... At the same time the above laws were delivered: saying; as follows.”
John Wesley reads the half in the morning and the half in the evening as joined to the morning and evening sacrifices. He counts it as an offering over and above the grain offering that accompanied those daily sacrifices. He also notes that this law of consecration was given earlier and is repeated here because of additions made to it.
Leviticus 6:20
“This law of his consecration was delivered before, and is here repeated because of some additions made to it. Perpetual - Whensoever any of them shall be so anointed. At night - Or, in the evening; the one to be annexed to the morning-sacrifice, the other to the evening- sacrifice, over and besides that meal-offering which every day was to be added to the daily morning and evening sacrifices.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Leviticus 6:20
“In the day when he is anointed - Not only in that day, but from that day forward, for this was to them and their successors a statute for ever. See Lev 6:22.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The flour is prepared with oil on a griddle, brought well kneaded and presented broken in pieces, the way Leviticus 2:5-6 prepares a griddle offering. Like the other grain offerings, it rises as a pleasing aroma to the LORD. John Gill, on the next verse, sets it apart from a common grain offering, where only a handful was burnt and the rest went to the priest.
Albert Barnes renders the last clause literally as the offering ascending in fire as a whole burnt offering. John Gill identifies the priest anointed in Aaron's place as the high priest's successor, and he reads the permanent portion as a statute binding every high priest until the Messiah should come. The duty passes from Aaron to each son who takes his office.
Leviticus 6:22
“And the priest of his sons that is anointed in his stead shall offer it,.... The successor of the high priest: it is a statute for ever unto the Lord; which he by an everlasting statute appointed to be offered to him by every high priest, until the Messiah should come: it shall be wholly burnt; of a common meat offering only a handful was burnt, and the rest was the priest's; see Lev 6:15.”
1 more voice on this verse
Leviticus 6:22
It shall be wholly burnt - literally, “it shall ascend in fire as a whole burnt-offering.”
The rule widens from the anointed priest's daily offering to every grain offering brought for a priest, and none of it is eaten. Adam Clarke explains that the priests were fed from the offerings of the people. If they ate their own offerings, he says, they would take back what they seemed to give to the LORD, as though they had offered nothing.
Leviticus 6:23
“For every meat-offering for the priest shall be wholly burnt - Whatever the priest offered was wholly the Lord’s, and therefore must be entirely consumed: the sacrifices of the common people were offered to the Lord, but the priests partook of them; and thus they who ministered at the altar were fed by the altar. Had the priests been permitted to live on their own offerings as they did on those of the people, it would have been as if they had offered nothing, as they would have taken again to themselves what they appeared to give unto the Lord.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Handling the sin offering in a holy place
This speech introduces the law of the sin offering, the last of the priest's instructions in this chapter. John Gill reads the formula as the LORD continuing His discourse with Moses. The message is again passed to Aaron and his sons in verse 25, since the handling of the sin offering falls to the priests.
Leviticus 6:24
“And the Lord spake unto Moses,.... Continued his discourse with him: saying; as follows.”
Leviticus 6:25-27
This is the law of the sin offering: The sin offering is slaughtered where the burnt offering is slaughtered, and the priest who offers it eats it. Leviticus 10:17 gives the reason, to take away the guilt of the congregation, and 10:16-20 records the one time the rule was broken, when Aaron's sons burned the goat. Verse 27 has holiness pass by touch, and spattered blood is washed out in a holy place.
Leviticus 6:25
“The place where ... - See Lev 1:11. It is most holy - See Lev 2:3. The key to the special sanctity of the flesh of the sin-offering, as set forth in Lev 6:26-30, must, it would seem, be found in the words of Moses to the priests Lev 10:17. The flesh of the victim, which represented the sinner for whom atonement was now made, was to be solemnly, and most exclusively, appropriated by those who were appointed to mediate between the sinner and the Lord.”
John Wesley limits the eating to sin offerings for a ruler or for the people, since the blood of a priest's own sin offering was brought into the tabernacle and that flesh could not be eaten. Adam Clarke adds that the portion was also part of the priests' maintenance, as Ezekiel 44:27-30 records, and he notes that men later sought the office for that provision.
Leviticus 6:26
“For sin - For the sins of the rulers, or of the people, or any of them, but not for the sins of the priests; for then its blood was brought into the tabernacle, and therefore it might not be eaten.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Leviticus 6:26
“The priest - shall eat it - From the expostulation of Moses with Aaron, Lev 10:17, we learn that the priest, by eating the sin-offering of the people, was considered as bearing their sin, and typically removing it from them: and besides, this was a part of their maintenance, or what the Scripture calls their inheritance; see Eze 44:27-30. This was afterwards greatly abused; for improper persons endeavored to get into the priest’s office merely that they might get a secular provision, which is a horrible profanity in the sight of God.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
John Wesley takes the garment to be the priest's own, since he alone sprinkled the blood and might easily spatter himself. He gives two reasons for washing it in a holy place: reverence for the blood of the sacrifices, which kept it from a common touch, and the need for garments fit for sacred service.
Leviticus 6:27
“Upon any garment - Upon the priest's garment; for it was he only that sprinkled it, and in so doing he might easily sprinkle his garments. In the holy place - Partly out of reverence to the blood of sacrifices, which hereby was kept from a profane or common touch; and partly that such garments might be decent, and fit for sacred administrations.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Leviticus 6:28-30
A clay pot the meat was boiled in is broken, and a bronze pot is scoured and rinsed and kept, with no reason given. Verse 30 lifts one class out of the eating rule: where the blood was brought into the Tent of Meeting, the meat is burned. Chapter 16 applies it on the Day of Atonement, and Hebrews 13:11-12 sets Jesus suffering outside the city gate beside it.
Leviticus 6:28
“The earthen vessel - shall be broken - Calmet states that this should be considered as implying the vessels brought by individuals to the court of the temple or tabernacle, and not of the vessels that belonged to the priests for the ordinary service. That the people dressed their sacrifices sometimes in the court of the tabernacle, he gathers from 1Sa 2:13, 1Sa 2:14, to which the reader is desired to refer. In addition to what has been already said on the different subjects in this chapter, it may be necessary to notice a few more particulars.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
2 more voices on this verse
Leviticus 6:28
“Broken - Because being full of pores, the liquor in which it was sodden might easily sink into it, whereby it was ceremonially holy, and therefore was broken, lest afterwards it should be abused to common uses.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Leviticus 6:28
“This intimated that the defilement was not wholly taken away by the offering, but did rather cleave to it, such was the weakness and deficiency of those sacrifices; but the blood of Christ thoroughly cleanses from all sin, and after it there needs no cleansing.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Verse 26 gave the flesh to the priest who offered it, and this verse opens it to every male among the priests. John Gill reads the two verses together: the officiating priest shared the meal with his male children and with the other priests on duty in the court. The same males ate the most holy grain offering at verse 18.
Leviticus 6:29
“And all the males among the priests shall eat thereof,.... As of the meat offerings, Lev 6:18 and this shows that not the single priest that offered only ate of it, Lev 6:26 but his male children, and not those only, but those of other priests then upon duty, or in the court: it is most holy; See Gill on Lev 6:25.”
The blood of the sin offering for the anointed priest and for the whole congregation was carried into the tent at Leviticus 4:5 and 4:16, so those two offerings fall under this rule. Albert Barnes identifies the Holy Place here as the outer room of the tabernacle. He points to Leviticus 10:18, where Moses applies the rule to a goat whose blood had stayed outside.
Leviticus 6:30
“To reconcile withal generally rendered “to make atonement for.” The holy place - The outer apartment of the tabernacle. See the Lev 10:18 note.”
How this psalm is built
The form: Ritual instruction addressed to the priesthood, each section opening on the phrase this is the law of, as law classes it.
The patterns in this chapter
| Device | What it does | Where to see it |
|---|---|---|
| The heading that opens each section | This is the law of the burnt offering at verse 9, of the grain offering at verse 14, and of the sin offering at verse 25. The same heading carries on into chapter 7 for the guilt offering and the peace offering.Counted for this lane over the store's Berean Standard Bible rows for Leviticus, 19 September 2026, Berean Standard Bible, Leviticus, read from the store. | Leviticus 6:9, Leviticus 6:14, Leviticus 6:25 |
| The fire commanded three times over | The fire on the altar is to be kept burning at verse 9, at verse 12 and again at verse 13. One passage gives the same order three times, and verse 13 adds that it must never be extinguished.Counted for this lane over the store's Berean Standard Bible rows for Leviticus, 19 September 2026, Berean Standard Bible, Leviticus, read from the store. | Leviticus 6:9, Leviticus 6:12, Leviticus 6:13 |
| The four speeches inside one chapter | Counted over the store's Berean rows, the LORD speaks to Moses at verses 1, 8, 19 and 24. Those are four of the thirty-three places in the book where a speech opens, and no other chapter of Leviticus carries more.Counted for this lane over the store's Berean Standard Bible rows for Leviticus, 19 September 2026, Berean Standard Bible, Leviticus, read from the store. | Leviticus 6:1, Leviticus 6:8, Leviticus 6:19, Leviticus 6:24 |
| Holiness moving outward by touch | Verse 18 says that whatever touches the grain offering will become holy, and verse 27 says the same of the flesh of the sin offering. The clause returns on a second offering, so the chapter states the rule twice in two different places.Counted for this lane over the store's Berean Standard Bible rows for Leviticus, 19 September 2026, Berean Standard Bible, Leviticus, read from the store. | Leviticus 6:18, Leviticus 6:27 |
The fire the priest did not light
9 more paragraphs on the patterns
Leviticus 9:24 has fire coming out from the presence of the LORD to consume the first offering laid on this altar. The wood the priest lays on every morning at verse 12 feeds a fire he did not kindle. The order of verses 9, 12 and 13 is therefore a charge to keep something already given rather than to produce it.
The counted formula
The phrase rendered a pleasing aroma falls twice in this chapter, at verses 15 and 21. Counted over the store's Berean rows on 19 September 2026, it stands in seventeen verses of Leviticus in all. The grain offering carries it at verse 15 and the priest's own grain offering carries it at verse 21.
The priest's own offering feeds nobody
Every other grain offering feeds the priesthood, and verse 17 says why they have it, that God gave it to them as their portion. The priest's own offering at verses 19 to 23 is wholly burned. A tenth of an ephah goes up, half in the morning and half in the evening. Adam Clarke reads the phrase on the day he is anointed as opening a standing obligation rather than marking one occasion, since verse 20 calls it a regular grain offering.
The New Testament's use
Verse 30 lifts one class of sin offering out of the eating rule. Where the blood was carried into the tent, the flesh is burned and no priest eats it. That is the offering of the Day of Atonement in chapter 16, and Hebrews 13:11 to 13:13 takes up the burning outside the camp and sets the suffering of Jesus outside the gate beside it.
The rule broken once in the book
Verse 26 gives the flesh of a sin offering to the priest who offers it, and the chapter gives no reason. The reason arrives at Leviticus 10:17, where Moses says God gave it to them to bear the iniquity of the congregation. Leviticus 10:16 to 10:20 is the one place the eating rule is broken, when Aaron's surviving sons burn a goat they were to have eaten.
Keep studying
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The form and classifications
Adam Clarke and John Gill, both recorded in the store's exposition of this chapter, MannaFest exposition of Leviticus 6, on verses 1 to 8; The store's published exposition note on Leviticus 6:9 to 13, MannaFest exposition of Leviticus 6, citing Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch and This site's published filing of Leviticus among the books of the law, src/lib/bible/book-sections.ts, the entry Leviticus: law.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.
