Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Susanna · Featured Study · A Labeled Study Resource, Not Canon

Susanna and the Two Judges

Two elders of Israel — judges, trusted men — corner a beautiful, God-fearing woman alone in her garden and hand her a sentence disguised as a choice: yield to us, or we will swear we caught you with a young man, and you will die. Susanna’s answer is the whole tale in one breath: “It is better for me to fall into your hands, and not do it, than to sin in the sight of the Lord.”She is convicted on their word and led out to die — until a young man named Daniel stops the procession with the one demand no liar survives: separate the witnesses. This page tells the trial whole, opens the famous wordplay at its center honestly — and lands where Susanna herself stood: fearing God above every hand that can kill.

The Choice, and the Cross-Examination

the tale's two hinges: verbatim

“Then Susanna sighed, and said, I am straitened on every side: for if I do this thing, it is death unto me: and if I do it not I cannot escape your hands. It is better for me to fall into your hands, and not do it, than to sin in the sight of the Lord.”Susanna 22–23 (KJV Apocrypha) — a labeled study resource, not canon

The court believes its judges; Susanna is condemned unheard. And then: “the Lord raised up the holy spirit of a young youth whose name was Daniel” (v. 45), who refuses the verdict and demands the one procedure corrupt witnesses cannot survive — questioning them apart. Asked under which tree the sin happened, one says a mastick tree, the other a holm tree — two trees, one lie, two exposed liars, and the law of false witness (Deut 19:18–19) falls on their own heads. The tale is the ancient world’s classic lesson in cross-examination, and synagogue and church alike have used it to teach exactly that: testimony must be TESTED, because authority can lie.

The Justification of Susanna: Gustave Doré
The Justification of Susanna: Doré draws the moment the verdict turns. — Gustave Doré, Doré’s English Bible (1866), public domain · Susanna 45-64 (a labeled study resource, not canon)

Two Trees, Two Puns

the wordplay at the tale's center: the standard datum, named honestly

Mastick and holm: what the Greek is doingthe composition question, both positions

Daniel’s two sentences pun in Greek: under the mastick tree (schinos) the angel will cut you in two (schisei); under the holm oak (prinos) he waits to saw you in two (prisai). Since Julius Africanus pressed the point on Origen in the third century, the puns have been the classic argument that Susanna was composed in Greek rather than translated from Hebrew, the standard datum (Metzger; the APOT introduction). The counter-position is as old as Origen’s reply: a translator can craft puns of his own. This page takes no side; it shows the reader the actual evidence both sides argue from, which is what this shelf is for.

Whom She Feared

where Susanna's choice points

“And be not afraid of them that kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” Matthew 10:28 (ASV)

Susanna’s calculus in verse 23 is Matthew 10:28 lived a century or two early: she feared the right Judge more than the two wrong ones, and chose the death men could give over the sin God sees. The tale remains a labeled study resource beside the sixty-six books; its two lessons remain permanently biblical — test every testimony, and fear God more than any court— and its heroine keeps her place among the era’s portraits of a conscience that would not bend.

The Voices on the Trial

with the work named

Bruce M. Metzger

An Introduction to the Apocrypha (Oxford University Press, 1957)

The standard introduction to the Daniel additions: Susanna's placement (before Daniel 1 in some Greek texts, as Daniel's first case), and the wordplay question this page lays out honestly.

Chuck Missler

Daniel (Koinonia House commentary)

Marcus Brown's formative teacher on the canonical Daniel: the young man whose God-given discernment this tale delights to show in its first exercise.

Jerome

Preface to Daniel (c. AD 407)

Public domain. Jerome marked the Greek additions to Daniel with critical signs and reported the church's questions about them: the honest boundary drawn at the church's own scholarly beginning.

R. H. Charles (ed.)

The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament, vol. I (Oxford, 1913)

The standard critical edition: the Susanna introduction, its two Greek text-forms, and the famous puns.

Marcus Brown's own commentary leads above all; within a tier, all voices are equal.

Read the Great Books

the works this study is built on

Susanna

a Greek addition to Daniel: a labeled study resource, not canon

The whole trial, sixty-four verses, in MannaFest’s own reader.

READ IT →

Daniel 1–2

Scripture: read it in MannaFest’s own reader

The canonical Daniel: the discernment this tale delights to show in its first exercise.

READ IT →

The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament, vol. I

R. H. Charles, ed. · 1913

The standard critical edition: Susanna’s two Greek text-forms and the famous puns.

READ IT FREE →

Go on from here

Keep studying

more from The Daniel Additions

Drafted from MannaFest's small-books set brief (2026-08-11). All Susanna quotations verified verbatim against the site's resident KJV Apocrypha text; canon quotations ASV from the resident floor. Metzger (1957) and Charles APOT I (1913) cited to the named works; Jerome's Daniel preface cited as the church's earliest critical witness. Scripture ASV. Every cited work: the sources registry →