Jobchapter 22
30 verses · KJVJob book hub →
Key verse
Hast thou marked the old way which wicked men have trodden?
It stands in scene B of the chapter, verses 12 to 20.
The chapter
Chapter summary
Eliphaz's third and last speech trades insinuation for indictment. 'Can a man be profitable unto God?': thy righteousness gains him nothing, so the trial cannot be about that: 'Is not thy wickedness great? neither is there any end to thine iniquities' (22:5). He then invents crimes to fit the sentence: pledges taken of thy brother for nought, the naked stripped, water withheld from the weary and bread from the hungry, widows sent away empty. Is not God in the height of heaven: dost thou say, How doth God know? Yet the speech ends in real gold, wrongly aimed: 'Acquaint now thyself with him, and be at peace' (22:21).
Context
Poetry · Unknown · Job overview
Where the chapter sits
Job 22 falls in Dialogue: three cycles (chapters 3–27). Job's opening complaint (3); three rounds with Eliphaz, Bildad, Zophar; the friends' rigid retribution theology; the third cycle breaks: Zophar does not speak again. The dialogue exhausts itself as argument.
Before it: Prose prologue: heavenly court, chapters 1–2. After it: Hymn to wisdom, chapters 28.
The whole shape of Job→The world behind this chapter
Job 22The history
Eliphaz finally does what the friends have been circling for twenty chapters: he invents specific charges. And the charges he picks are a checklist of the recognised social crimes of the ancient Near East, the exact list a wealthy landholder would be measured against.
The rest of the history, and what it meant to them
Taking a pledge from a brother for nothing means seizing security on a loan from a man who owed little, and stripping the naked of their clothing points at the commonest pledge of all, the outer cloak, which was also a poor man's only blanket at night. Withholding water from the weary and bread from the hungry violated the most basic law of hospitality in a desert country, where refusing water could kill. Sending widows away empty and breaking the arms of the fatherless names the two groups every ancient law code, from Hammurabi's to Israel's, claimed to protect.
Eliphaz then attributes to Job an argument Job never made: 'Is not God in the height of heaven? and behold the height of the stars, how high they are! And thou sayest, How doth God know? can he judge through the dark cloud?' That is the ancient version of saying the high God is too far away to notice, a real position in that world, and a slander here.
His warning example is the old world destroyed by the flood: wicked men cut down out of time, whose foundation was overflown with a flood. And his closing appeal is genuinely tender, acquaint now thyself with him and be at peace; lay up gold as dust and the gold of Ophir as the stones of the brooks, and the Almighty shall be thy treasure. Ophir was a real gold source reached by sea trade, and its gold was the byword for the finest.
What it meant to them
The chapter shows what a system does when the facts will not fit it: it manufactures facts. Eliphaz has no evidence and needs Job guilty, so he supplies the crimes.
First hearers, who had heard Job's own account of his life and would hear it again in chapter 31, were watching a good man's reputation destroyed by a theology that could not afford for him to be innocent.
Sources cited
- John H. Walton, Victor H. Matthews & Mark W. Chavalas, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament
- John E. Hartley, The Book of Job
A. Eliphaz: Is Not Thy Wickedness Great?
1. (vv. 1-3)
a.Eliphaz the Temanite answered and said: Eliphaz opens with a premise meant to remove any question of divine self-interest from the case, can a man be profitable unto God, as he that is wise may be profitable unto himself. If God gains nothing from Job's righteousness and loses nothing from his sin, then Job's calamity cannot be read as God needing or resenting anything from him, which quietly clears the way for Eliphaz's real conclusion that Job's suffering must trace to Job's own guilt. Gill notes the logic is sound as far as it goes and entirely beside the point the book has already settled in chapters 1 and 2.
Job 22:1, 1 voiceWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.
Job 22:1
“Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered and said. As Eliphaz was the first that entered the discussion with Job, being perhaps the oldest man, and might be reckoned the wisest, so he gives the lead in every course of disputation; and here, instead of replying to Job's arguments and instances, at which he was very angry, betakes himself to calumny and reproach, and to draw invidious consequences, instead of making use of solid reasons for conviction and confutation.”
Job 22:2, 1 voice
Job 22:2
“Can a man be profitable unto God?.... Eliphaz imagined that Job thought so, by his insisting so much on his integrity, and complaining of his afflictions; and that God was beholden to him for his holiness and righteousness, and that instead of afflicting him, should have heaped honours and happiness upon him; whereas there is not anything a man can do, or does, by which God can be profiled; which is a very great truth, though misapplied to Job through a wrong construction of his words and meaning.”
Job 22:3, 1 voice
Job 22:3
“Is it any profit to the Almighty that thou art righteous? or is it gain to Him, that thou makest thy ways perfect? For in all that we do well, we are doing good to ourselves and not to God. And hence by the Psalmist it is said, O my soul, thou hast said unto the Lord, Thou art my God, seeing that Thou needest not my goods.”
Gregory the Dialogist· written before 604· Morals on the Book of Job, Book XVIpatristic
2. (vv. 4-5)
a.Will he reprove thee for fear of thee?: Eliphaz asks whether God's dealing with Job could spring from fear of him, dismisses the thought, and moves straight from that dismissal to an outright charge, is not thy wickedness great, and thine iniquities infinite. Nothing between verse 4 and verse 5 supplies any evidence for the leap; the accusation follows from the theology rather than from anything observed in Job's life. Henry marks this as the turn where Eliphaz stops arguing in general terms and starts naming Job specifically as a great sinner.
Job 22:4, 1 voice
Job 22:4
“Is the punishment inflicted on thee from fear of thee, in order to disarm thee? as Job had implied (see on Job 7:12; Job 7:20; and Job 10:17). will he enter . . . into judgment?--Job had desired this (Job 13:3, 21).”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Job 22:5, 1 voice
Job 22:5
“Is not thy wickedness great? - That is, “Is it not utter presumption and folly for a man, whose wickedness is undoubtedly so great, to presume to enter into a litigation with God?” Eliphaz here “assumes” it as an undeniable proposition, that Job was a great sinner. This charge had not been directly made before.”
3. (vv. 6-7)
a.taken a pledge from thy brother: Eliphaz's charges begin here, thou hast taken a pledge from thy brother for nought, and stripped the naked of their clothing, thou hast not given water to the weary to drink. The phrase for nought is the same word the accuser used of Job at 1:9, doth Job fear God for nought, though Eliphaz has no way of knowing whose vocabulary he has taken up. Nothing in the narrator's account of Job in chapters 1 and 2 supports the charge, and Job answers it directly under oath at 31:16 through 31:22, denying every particular.
Job 22:6, 1 voice
Job 22:6
“For thou hast taken a pledge from thy brother for nought,.... It can hardly be thought that it was for nothing at all, on no consideration whatever, or that nothing was lent, for which the pledge was taken; but that it was a small trifling sum, and comparatively nothing, not to be spoken of; or it was borrowed for so short a time, that there needed not any pledge it; and it was unkind to take it, especially of a brother, whether in nature, or in religion, whether a near kinsman, or friend, or neighbour.”
Job 22:7, 2 voices
Job 22:7
All these things are accusations, and certainly very reproachful ones. But they are not true with regard to Job and are unjustly pronounced against him. These things happen in times of hardship. Sometimes, when one has only a piece of bread, even though he does not have an entire loaf, we take it away from him by saying, "You are in debt."
Origen of Alexandria· written before 253· FRAGMENTS ON JOB 16.22-23patristic
Job 22:7
“Thou hast not given water to the weary - That is, thou hast withheld the rites of hospitality - one of the most grievous offences which could be charged on an Arabian; compare the notes at Isa 21:14. In all the Oriental world, hospitality was regarded, and is still, as a duty of the highest obligation.”
4. (vv. 8-9)
a.the mighty man, he had the earth: The indictment continues with the portrait of a land-grabbing power broker, the mighty man had the earth, and sent widows away empty, the arms of the fatherless broken. This is precisely the figure Job later describes himself as opposing rather than embodying, when he speaks of being eyes to the blind and a father to the poor at 29:15-16. Clarke reads Eliphaz's charges here as a stock description of the oppressor drawn from wisdom tradition and simply attached to Job without any grounding in his actual conduct.
Job 22:8, 1 voice
Job 22:8
“But as for the mighty man, he had the earth - איש זרוע ish zeroa, the man of arm. Finger, hand, and arm, are all emblems of strength and power. The man of arm is not only the strong man, but the man of power and influence, the man of rapine and plunder. The honorable man - Literally, the man whose face is accepted, the respectable man, the man of wealth. Thou wert an enemy to the poor and needy, but thou didst favor and flatter the rich and great.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Job 22:9, 1 voice
Job 22:9
“Thou hast sent widows away empty - That is, without regarding their needs, and without doing anything to mitigate their sorrows. The oppression of the widow and the fatherless is, in the Scriptures, every where regarded as a crime of special magnitude; see the notes at Isa 1:17. The arms of the fatherless have been broken - Thou hast taken away all that they relied on. Thou hast oppressed them and taken advantage of their weak and defenseless condition to enrich yourself. This charge was evidently gratuitous and unjust.”
5. (vv. 10-11)
a.snares are round about thee: Eliphaz reasons backward from Job's condition to the charges just made, therefore snares are round about thee, and sudden fear troubleth thee, or darkness, that thou canst not see, and abundance of waters cover thee. The suffering is offered as proof of the sin, though the sin itself has no evidence apart from the suffering it is meant to explain, a circle the friends have run before. Barnes notes this is the same reasoning the narrator's frame has already shown to be false, since the reader watched the calamities begin in a heavenly wager Job never caused.
Job 22:11, 1 voice
Job 22:11
Or darkness, that thou canst not see - The sense of this passage, in the connection that the particle or gives it with the preceding verse, is not easy to be ascertained. To me it seems very probable that a letter has been lost from the first word; and that או o which we translate Or, was originally אור or Light. The copy used by the Septuagint had certainly this reading; and therefore they translate the verse thus: Το φως σοι εις σκοτος απεβη; Thy Light is changed into darkness; that is, Thy prosperity is turned into adversity. Houbigant corrects the text thus: instead of או חשך לא תראה o chosech lo tireh, or darkness thou canst not see, he reads חשך לא אור תראה chosech lo or tireh, darkness, not light, shalt thou behold; that is, Thou shalt dwell in thick darkness. Mr. Good translates: “Or darkness which thou canst not penetrate, and a flood of waters shall cover thee.” Thou shalt either be enveloped in deep darkness, or overwhelmed with a flood. The versions all translate differently; and neither they nor the MSS. give any light, except what is afforded by the Septuagint. Coverdale is singular: Shuldest thou then send darcknesse? Shulde not the water floude runne over the? Perhaps the meaning is: “Thou art so encompassed with darkness, that thou canst not see thy way; and therefore fallest into the snares and traps that are laid for thee.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
B. Eliphaz: Thou Sayest, What Doth God Know Through the Dark Cloud?
1. (vv. 12-14)
a.Is not God in the height of heaven?: Eliphaz next accuses Job of thinking God too remote to see him, thick clouds are a covering to him, that he seeth not, and he walketh in the circuit of heaven. Job has said nothing of the kind; at 21:22 he affirmed that none can teach God knowledge, seeing he judgeth those that are high, the opposite claim to the one Eliphaz answers here. Gill and JFB both note the charge misses its target, a pattern that runs through the whole speech, an accusation shaped to fit the doctrine rather than the man.
Job 22:12, 2 voices
Job 22:12
“Is not God in the height of heaven? - It appears, from this and the following verses, that Eliphaz was attributing infidel and blasphemous speeches or sentiments to Job. As if he had said: “Thou allowest that there is a God, but thou sayest that he is infinitely exalted above the heavens and the stars, and that there is so much dense ether and thick cloud between his throne and the earth, that he can neither see it nor its inhabitants.” These were sentiments which Job never held, and never uttered; but if a man be dressed in a bear’s skin, he may be hunted and worried by his own dogs.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Job 22:12
“Eliphaz says this to prove that God can from His height behold all things; gratuitously inferring that Job denied it, because he denied that the wicked are punished here. height--Hebrew, "head of the stars"; that is, "elevation" (Job 11:8).”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Job 22:13, 1 voice
Job 22:13
“And thou sayest, How doth God know? - That is, it “follows” from what you have said; or the opinion which you have advanced is “the same” as if you had affirmed this. How common it is to charge a man with holding what we “infer,” from something which he has advanced, he must hold, and then to proceed to argue “as if” he actually held that. The philosophy of this is plain.”
Job 22:14, 1 voice
Job 22:14
“This is gross absurdity, as well as gross impiety, which Eliphaz here fathers upon Job; for it supposes that the administration of government is a burden and disparagement to the supreme governor and that the acts of justice and mercy are a toil to a mind infinitely wise, holy, and good.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
2. (vv. 15-18)
a.the old way which wicked men have trodden?: Eliphaz points to a historic example, men cut down out of time, whose foundation was overflown with a flood, which Henry and Gill both read as the generation destroyed in Genesis 7. Verse 17's which said unto God, Depart from us repeats word for word the defiance Job had cited at 21:14, and verse 18's closing line, but the counsel of the wicked is far from me, repeats Job's own disclaimer from 21:16 without change. The speech answers Job partly in Job's own sentences, though no note here settles why the wording recurs.
Job 22:15, 3 voices
Job 22:15
“Hast thou marked the old way which wicked men have trodden? - Hast thou seen what has happened in former times to wicked people? Job had maintained that God did not deal with people in this world according to their character. To meet this, Eliphaz now appeals to ancient facts, and especially refers to the deluge, when the wicked were cut off by a flood for their sins.”
Job 22:15
“Antiquity is, moreover, no excuse for sin. It may be that men have long transgressed, but use in rebellion will not mitigate the treason before the eternal Throne. If you know better, it will not stand you in any place that God winked at the ignorance of others in former ages. If you have had more light than they, you shall have severer judgment than they—therefore plead not the antiquity of any evil custom as an excuse for sin.”
Job 22:15
“Note, There is an old way which wicked men have trodden. Religion had but newly entered when sin immediately followed it. But though it is an old way, a broad way, a tracked way, it is a dangerous way and it leads to destruction; and it is good for us to mark it, that we may not dare to walk in it.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Job 22:16, 1 voice
Job 22:16
“Whose foundation was overflown with a flood - The unrighteous in the days of Noah, who appear to have had an abundance of all temporal good, (Job 22:18), and who surpassed the deeds of all the former wicked, said in effect to God, Depart from us. And when Noah preached unto them the terrors of the Lord, and the necessity of repentance, they rejected his preaching with, What can the Almighty do for us? Let him do his worst; we care not for him, Job 22:”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Job 22:17, 1 voice
Job 22:17
“Which said unto God, Depart from us - Notes, Job 21:14. A very correct description of the old world. They had no wish to retain God in their knowledge. Probably Eliphaz here refers to what Job had said, Job 21:14-15. He had remarked, in describing the wicked, that they said unto God, “Depart from us,” and yet they lived prosperously. “But see,” says Eliphaz,’” a case” where they did this.”
Job 22:18, 3 voices
Job 22:18
“Yet He has filled their houses with good things. The Lord 'filleth the houses of the wicked with good things,' in that even to the unthankful He refuses not His gifts, that either they may blush at the loving-kindness of their Creator and be brought back to goodness, or altogether despising to return thereto, may from the same cause be there worse punished, that here they rendered an evil return for God's more bounteous good, so that severer woes should there chastise those whose wickedness here not even gifts overcame.”
Gregory the Dialogist· written before 604· Morals on the Book of Job, Book XVIpatristic
Job 22:18
But the counsel of the wicked is far from me - Sarcastically quoting Job’s words, Job 21:14, Job 21:16. Job, having in the preceding chapter described the wicked, who said unto the Almighty, “Depart from us,” etc., adds, But the counsel of the wicked is far from me. Eliphaz here, having described the impious, among whom he evidently ranks Job, makes use of the same expression, as if he had said, “Thank God, I have no connection with you nor your companions, nor is my mind contaminated by your creed.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Job 22:18
"Yet" you say (see on Job 21:16) that it is "He who filled their houses with good"--"their good is not in their hand," but comes from God. but the counsel . . . is--rather, "may the counsel be," &c.
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
3. (vv. 19-20)
a.The righteous see it, and are glad: Eliphaz pictures the righteous watching the wicked's downfall with approval, the innocent laugh them to scorn, and counts his own party among the survivors, our substance is not cut down. Watson notes the irony the reader is left to carry forward: Eliphaz places himself among the righteous who see and are glad, yet it is Eliphaz who stands under God's rebuke at 42:7 for the very speech he is delivering here. The verse states Eliphaz's confidence in his own standing, not the book's verdict on it.
Job 22:19, 2 voices
Job 22:19
“The righteous shall see it and be glad; and the innocent one shall laugh them to scorn. The righteous when they see the unrighteous erring here cannot be glad for the error of persons ruining themselves. For if they rejoice in errings, they cease to be righteous. Again, if in the feeling of triumph they be glad, for this that they are not such as they see others are, they are altogether full of pride.”
Gregory the Dialogist· written before 604· Morals on the Book of Job, Book XVIpatristic
Job 22:19
“Nay, they shall laugh them to scorn, that is, they justly might do it, they shall do it, as God does it, in a holy manner, Ps. ii. They shall take occasion thence to expose the folly of sinners and show how ridiculous their principles are, though they call themselves wits. Lo, this is the man that made not God his strength; and see what comes of it, Ps. lii.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Job 22:20, 2 voices
Job 22:20
“Whereas our substance is not cut down - We, who fear the Lord, still continue in health and peace; whereas they who have departed from him are destroyed even to their very remnant. Mr. Good thinks that קימנו kimanu, which we translate our substance, is the same as the Arabic (Arabic) our people or tribe; and hence he translates the clause thus: “For our tribe is not cut off; while even the remnant of these a conflagration consumed.” The reference here is supposed to be to the destruction of the men of Sodom and Gomorrah.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Job 22:20
“The triumphant speech of the pious. If "substance" be retained, translate, rather as the Septuagint, "Has not their substance been taken away, and . . . ?" But the Hebrew is rather, "Truly our adversary is cut down" [GESENIUS].”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
C. Eliphaz: Acquaint Now Thyself With Him, and Be at Peace
1. (v. 21)
a.Acquaint now thyself with him: This single verse holds the book's most quoted wrong counsel, acquaint now thyself with him, and be at peace: thereby good shall come unto thee. Henry calls the words good in themselves and entirely sound for a man estranged from God by sin, which is exactly the description that does not fit Job, so the counsel rests on a premise the narrative frame has already shown false. Right words are offered on a false case, and the verse's beauty is no argument for its application here.
Job 22:21, 2 voices
Job 22:21
“Acquaint now thyself with him - Margin, that is, “with God.” Eliphaz takes it for granted now, that Job was a sinner wholly unreconciled to God, and unacquainted with him. This fact, he supposes, was the source of all his calamities. As long as he remained thus unreconciled to God, he must be miserable. He proceeds, therefore, in a most beautiful manner, to exhort him to be at peace with God, and portrays the benefits which would result from such a reconciliation.”
Job 22:21
“It is our honour, that we are made capable of this acquaintance, our misery that by sin we have lost it; our privilege, that through Christ we may return to it; and our unspeakable advantage, to renew and cultivate it.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
2. (vv. 22-23)
a.Receive, I pray thee, the law from his mouth: Eliphaz calls for repentance and restoration, if thou return to the Almighty, thou shalt be built up, language that presumes a departure from God that the narrative never records. Lay up his words in thine heart asks Job to receive correction for a fault the reader has not seen him commit. Barnes notes the call to return only makes sense once the underlying charge is granted, and the whole speech has offered the charge without evidence.
Job 22:22, 2 voices
Job 22:22
“This is what he means, in my opinion: "Confess your sins; receive from God's mouth his support after your confession; and take his words into your heart." Certainly Eliphaz said these things, as he believed, by making himself equal to Job.… However, he pronounces a correct dogma here. He, in fact, thinks that Job suffers his adversities because of his sins but also so that he will be purified through the endurance of his afflictions. Once he is purified, he will be delivered from any extraneous element and freed from any involvement with iniquity.”
Origen of Alexandria· written before 253· FRAGMENTS ON JOB 16.61, 69patristic
Job 22:22
“Though, in Job's time, we do not know that there was any written word, yet there was a revelation of God's will to be received. Eliphaz looked upon Job as a wicked man, and was pressing him to repent and reform. Herein consists the conversion of a sinner--his receiving the law from God's mouth and no longer from the world and the flesh.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Job 22:23, 2 voices
Job 22:23
“If thou return to the Almighty - Assuming that he was an impenitent sinner, and wholly unreconciled to him. Thou shalt be built up - A figure taken from building up a house, in contradistinction from pulling one down, and denoting that he would be prospered and happy. Thou shalt put away iniquity - Rosenmuller, Good, Noyes, and Wemyss, suppose correctly, as it seems to me, that the word “if” is to be understood here to complete the sense - “if thou shalt put away iniquity.” From thy tabernacle - From thy tent, or dwelling.”
Job 22:23
“Thou shalt - It is either, 1. a spiritual promise, if thou dost sincerely repent, God will give the grace effectually to reform thyself and family: or, 2. a temporal promise, thou shalt put away iniquity, or the punishment of thy sins; as iniquity is very often used: far from thy tabernacles; from all thy dwellings, and tents, and possessions.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
3. (vv. 24-25)
a.lay up gold as dust: Eliphaz promises material reward for repentance, thou shalt lay up gold as dust, and the gold of Ophir as the stones of the brooks, then shalt thou have plenty of silver. The offer echoes the very transaction the accuser proposed at 1:9 through 1:11, that piety and prosperity are exchanged for one another, though Eliphaz cannot know he is repeating the wager's own terms. Delitzsch reads the promise as sincere on Eliphaz's part and mistaken all the same, built on the assumption the whole book exists to overturn.
Job 22:24, 2 voices
Job 22:24
“Then shalt thou lay up gold as dust - The original is not fairly rendered in this translation, ושית על עפר בצר veshith al aphar batser, which Montanus renders: Et pone super pulverem munitionem, “And fix a tower upon the dust;” ובצור נחלים אופיר ubetsur nechalim Ophir, et in petra torrentes Ophir, “and in the rock, the torrents of Ophir.” The Vulgate is widely different: Dabit pro terra silicem, et pro silice torrentes aureos, “He will give thee flint for earth: and torrents of gold for flint;” which Calmet thus paraphrases: “Instead of brick thou shalt build with solid stone; and for ornaments, instead of stone as formerly, thou shalt have massive gold!” All the versions are different.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Job 22:24
“Ophir--derived from a Hebrew word "dust," namely, gold dust. HEEREN thinks it a general name for the rich countries of the South, on the African, Indian, and especially the Arabian coast (where was the port Aphar. El Ophir, too, a city of Oman, was formerly the center of Arabian commerce).”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Job 22:25, 2 voices
Job 22:25
“Yea, the Almighty shall be - Or, rather, “then the Almighty shall be” - והיה yehâyâh. The meaning is, that if he would return to God, and cast off his anxiety for gold, “then” the Almighty would be his real treasure, and would impart to him solid happiness. Thy defense - Margin, “gold.” The margin is the more correct translation.”
Job 22:25
“Yea--rather, Then shall the Almighty be, &c. defence--rather, as the same Hebrew means in Job 22:24 (see on Job 22:24) --Thy precious metals; God will be to thee in the place of riches. plenty of silver--rather, "And shall be to thee in the place of laboriously-obtained treasures of silver" [GESENIUS].”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
4. (vv. 26-28)
a.delight in the Almighty: Eliphaz describes a restored fellowship in language that is genuinely devotional even sitting inside a false argument, thou shalt make thy prayer unto him, and he shall hear thee, and thou shalt pay thy vows. Thou shalt also decree a thing, and it shall be established unto thee anticipates, without Eliphaz intending it, the standing Job is given back at the book's close. Davidson notes the passage reads almost as prophecy of chapter 42 once the reader knows how the book ends, prayer heard and a word established, though spoken here on the wrong occasion.
Job 22:26, 1 voice
Job 22:26
“THE Lord said to Eliphaz and his friends, "you have not spoken of Me the thing that is right, as My servant Job has." And, therefore, we must always regard what they said with careful discrimination. They were wise men according to their light, but they were quite at sea in their judgment of Job. However, in this particular verse, Eliphaz declared that which is taught in many other parts of Holy Scripture and we may profit by his utterance. God grant that by His Spirit we may fully experience the joys described in the words before us.”
Job 22:27, 1 voice
Job 22:27
“Thou shalt make thy prayer unto Him, and He shall hear thee. For they make their prayer to God, but never obtain to be listened to, who set at nought the precepts of the Lord, when He enjoins them. Whence it is written, He that turneth away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer shall be abomination. So long then as Eliphaz believed that blessed Job was not heard, he determined that that person had surely done wrong in his practice. And hence he adds further, And thou shalt pay thy vows.”
Gregory the Dialogist· written before 604· Morals on the Book of Job, Book XVIpatristic
5. (vv. 29-30)
a.When men are cast down: The chapter's closing line carries a disputed Hebrew text: the King James reads he shall deliver the island of the innocent, while Gill and Delitzsch both note the widely discussed alternate rendering, he shall deliver him that is not innocent, by the pureness of thine hands. Either reading is answered at 42:8, where it is Job's prayer and Job's pure hands, not Eliphaz's own, that deliver men who have not spoken rightly of God, Eliphaz himself first among them. Eliphaz promises a deliverance he does not know he will need, and receives it from the very man he has just finished accusing.
Job 22:29, 3 voices
Job 22:29
“For he that has been abased shall be in glory, and he that has bent down his eyes, the same shall be saved. Which same sentence is not at variance with the mouth of 'Truth,' when It says, For whosoever exalteth himself shall be abased, and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted. And hence it is said by Solomon, Before destruction the heart of man is haughty, and before honour is humility.”
Gregory the Dialogist· written before 604· Morals on the Book of Job, Book XVIpatristic
Job 22:29
“When men are cast down - The meaning of this is, probably, when people are usually cast down, or in the times of trial and calamity, which prostrate others, you shall find support. You shall then be enabled to say, “there is lifting up, or there is support.” Or, more probably still, it may mean, “in times when others are cast down and afflicted, thou shalt be able to raise them up, or to aid them. Thou shalt be able to go to them and say, ‘Be of good cheer. Do not be cast down.”
Job 22:29
“Therefore it is better, I think, to take the first clause as referred to by "God resisteth the proud." When (men) are cast down, thou shalt say (behold the effects of) pride. Eliphaz hereby justifies himself for attributing Job's calamities to his pride. "Giveth grace to the humble," answers to the second clause.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Job 22:30, 2 voices
Job 22:30
“He shall deliver the island of the innocent - The word אי ai, which we translate island, is most probably the Arabic particle (Arabic) whosoever, whatsoever, any, whosoever he may be, as (Arabic) ai rajuli, whatsoever man he may be. And it is most probable that both words are Arabic, (Arabic) or (Arabic) any innocent, chaste, pure, or holy person; for the word has the same meaning both in Hebrew and Arabic.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Job 22:30
“The irony is strikingly exhibited in Eliphaz unconsciously uttering words which exactly answer to what happened at last: he and the other two were "delivered" by God accepting the intercession of Job for them (Job 42:7, 8).”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
The text of this chapter
This page carries no textual note on Job 22. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →
This page draws on 13 works. Open for the list.
This page draws on A. B. Davidson, The Book of Job, Cambridge Bible; Adam Clarke; Albert Barnes; Charles Spurgeon; Franz Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Book of Job; Gregory the Dialogist, Morals on the Book of Job, Book XVI; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871); Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765); Matthew Henry; Origen of Alexandria and R. A. Watson, The Book of Job, Expositor's Bible.
Keep studying
On this page
Studies1
