MANNAFEST

Doctrine · contested ground, presented whole

The Sons of God and the Nephilim

3 historic readings

Four verses before the flood narrative stand among the strangest in the Bible: the sons of God, the daughters of men, and the Nephilim. Three readings have contended for them since before the time of Christ.

The evidence, first

The texts

1And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the ground, and daughters were born unto them, 2that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all that they chose. 3And Jehovah said, My Spirit shall not strive with man for ever, for that he also is flesh: yet shall his days be a hundred and twenty years. 4The Nephilim were in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them: the same were the mighty men that were of old, the men of renown.

The text itself: בְנֵי־הָאֱלֹהִים (bene ha-Elohim) take wives; the Nephilim (H5303) are in the earth 'in those days, and also after that'; their offspring are the gibborim, 'men of renown.'

6Now it came to pass on the day when the sons of God came to present themselves before Jehovah, that Satan also came among them.

The same phrase, bene ha-Elohim, in the Bible's other early usages — Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7 — where the sons of God present themselves before the LORD and shout at creation's founding.

6And angels that kept not their own principality, but left their proper habitation, he hath kept in everlasting bonds under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

Jude: 'the angels which kept not their first estate' held in chains; verse 7 continues 'EVEN AS Sodom… going after strange flesh.' Jude 14-15 quotes 1 Enoch 1:9 by name.

4For if God spared not angels when they sinned, but cast them down to hell, and committed them to pits of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; 5and spared not the ancient world, but preserved Noah with seven others, a preacher of righteousness, when he brought a flood upon the world of the ungodly;

Peter dates the angels' sin to the flood context: 'spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell (ταρταρώσας)… and spared not the old world.'

19in which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison, 20that aforetime were disobedient, when the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls, were saved through water:

'Spirits in prison… disobedient… in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing.'

33And there we saw the Nephilim, the sons of Anak, who come of the Nephilim: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.

'And there we saw the Nephilim (giants), the sons of Anak, which come of the Nephilim' — the post-flood giant clans; compare Deut 3:11 (Og's bed).

Each at its strongest

The historic readings

The Watchers (angelic) view

The earliest attested reading: the Septuagint tradition (some codices read 'angels of God'), 1 Enoch, Jubilees, Philo, Josephus, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Athenagoras, Tertullian. Modern advocates include Chuck Missler and Michael Heiser (cited, not reproduced).

Reads bene ha-Elohim as heavenly beings — the divine council language of Job — who transgressed their station; the Nephilim are their unnatural offspring, and the flood answers the corruption.

Its steel

  • Every other Torah-era use of bene ha-Elohim (Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7) denotes heavenly beings.
  • Jude 6-7 parallels the angels' sin with Sodom's — 'going after strange flesh' — and 2 Peter 2:4-5 places the angels' sin in Noah's context.
  • It is the oldest reading on record: dominant in Second Temple Judaism and the earliest church fathers.
  • It explains why the offspring are Nephilim/gibborim, 'men of renown,' rather than ordinary children.
The angels of God, seeing the daughters of men that they were beautiful, took unto themselves wives of all which they chose... and begat sons, the giants.

Flavius Josephus· Antiquities of the Jews 1.73 (Whiston translation)Jewish

The angels transgressed this appointment, and were captivated by love of women, and begat children who are those that are called demons.

Justin Martyr· Second Apology 5Patristic

The Sethite view

Augustine (City of God 15.23), Chrysostom, and most of the Reformers including Calvin; the majority Western reading from the fifth century to the modern era.

Reads the sons of God as the covenant line of Seth and the daughters of men as the line of Cain: the passage describes the intermarriage and collapse of the godly line before the flood.

Its steel

  • Genesis 4–5 deliberately lays out two genealogies side by side — the narrative HAS two lines in view.
  • 'Sons of God' is used covenantally of humans elsewhere (Deut 14:1; Hos 1:10).
  • Matthew 22:30 — 'in the resurrection they neither marry' — angels are presented as not marrying.
  • It requires no supernatural biology and keeps the flood's cause squarely on human wickedness (Gen 6:5).
By these two names (sons of God and daughters of men) the two cities are sufficiently distinguished. For though the former were by nature children of men, they had come into possession of another name by grace.

Augustine of Hippo· The City of God 15.23Patristic

It was, therefore, base ingratitude in the posterity of Seth to mingle themselves with the children of Cain... they voluntarily deprived themselves of the inestimable grace of God.

John Calvin· Commentary on Genesis 6:2Reformed

The divine-kings view

Attested in some rabbinic sources (rulers/judges reading, e.g. Targum Onkelos's 'sons of nobles'); developed in the modern era by Meredith Kline and others from ancient Near Eastern royal ideology.

Reads bene ha-Elohim as tyrant kings who claimed divine sonship — as pharaohs and Mesopotamian kings did — seizing wives at will (polygamous harems); the gibborim are their dynasties of renown.

Its steel

  • Ancient Near Eastern kings routinely styled themselves sons of the gods — the title fits the second-millennium world.
  • Targum Onkelos (the synagogue's own Aramaic rendering) translates 'sons of nobles/great ones.'
  • 'Taking wives of all which they chose' reads naturally as royal harem-taking; 'men of renown' as dynastic fame.
  • It preserves a fully human referent while explaining the language of divinity.

Labeled study resources

Ancient witnesses

1 Enoch 6–16 (the Book of the Watchers)

Non-canonical — Second Temple study resource

Two hundred Watchers descend on Mount Hermon under Semjaza and Azazel, bind themselves by oath, take wives, teach forbidden arts; their offspring are the giants, and their imprisonment is fixed 'for seventy generations.' Jude 14-15 quotes 1 Enoch 1:9 verbatim.

1 Enoch, tr. R. H. Charles (1917, public domain)

Jubilees 4–5

Non-canonical — Second Temple study resource

Retells Genesis 5–6 with the Watchers descending 'in the days of Jared' and the flood as the cleansing of the corruption they introduced.

The Book of Jubilees, tr. R. H. Charles (1917, public domain)

The Genesis Apocryphon (1QapGen) and the Book of Giants

Dead Sea Scrolls — described, not reproduced

In the Genesis Apocryphon, Lamech fears his son Noah was fathered by a Watcher — evidence the angelic reading was live at Qumran. The Book of Giants fragments name the giants and their dreams of judgment.

Qumran caves 1 and 4 (descriptions from public scholarship)

Philo of Alexandria, On the Giants

Second Temple philosophy

Philo reads the sons of God as angels/souls in the air, allegorizing while preserving the angelic identification.

Philo, De Gigantibus, tr. C. D. Yonge (1855, public domain)

The manuscripts

Textual notes

Deuteronomy 32:8 — sons of God or sons of Israel?

The Masoretic Text reads 'according to the number of the children of Israel'; a Dead Sea Scrolls fragment (4QDeut^j) and the Septuagint read 'sons of God / angels of God.' The variant matters for the divine-council frame in which Genesis 6 is often read, and it is presented here as manuscript data.

Genesis 6:2 in the Septuagint tradition

Some LXX witnesses (noted in the apparatus of Codex Alexandrinus) read ἄγγελοι τοῦ θεοῦ ('angels of God') where others read υἱοὶ τοῦ θεοῦ ('sons of God') — evidence of how the earliest Greek-speaking readers heard the phrase.

Scripture: ASV/KJV/WEB (public domain).

Patristic quotations: Ante-Nicene Fathers / City of God translations (public domain), attributed and tradition-tagged.

Josephus: Whiston translation (public domain). Philo: Yonge translation (public domain).

1 Enoch / Jubilees: R. H. Charles translations (1917, public domain), clearly labeled non-canonical.

Modern authors (Missler, Heiser, Kline) are cited by name only — their works are under copyright.